scholarly journals Problems of Harmonization on The Post-Establishment of Omnibus Law on Job Creation

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 459
Author(s):  
Henry Lbn Toruan Donald
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Job Creation ◽  
Creation Process ◽  
Analysis And Evaluation ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Settlement Mechanism ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The government has issued Law Number 11 Year 2020 concerning Job Creation (UUCK) on November 2, 2020. Through this law, around 1,200 articles in eighty laws are simplified into one law that regulates the provisions of the replaced laws. The model of simplifying regulations by combining various laws into a law is called the Omnibus Law. The establishment of the UUCK was a form of simplification of regulations related to the job creation process. The statement of the problem of this research is how to harmonize subordinate regulations into law, which was previously an implementing regulation from a law into a law. The research method used is normative juridical which is descriptive analysis. Law No. 12 Year 2011 as amended by Law No. 15 Year 2019 concerning the Establishment of Laws and Regulations states that harmonization was still in the draft stage. Therefore, no provisions govern the harmonization of regulations in force. If there are overlapped regulations both vertically and horizontally under the law, the settlement mechanism is done through the judiciary, namely the Supreme Court. This research concludes that the settlement of the disharmony regulation is resolved through executive review or analysis and evaluation.

scholarly journals MENALAR URGENSI PENGHAPUSAN UJIAN NASIONAL DEMI KEADILAN SISWA, GURU DAN SEKOLAH PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR: 2596 K/PDT/2008

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Aufi Imaduddin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
National Level ◽  
Educational Thought ◽  
National Examination ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The national exam is a form of national level learning evaluation that has been set by the government to determine student learning outcomes. However, in the implementation of the national exam has a negative impact on students, teachers and schools. So lately there has been a renewed discourse about the elimination of the national examination, it began with the policy of the Indonesian Minister of Education and Culture to abolish the national examination in 2021. Especially if we examine further that legal efforts to stop the implementation of the national examination have existed since 2006 and the peak in 2009 was the decision of the Supreme Court number: 2596 K / PDT / 2008 which in essence required the government to stop the implementation of the national examination before resolving various existing problems. Therefore, the writer is interested in asking logically to think about the urgency of abolishing the national exam after the decision of the Supreme Court. In this paper, the method used by the author is a qualitative method based on social facts that occur based on juridical reasons based on the laws and regulations related to research. The results of this study found that the implementation of the national exam has claimed justice for students in obtaining their human rights in obtaining education that has been mentioned in the 1945 Constitution and is not in accordance with educational thought according to Ki Hajar Dewantara, as well as causing various depressive pressures which have an impact on their minds stressed and suicidal students. The implementation of national exams has also revoked justice for teachers, where teachers in their teaching are supposed to educate students well and develop their students' thinking instincts, with the national examination the teacher only drills students to memorize and do exercises that lead to the national exam. Recalling also that the implementation of national examinations in a juridical manner in the decision of the Supreme Court has violated various laws and regulations regarding education in Indonesia. Therefore, the elimination of the national exam will give back the right to justice for students, teachers and schools according to their respective proportions.

scholarly journals PENGATURAN TENTANG PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK NORMA ANTARA PERATURAN MENTERI TERHADAP UNDANG-UNDANG

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1191
Author(s):  
Maria Virginia Usfunan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan tentang penyelesaian tentang konflik norma antara peraturan menteri terhadap undang-undang dan unruk mengetahui bagaimana sifat putusan mahkamah agung dalam hak uji material. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Pengaturan tentang penyelesaian konflik norma antara Peraturan Menteri Terhadap Undang-Undang, metode penyelesaian konflik norma itu dengan digunakannya asas lex superior derogate lex inferior ini, yang digunakan dengan terjadinya konflik norma antara UU Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dengan Permenkumham Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 terkait pengaturan penyelesaian konflik norma antara peraturan menteri dengan Undang-Undang, maka berdasarkan asas tersebut yang digunakan adalah UU Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, sehingga Permenkumham Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 harus dikesampingkan. Maka, Pengaturan mengenai Penyelesaian Konflik Norma Antara Peraturan Menteri Terhadap Undang-Undang, menjadi kewenangan Mahkamah Agung berdasarkan Pasal 9 UU Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Dan Sifat Putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam Hak Uji Materiil dalam memberikan putusannya yang pada prinsipnya yang memiliki konsekuensi hukum aturan tersebut apabila terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bertentangan dengan aturan di atasnya maka aturan tersebut akan menjadi tidak sah serta tidak berlaku, dan menjadi tanggungjawab instansi terkait untuk mencabutnya. The purpose of the study is to find how adjustment of the settlement of norm conflicts between Ministerial Regulations toward the Constitution and to find out how the nature of the Supreme Court decision in the right of judicial review. The method used was normative legal research method with the legislation approach and concept approach. Adjustment on resolving norms of conflict between Ministerial Regulations toward the Constitution, the method of resolving norms conflicts by using the principle of lex superior derogate lex inferior, which was used in the norm conflicts between the Constitution on Laws and Regulations with Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 2 of 2019 in relation to conflict resolution arrangements the norm between Ministerial Regulations and the Constitution, then based on the principle used was the Constitution on Laws and Regulations, so Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation Number 2 of 2019 must be set aside. Thus, the adjustment on resolving norms of conflict between Ministerial Regulations toward the Constitution became authority of the Supreme Court based on Article 9 of the Constitution on Laws and Regulations. And the nature of the Supreme Court's Decision in the Right to Judge Material in providing its decision which in principle had legal consequences of the rule if it was proven legally and convincingly contrary to the rules above, the rule would be invalid and not applicable, and it was the responsibility of related agencies to revoke it.

