scholarly journals Analysis of 87 cases of laparoscopic choledochotomy with primary suture

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiping Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Primary Suture ◽  
Residual Stone ◽  
Laparoscopic Choledochotomy ◽  
Postoperative Ventilation ◽  
Endoscopic Group

To investigate the feasibility and clinical effect of laparoscopic choledochotomy for primary suture of bile duct. Methods: There were 190 cases of cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis. They were randomly divided into endoscopic group and open group. In the endoscopic group ,87 patients underwent laparoscopic choledocholithotomy and primary bile duct suture. A total of 103 patients in open group were treated with open bile duct incision and T tube drainage. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative ventilation time, hospital stay and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The length of hospital stay, the amount of bleeding during operation and the time of postoperative ventilation were less than those in open group. The operation time was longer than that in open group, P <0.01. There were 0 cases of postoperative incision infection ,2 cases of bile leakage and 1 case of residual stone in endoscopic group. The incidence of complications was 5.7%. The open group was 5,3,3 and 10.7% respectively. Comparison of complications between the two groups, P<0.01. Conclusion: Select the right case strictly, Laparoscopic and choledochoscopy combined with cholecystolithiasis with choledocholithiasis is effective, safe and minimally invasive, short hospitalization time and less complications.

scholarly journals Nighttime Appendectomy is Safe and has Similar Outcomes as Daytime Appendectomy: A Study of 1198 Appendectomies

2020 ◽  
pp. 145749692093860
Author(s):  
T. Mönttinen ◽  
H. Kangaspunta ◽  
J. Laukkarinen ◽  
M. Ukkonen
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Patient Comfort ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinically Significant

Introduction: Although it is controversial whether appendectomy can be safely delayed, it is often unnecessary to postpone operation as a shorter delay may increase patient comfort, enables quicker recovery, and decreases costs. In this study, we sought to study whether the time of day influences the outcomes among patients operated on for acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy at Tampere University Hospital between 1 September 2014 and 30 April 2017 for acute appendicitis were included. Primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and amount of intraoperative bleeding. Appendectomies were divided into daytime and nighttime operations. Results: A total of 1198 patients underwent appendectomy, of which 65% were operated during daytime and 35% during nighttime. Patient and disease-related characteristics were similar in both groups. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 4.8% and 0.2%, respectively. No time categories were associated with risk of complications or complication severity. Neither was there difference in operation time and clinically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding. Patients undergoing surgery during night hours had a shorter hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, only complicated appendicitis was associated with worse outcomes. Discussion: We have shown that nighttime appendectomy is associated with similar outcomes than daytime appendectomy. Subsequently, appendectomy should be planned for the next available slot, minimizing delay whenever possible.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes of Endoscopic Stenting and Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. 991-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Leiyuan ◽  
Xu Jianli ◽  
Zhao Zhengzhong ◽  
Ji Guangyan ◽  
Zhu Dailiang
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Gastric Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Endoscopic Stenting ◽  
Stent Group ◽  
Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction ◽  
Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy

To compare the clinic outcomes of endoscopic stenting and laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) for patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). We retrospectively reviewed 63 patients with malignant GOO that underwent endoscopic stenting [Stent Group (SG), n = 29] or LGJ [Laparoscopic Group (LG), n = 34]. Then, we evaluated the medical effects, postoperative hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses in both groups. Compared to LG, SG has a shorter operation time [SG: (41.1 ± 9.3) minutes vs LG: (137.4 ± 21.7) minutes, P = 0.000], less intra-operative blood loss [(23.7 ± 9.0) mL vs (121.1 ± 24.3) mL, P = 0.000], relatively lower hospitalization expenses [(2272.7 ± 413.9) $ vs (5182.4 ± 517.3) $, P = 0.000]. Besides, the median intake time was significantly shorter in the SG than that in the LG [(0.9 ± 0.3) days vs (4.1 ± 0.6) days, P = 0.000]. However, there were no significant differences between SG with LG in surgical success rate (100 vs 100%, P = 1.000), length of hospital stay [(6.1 ± 3.3) days vs (10.9 ± 4.7) days, P = 0.422], recurrent obstructive rate (37.9 vs 26.5%, P = 0.949) and median survivals [(141.4 ± 81.4) days vs (122.7 ± 88.8) days, P = 0.879]. Endoscopic stenting and LGJ are both relatively safe and effective treatments for patients with malignant GOO. But we suggest that endoscopic stenting should be considered first in patients with malignant GOO because it has many advantages over LGJ.

