scholarly journals Impact of a pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship program in a private hospital in Costa Rica

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
José Pablo Díaz-Madriz ◽  
Eugenia Cordero-García ◽  
José Miguel Chaverri-Fernández ◽  
Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel ◽  
Josué Murillo-Cubero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Private Hospital ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

Objective. To measure the impact generated by the implementation of the pharmacy-driven antimicrobial stewardship program of the Clínica Bíblica Hospital. Methods. This is a retrospective observational study that evaluates the consumption of antibiotics for the periods before and during implementation of the Clínica Bíblica Hospital antimicrobial stewardship program, calculated by means of defined daily dose per 1 000 patient-days and days of therapy per 1 000 patient-days. In addition, bacterial resistance patterns for the periods 2014–2015 and 2016–2017 were compared. Results. Consumption of most-used antibiotics was calculated, looking for trends that might be associated with the activities implemented by the Clínica Bíblica Hospital antimicrobial stewardship program. Comparing some of the antibiotics with the highest consumption in periods I and II, use of levofloxacin and ceftriaxone showed a decrease of 54.0% (p < 0.001) and 14.6% (p = 0.003), respectively, whereas there was an increase in the use of cefazolin of 4 539.3% (p < 0.001). Regarding percentage of bacterial resistance, in most bacterial isolates no statistically significant changes were observed between the two periods. Conclusions. A reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics has been achieved over time, most likely attributable to the antimicrobial stewardship program. However, this trend was not observed for all the antibiotics studied. The pattern of resistance among the commonly isolated microorganisms did not vary greatly between the periods studied, which suggests that either the antimicrobial stewardship program may have prevented an increase in bacterial resistance since its implementation, or that it is too soon to see impact on bacterial resistance.

An Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Based on Systematic Infectious Disease Consultation in a Rehabilitation Facility

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Tedeschi ◽  
Filippo Trapani ◽  
Maddalena Giannella ◽  
Francesco Cristini ◽  
Fabio Tumietto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Rehabilitation Hospital ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Resistance Patterns ◽  
The Impact

OBJECTIVETo assess the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) on antibiotic consumption, Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), and antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.DESIGNQuasi-experimental study of the periods before (from January 2011 to June 2012) and after (from July 2012 to December 2014) ASP implementation.SETTING150-bed rehabilitation hospital dedicated to patients with spinal-cord injuries.INTERVENTIONBeginning in July 2012, an ASP was implemented based on systematic bedside infectious disease (ID) consultation and structural interventions (ie, revision of protocols for antibiotic prophylaxis and education focused on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions). Antibiotic consumption, occurrence of CDI, and antimicrobial resistance patterns of selected microorganisms were compared between periods before and after the ASP implementation.RESULTSAntibiotic consumption decreased from 42 to 22 defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 patient days (P<.001). The main reductions involved carbapenems (from 13 to 0.4 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.01) and fluoroquinolones (from 11.8 to 0.99 DDD per 100 patient days; P=.006), with no increases in mortality or length of stay. The incidence of CDI decreased from 3.6 to 1.2 cases per 10,000 patient days (P=.001). Between 2011 and 2014, the prevalence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains decreased from 55% to 12% in P. aeruginosa (P<.001) and from 96% to 73% in A. baumannii (P=.03). The prevalence of ESBL-producing strains decreased from 42% to 17% in E. coli (P=.0007) and from 62% to 15% in P. mirabilis (P=.0001). In K. pneumoniae, the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant strains decreased from 42% to 17% (P=.005), and the prevalence of in methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains decreased from 77% to 40% (P<.0008).CONCLUSIONSAn ASP based on ID consultation was effective in reducing antibiotic consumption without affecting patient outcomes and in improving antimicrobial resistance patterns in a rehabilitation hospital.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;1–7

scholarly journals IMPACT OF ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM ON THE USE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN PNEUMONIA PATIENTS AT TEACHING HOSPITAL IN SURAKARTA INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-23
Author(s):  
HIDAYAH KARUNIAWATI ◽  
TRI YULIANTI ◽  
DEWI KUROTA AINI ◽  
FINISHIA ISNA NURWIENDA
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Defined Daily Dose ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Daily Dose ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Method Show

