scholarly journals RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF BI-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH DURING 2013 – 2020: A SCIENTOMETRIC APPRAISED

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 320-324
Author(s):  
Rajendran L.
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Animal Research ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Monthly Journal

Animal research from the bimonthly Journal of Animal Research was collected using scientometric analysis from 2013 to 2020. According to the study, 1057 publications were written between 2013 and 2020, with 48 of them having a high publication rate in 2015. As a result, animal research is the most popular topic among veterinary researchers, with 1164 papers published out of 1057 submitted. During the years, author R.K.Sharma published 22 articles, while other authors published (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,14,17,19,21) articles (2013 to 2020).

Scientometric Analysis of the Research Output of Physics and Astronomy of Guru Nanak Dev University during 2006-15

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Sunaina Khanna ◽  
Neeraj Kumar Singh ◽  
Deepika Tewari ◽  
Harinder Singh Saini
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
H Index ◽  
Average Citation ◽  
Publication Number ◽  
International Collaborations ◽  
The University ◽  
Number Of Citations

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>The study attempts to analyse research contributions of the Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar in physics and astronomy during the period 2006-15. The data for this study was extracted from Scopus. The study analyses the </span><span>year-wise research productivity, national and international collaborations, top collaborating institutions, most prolific </span><span>authors, journals used for communication, most preferred journals for publication, number of citations received by the University during the period under study. This paper analyses that the university has published 652 papers in physics and astronomy. The University had registered the average citation impact per paper of 7.01 per cent and 6 publications received 51 to 100 citations. Among the Indian universities, University stood at 23</span><span>rd </span><span>rank in term of publications output (652) and h-index (29), 16</span><span>th </span><span>rank in average citation per paper (7.01 per cent) and 18</span><span>th </span><span>rank in share of high cited papers (1 per cent) and 19</span><span>th </span><span>rank in terms of international collaborative papers (27.45 per cent) during 2006-15. Around 68.71 per cent publications of the University in physics and astronomy were in national collaboration between GNDU and several other Indian organisations. The study clearly indicates that journals are the most preferred form of publication to communicate research works by the researchers. </span></p></div></div></div>

Scientometric Analysis of Library and Information Science Articles During the Year 2008-2017 Using Web of Science

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
P. Boopathi ◽  
P. Gomathi
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Analytical Study ◽  
Information Science ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Library Science ◽  
Library And Information Science ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Academic World ◽  
The Web

This article highlights the research productivity and scholarly communication of library and information science articles during the year 2008–2017 indexed by the Web of Science database. This analytical study consisting of 56 reports and data downloaded from the Web of Science (Clarivate Analysis) database. Scientometric research mainly focused on the range of research productivity in the field of library science in a specific period. To evaluate the Publication years, to identify the authors who wrote, the more articles, which journals published most of the relevant subject articles, which institute and country have mostly involved in a particular subject; all these are to mainly discussed in this study. The present study considered as a useful tool for effective allocation of research funds in the research community and the academic world of library and information science to enhance the research process.

Mapping of Spacecraft Research Publications in India: A Scientometric Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Shynee Martin ◽  
V. Geetha
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Authorship Pattern ◽  
The Past ◽  
Increasing Trend ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Subject ◽  
China And Japan

This paper presents a scientometric analysis of the scholastic research papers published on spacecraft. The main purpose is to provide an overview of the research productivity in India on the subject during the period of the study (2012-2016), exploring different subdivisions of the spacecraft research. Ever since India sent a spacecraft to Mars in 2014, India has earned its place in the top ranking space-faring nations which include the USA, Europe Russia, China and Japan. This study highlights a quantitative analysis on the authorship pattern and collaborative trends during the past five years in the newly emerged the growing field of spacecraft in Engineering. This study reveals almost a constant trend of inflow of papers with increasing trend of multi authored papers year by year. Highest share of Papers are being contributed by authors from India, written in English and the results of degree of collaboration C= 0.91 of collaborative author’s articles is published during the study period.

scholarly journals Global, regional, and national trends and patterns in physical activity research since 1950: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ramírez Varela ◽  
Gloria Isabel Nino Cruz ◽  
Pedro Hallal ◽  
Cauane Blumenberg ◽  
Shana Ginar da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Research Capacity ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background National, regional and global scientific production and research capacity for physical activity - PA may contribute to improving public health PA policies and programs. There is an uneven distribution of research productivity by region and country income group, where countries with the highest burden of non-communicable diseases attributable to physical inactivity having low research productivity. A first step towards improving global research capacity is to objectively quantify patterns, trends, and gaps in PA research. This study describes national, regional and global trends and patterns of PA research from 1950 to 2019. Methods A systematic review using searches in PubMed, SCOPUS and ISI Web of Knowledge databases was conducted in August 2017 and updated between January and May 2020. The review was registered at the PROSPERO database number CRD42017070153. PA publications per 100,000 inhabitants per country was the main variable of interest. Descriptive and time-trend analyses were conducted in STATA version 16.0. Results The search retrieved 555,468 articles of which 75,756 were duplicates, leaving 479,712 eligible articles. After reviewing inclusion and exclusion criteria, 23,860 were eligible for data extraction. Eighty-one percent of countries (n = 176) had at least one PA publication. The overall worldwide publication rate in the PA field was 0.46 articles per 100,000 inhabitants. Europe had the highest rate (1.44 articles per 100,000 inhabitants) and South East Asia had the lowest (0.04 articles per 100,000 inhabitants). A more than a 50-fold difference in publications per 100,000 inhabitants was identified between high and low-income countries. The least productive and poorest regions have rates resembling previous decades of the most productive and the richest. Conclusion This study showed an increasing number of publications over the last 60 years with a growing number of disciplines and research methods over time. However, striking inequities were revealed and the knowledge gap across geographic regions and by country income groups was substantial over time. The need for regular global surveillance of PA research, particularly in countries with the largest data gaps is clear. A focus on the public health impact and global equity of research will be an important contribution to making the world more active.