scholarly journals A comparative study of the fracture union between long and short proximal femoral intramedullary nails antirotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a multicentric analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 288
Author(s):  
B. Hari Krishnan ◽  
S. K. Rai ◽  
Rohit Vikas ◽  
Manoj Kashid ◽  
Pramod Mahender
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Fracture Union ◽  
Femur Fractures

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to compare the fracture union of long vs. short proximal femoral intramedullary nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients who was more than 60 years old.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A retrospective analysis of 170 cases of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur (AO type A1 and A2) in the elderly was conducted. There were 64 males (37.6%) and 106 females (62.3%) with the age of 60–90 (mean age 75) years. The general demographic data of patients, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, blood transfusion rate, anterior thigh pain, postoperative complications like periprosthetic fractures, infections were recorded.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> The short nail group also had a significantly shorter operation time (41.5±15.3 minutes vs. 62.5±25.3 minutes, p=0.002) and lower rate of postoperative transfusion (31.3% vs. 58.7%, p=0.041). However the length of hospital stay showed no significant differences. After surgery in short group there were 03 cases of periprosthetic fracture with a total incidence of 03%, however there were none in long nail group. At the end of the follow-up, all patients achieved bony union. The average fracture union time of the long nail group was (8.5±3.2) months, and the short nail group was (7.8±4.7) months, revealing no significant differences (p=0.09).</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Both the proximal femoral intramedullary long and short nail fixation has a good result in the form of fracture union in treating intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly. They showed no significant difference in terms of fracture union, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures and anterior thigh pain was slightly high in short nail group. In short intramedullary nailing group there was obvious decrease in the intraoperative blood loss, operation time and postoperative blood transfusion.</p>

scholarly journals Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Ponco Birowo ◽  
William Tendi ◽  
Indah S. Widyahening ◽  
Nur Rasyid ◽  
Widi Atmoko
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Major Complication Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Background: The decision for using supine or prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still debatable. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profile of the supine and prone position when performing PCNL. Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed using the database from MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar from January 2009 to November 2019. The outcomes assessed were stone free rate, major complication rate, length of hospital stay and mean operation time. Results: A total of 11 articles were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The efficacy of PCNL in supine position as determined by stone free rate is significantly lower than in prone position (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66 – 0.83; p<0.00001), However, major complication rate is also lower in the supine group compared with the prone group (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51 – 0.96; p=0.03). There is no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay and mean operation time between both groups. Conclusion: Prone position leads to a higher stone free rate, but also a higher rate of major complication. Thus, the decision of using which position during PCNL should be based on the surgeon’s experience and clinical aspects of the patients.

scholarly journals Comparative study between excision with lay open and excision with primary closure in treatment of pilonidal sinus

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1242
Author(s):  
B. N. Anandaravi ◽  
Aswath Viswanathan
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Pilonidal Sinus ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Limberg Flap ◽  
Surgical Methods ◽  
Considerable Morbidity ◽  
Closure Method

Background: Pilonidal sinus is a common anorectal condition affecting young adults with various etiological factors. Various surgical methods have been described, but treatment failure and recurrence are frequent, causing considerable morbidity. This study was undertaken to study the different surgical methods in treatment of pilonidal sinus.Methods: This study was done between January 2017 and June 2018. 20 cases underwent excision with open healing and 10 cases underwent excision with primary closure. The surgeries for primary closure included Limberg flap, Karydakis technique and Z plasty. Patients were analyzed with respect to post operative complications, duration of hospital stay, duration of getting back to work and duration of wound healing.Results: Spectrum of clinical presentation included pain, discharge, sinus and swelling. No recurrences were observed in the present study. Wound infection occurred in only three cases. Duration of wound healing was found to be an average of 51.6 days in Excision with open healing method and 14.2 days in excision with primary closure method. The average length of hospital stay in excision and lay open group was 4.35 days and 5.4 days in the excision and primary closure group. The average duration to return to work was 34 days in excision and lay open group, while it was 8 days in excision and primary closure group.Conclusions: Excision with primary closure is a better modality than excision with lay open technique in treatment of pilonidal sinus.