Objective: Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem worldwide. One cause of antibacterial resistance is the inappropriate use of antibiotics. Thestudy of antibiotic use in hospitals found that 30–80% were not based on indications. Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) was developed tocontrol antimicrobial resistance. This study aims to evaluate the impact of ASP in pneumonia patients qualitatively and quantitatively pre-post ASPapplied.Methods: This research is a non-experimental study. Data were taken from the medical records of pneumonia patients and analyzed qualitativelyusing the Gyssens method and quantitatively using the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) method. Sampling was conducted through purposive sampling andresults were described descriptively.Results: During the study period, 96 samples were obtained with 48 data pre-ASP and 48 data post-ASP. The results of the qualitative analysis usingthe Gyssens method show an increase in the prudent use of antibiotics from 31.25% to 62.5% pre-post ASP, respectively. Quantitative evaluationshows a decrease of antibiotic use pre-post ASP from 90.84 DDD/100 patients-days to 61.42 DDD/100 patients-days.Conclusion: The ASP can improve the quality of antibiotic use in pneumonia patients quantitatively and qualitatively.

scholarly journals 43. Impact of a Five-Year Intervention of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on the Optimal Antibiotic Prophylaxis Selection in Surgery in a Hospital without Restrictions on Antibiotics Prescription in Costa Rica

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S143-S143
Author(s):  
José P Díaz-Madriz ◽  
Esteban Zavaleta-Monestel ◽  
Jorge A Villalobos-Madriz ◽  
Alison V Meléndez-Alfaro ◽  
Priscilla Castrillo-Portillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Bacterial Resistance ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Defined Daily Doses ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Background In a private hospital without restrictions on antibiotic prescription, the success of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) depends mainly on prospective feedback and education. Previously, the ASP of this hospital (PROA-HCB) managed to achieve a positive impact on the antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean delivery. The purpose of this study is to characterize the impact after implementing the PROA-HCB on the optimal prophylaxis selection of all the procedures included in the clinical guideline for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in adult patients. Methods A retrospective observational study that compares the selection, duration, antibiotic consumption, bacterial resistance profiles and patient’s safety outcomes regarding antibiotic use for all surgical prophylaxis prescription over six months for the periods before (pre-ASP) and after a five-year intervention of PROA-HCB (post-ASP). Results After a five-year intervention, the percentage of optimal selection of antibiotic prophylaxis in Surgery was 21.0% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 80.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (59% absolute improvement, p &lt; 0.001). Percentage of optimal duration was 69,1% (N=1598) in the pre-ASP period and 78.0% (N=841) in the post-ASP period (8.9% absolute improvement, p &lt; 0.001). Mean ceftriaxone utilization was 217.7 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 patient days DDD for the pre-ASP period and 139.8 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (35.8% decrease; p = 0.019). Mean cefazolin utilization was 14.9 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the pre-ASP period and 153.3 DDD per 1,000 patient days for the ASP period (928.6% increase; p = 0.021). Regarding percentage of bacterial resistance, there was detected an improvement in some isolates like Escherichia coli with a decrease of ESBL detection (11% decrease; p = 0.007). In addition, no serious adverse reactions or an increase in surgical site infections were detected after the intervention. Conclusion The implementation of an ASP in the surgical ward showed an overall positive impact on selection and duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. Furthermore, this intervention could have had a positive impact on antimicrobial resistance and at the same time had no negative effects on the patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Multilayer Model of Pharmacy Participation in the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at a Large Academic Medical Center