scholarly journals Scientometric Analysis of the Research Productivity of Savitribai Phule Pune University

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 438-447
Author(s):  
Santosh B. Chaturbhuj ◽  
Nandkishor Ramrao Motewar
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
Polymer Science ◽  
H Index ◽  
Research Priority ◽  
The World ◽  
Applied Microbiology ◽  
Medical Chemistry ◽  
Index Value ◽  
The University

The study is about the Scientometric analysis of published articles under the Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune since 2001 to 2019. Total of 6449 documents were studied. Specialisation Index and the Research Priority Index have been used for analysing the subjects and their sub-subjects Chemistry, Physics, Biology, and Engineering. The study provides an overview of research conducted by the University and tries to show the weaker and stronger areas in four major subjects. The study measures and illustrates the research efforts taken by the Savitribai Phule Pune University in comparison with research efforts taken by the Nation and the World in the same subjects. The study found ‘Physics’ as a specialised subject in the University which obtained 1.455 SI Index Value. The study also reveals that ‘Medical Chemistry’ with 333.2 PI Value in Chemistry, ‘Polymer Science’ with 757.87 PI Value in Physics, ‘Microbiology’ with 1090.51 PI Value in Biology, and ‘Biotechnology Applied Microbiology’ with 936.9 PI Value in Engineering have received the highest research priority and corresponds to the Nation’s research productivity efforts in the same Sub-subjects. The study provides different ranking such as author’s productivity, most cited authors, author’s impact (h-index, g-index, m-index), most-cited journals and most contributed journals.

scholarly journals An audit of research productivity in clinical biochemistry revisited

JRSM Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 205427041984418
Author(s):  
Tim M Reynolds ◽  
Anthony S Wierzbicki
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Clinical Biochemistry ◽  
Publication Rate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Weak Links ◽  
Laboratory Staff ◽  
Publication Rates ◽  
Scientific Staff ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Educational Groups

Objective To investigate recent (2011–2015) research productivity in clinical biochemistry and compare it with a previous audit (1994–1998). Design A retrospective audit of peer-reviewed academic papers published in Medline listed journals. Setting UK chemical pathology/clinical biochemistry laboratories and other clinical scientific staff working in departments of pathology. Participants Medically qualified chemical pathologists and clinical scientists. Main outcome measures Publications were identified from electronic databases for individuals and sites. Analyses were conducted for individuals, sites and regional educational groups. Results Clinical scientific staff numbers fell by 3.9% and medical staff by 17.4% from 1998 to 2015. Publication rates declined as publication count centiles rose between 1998 and 2015 (e.g. n = 5; 67th→84th centile; p < 0.001). A reduction in productivity was seen in medically qualified staff but less from clinical scientists. Regional staffing was 77 ± 37 (range 30–150) with university hospital laboratory staff accounting for 58 ± 19% (range 30–92%). Medically qualified staff comprised 20 ± 4% of staff with lowest numbers in some London regions. Publication rates varied widely with a median of 155 papers per region (range 98–1035) and 2.82 (1.21–8.62) papers/individual. The skew was attenuated, increasing the publication rate to 6.0 ± 2.73 papers (range 2.29–11.76)/individual after correction for the number of university hospital sites per region and was not related to numbers of trainees. High publication rates were associated with the presence of one highly research-active individual. Their activity correlated over their careers from recruitment to today (r2 = 0.45; p = 0.05). The productivity rates of recent cohorts of trainees are inferior to previous cohorts. Conclusions Research remains a minority interest in clinical biochemistry. A small and decreasing proportion of individuals publish 90% of the work. A reduction was seen in clinical scientist and especially medical research productivity. No correlation of training activity with research productivity was seen implying weak links with translational medicine.

Scientometric Analysis of the Research Output of Physics and Astronomy of Guru Nanak Dev University during 2006-15

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 337
Author(s):  
Sunaina Khanna ◽  
Neeraj Kumar Singh ◽  
Deepika Tewari ◽  
Harinder Singh Saini
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Research Output ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
Scientometric Analysis ◽  
H Index ◽  
Average Citation ◽  
Publication Number ◽  
International Collaborations ◽  
The University ◽  
Number Of Citations

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>The study attempts to analyse research contributions of the Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar in physics and astronomy during the period 2006-15. The data for this study was extracted from Scopus. The study analyses the </span><span>year-wise research productivity, national and international collaborations, top collaborating institutions, most prolific </span><span>authors, journals used for communication, most preferred journals for publication, number of citations received by the University during the period under study. This paper analyses that the university has published 652 papers in physics and astronomy. The University had registered the average citation impact per paper of 7.01 per cent and 6 publications received 51 to 100 citations. Among the Indian universities, University stood at 23</span><span>rd </span><span>rank in term of publications output (652) and h-index (29), 16</span><span>th </span><span>rank in average citation per paper (7.01 per cent) and 18</span><span>th </span><span>rank in share of high cited papers (1 per cent) and 19</span><span>th </span><span>rank in terms of international collaborative papers (27.45 per cent) during 2006-15. Around 68.71 per cent publications of the University in physics and astronomy were in national collaboration between GNDU and several other Indian organisations. The study clearly indicates that journals are the most preferred form of publication to communicate research works by the researchers. </span></p></div></div></div>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document