scholarly journals Discourse on Creating a Special Environmental Court in Indonesia to Resolve Environmental Disputes

BESTUUR ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Suwari Akhmaddhian
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Justice ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
Rational Analysis ◽  
Environmental Disputes ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Laws And Regulations

<p>The purpose of this study is to determine the regulation of laws and regulations regarding environmental justice in Indonesia and how the concept of building environmental justice in the justice system in Indonesia. This research can be useful both practically and theoretically, practically. The research method used by researchers is the evaluative analysis method, which is a method of gathering and presenting data obtained to analyze the actual situation and then rational analysis is carried out based on juridical references through library research. The results of the research Regulations on the environment are already available namely Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management and building an environmental justice system starting from improving human resources namely the Supreme Court by consistently educating and training judges with knowledge of aspects of environmental law life that will later handle environmental cases; The Supreme Court makes a special assembly that handles environmental cases; The Supreme Court creates a special chamber that is integrated with the general court that handles environmental cases; The government is amending the 1945 Constitution specifically Article 24 by adding the judicial environment to the environmental court. The conclusion of the legislation is already available and must be used as well as possible and amend the laws and regulations so that bias can be created specifically for environmental justice.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Building; Environmental; Justice System.</p>

scholarly journals Dualisme Judicial Review Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 318
Author(s):  
Nanang Al Hidayat ◽  
Mela Sari
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Regulatory Bodies ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Based on the provisions of Article 24A paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution and Article 24C paragraph 1 of the 1945 Constitution, there is a dualism of judicial institutions authorized to decide the judicial review of conflict of laws and regulations, namely the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. This study aims to find out how to regulate the judicial review of legislation in Indonesia. The research method used in this paper is the normative juridical. The results of the study showed that the dualism of statutory regulatory bodies resulted in inconsistencies in providing decisions related to the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia. Whereas legislation is arranged hierarchically and has a proportion of certain content material that must be tested consistently in one institution only to provide a legal certainty for the community. Berdasarkan ketentuan dalam Pasal 24A ayat 1 UUD 1945  dan Pasal 24C ayat 1 UUD 1945 terjadi dualisme lembaga kehakiman yang berwenang memutus judicial review konflik peraturan perundang-undangan yaitu Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaturan judicial review peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan dualisme lembaga pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan menyebabkan inkonsistensi dalam memberikan putusan terkait permasalahan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Padahal peraturan perundang-undangan itu tersusun secara hirarkis dan mempunyai proporsi materi muatan tertentu sehingga harus diuji secara konsisten dalam satu lembaga saja agar memberikan suatu kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat.

scholarly journals Ratio Decidendi, Agreement, Againts The Decision of MA No. 601K/PDT/2015 in The Case of Agreements that do not use Indonesian

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 517
Author(s):  
Jeremy Emmanuel Purba
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Ratio Decidendi ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Government ◽  
Made In ◽  
Laws And Regulations

The Supreme Court’s decision in the case of an agreement between investors who enter into an agreement using English is contrary to the agreement of the parties. Changes to the agreement may be detrimental to investors in Indonesia, who must amend the agreement previously made in English. The research method based on the data needed in this research is secondary data obtained through literature study in the form of laws and descriptive analysis, namely analyzing the laws and regulations. The loan agreement between PT. BKP and Nine AM, Ltd. should not be null and void. The judge’s interpretation of a lawful cause is wrong because a lawful cause refers the contents of the loan agreement. The government should be firm in determining a sanction if there is a violation of the law. This is intended so that judges are not wrong in applying regulations so that they do not produce decisions that can harmcertain parties.

