scholarly journals Comparison of ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight and actual birth weight.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1428-1432
Author(s):  
Summan Hameed ◽  
Zobia Saleem ◽  
Mehwish Rauf ◽  
Tayyaba Aslam ◽  
Aqsa Hafeez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Actual Weight ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Minimum Age ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Objective: To determine the accuracy of estimated fetal weight by ultrasound compared with actual birth weight. Study Design: Cross Sectional study. Setting: Department of Radiology, Fatima Memorial Hospital, Lahore. Period: September 2017 to January 2018. Material & Methods: A sample of 139 pregnant women who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study Ultrasonography of full term pregnant women was performed to determine the comparison and accuracy with the actual weight of baby at birth. Results: In a sample of 139 pregnant women, the mean age was 27.8±4.2 years (with minimum age of 20 years and maximum age of 40 years). Ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight and actual birth weight was compared by using paired t-test. No significant difference was found between estimated fetal weight and actual birth weight with P-value 0.237. Conclusion: Ultrasound is highly sensitive, good, reliable, safe and accurate modality for estimation of fetal weight. There is no significant difference between fetal weight and actual birth weight.

scholarly journals Ghrelin levels in hypertensive obese and normotensive obese subjects.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (08) ◽  
pp. 1142-1146
Author(s):  
Zehra Niazi ◽  
◽  
Sundus Tariq ◽  
Muhammad Azhar Saeed ◽  
Sana Akram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Ghrelin Level ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Social ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Minimum Age ◽  
Obese Subjects

Objective: The purpose was to determine the ghrelin level, its effect and relationship with blood pressure levels in obese subjects. Study Design: Comparative Cross Sectional study. Settings: General OPD of Madinah Teaching Hospital (MTH) and District Head Quarter hospital Faisalabad (DHQ). Period: 2019 to 2020. Material & Methods: Blood samples were collected from hypertensive and compared with the normotensive obese (BMI >30). Ghrelin level was measured by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Statistical analysis was done on Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) 20 software. Mean ±SD has been given for quantitative variables. Independent sample t test was used for comparisons. Significance has been chosen as p ≤ 0.05. Results: Total 114 obese patients were selected for this study, of which 57 were hypertensive and 57 were normotensive. Minimum age was 30 years and maximum age was 60 years with mean age 39.35 ± 10.08 years. Mean age of hypertensive obese was 43.42 ± 10.46 years and mean age of normotensive was 35.28 ± 7.87 years. Statistically significant difference of mean fasting ghrelin levels between hypertensive obese and normotensive obese was noted with p value 0.013. Conclusion: Obese persons with elevated circulating concentration of ghrelin may be susceptible to the progression of increasing blood pressure.

PERBANDINGAN RUMUS JOHNSON DAN RUMUS RISANTO DALAM MENENTUKAN TAKSIRAN BERAT JANIN PADA IBU HAMIL DENGAN BERAT BADAN BERLEBIH