scholarly journals Two-port versus three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: feasibility, postoperative outcome and long-term recurrence rates

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Fung ◽  
Hany Ashmawy ◽  
Sami Safi ◽  
Anja Schauer ◽  
Alexander Rehders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chest Tube ◽  
Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Recurrence Rates

Abstract Background Two-port VATS (2-P-VATS) and three-port VATS (3-P-VATS) are well-established techniques for surgical therapy of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). However, comparisons of both techniques in terms of postoperative outcome and recurrence are limited. Methods From January 2010 to March 2020, we retrospectively reviewed data of 58 PSP patients who underwent VATS in our institution. For statistical analysis, categorical and continuous variables were compared by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and the Student´s t-test, respectively. Twenty-eight patients underwent 2-P-VATS and 30 were treated with 3-P-VATS. Operation time, length of hospital stay (LOS), total dose of analgesics per stay (opioids and non-opioids), duration of chest tube drainage, pleurectomy volume (PV), postoperative complications and recurrence rates were compared between both groups. Results Clinical and surgical characteristics including mean age, gender, Body-Mass-Index (BMI), pneumothorax size, smoking behaviour, history of contralateral pneumothorax, side of pneumothorax, pleurectomy volume and number of resected segments were similar in both groups. The mean operation time, LOS and total postoperative opioid and non-opioid dose was significantly higher in the 3-P-VATS group compared with the 2-P-VATS group. Despite not being statistically significant, duration of chest tube was longer in the 3-P-VATS group compared with the 2-P-VATS group. In terms of postoperative complications, the occurrence of hemothorax was significantly higher in the 3-P-VATS group (3-P-VATS vs. 2-P-VATS; p = 0.001). During a median follow-up period of 61.6 months, there was no significant statistical difference in recurrence rates in both groups (2/28 (16.7%) vs. 5/30 (7.1%); p = 0.274). Conclusion Our data demonstrate that 2-P-VATS is safer and effective. It is associated with reduced length of hospital stay and decreased postoperative pain resulting in less analgesic use.

scholarly journals Using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair

BMC Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiming Li ◽  
Yijun Li ◽  
Lili Ding ◽  
Xiongzhi Chen ◽  
Qingwen Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inguinal Hernia ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Inguinal Hernia Repair ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Anatomical Landmarks ◽  
Post Operative Pain

Abstract Background Inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks for anterior inguinal hernia repair is an alternative surgical procedure. We present our experience and outcome of the way. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 230 patients who received anterior tension-free hernia repair between May 2016 to May 2017. Among these cases, 120 were performed using the traditional transinguinal preperitoneal (TTIPP) technique while 100 were performed using the vascular anatomic landmark transinguinal preperitoneal (VALTIPP) technique. Between these two groups, we compared the operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 2 days, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery. Results Surgery was well-tolerated in both groups with no significant hemorrhage or complications. The operation times for the VALTIPP and TTIPP groups were 42.52 ± 9.15 and 53.84 ± 10.64 min (P < 0.05), respectively. Ten patients in the VALTIPP group and 17 patients in the TTIPP group reported sensations of foreign bodies (P < 0.05). The VAS pain score in VALTIPP patients at 2 days (4.0 ± 0.5), 3 months (1.0 ± 0.3), and 6 months (0.9 ± 0.3) were significantly lower when compared with those of TTIPP patients (5.3 ± 0.9 at 2 days, 1.8 ± 0.4 at 3 months, and 1.1 ± 0.1 at 6 months, p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in age, gender, BMI, hernia type and location, follow-up period, incidence of post-operative seromas, recurrence rate, or length of hospital stay. Conclusion Anterior inguinal hernia repair using inferior epigastric vascular anatomical landmarks may lead to reduced operation times, reduced sensations of foreign bodies, and reduced post-operative pain. This technique is simple, practical, and effective in the management of inguinal hernias.

scholarly journals Can Awake Thoracoscopy Procedure be Performed with the Help of Thoracic Paravertebral Anesthesia?