scholarly journals Kemerdekaan Hakim Dan Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakima Dalam Konsep Negara Hukum

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-57
Author(s):  
Azwad Rachmat Hambali
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis kemerdekaan hakim dan kemandirian kehakiman dalam konsep negara hukum. Metode Penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normative, Hasil penelitian bahwa Kemerdekaan Hakim  dan kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman sebagai  penjelmaan konsep Negara Hukum sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1 ayat 3 Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik indonesia Tahun 1945  (hasil amandemen) beserta beberapa peraturan perundang undangan yang terkait seperti Undang Undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Undang Undang Mahkamah Agung, Undang Undang Komisi Yudisial  serta ketetapan MPR yang merupakan rujukan dalam pelaksanan Kemerdekaan Hakim, dan kemandirian personal, kemandirian substantive ,kemandirian internal serta kemandirian institusi. Rekomendasi mewujudkan konsep Negara Hukum perlu ditata peraturan perundang undangan yang menjamin kemerdekaan Hakim dan Kemandirian Kekuasaan. The research objective is to analyze the independence of judges and the independence of the judiciary in the concept of a rule of law. The research method uses normative legal research. The results show that the independence of judges and the independence of the judicial power as the embodiment of the concept of the rule of law as regulated in Article 1 paragraph 3 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (amendments) along with several related laws and regulations such as the Law Judicial Power, the Law on the Supreme Court, the Judicial Commission Law and the MPR decrees which are references in the implementation of Judges' Independence, and personal independence, substantive independence, internal independence and institutional independence. Recommendations to embody the concept of a rule of law need to put in place laws and regulations that guarantee the independence of judges and independence of power.

DEKADENSI PEMILIHAN HAKIM AGUNG OLEH DPR RI

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-104
Author(s):  
Rustam Magun Pikahulan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Due Diligence ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Institutional Status ◽  
The Government

Abstract: The Plato's conception of the rule of law states that good governance is based on good law. The organization also spreads to the world of Supreme Court justices, the election caused a decadence to the institutional status of the House of Representatives as a people's representative in the government whose implementation was not in line with the decision of the Constitutional Court. Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court No.27/PUU-XI/2013 explains that the House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only approve or disapprove candidates for Supreme Court Justices that have been submitted by the Judicial Commission. In addition, the proportion of proposed Supreme Court Justices from the judicial commission to the House of Representatives (DPR) has changed, whereas previously the Judicial Commission had to propose 3 (three) of each vacancy for the Justices, now it is only one of each vacant for Supreme Court Judges. by the Supreme Court. The House of Representatives no longer has the authority to conduct due diligence and suitability (elect) to prospective Supreme Judges proposed by the Judicial Commission. The House of Representatives can only "approve" or "disagree" the Supreme Judge candidates nominated by the Judicial Commission.

Summary of Results

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Kuenzler
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government ◽  
Networked Economy

The persuasive force of the accepted account’s property logic has driven antitrust and intellectual property law jurisprudence for at least the past three decades. It has been through the theory of trademark ownership and the commercial strategy of branding that these laws led the courts to comprehend markets as fundamentally bifurcated—as operating according to discrete types of interbrand and intrabrand competition—a division that had an effect far beyond the confines of trademark law and resonates today in the way government agencies and courts evaluate the emerging challenges of the networked economy along the previously introduced distinction between intertype and intratype competition. While the government in its appeal to the Supreme Court in ...

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILU DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN ADMINISTRASI DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-85
Author(s):  
Alasman Mpesau
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Electoral System ◽  
General Election ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts

In the General Election and Regional Head Election Law, the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu) has the authority supervisory to each Election stages, it is the center for law enforcement activities of the Election (Sentra Gakkumdu) to criminal acts and carrying out the judicial functions for investigating, examining, and decided on administrative disputes of General Election and Regional Head Election.  With the Bawaslu’s authority then placed as a super-body institution in the ranks of the Election Management Body, due to its essential role in building a clean and credible electoral system, it also has potential for abuse of power within it. In Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power has defined state institutions that have the authority to administrate judicial functions. These are the Supreme Court and Judicial Bodies that under its lines of general court, Religious Courts, Military Courts, Administrative Court (PTUN) and the Constitutional Court. The research method is normative juridical, that focuses on the analysis of the laws and regulations on General Election, Regional Head Elections and the Law on Judicial Power. The analytical tool is descriptive analysis, by describing the main issues, an analysis is carried out that was supported by case-approach related to the research. The study concludes that Bawaslu in carrying out judicial functions in its position as a semi-judicial institution has not a hierarchical relationship to the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK); however, what does exist is functional relationship.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document