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 628-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanina Dubrovskaya ◽  
Marco R. Scipione ◽  
Justin Siegfried ◽  
Shin-Pung Jen ◽  
Vinh Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Dose Adjustment ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Hospital Pharmacists ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: Leveraging pharmacy personnel resources for the purpose of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) operations presents a challenging task. We describe our experience integrating all pharmacists into an ASP, and evaluate the impact on ASP interventions, antimicrobial utilization, rate of selected hospital-onset infections and readmission. Summary: During a study period (January 1 to December 31, 2015), a total of 14 552 ASP-related pharmacy interventions were performed (ASP clinical pharmacotherapy specialists [CPS] n = 4025; non-ASP CPS n = 4888; hospital pharmacists n = 5639). Sixty percent of interventions by ASP CPS were initiated utilizing the dedicated ASP phone, and 40% through prospective audit and feedback. Non-ASP CPS performed interventions during bedside rounds (dose adjustment 23%, initiate new or alternative anti-infective 21%, discontinue antibiotic(s) 12%, therapeutic drug monitoring 11%, de-escalation 4%), whereas hospital pharmacists participated at the point of verification (dose adjustment 75%, restricted antibiotic verification 15%, and reporting major drug-drug interactions 4%). The acceptance rate of interventions by providers and clinicians was >90% for all groups. Annual aggregate antimicrobial use decreased by 6.4 days of therapy/1000 patient-days (DOT/1000 PD; P = 1.0). Ceftriaxone use increased by 8.4 DOT/1000 PD ( P = .029) without a significant compensatory increase in the use of antipseudomonal agents. Sustained low rates of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile (CDI) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections were observed in 2015 compared with the prior year (1.1 and 1.2 cases/1000 PD, 0.2 and 0.1 cases/1000 PD, respectively). Thirty-day readmission rate decreased by 0.6% ( P = .019). Conclusions: Integration of all pharmacists into ASP activities based on the level of patient care and responsibilities is an effective strategy to expand clinical services provided by ASP.

scholarly journals 1068. Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) Managed by an Infectious Disease Physician and Pharmacists in a Community Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S378-S379
Author(s):  
Jeanne Brady PharmD ◽  
Mahendra Poudel
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Disease ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Infectious Disease Physician ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is one of the basis for the control of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR), optimization of antibiotic use, minimization of adverse events, and reduction of unnecessary costs. We demonstrate the design, development, and participation in ASP program following CDC and Prevention Core Elements strategies.1,3,4 The objective is to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacists working in conjunction with infectious disease (ID) physician on tracking and documenting antibacterial utilization in per patient-days, pharmacist clinical interventions, prescriber practices, and antibiotic purchases. Methods We conducted a multidisciplinary-team project of pharmacist-led prospective-audit-with-feedback ASP from 2015 to 2018. The ID physician and clinical pharmacist conducted patient care rounds twice weekly to make recommendations that include de-escalation, intensification of treatment, alternative therapy, dose optimization, order clarification, stop date/duration, additional monitoring, education, restriction enforcement, consult, IV to PO conversion, rejection of recommendation, and total monitored interventions requiring no changes. Results Pharmacist tracked between 150 and 200 interventions monthly through the EMR system, reflecting both self-stewardship and during rounds with ID physician. Figures 2–8: Charts display the number of patient-days of therapy per 1,000 days at risk and yearly SVMH Antibacterial Utilization Rates compared nationally to other Teaching and Nonteaching hospitals.5 Below each graph exhibits yearly Drug Spend per patient-days of Therapy.6 Conclusion Overall, the antibiotic utilization rates decreased over 4 years, particularly with aztreonam, meropenem, and levofloxacin.The formalization of an antimicrobial stewardship partnership between ID physician and pharmacy team led to increases in pharmacist-recommended interventions, streamlining of antimicrobial therapy, as well as decreases in antimicrobial purchasing costs. Proactively working in conjunction with hospitalists allows the pharmacists to play a critical role in sustaining a robust ASP service at our community hospital. The ASP at SVMH can serve as a model for other community hospitals with similar resources. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Implementation of a Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Platform for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections With Paired Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan D Robinson ◽  
Allison M Stilwell ◽  
April E Attai ◽  
Lindsay E Donohue ◽  
Megan D Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Implementation of the Accelerate PhenoTM Gram-negative platform (RDT) paired with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention projects to improve time to institutional-preferred antimicrobial therapy (IPT) for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, few data describe the impact of discrepant RDT results from standard of care (SOC) methods on antimicrobial prescribing. Methods A single-center, pre-/post-intervention study of consecutive, nonduplicate blood cultures for adult inpatients with GNB BSI following combined RDT + ASP intervention was performed. The primary outcome was time to IPT. An a priori definition of IPT was utilized to limit bias and to allow for an assessment of the impact of discrepant RDT results with the SOC reference standard. Results Five hundred fourteen patients (PRE 264; POST 250) were included. Median time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results decreased 29.4 hours (P &lt; .001) post-intervention, and median time to IPT was reduced by 21.2 hours (P &lt; .001). Utilization (days of therapy [DOTs]/1000 days present) of broad-spectrum agents decreased (PRE 655.2 vs POST 585.8; P = .043) and narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased (69.1 vs 141.7; P &lt; .001). Discrepant results occurred in 69/250 (28%) post-intervention episodes, resulting in incorrect ASP recommendations in 10/69 (14%). No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. Conclusions While implementation of a phenotypic RDT + ASP can improve time to IPT, close coordination with Clinical Microbiology and continued ASP follow up are needed to optimize therapy. Although uncommon, the potential for erroneous ASP recommendations to de-escalate to inactive therapy following RDT results warrants further investigation.

