scholarly journals ANALISIS SOAL-SOAL OLIMPIADE SAINS NASIONAL (OSN) SMA/MA BIDANG KIMIA TAHUN 2012 DAN 2013 BERDASARKAN DIMENSI PROSES KOGNITIF DAN PENGETAHUAN

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tita Sunggarani ◽  
Euis Nursa’adah ◽  
Yunita Yunita
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Cognitive Process ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Challenging Problem ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Cognitive Levels ◽  
National Competition ◽  
Process Dimension

Abstrak: Ilmu kimia sebagai ilmu yang berdasarkan pada  penelitian (induktif), yang seharusnya mampu menyajikan soal yang menantang dan tersebar dalam enam level kognitif, hanya saja kondisi sebenarnya soal-soal kimia masih dibuat tradisional dengan berada pada level kognitif rendah. Soal olimpiade sebagai ajang kompetisi nasional siswa-siswa berprestasi di Indonesia pun belum diketahui level kognitif yang terkandung di dalamnya. Maka tujuan penelitian ini yakni, mendeskripsikan komposisi penyebaran soal terhadap tabel Taksonomi Bloom revisi, mendeskripsikan perbandingan soal OSN dan IChO (International Chemistry Olympiad) pada materi yang sama, dan  memetakan soal-soal tersebut terhadap standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar SMA/MA. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pada tahun 2012 tersebar pada prosedural-mengaplikasikan dan konseptual-memahami. Pada tahun 2013 tersebar pada dimensi prosedural-mengaplikasikan dan faktual-memahami. Berdasarkan konten materi dalam satu soal IChO  menuntut siswa dapat menemukan keterkaitan suatu materi dengan materi lainnya guna menyelesaikan soal tersebut sedangkan OSN tidak, tetapi keduanya  memiliki dimensi pengetahuan dan dimensi proses kognitif yang tidak terlalu berbeda yakni pada lingkup prosedural-mengaplikasikan dan prosedural-menganalisis. Hasil pemetaan terhadap SK-KD SMA/MA menunjukkan sebesar setengah dari jumlah ksesluruhan soal dapat dipetakan. Adanya analisis ini diharapkan menjadi masukan bagi guru untuk memberikan penguatan konsep kimia pada pembelajaran, agar siswa mampu mengerjakan berbagai macam soal, salah satunya soal OSN. Penelitian ini masih terbatas pada tahun 2012 dan 2013, sehingga dapat dikembangkan analisis untuk tahun-tahun lainnya. Kata-kata Kunci : Analisis, Taksonomi Bloom revisi, Dimensi Pengetahuan, Dimensi Proses Kognitif Abstract: Chemistry as a science that is based on research (inductive), which is supposed to be able to present a challenging problem and scattered in six cognitive levels, it's just that the actual conditions of chemical problems are still made traditionally with low cognitive level. Olympics as a matter of national competition top students in Indonesia is not yet known cognitive level contained therein. So the purpose of this study, describing the composition of matter of the spread of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy tables, describing the comparison about OSN and IChO (International Chemistry Olympiad) on the same material, and to map these problems to the standards of competence and basic competences SMA/MA. The analysis showed that in 2012 spread over-apply procedural and conceptual understanding. In 2013 spread to the dimension-apply procedural and factual-understand. Based on the content of the material in a matter of IChO requires students to be able to find a material relationship with the other materials in order to resolve these problems while OSN does not, but both have dimensions of knowledge and cognitive process dimensions are not too different from that in the scope of procedural-procedural-applying and analyzing. The results of the mapping of the SK-KD SMA / MA shows only half the number of ksesluruhan matter can be mapped. The existence of this analysis are expected to be the input for the teacher to provide reinforcement in learning chemistry concepts, so that students are able to do a variety of problems, one of which is a matter of OSN. This study was limited in 2012 and 2013, so that the analysis can be developed for other years. Key Words: Analysis, revised Bloom's Taxonomy, Knowledge Dimension, The Cognitive Process Dimension

scholarly journals Cognitive Level Analysis of Problems in Mathematics Textbook Class XII Revision 2018 Materials of Congress and Construction Based on the Revised Bloom Taxonomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-25
Author(s):  
Dira Oktia Mita ◽  
Ringki Agustinsa ◽  
Edi Susanto
Keyword(s):  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Mathematics Textbook ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Cognitive Levels ◽  
Level Of Understanding ◽  
Bloom Taxonomy ◽  
Level Analysis

