IT-Architecture Study Literature Research Collaboration: Malay Architecture Context

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 212
Author(s):  
Gun Faisal ◽  
Nina Fadilah Najwa ◽  
Muhammad Ariful Furqon ◽  
Fazrol Rozi
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Research Collaboration ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Quality Measurement ◽  
Information Modeling ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
It Architecture

Talking about architecture culture means talking about buildings and architecture. Architecture is a field of research that is always related to space and form. One of the exciting research topics on architecture is research on Malay architecture. Preserving Malay architecture is an important thing that must be done physically and meaningfully, positively impacting the community's development. The rapid development of information technology (IT) should be part of conservation efforts. IT supports various activities that significantly help conservation efforts. The role of IT in architecture is a significant research opportunity because of still little research on this topic. Thus, we conduct a study and analysis using a systematic literature review methodology to review IT-Architecture research, especially Malay architecture. The systematic literature review methodology consists of six stages, namely: (1) research question definition; (2) literature searching by keywords on literature sources; (3) literature assessment; (4) literature quality measurement; (5) data extraction and synthesis; and (6) research recommendation and suggestion. After going through the quality assessment process, only 37 papers were obtained that were relevant to the topic of IT-Architecture. The most discussed research themes in this literature review search were: (1) building information modeling (BIM) and augmented reality (AR) / virtual reality (VR); (2) BIM and geographic information system (GIS); and (3) BIM application and technology. However, based on literature searches, IT, and Malay architecture are still insufficient. Therefore, the topic of IT and Malay architecture still needs to be studied further in the future.

scholarly journals Blockchain Disruption on Management Accountant's Role: Systematic Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Vecco Suryahadi Saputro ◽  
Hamzah Ritchi ◽  
Sofik Handoyo
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Assessment Data ◽  
Academic Journal ◽  
Accounting Practice ◽  
Management Accountant ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Abstract Screening

Blockchain considered as an emerging technology that potentially disrupts how management accountant work and his role. This research intends to understand what Blockchain’s capabilities will disrupt the profession by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR). A protocol of SLR is inspired by Kitchenham, Van Akthley, and Okoli in their works. The protocol consists of identifying purpose and outcome research, definition research question, preparing search and review protocol, title and abstract screening, paper quality assessment, data extraction, and data analysis. MAXQDA  was used to conduct the SLR protocol. Seven academic journal databases were used in the searching stage. Kitchenham’s guidelines inspire data extraction and narrative synthesis. This study finds that Blockchain enables the user to do real-time accounting, gather data for supervising and monitoring function, and streamline the accounting practice process. With these findings, the management accountant can prepare to blockchain disruption by upgrading his analytics and computation skills.

scholarly journals Decision Making Of Contraception Usage In Women: Systematic Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Hanriska Awidiya Putri ◽  
Fitria Siswi Utami ◽  
Esitra Herfanda
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Literature Searching ◽  
Exclusion Criteria

Studi menunjukan bahwa penggunaan kontrasepsi dapat mengurangi kemungkinan kehamilan dan komplikasi yang terkait, menurunkan resiko melakukan aborsi yang tidak aman, menunda kehamilan pertama pada wanita muda yang mungkin memiliki perkembangan panggul dini, mengurangi bahaya dari kelemahan dari paritas tinggi dan kehamilan berdekatan. Dan mencegah hampir 230 juta kelahiran setiap tahun di seluruh dunia. Statistik menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan 15 sampai 17% dari menggunakan kontrasepsi mengurangi pertumbuhan penduduk dengan satu kelahiran untuk satu wanita. Menyimpulkan dan memeriksa literatur yang berhubungan dengan pengambilan keputusan kontrasepsi pada wanita. Delapan tahapan untuk melakukan sistematik literatur review. Delapan tahapan melalui Identifying midwifery problem, Determining the priority of problems and research question, Inclusion and Exclusion criteria, Literature searching, Selecting articles, Data extraction, Critical Appraisal, Collecting data and Maping.Hasil identifikasi dari search metode pada PUBMed di dapatkan hasil 139 data dan search metode pada Proquest didapatkan 600 data hasil pencarian. Kemudian di lakukan screening kemudian Eligibility untuk mendapatkan dokumen yang sesuai dengan kriteria studi pencarian. Berdasarkan hasil sintesa tersebut di dapatkan 9 dokumen yang sesuai dengan kriteria studi. Enam dari sembilan sub tema membahas tentang peran suami sangat berperaran aktiv dalam pengambilan keputusan, empat dari sembilan sub tema membahas bahwa pendidikan juga mengambil peranan dalam pengambilan keputusan, dan tiga dari sembilan sub tema tentang ekonomi juga berperan dalam pengambilan keputusan kontrasepsi. Hasil dari studi systematic literatur review di dapatkan bahwa faktor yang paling mempengaruhi ibu dalam membuat keputusan pemakaian kontrasepsi adalah tingkat ekonomi yang tinggi, persetujuan pasangan dan pendidikan.