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-27
Author(s):  
Leo Jumadi Simanjuntak ◽  
Patrick Anando Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: Estimated fetal weight (EFW) is important to determine mode of delivery. The use of estimated fetal weight based on fundal height has been widely used, but the use on overweight mothers is still limited. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the Johnson’s and Risanto’s formula in estimating fetal weight on overweight mothers. Method: The design used was cross-sectional, conducted at Mitra Sejati, Herna, and Methodist Sussana Wesley hospital on November 2019 until January 2020. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare EFW mean differences between Johnson’s and Risanto’s to actual birth weight. Paired t-test was used to compare EFW mean differences between Johnson’s and Risanto’s. Results: There were 103 overweight pregnant mothers fulfilling study criteria. The BMI mean was 31,26 ± 5l,54 kg/m2. Both Johnson’s and Risanto’s formula had no significant mean difference compare to actual birth weight, of 332,45 gram on Johnson’s (p value = 0,070) and 298,57 gram on Risanto’s (p value = 0,863). The mean difference between Risanto’s formula and actual birth weight was significantly lower than Johnson’s (mean difference = 33,88 gram, p value = 0,01). Conclusions: EFW measurement using Johnson’s and Risanto’s formula based on fundal height can be applied and used properly by health care workers. Risanto’s formula was more accurate to estimate fetal weight than Johnson’s in overweight mothers.   Latar belakang: Menentukan taksiran berat janin (TBJ) adalah penting bagi penolong persalinan untuk menentukan jenis persalinan. Pengukuran TBJ menggunakan tinggi fundus uterus merupakan metode yang banyak digunakan, namun penggunaan pada ibu hamil dengan berat badan berlebih masih terbatas. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan rumus Johnson dan rumus Risanto dalam menentukan TBJ pada ibu hamil dengan berat badan berlebih. Metode: Desain penelitian adalah potong lintang, data diambil di RSU Mitra Sejati, RSU Herna, dan RSU Methodist Sussana Wesley pada November 2019 – Januari 2020. Dilakukan uji Mann-Whitney untuk membandingkan perbedaan rerata TBJ dengan rumus Johnson dan Risanto dengan berat badan lahir. Uji-t berpasangan digunakan untuk membandingkan perbedaan rerata TBJ dengan rumus Johnson dan Risanto. Hasil: Didapatkan 103 ibu hamil yang memenuhi kriteria penelitian dengan rerata IMT 31,26 ± 5l,54 kg/m2. Terdapat perbedaan rerata TBJ rumus Johnson dan rumus Risanto dibandingkan berat badan lahir sebesar 332,45 gram dan 298,57 gram. Tidak terdapat perbedaan rerata bermakna antara penghitungan TBJ menggunakan rumus Johnson dengan berat badan lahir (p = 0,070) dan rumus Risanto dengan berat badan lahir (p = 0,863). Perbedaan selisih TBJ Risanto dengan berat badan lahir lebih rendah dibandingkan selisih TBJ Johnson dengan berat badan lahir, yaitu sebesar 33,88 gram dan bermakna secara statistik (p = 0,01). Kesimpulan: Pengukuran TBJ menggunakan rumus Johnson dan rumus Risanto dapat diterapkan dan digunakan dengan baik oleh tenaga medis. Rumus Risanto memiliki tingkat ketepatan yang lebih baik dibandingkan rumus Johnson dalam menentukan TBJ pada ibu hamil dengan berat badan berlebih.

Comparison between clinical estimated fetal weights (CEFW) Versus Ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (UEFW) for co-relation with actual birth weight (ABW) in 3rd Trimester of Pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. e1-e4
Author(s):  
Rabia Razaq
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Study Results ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: Accurate prenatal estimation of birth weight is useful in the management of labour and delivery. Objective: To determine the correlation between clinical estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight in 3rd trimester of pregnancy and to determine the correlation between Ultrasonographic fetal weight assessment with actual birth weight in 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Material & Methods: This cross sectional study with non-probability purposive sampling technique was conducted in three tertiary care hospitals of Punjab, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, Lady Aitcheson Hospital Lahore and Lady Willington Hospital Lahore. Informed consent was obtained from each female to use their data for research purpose. Demographic details were also noted. Then females undergo CEFW was done by using Johnson’s formula. Then ultrasonography was done on every female by experienced radiologists to get UEFW. FW measurement was done by using Shepard formula. Then females were followed-up till delivery of fetus. Actual birth weight (ABW) was noted on birth. Pearson correlation was used to measure the correlation coefficient for CEFW and UEFW with ABW. P-value≤0.05 was taken as significant. Results: In our study the mean age of the patients was 29.60±6.23 years and the mean gestational age of 33.30±2.31 weeks. The mean BMI value of the patients was 23.08±1.26 Kg/m2, the mean CEFW value 2219.60±556.41 grams while the mean UEFW value of the patients was 2227.77±521.94 grams and the mean value of ABW of the patients was 2284.00±515.29 grams. In our study the positive correlation was found between the CEFW, UEFW with ABW of the baby. Conclusion: Our study results concluded that both the clinical estimation ultrasonography estimation showed the feasible and reliable results. Both showed positive correlation with actual birth weight.