Abstract:This study aims to describe the distribution of cognitive levels of questions in the 2018 Revised Class XII Mathematics Textbook for Congruence and Similarity Based on Bloom's Taxonomy. Bloom's Taxonomy used is a revised Bloom's Taxonomy with cognitive process dimensions consisting of: remembering(C1), understanding(C2), applying(C3), analyzing(C4), evaluating(C5), and creating(C6). This type of research was descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Sources of data in this study were questions about the material congruence, similarity and competency test questions contained in the mathematics textbooks of class XII students. The research was carried out with the method of collecting documentation data and using research instruments in the form of analysis sheets and analysis conformity sheets. The results showed that the distribution of the cognitive level of questions on the congruence and similarity material contained the cognitive level of understanding(C2) as much as 18.2%, applying(C3) as much as 50% and analyzing(C4) as much as 31.8%, with the dominant cognitive level being cognitive level of applying(C3) and does not include cognitive levels of remembering(C1), evaluating(C2) and creating(C6). So it was found that the distribution of the cognitive level of the questions on the material of congruence and similarity topic did not vary or was not proportional. with the dominant cognitive level being cognitive level of applying(C3) and does not include cognitive levels of remembering(C1), evaluating(C2) and creating(C6). So it was found that the distribution of the cognitive level of the questions on the material of congruence and similarity topic did not vary or was not proportional. with the dominant cognitive level being cognitive level of applying(C3) and does not include cognitive levels of remembering(C1), evaluating(C2) and creating(C6). So it was found that the distribution of the cognitive level of the questions on the material of congruence and similarity topic did not vary or was not proportional. Keywords: Mathematics Textbook, Congruence, Similarity, Question, Revised Bloom's Taxonomy, Cognitive Level.

COGNITIVE LEVEL OF READING QUESTIONS IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK FOR GRADE XI

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lamtiar Sinaga And Meisuri
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Senior High School ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Cognitive Levels ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

The objective of the study was to find out the cognitive level of the reading questions in English textbook for grade XI based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. This study was conducted by using descriptive qualitative method. The data of this research were the reading questions in the English textbook for grade XI Senior High School. The result of this study was the whole reading questions in the textbook covering all of the cognitive levels, they were Remembering (26,02%), Understanding (26,02%), Applying (9,18%), Analyzing (33,16%), Evaluating (1,53%), and Creating (4,08 %).

scholarly journals The Use of Bloom’s Taxonomy to Inform Students’ Cognitive Levels

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Siti Nursaila Alias ◽  
Faridah Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Social Science ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Newton's Law ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Newton’S Law ◽  
Cognitive Levels ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Spss Software

To improve students’ conceptual understanding depends on the question types asked by the teachers. This paper investigates to examine form four students’ cognitive levels in Newton’s Law based on Bloom’s Taxonomy. The study sample consisted of 189 science stream students from three secondary schools in Kuala Kangsar, Perak. Researcher implemented Newton’s Law questions as instrument to determine the three cognitive levels of the respondent which namely Knowledge, Comprehension and Application. The paper-pencil test was developed and administered on the subject. The data were collected and analyzed using the Statistical Packages for Social Science for Windows release 21 (SPSS Software). The findings show that the mean of the Knowledge, Comprehension and Application level is moderate.

scholarly journals A comparison of the reliability of the Solo- and revised Bloom's Taxonomy-based classifications in the analysis of the cognitive levels of assessment questions

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 637-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa İlhan ◽  
Melehat Gezer
Keyword(s):  
Generalizability Theory ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Residual Variance ◽  
Solo Taxonomy ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Cognitive Levels ◽  
Main Effect ◽  
Assessment Questions

