scholarly journals Categorization of Long Term Care Hospital in Korea Using Cluster Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Kyung Park ◽  
Yeon-Ju Lee
Author(s):  
Isabel Brown

ABSTRACTA retrospective study was conducted in a large multilevel geriatric centre to analyse the deaths reported in the year 1981. This centre provides accommodation for 750 elderly and/or chronically ill persons in three agencies—an apartment complex, a home for the aged, and a long-term care hospital The study revealed that the hospital is the place of death for a high proportion of the elderly residents of the centre. In particular, residents of the home for the aged are unlikely to remain in the “home” to die. It was found that patterns of death and dying for individuals admitted to the hospital from the general community differ in several ways from the patterns of those who are already living in the centre in terms of age and probable cause of death.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Michael Bergmann

In Germany, a new assessment system (the NBA) is being applied to assess the need for long-term care. The degree of care that is calculated defines the extent of welfare state benefits. Measuring and analysing the need for care in a statistically appropriate way is subject to certain preconditions. This book presents multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) in combination with cluster analysis (HCA) as an innovative methodological approach to dealing with this challenge. The first part provides a theoretical discussion of the need for care; the second part describes MCA and HCA in detail using an example. The book is aimed at all those involved in the measurement and analysis of the need for care.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 769-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideharu Hagiya ◽  
Norihisa Yamamoto ◽  
Ryuji Kawahara ◽  
Yukihiro Akeda ◽  
Rathina Kumar Shanmugakani ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S526-S526
Author(s):  
Chelsea Lynch ◽  
Andrea Appleby-Sigler ◽  
Jacqueline Bork ◽  
Rohini Dave ◽  
Kimberly C Claeys ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Urine cultures are often positive in the absence of urinary tract infection (UTI) leading to unnecessary antibiotics. Reflex culturing decreases unnecessary urine culturing in acute care settings but the benefit in other settings is unknown. Methods This was a quasi-experimental study performed at a health system consisting of an acute care hospital, an emergency department (ED), and two long-term care (LTC) facilities. Reflex urine criterion was a urine analysis with > 10 white blood cells/high-power field. Urine cultures performed per 100 bed days of care (BDOC) were compared pre- (August 2016 to July 2017) vs. post-intervention (August 2017 to August 2018) using interrupted time series regression. Catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) rates were reviewed to determine potential CAUTIs that would have been prevented. Results In acute care, pre-intervention, 894 cultures were performed (3.6 cultures/100 BDOC). Post-intervention, 965 urine cultures were ordered and 507 cultures were performed (1.8 cultures/100 BDOC). Reflex culturing resulted in an immediate 49% decrease in cultures performed (P < 0.001). The CAUTI rate 2 years pre-intervention was 1.8/1000 catheter days and 1.6/1000 catheter days post-intervention. Reflex culturing would have prevented 4/14 CAUTIs. In ED, pre-intervention, 1393 cultures were performed (5.4 cultures/100 visits). Post-intervention, 1959 urine cultures were ordered and 917 were performed (3.3 cultures/100 visits). Reflex culturing resulted in an immediate 47% decrease in cultures performed (P = 0.0015). In LTC, pre-intervention, 257 cultures were performed (0.4 cultures/100 BDOC). Post-intervention, 432 urine cultures were ordered and 354 were performed (0.5 cultures/100 BDOC). Reflex culturing resulted in an immediate 75% increase in cultures performed (P < 0.001). The CAUTI rate 2 years pre-intervention was 1.0/1000 catheter days vs. 1.6/1,000 catheter days post-intervention. Reflex culturing would have prevented 1/13 CAUTIs. Conclusion Reflex culturing canceled 16%-51% of cultures ordered with greatest impact in acute care and the ED and a small absolute increase in LTC. CAUTI rates did not change although reflex culturing would have prevented 29% of CAUTIs in acute care and 8% in LTC. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Parashar ◽  
Shelley McLeod ◽  
Don Melady

AbstractObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to identify information included in long-term care (LTC) transfer documentation and to compare it to the information required by local emergency department (ED) physicians to provide optimal care and make decisions for LTC patients.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted for a sample of LTC residents transferred by ambulance to the ED of an academic, tertiary care hospital over a 1-year period. All emergency physicians working at the institution were invited to complete an online questionnaire about information included in LTC transfer documentation and information required by emergency physicians to provide care for LTC patients.ResultsOf the 200 charts reviewed, the most common information transferred to the ED with the LTC patient was the patient’s past medical history (n=184, 92.0%), name of family physician (n=182, 91.0%), a list of known allergies (n=179, 89.5%), the reason for transfer to the ED (n=155, 77.5%), the patient’s emergency contact information (n=152, 76.0%), and medication administration record (n=150, 75.0%). From a physician’s perspective, the most frequently requested pieces of information included reason for transfer, past medical history, cognitive status, advanced directives for level of care and resuscitation, and the patient’s emergency contact information. This information was provided 77.5% (n=155), 92.0% (n=184), 24.0% (n=48), 62.0% (n=124), and 76.0% (n=152) of the time, respectively.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates a clear discrepancy between information provided and information required by emergency physicians for LTC patients. Quality improvement initiatives at the local level may help reduce this discrepancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document