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 576-582
Author(s):  
Fazli Yanik ◽  
Yekta Altemur Karamustafaoglu ◽  
Elif Copuruoglu ◽  
Gonul Sagiroglu
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Wedge Resection ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Talc Pleurodesis ◽  
The Mean

Aim:The aim of this study was to present our experience with 11 patients who were spontaneously breathing with Awake Video Thoracoscopy (AVATS) procedure with the help of TPB because of rareness in the literature.Materials and Methods: Between December 2015 and December 2017, a total of 125 VATS cases were performed; 11 cases underwent VATS operation with the help of TPB; age, gender, operation performed, duration of operation, time of onset of mobilization-oral intake, duration of hospital stay, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were evaluated retrospectively.Results: All cases were treated with uniportal AVATS procedure with the help of TPB. The mean age was 40,3 ± 17,4 years (range 18-64 years ), nine (82%) of the pateints were male and two (18%) were female. Operation procedures included wedge resection in eight (73 %) patients (six of them for pneumothorax, two of them for diagnosis), in three (27%) patients pleural biopsy (one of them used talc pleurodesis).There were no perioperative events. The mean operation time was 27,7 ± 6,4 minutes (range, 20-40 min) and the mean anesthesia time was 25 ± 3,8 minutes (range 20-30 min).The mean time of mobilizitation, oral intake opening time and length of hospital stay was 1,1 ± 0,4 hours (1-2 hours), 3,5 ± 0,5 hours (3-4 hours), 2,6 ± 0,5 days (2-3 days), respectively.Conclusion:Awake Video Asssited Thoracoscopic Surgery with the help of TPB has less side effects and less complication risks than other awake procedures with the help of other regional anesthesia techniques. We conclude that; although AVATS with the help of TPB has some minor complications, it has advantages such as early discharge, early mobilization and early oral intake, low pain levels in well-selected patient groups.Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.17(4) 2018 p.576-582

scholarly journals Complications of laparoscopic choledochotomy and lithotomy for primary suture

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiping Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Primary Suture ◽  
Bile Duct Stenosis ◽  
Drainage Time ◽  
Peritoneal Drainage ◽  
Laparoscopic Choledochotomy ◽  
The Right ◽  
Duct Stenosis

Objective: To explore the non-placement of "T" tube" after laparoscopic choledochotomy. feasibility and complication analysis of primary suture bile duct. Methods: Retrospective analysis of January 2013~ December 2016, Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy for primary bile duct suture in 87 cases, Combined with literature, the indications, methods and complications of the operation were summarized and analyzed. Results: There was no operative death in the whole group, Postoperative complications occurred in 5 cases (5.7%), 1 case with jaundice, gradually subsided after 4 days of conservative treatment. Two cases had postoperative bile leakage, to prolong the drainage time of the peritoneal drainage tube and stop by itself. In 1 case, bile duct stenosis occurred. 1 case of residual common bile duct stones. The average postoperative hospitalization was 9 days. Conclusion: Select the right case strictly, Patient and delicate operation, Laparoscopic choledochotomy is safe and feasible.

scholarly journals The effect of the laparoscopic primary suture of the common bile duct in elderly patients: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinheng Liu ◽  
Yanting Wang ◽  
Xubao Liu ◽  
Sineng Yin
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Primary Suture ◽  
Tube Drainage ◽  
T Tube ◽  
Laparoscopic Choledochotomy ◽  
Extubation Time ◽  
Suture Group ◽  
The Common

Abstract Background Traditionally, Surgical treatment strategies for elderly patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis include laparoscopic choledocholithotomy, cholecystectomy, and T-tube drainage. However, T-tube drainage in the biliary tract can still cause pain and other complications. This study was designed to compare the primary closure of choledochotomy and the use of T-tube after laparoscopic choledochotomy to determine whether primary suture can be as feasible and safe as suture with T-tube drainage in elderly patients. Methods From January 2017 to January 2018, 85 patients were selected to undergo laparoscopic surgery. They were divided into two groups: primary suture group (n=56) and T tube group (n=29). Preoperative data, intraoperative index, postoperative complications were recorded. Results There were no differences in preoperative data in both groups. Compared with the T-tube group, the postoperative total drainage volume on the first day and patients of residual stones were fewer, and all drainage tube extubation time was shorter in the primary suture group. And there were statistically significant differences in postoperative TBIL between the two groups. There were no pressure sores, hypostatic pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, serious complications of heart, lung and brain and even death in both groups. Conclusion Only if accurate preoperative risk assessment and strict treatment of basic diseases in elderly patients, intraoperative fine suture of the common bile duct, primary suture in elderly patients are feasible, safe, and valid after laparoscopic choledochotomy for verification of ductal clearance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document