This study aims to compare the reliability of SOLO and revised Bloom's taxonomy-based (RBT) classifications in the determination of the cognitive levels of the assessment questions. The data were obtained by three experts' examination of the assessment questions in the Seventh Grade Social Studies Textbook published by the Ministry of National Education and Eight Grade Science and Technology Textbook published by Yıldırım Publishing in 2015. The collected data were analyzed in a crossed design whereby the assessment questions were the object of measurement and the experts were the facet on the basis of the generalizability theory. It was found that the variance percentage of the main effect of the assessment question was found to be higher in the SOLO-based classifications. The variance component related to the experts' main effect and the residual variance values were found to be higher in the RBT than in the SOLO taxonomy. In conclusion, compared to the RBT, the SOLO-based classifications were found to have higher G and Phi coefficients. These results indicate that SOLO taxonomy seems to be more reliable than RBT in the determination of the cognitive level of assessment questions.

scholarly journals LEVELS OF COGNITIVE DOMAIN OF TASKS IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOKS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL: A REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ANALYSES

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-105
Author(s):  
Rustiyani Rustiyani ◽  
Dedi Sofyan ◽  
Syafryadin Syafryadin
Keyword(s):  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Cognitive Dimension ◽  
Instructional Activity ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
English Textbooks ◽  
Bloom Taxonomy ◽  
Dominant Activity

This study is a descriptive qualitative which aims to know the appropriateness of the textbook’s content with the cognitive dimension of Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and to know the dominant cognitive category of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in the textbook. This research was focused on analyzing the English Textbook, “Pathway to English”, which is published by Erlangga. The data was analyzed through data analysis table to categorize the activity with defined as any one of the following: a question or instructional activity, based on cognitive dimension. The result showed that there are 271 activities in the textbook. The activities spread over 105 (38.7%) remembering, 76 (28%) understanding, 48 (17.7%) applying, 28 (10.3%) analyzing, 7 (2.6%) evaluating, and 7 (2.6%) creating. The total number of activities that included to HOTS are 42 activities or 15.5% and the activities that included to LOTS are 229 activities or 84.5%. The most dominant activity was remembering which the lowest dimension of cognitive level of Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Then, the number of LOTS and HOTS activities in each chapter are very different. Hence, it is not enough if the teacher just only uses the English textbook as a teaching tool to improve students HOTS ability.

DEVELOPING ENGLISH SUMMATIVE TEST BASED ON REVISED BLOOM’S TAXONOMY

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresia Manalu And Indra Hartoyo
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Research And Development ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy

This was a research and development (R&D) study which aimed to evaluate the English summative test items based on revised Bloom’s taxonomy for grade VIII. This study focused on the developing the English summative test items according to the cognitive level of revised Bloom’s taxonomy for grade VIII at SMP Negeri 3 Tebing Tinggi. The data consist of the existing English summative test items which were directly collected from the English teacher due to analyze the proportion of cognitive level according to revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Based on the data analysis, the existing English summative test had not fulfilled the proportion of cognitive level according to revised Bloom’s taxonomy regulated by the Ministry of Education and Culture. The inappropriate English summative test items were then developed according to the proportion demand and suitability to the syllabus and indicators. The results of the study are 30 developed English summative test items which had been validated by the experts and tested to 20 students due to get the reliability scores.

scholarly journals An Analysis of EFL students' questions in Research on ELT class at University of PGRI Ronggolawe Tuban

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21
Author(s):  
Christina Innocenti Tumiar Panggabean ◽  
Aisah Asariski
Keyword(s):  
English Language ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
English Language Teaching ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Cognitive Domains ◽  
Qualitative Research Design ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
The Subject