scholarly journals An evaluation of toxigenic Clostridioides difficile positivity as a patient outcome metric of antimicrobial stewardship in Saudi Arabia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Okeahialam ◽  
Ali A. Rabaan ◽  
Albert Bolhuis
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcome ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Repeated Testing ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
The Impact

AbstractBackgroundAntimicrobial stewardship has been associated with a reduction in the incidence of health care associated Clostridium difficile infection (HA-CDI). However, CDI remains under-recognized in many low and middle-income countries where clinical and surveillance resources required to identify HA-CDI are often lacking. The rate of toxigenic C. difficile stool positivity in the stool of hospitalized patients may offer an alternative metric for these settings, but its utlity remains largely untested.Aim/ObjectiveTo examine the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship on the rate of toxigenic C. difficile positivity among hospitalized patients presenting with diarrhoeaMethodsA 12-year retrospective review of laboratory data was conducted to compare the rates of toxigenic C. difficile in diarrhoea stool of patients in a hospital in Saudi Arabia, before and after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship programResultThere was a significant decline in the rate of toxigenic C difficile positivity from 9.8 to 7.4% following the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship program, and a reversal of a rising trend.DiscussionThe rate of toxigenic C. difficile positivity may be a useful patient outcome metric for evaluating the long term impact of antimicrobial stewardship on CDI, especially in settings with limited surveillance resources. The accuracy of this metric is however dependent on the avoidance of arbitrary repeated testing of a patient for cure, and testing only unformed or diarrhoea stool specimens. Further studies are required within and beyond Saudi Arabia to examine the utility of this metric.

Development of an antimicrobial stewardship program in an integrated healthcare system

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Lane ◽  
Amanda J Hays ◽  
Helen Newland ◽  
Jeanne E Zack ◽  
Rebecca M Guth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare System ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Gap Analysis ◽  
System Level ◽  
Antimicrobial Use ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Integrated Healthcare ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Regulatory Mandates ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose The development of an inpatient antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in an integrated healthcare system is described. Summary With increasing national focus on reducing inappropriate antimicrobial use, state and national regulatory mandates require hospitals to develop ASPs. In 2015, BJC HealthCare, a multihospital health system, developed a system-level, multidisciplinary ASP team to assist member hospitals with ASP implementation. A comprehensive gap analysis was performed to assess current stewardship resources, activities and compliance with CDC core elements at each facility. BJC system clinical leads facilitated the development of hospital-specific leadership support statements, identification of hospital pharmacy and medical leaders, and led development of staff and patient educational components. An antimicrobial-use data dashboard was created for reporting and tracking the impact of improvement activities. Hospital-level interventions were individualized based on the needs and resources at each facility. Hospital learnings were shared at bimonthly system ASP meetings to disseminate best practices. The initial gap analysis revealed that BJC hospitals were compliant in a median of 6 ASP elements (range, 4–8) required by regulatory mandates. By leveraging system resources, all hospitals were fully compliant with regulatory requirements by January 2017. Conclusion BJC’s ASP model facilitated the development of broad-based stewardship activities, including education modules for patients and providers and clinical decision support, while allowing hospitals to implement activities based on local needs and resource availability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document