Quality Evaluation of Health Information Systems: A Systematic Literature Review (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Noël ◽  
Carla Taramasco ◽  
Gastón Márquez
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Health Information ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Quality Evaluation ◽  
Health Information System ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Current Scenario ◽  
Patient Care Quality ◽  
Critical Components

BACKGROUND Evaluating Health Information System (HIS) quality is strategically advantageous for improving patient care quality. Nevertheless, there is little research evidence identifying and describing what standards, processes, and tools are used to evaluate HIS quality. OBJECTIVE This study aims to illustrate, detail, and discuss the current scenario regarding the standards, norms, processes, and tools used to evaluate HIS quality. METHODS We conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) using review guidelines focused on software and systems. We examined seven electronic databases (Scopus, ACM, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplorer, the Web of Science and PubMed) to search and select primary studies. Three researchers and three collaborators participated in the review and quality assessment process of the studies. RESULTS We identified 17 primary studies that have been published in journals and conferences. We found that most of the primary studies address quality evaluation from a management perspective. Second, there is little explicit and pragmatic evidence on the processes and tools that allow evaluation of HIS quality. CONCLUSIONS To promote quality evaluation of HISs, it is necessary to define mechanisms and methods that operationalize the standards and norms of HISs. Additionally, it is necessary to create metrics that measure the quality of the most critical components and processes of HISs. CLINICALTRIAL Does not apply to our study

scholarly journals Is there a sex difference in mortality rates for deaths occurring in paediatric intensive care units? Systematic literature review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e046794
Author(s):  
Ofran Almossawi ◽  
Amanda Friend ◽  
Luigi Palla ◽  
Richard Feltbower ◽  
Bianca De Stavola
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Linkage Study ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care Units

IntroductionIn the general population, female children have been reported to have a survival advantage. For children admitted to paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), mortality has been reported to be lower in males despite the higher admission rates for males into intensive care. This apparent sex reversal in PICU mortality is not well studied. To address this, we propose to conduct a systematic literature review to summarise the available evidence. Our review will study the reported differences in mortality between males and females aged 0–17, who died in a PICU, to examine if there is a difference between the two sexes in PICU mortality, and if so, to describe the magnitude and direction of this difference.Methods and analysisStudies that directly or indirectly addressed the association between sex and mortality in children admitted to intensive care will be eligible for inclusion. Studies that directly address the association will be eligible for data extraction. The search strings were based on terms related to the population (children in intensive care), the exposure (sex) and the outcome (mortality). We used the databases MEDLINE (1946–2020), Embase (1980–2020) and Web of Science (1985–2020) as these cover relevant clinical publications. We will assess the reliability of included studies using the risk of bias in observational studies of exposures tool. We will consider a pooled effect if we have at least three studies with similar periods of follow up and adjustment variables.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this review as it will synthesise data from existing studies. This manuscript is a part of a larger data linkage study, for which Ethical approval was granted. Dissemination will be via peer-reviewed journals and via public and patient groups.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020203009.

Requirements Engineering for Software Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 339-349
Author(s):  
A. A. Kodubets ◽  
◽  
I. L. Artemieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Requirements Engineering ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Software Systems ◽  
Software System ◽  
Requirements Development

This article contains a systematic literature review of requirements engineering for software systems. The literature published within last 5 years was included into the review. A research question was defined as requirements development process of large scale software system (with thousands of requirements) and an interaction problem during this process (communication, coordination and control). The problem is caused by the fact that large-scale software system requirements process is a cross-disciplinary task and it involves multiple parties — stakeholders, domain experts, and suppliers with own goals and constrains, and thus, the interaction between them seriously slows down the overall requirements development process than writing the requirements specification itself. The research papers were classified by several research directions: Natural Language Processing for Requirements Engineering (NLP4RE), Requirement Prioritization, Requirements Traceability, Quality of Software Requirements, Non-functional Requirements and Requirements Elicitation. Motivation and intensity of each direction was described. Each direction was structured and represented with the key references. A contribution of each research direction into the research question was analyzed and summarized including potential further steps. It was identified that some researchers had met a part of the described problem in different forms during their researches. At the end, other researches were described additionally in a short overview. To approach the research question further potential direction was described.