This research was conducted to analyze the questions used by EFL students in Research on ELT ( English Language Teaching ) Class  at  University of PGRI Ronggolawe  Tuban. This research was conducted to know the types of questions applied by the students, the most dominant questions used based on the cognitive domains of Bloom’s taxonomy, and the students’ responses towards the questions. Descriptive qualitative research design was applied in the research. The subject of the study were the sixth semester students who took Research on ELT course. To collect the data, observation using Telegram application and interview were applied. The data were analyzed qualitatively to determine the cognitive level of each question according to revised Bloom’s taxonomy. The result of the data analysis showed that the students used empirical questions as the type of questions. The dominant question used based on the cognitive domains of Bloom’s taxonomy was Analyzing level or C4 which appeared 48%. It showed that HOTS questions were the most used at the classroom with the total 64%, while the LOTS questions only got 36%. The students claimed that they felt interested and glad to answer the questions. It can be concluded that the students of Research on ELT class had shown that they had ability to think critically.    

scholarly journals Analisis Struktur dan Kemunculan Tingkat Kognitif pada Desain Kegiatan Laboratorium Materi Fotosintesis

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Nur Sopiah Wahidah ◽  
Bambang Supriatno ◽  
Mimin Nurjhani Kusumastuti
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
School Design ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Laboratory Activity ◽  
Construction Of Knowledge ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Basic Competencies

In practical activities usually teachers provide guidance in the form of students’ worksheet or design of laboratory activity. Based on field studies Supriatno (2009), only 24% design laboratory that can be done with the appropriate procedures and complete results in terms of data analysis and conclusion, so it does not support the construction of knowledge. It required the analysis to determine whether design laboratory used already support the construction of knowledge. Design laboratory analysis refers to the Vee diagram and revised Bloom's taxonomy as both lead students to construct knowledge. This research is a descriptive study with purposive sampling technique. The research data captured with a rare test work results table, the table where the component diagram Vee, Vee diagrams scoring table, as well as the revised Bloom's taxonomy table. The results of the 16 samples and 5 samples design laboratory, junior high school design laboratory of photosynthetic material shows that there are still procedural mistakes and instruction unstructured. Vee diagram component analysis results show the general components that arises is the question of focus, the object/event, theories, principles, concepts and knowledge claims. Components that are generally not appear that notes/transformation. Results of the analysis showed scores of each component Vee diagram, Vee diagram on middle and high school degign laboratory generally have not yet reached the ideal score. Results of the analysis showed the emergence of the cognitive level of cognitive level generally required design laboratory in middle and high school, namely C1, C2 and C3, with dominant category procedural C3. This cognitive level is in conformity with the demands of basic competencies middle school, but not in accordance with the demands of basic competencies of high school.

scholarly journals Implementation of Revised Bloom Taxonomy in Developing Chemistry Questions in the Domain of Knowledge

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bekti Mulatsih
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Learning Objectives ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Chemistry Teachers ◽  
Knowledge Based ◽  
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Essay Tests ◽  
Bloom Taxonomy

The application of the revised Bloom's taxonomy in the development of chemistry problems in the domain of knowledge is still difficult for some chemistry teachers. This paper is a practical study of the preparation of learning objectives and the development of chemical items by applying the revised Bloom's taxonomy which includes three domains, namely knowledge (cognitive), attitude (affective), and skills (psychomotor). This paper is focused on the preparation of learning objectives and the development of chemistry items for the assessment of the domain of knowledge which includes the levels of remembering, understanding, applying, analyzing, evaluating, and creating. The six cognitive processes are sequential from the lowest cognitive processes to the highest cognitive processes called C1-C6 cognition processes. The methodology in this paper consists of three steps, namely examining the meaning of each level of cognition in the revised Bloom taxonomy, developing learning objectives that are in accordance with the cognitive level being studied and continuing with the arrangement of the problem items in chemistry subjects. The strengths of this study are very helpful for chemistry teachers in developing learning objectives and chemistry questions in the domain of knowledge based on the revised Bloom taxonomy, because this study is equipped with descriptions of each cognitive process, examples of learning objectives and appropriate question items. Examples of questions given in this paper are multiple choice types and essay tests, because each type of question has its advantages. The result of this study is that the application of the revised Bloom's taxonomy to the development of chemical problems requires an understanding of each level of the cognitive level in the revised Bloom's taxonomy, as the basis for developing learning objectives and the appropriate problem questions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document