scholarly journals Correlation of Actual Fetal Weight with Clinically and Ultrasonographically detected Macrosomia cases among Diabetic Mother

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Shamsun Nahar ◽  
Kashefa Khatun ◽  
Tahmina Khanum ◽  
TA Chowdhury ◽  
AS Mohiuddin
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Diabetic Mother ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Diagnosed Diabetes ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: Correlation of actual fetal weight with clinically and ultrasonographically detected macrosomia cases among diabetic mother is very essential for the management of the neonates. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to correlate actual fetal weight with clinically and ultrasonographically detected macrosomia cases among diabetic mother. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was carried out in inpatient Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and in outpatients Department of Radiology and Imaging, BIRDEM during the period of April 2005 to March 2007. Pregnant women with diagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM) or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) selected for caesarean section or induction of labour, gestational age 236 weeks having 23700 gm by clinical method were included in this study. First clinical estimation of fetal weight was done by the investigator then Radiologist estimated the fetal weight without knowing the EFW by clinical method. The actual birth weight was estimated after the birth of the babies. Result: The mean (+SD) age of the patients was 30.8±5.1 years ranged from 20 to 40 years. A significant correlation (r=0.5081; p<0.05) was found between clinically estimated fetal weight (gm) and actual birth weight (macrosomia) (gm). Significant correlation (r=0.6199; p<0.05) was found between sonographically estimated fetal weight (gm) and actual birth weight (macrosomia) (gm). Significant correlation (r=0.4863; p<0.05) was found between clinically estimated fetal weight (gm) and sonographically estimated fetal weight (gm). Conclusion: The study findings indicate that clinical method can be used instead of ultrasonography for prediction of macrosomia in diabetic mother Journal of Science Foundation 2018;16(2):38-44

scholarly journals Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation Using Hadlock II Formula

2019 ◽  
pp. 166-169
Author(s):  
Dwi Pratika Anjarwati ◽  
Yudhistya Ngudi Insan Ksyatria ◽  
Widardo Widardo
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Skills Training ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Fetal Birth Weight ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

abstract Objective: to investigate the accuracy of estimated fetal weight using Hadlock II formula in RSUD Dr Moewardi. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at RSUD Dr Moewardi in June 2017. Subjects were women who gave birth at RSUD Dr Moewardi from August 2014 to March 2017. The method of collecting data by quoting the medical record as required. Data analysis was done by using linear regression statistic test. Result: By distribution, the number of samples that, according to the standard, is 81.67 %. With the value of R = 0.706 which means that the relationship between two research variables are strong and the value of R Square = 0.499 which means that estimated fetal weight using Hadlock II formula has contribution 49.9 % on fetal birth weight and 50.1 % others by other factors. Conclusion: Fetal weight estimation using Hadlock II formula in RSUD Dr Moewardi has low accuracy. Operator skills training is required to improve the accuracy of estimated fetal weight. Keywords:  fetal birth weight,  fetal weight estimation, Hadlock II   abstrak Tujuan : Mengetahui keakuratan taksiran berat janin menggunakan rumus Hadlock II di RSUD Dr Moewardi. Metode : Penelitian ini adalah penelitian observasional analitik. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di RSUD Dr Moewardi pada Juni 2017. Subjek penelitian ini adalah data rekam medis dari ibu hamil yang mengalami partus di RSUD Dr Moewardi pada Agustus 2014 – Maret 2017. Metode pengumpulan data dengan mengutip data rekam medis pasien sesuai ketentuan. Analisis data dilakukan dengan uji statistik regresi linier. Hasil : Secara distribusi, jumlah sampel yang memenuhi standar yaitu   81,67 %. Dengan nilai R = 0,706 yang artinya bahwa hubungan kedua variabel penelitian ada dalam kategori kuat dan nilai R Square = 0,499 yang berarti taksiran berat janin menggunakan rumus Hadlock II memiliki pengaruh kontribusi sebesar 49,9% terhadap berat bayi lahir sedangkan 50.1 % lainnya dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain. Kesimpulan : Taksiran berat janin menggunakan rumus Hadlock II  di RSUD Dr Moewardi kurang akurat. Perlu dilakukan pelatihan ketrampilan operator sehingga diharapkan dapat meningkatkan keakuratan taksiran berat janin.  Kata kunci:   berat bayi lahir , Hadlock II, , taksiran berat janin