Airport service quality dimension and measurement: a systematic literature review and future research agenda

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Usman ◽  
Yudi Azis ◽  
Budi Harsanto ◽  
Anton Mulyono Azis
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Service Quality ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Quality Measurement ◽  
Research Direction ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Publish Or Perish ◽  
Future Research Agenda ◽  
Passenger Satisfaction

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to outline the evolution of research on airport service quality and measurement index of passenger satisfaction to explore opportunities for future research direction.Design/methodology/approachA systematic literature review was conducted involving a total final sample 27 articles published during 2000–2020, the source of the database used in this study is Emerald, ScienceDirect, Harzing's Publish or Perish with API Key based on set of inclusion/exclusion criteria for analysis and synthesis to meet the purpose of the paper.FindingsDimensions of measuring airport service quality are currently based on a process approach. There are eight dimensions of ASQ measurement practiced by the industry, which is different from the five dimensions of service quality measurement generally. There is still a theoretical and empirical gap, so one of the challenges in applying the ASQ measurement dimensions is bridging research with applications in the airport industry. Other findings, research on airport service quality measurement is currently focused on passenger satisfaction. The integration of expectation-disconfirmation theory and service profit chain models can be used in service quality, passenger satisfaction and profitability.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper seeks to contribute to and analyze limited articles on service quality at airports and identify further research areas.Originality/valueThis paper tries to explain the development of research on the dimensions of measuring service quality at airports. The author identifies a gap in airport service quality measurement dimensions used by researchers and the industry. The author believes that this study can provide a comprehensive thought on using airport service quality measurement dimensions for future research.

Collaboration among public organizations: a systematic literature review on determinants of interinstitutional performance

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Costumato
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Performance Management ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Public Management ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Collaborative Governance ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Systematic Overview ◽  
Interinstitutional Collaboration ◽  
Performance Determinants

PurposeThe concept of collaboration has received increased attention from scholars in public management, as it has been seen as a viable solution to address “wicked” problems. Solving such problems may require a horizontal collaboration within the same governmental jurisdiction or, vertically, between different levels of government. Despite broad interest from the field of public management, the dynamics of public interinstitutional collaboration have received little attention within the literature. This paper aims to provide a systematic overview of the most significant academic contributions on the topic, highlighting the features of this collaborative context and identifying determinants those can foster its performance.Design/methodology/approachIn total, two main literature streams have occasionally dealt with public interinstitutional collaboration and related performance management: the “collaborative governance” stream and “public network performance”. Through a systematic literature review (SLR), this paper answers the following research question: what has been done and what is missing in order to assess performance in the context of public interinstitutional collaboration?FindingsThe findings of this study suggest that the most relevant papers are those dealing with public interagency collaboration, as this form of collaboration presents several similarities with public interinstitutional circumstances. Furthermore, the authors provide an analysis of the main determinants of public interinstitutional performance, which highlight the effects of trust, power sharing, leadership style, management strategies and formalization on the achievement of efficient and effective collaboration between public entities.Originality/valueBy drawing on two autonomous literature streams, this paper describes the main features of public interinstitutional collaboration. It contributes to the field by offering a systematic overview of how specific performance determinants, which are widely recognized as relevant for collaboration in general, work in the specificity of public–public contexts.

A systematic literature review on the usage of eye-tracking in understanding process models

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Batista Duarte ◽  
Denis Silva da Silveira ◽  
Vinícius de Albuquerque Brito ◽  
Charlie Silva Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Business Process ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Process Models ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Tracking Device

PurposeBusiness process modeling can involve multiple stakeholders, so it is natural that problems may occur during the designing and understanding processes. One way to perceive these problems is to evaluate the comprehension of business process models through the collection of data related to the readers' eye movement via an eye-tracking device. The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of eye-trackers in understanding process models and to offer a research roadmap to challenge the community to address the identified limitations and open issues that require further investigation.Design/methodology/approachTo achieve this goal, Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was performed following good practices from the Evidence-Based Software Engineering's (EBSE) field.FindingsThis study resulted in 10 primary studies selected for analysis and data extraction, from the 1,482 initially retrieved. The major findings indicate that the business process community still benefits little from the use of eye-tracking, e.g. not offering sufficient support for inexperienced designers and not having an explicit standardization in its use. These and other findings are synthesized in a research roadmap which results would benefit researchers and practitioners.Originality/valueIn the studies found, the methods used to explore eyes' movement in process models' comprehension analysis were presented as an advantage of the current study. Additionally, another aspect presented in this SRL as an originality is presenting a set of open questions, suggesting valuable topics for future research through a research script (research roadmap).

scholarly journals Qualitative systematic literature review: the experience of being in seclusion for adults with mental health difficulties

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Mellow ◽  
Anna Tickle ◽  
Michael Rennoldson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mental Health Difficulties ◽  
Positive Experiences

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic search of the peer-reviewed qualitative literature investigating the lived experience of seclusion for adults with mental health difficulties, to appraise the quality of the existing literature and synthesise findings. Background: seclusion is a controversial intervention for the short-term management of unsafe behaviours in inpatient mental health services. There has been some sporadic interest in service users’ experiences of this. Design/methodology/approach Systematic literature review and meta-synthesis: data sources – databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PSYCINFO were searched in July 2015; review methods – the Joanna Briggs Institute’s Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument tools for critical appraisal and data extraction were used to review papers and synthesise findings. Findings A small number of papers were found, which were of mixed quality. Originality/value The existing research is limited in both quantity and quality. Although most participants from the existing research described seclusion as mostly negative with the potential for causing iatrogenic harm, some described more positive experiences, often in the context of compassionate interactions with staff.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document