scholarly journals China’s Policy of Social Organization Management in Xi’s Era — Focusing on “Guideline on Reforming Management System of Social Organizations so as to Promote Their Healthy and Orderly Development”

2018 ◽  
Vol null (60) ◽  
pp. 113-129
Author(s):  
KIM SUNG MIN
2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-274
Author(s):  
Yushan Xu ◽  
Siying Luo

This case study describes the process of Shenzhen’s social organizations registration and management system reform in the past ten years. Shenzhen has taken three modest reform measures, including the disconnection of trade associations from administrative departments, direct registration of trade associations and expanded range of direct registration, which has lowered the threshold for the registration of social organizations and kindled the vigor of social organizations. In line with the reform and devolution of city-level departments of civil affairs, different districts have made efforts to experiment and innovate with new policies, issuing reform plans regarding the filing of community social organizations, the incubation of social organizations, etc.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Chao Wu

<em>Currently Shanghai Songjiang District has achieved initial success in nurturing and developing the relevant social organizations around the overall objective to accelerate the development of cultural industry. But there still exist many problems, for example, organizations are immature, function is not significant, the management system is not perfect and so on. Analyzing the basic characteristics and key points of the development of Shanghai Songjiang District’s social organizations for cultural and creative industries, we should put forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions, which will help to promote the construction of modern social organization system and the urban cultural soft power.</em>


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-86
Author(s):  
Zhou Xiuping ◽  
Liu Qiushi

Abstract Categorized management is one of the main lines of thinking on the reform of the Chinese system of management for social organizations. However, there is a divergence of opinion amongst different researchers on the standards for categorization. On the basis of the findings of international research about supportive social organizations, the authors attempt to set forth a way of categorizing social organizations into two main groups: supportive and implementing organizations. They go on to demonstrate that the management of implementing organizations through supportive social organizations is a new kind of innovation within the self-governance of society and system of management for social organizations in China. Three methods of supportive social organization management and service for implementing organizations are explored, including industry leadership, bridging between sectors and self-regulation. Finally, a description is given of the challenges faced by China’s supportive social organizations themselves during their own development.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris N. Gerasimov ◽  
Kirill B. Gerasimov

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-172
Author(s):  
Ernest G. Rigney ◽  
Timothy C. Lundy

AbstractGeorge Herbert Mead's advocacy of innovative social reform was not a distinct endeavor unrelated to his pragmatist social philosophy. In fact, the convergence of social philosophy and social reform is discernable in Mead's analysis of social settlements: an analysis that led him to conclude that settlements were indispensable social organizations for promoting cooperative living and civic progress within America's emerging industrial municipalities. For Mead, the settlement was the only social organization capable of understanding the immigrant's world and explaining that world to the nonimmigrant. In 1908, Mead wrote a letter to theChicago Record Heraldendorsing the work of social settlements. He composed the letter during an era when the violent actions of some political extremists (i.e., anarchists) seemed to encourage many native-born citizens to regard all immigrants as nascent terrorists and to treat organizations created to assist immigrants, such as settlements, with distrust and hostility.Most unfortunately, theChicago Record Heraldrefused to publish Mead's letter. This article describes the historical circumstances that prompted Mead to write a letter in defense of settlements; it then reprints the original letter in its entirety, with annotations; and, it concludes by briefly noting the letter's significance in relation to Mead's other writings about social settlements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document