scholarly journals Relationship Between Placental Calcification and Estimated Fetal Weight Percentile at 30-34 Weeks of Pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 478-482
Author(s):  
Mojgan Barati ◽  
Sara Masihi ◽  
Elnaz Barahimi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Khorrami
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Uterine Artery ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Multiple Pregnancy ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adverse Pregnancy ◽  
Doppler Indices ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Objectives: The identification of at-risk fetus is considered as one of the most difficult challenges for clinicians and researchers although the clinical significance of placental calcifications (PCs) and its relation to adverse pregnancy outcome are controversial. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between PC and estimated fetal weight (EFW) percentile at 30-34 weeks of pregnancy. Materials and Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study was carried out on all pregnant women except for multiple pregnancy subjects who were admitted to an outpatient perinatal center from October 2016 to September 2018. Several parameters were measured at 30-34 weeks of pregnancy, including EFW, umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI), middle cerebral artery PI, cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), right and left uterine artery PI, along with right and left uterine artery notch. Finally, the calcification of the placenta with any shape and degree was determined as well. Results: In this study, 739 pregnant women were evaluated for PC, including patients with PC (9.87%), small-for-gestational age (SGA, 3.65%), and those with at least one abnormal Doppler index (23.95%). Patients with PC and those with at least one abnormal Doppler index had significantly higher SGA (29.62% and 12.42%, respectively). In addition, there were 55.55% and 30.13% patients with SGA and PC in the group with at least one abnormality in terms of Doppler indices. Conclusions: In general, the findings showed that PC is more common in SGA. Based on the results, at least one abnormality in Doppler indices was more common in PC and SGA, and uterine artery Doppler abnormality was the most prevalent abnormal findings in the arterial Doppler. Thus, PC may be an important marker for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

scholarly journals Anxiety and depression in pregnant women amid COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Pravin Shrestha ◽  
Vibha Mahato ◽  
Anil Subedi ◽  
Shipra Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prevalence Of Depression ◽  
Hospital Patients

Background: COVID-19 has become a global pandemic. It has affected the psychological condition of pregnant women. Aims and Objective: This study aims to assess prevalence of depression and anxiety in pregnancy during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: The current study was an observational, cross sectional study conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manipal Teaching Hospital. Patients were assessed using Nepali version of Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) for anxiety and depression respectively. Result: There were total of 115 patients in this study. The prevalence of anxiety according to BAI was 39.1%. The prevalence of depression according to BDI was 19%. There was a statistically significant difference in rate of anxiety according to maternal age (p value 0.028). Anxiety was higher in women less than 20 years of age. Anxiety symptoms were more prevalent i.e., 44.6% in third trimester followed by 31.4% in second trimester and 29.4% in first trimester. Symptoms of depression was higher in women more than 35 years of age (27.2%) and in second trimester of pregnancy (27.2%). Conclusion: Antenatal anxiety and depression are important issues because it impacts both maternal wellbeing and fetal health. Prevalence of anxiety and depression among pregnant women during COVID 19 pandemic was studied. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was 39.1% and 19% respectively.

scholarly journals Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation by Ultrasonographic Evaluation in a Northeastern Region of India

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ranjumoni Konwar ◽  
Bharati Basumatary ◽  
Malamoni Dutta ◽  
Putul Mahanta
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Weight Category ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
The Difference

Background and Objectives. Fetal weight evaluation in utero is a significant component in obstetric practices. The present study aims to estimate the fetal weight (EFW) by evaluating two available formulas using ultrasound parameters and comparing them with actual birth weight (ABW) after delivery. The accuracy and efficacy of both EFW formulas in detecting intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) and macrosomia were also compared in our local sample of the population. Methods. The cross-sectional study included 100 pregnant women aged 20–45 years from the Kamrup district admitted to Guwahati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 16. The EFW at term was calculated using Shepard’s formula and Hadlock’s formula. Differences in means are compared using the one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test and paired t-test. The accuracy of the two procedures was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). A p value<0.05 was considered significant. Results. The present study included 100 pregnant women aged 21–38 years with term or postterm pregnancies subjected to ultrasonographic evaluation within 72 hours of delivery. The mean (±s.d.) EFW by Shepard’s formula was 2716.05 (±332.38) g and Hadlock’s formula was 2740.44 (±353.23) g, respectively. For Hadlock’s formula, MAE ± s.d. was found to be higher (overall 84.59 ± 76.54) specifically in the weight category less than 2500 (106.42 ± 88.11) as compared to Shepard’s (overall MAE ± s.d = 79.86 ± 64.78, and among ABW < 2500 g, MAE ± s.d = 65.04 ± 61.02). The overall MAPE of Hadlock’s formula was 3.14% and that for Shepard’s formula was 2.91%, and the difference was not statistically significant. Both Shepard’s formula and Hadlock’s formula had a sensitivity of 92.85% in detecting IUGR, but Hadlock’s method had higher specificity (66%), higher PPV (86.67%), and higher NPV (80%). Conclusion. The ultrasonographic evaluation of fetal weight helps predict fetal birth weight precisely and can influence obstetric management decisions concerning timing and route of delivery, thus reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality.

Accuracy of Prediction of Birth Weight by Fetal Ultrasound

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-14
Author(s):  
Sumnima Acharya ◽  
Awadhesh Tiwari
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Fetal Ultrasound ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Actual Weight ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Accuracy Of Prediction

Introduction: Fetal weight estimation using ultrasonography (USG) is beneficial for the better feto-maternal outcome. This study was done to determine the accuracy of prediction of birth weight by fetal ultrasound. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study carried out in the Department of Radio diagnosis, Lumbini Medical College and Teaching Hospital (LMCTH), Palpa, Nepal from1st June to 31st December 2018.Fetal weight was calculated by USG in 325 women using Hadlock’s formula and correlated with birth weight. Results: Our study showed that fetal ultrasound using Hadlock’s formula has error in estimation of fetal weight by 189gm (SD: 111 gm). In 91.3% of the cases, there was an error of estimation by less than 10% compared to actual weight. Conclusion: It can be concluded that sonographic estimation of birth weight can be recommended to yield a better prediction of birth weight and to further evaluate fetal well-being.  

scholarly journals Risanto’s Formulas is more Accurate in Determining Estimated Fetal Weight Based on Maternal Fundal Height

2016 ◽  
pp. 149-151
Author(s):  
Hanifah I Titisar ◽  
Risanto Siswosudarmo
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Obstet Gynecol ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight ◽  
Uterine Fundus

Objectives: To compare the accuracy of Johnson’s and Risanto’s formulas in determining estimated fetal weight based on maternal fundal height (FH). Methods: This was a cross sectional study, consisting of 655 pregnant women from Dr. Sardjito Hospital and affiliated hospital sat 37-42 weeks of gestation. Fundal height was measured from the symphisis to the top of uterine fundus, using inverted unelastic flexible tape. EFW based on Johnson’s and Risanto’s formulas were compared with the actualbirth weight. Wilcox on analysis was used for statistical analysis. Results: Mean EFW of Johnson’s formula was 3136 ± 392.2 grams and EFW of Risanto’s formula was 3056 ± 322.5 grams and mean actual birth weight was 3021 ± 341.1 grams. The mean difference between EFW of Johnson’s formula and the actual birth weight was 156.1 ± 107.3 grams, and mean difference between EFW of Risanto’s formula and the actual birth weight was 100.8 ± 86.1 grams. Those two differences was statistically significant (p=0.001). Conclusion: This study showed that Risanto’s formula was more accurate than Johnson’s in predicting birth weight based on the maternal’s fundal height. [Indones J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 1-3: 149-51] Keywords: actual birth weight, fundal height, Johnson’s formula, Risanto’s formula

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document