scholarly journals Penerapan Metode CPM Dan PERT Pada Gedung Parkir 3 Lantai Grand Panglima Polim Kediri

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Tsalist Iluk ◽  
Ahmad Ridwan ◽  
Sigit Winarto

The project is an activity carried out to products or services that have specific scheduling. Scheduling is determined by the relationship between activities made very detailed and accurate. Therefore, the purpose of the final task is to know how to implement the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) in scheduling the project, which originally used the Bar Chart method with a duration of 140 days and resulted in a cost of Rp. 5.500.000.000. From the calculation result of this final task in using the CPM, the method generates a period of 105 days and provides cost after crashing in the labor increase of Rp. 5.568.464.052 and the increase in working hours (overtime) Rp. 5.603.725.490. While using the PERT method generates a period of 109 days and generates the cost after being crashing in the labor increase of Rp. 5.574.721.755 and the increase of working hours (overtime) of Rp.5.612.082.633 with a projected probability of reaching the target of 84 %. Has a comparison with the difference in cost of Rp. 6,257,703 in increased workforce and Rp. 8,357,143 other than working hours.Proyek merupakan suatu kegiatan yang dilakukan untuk menghasilkan produk / jasa yang mempunyai penjadwalan tertentu. Penjadwalan ditentukan oleh hubungan antar kegiatan yang dibuat sangat rinci dan akurat. Oleh karna itu tujuan dari artikel ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah penerapan metode Critical Path Method (CPM) dan Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) pada penjadwalan proyek tersebut yang awalnya  menggunakan metode Bar Chart dengan durasi waktu 140 hari dan menghasilkan biaya sebesar Rp.5.500.000.000. Dari hasil perhitungan artikel ilmiah ini dalam menggunakan metode CPM menghasilkan jangka waktu 105 hari dan mengasilkan biaya setelah di crashing dalam penambahan tenaga kerja sebesar Rp. 5.568.464.052 dan penambahan jam kerja (lembur) Rp.5.603.725.490 Sedangkan menggunakan metode PERT menghasilkan jangka waktu 109 hari dan menghasilkan biaya setelah dicrashing  dalam penambahan tenaga  kerja  sebesar  Rp. 5.574.721.755  dan penambahan   jam kerja (lembur) Rp. 5.612.082.633. dengan probabilitas proyek  mencapai target 84%. Mempunyai perbandingan selisih biaya sebesar Rp. 6.257.703 dalam penambahan tenaga kerja dan Rp. 8.357.143 dalam penambahan jam kerja.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Ahmad Nalhadi ◽  
Nana Suntana

CV. ABP a construction company worked in infrastructure building development for private and goverment. Now CV. ABP is handling infrastructure development project of the acropolitan area (Right Payment) Sukaci - Baros Village. This project has been late for 19 days from the dead line 126 days. Therefore the cost is getting higher. It’s happened because bad management is the problem source. Restoring the project time need to be focused on the cost and the due date based on the schedule. Scheduling evaluation using Critical Path Method (CPM) and Crashing to find optimal results using Critical Path Method (CPM) can be found the critical paths activity, there are ground digging , bopflang installation, stone installation, agregrate B agrgregation , aggregate A flatting, rigit bavement work, and refining, when the time suppression obtained optimal time results from 126 days to 92 days. It taken an alternative to the addition of working hours with duration 92 day after the crashing. Using two alternatives, additional working hours and the addition of workforce, obtaining the difference of extra hours of work cost Rp 80.128.125 and labourcost increase Rp 55.260 from the regular cost.


Author(s):  
Syahrur Romadhona ◽  
Fredy Kurniawan ◽  
Julistyana Tistogondo

The project acceleration by the Crash Program is one of the ways that is often used to make time and cost efficiency on an ongoing project. Acceleration of project completion time will affect the efficiency of equipment and labor productivity. In the case study of the Surabaya Outer East Ring Road Project Construction Segment 1, a project that has the potential to be accelerated is discussed in order to obtain efficiency values in terms of time and cost, Project acceleration by means of the Crash Program using the Precedence Diagram Method (PDM) method to determine the value of efficiency. This project uses resources, in this research the software used is Microsoft Project 2016. The research method used is to design network planning, find the critical path for each job, determine the work that has the potential to be accelerated, calculate the crash cost in additional working hours. and work shifts, calculating direct costs and indirect costs for each activity that changes due to changes in the duration of implementation, calculating the cost slope. Application of the Crash Program in the work of Asphalt Concrete Surface Layers (AC) thick 5 cm in the project will have an impact on increasing the time efficiency previously planned from 180 working days to 175 working days and efficiency with the difference in project costs of Rp. 18.313.935,8 with a ratio of 0,997 between the PDM method compared to the cost of the contract value calculated using the crashing project method.


Author(s):  
Rhett D. Graves ◽  
B. K. Hodge ◽  
Louay M. Chamra

“Spark spread” refers to the difference between the cost of electricity and the cost of fuel on a per-MMBTU basis. This metric is often considered when recommending equipment retrofits that require fuel switching. A spark spread of at least $12 per MMBTU is considered the threshold for economic viability of Combined Heat and Power (CHP) systems. However, this study shows that an increase in the electric utility rate has an impact on the spark spread required to maintain the economic viability of a CHP project. This challenges the paradigm that a single value for spark spread can be used as a “rule of thumb” for determining the economic viability of CHP projects. As utility rates increase, so does the importance of understanding the relationship between spark spread and the economic viability of projects.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Firdaus Hidayatul Iman ◽  
Hadi Wahyono ◽  
Eka Bambang Gusminto

This research was conducted to evaluate the scheduling of time in the project of building type 30 house in Tegal Besar Jember Palace. This research is an action research research using CPM method. The data used in this research are primary data and secondary data. Primary data in this research is data about how long building type 30 housing and expenses incurred to build type 30 house in Tegal Besar Palace Jember. Based on the result of research known that building of type 30 house in Tegal Besar Jember Palace based on CPM method for 54 days. While the cost out to build a type 30 house based on the critical path CPM method of Rp 43.983403. In terms of cost, the completion of the projects is no different because PT. Kinansyah Adi Jaya Land uses wholesale system and housing type 30 subsidized by government.Keywords: Time, Critical Path, Critical Path Method (CPM)


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118
Author(s):  
Mohamad Firdaus

Semakin berkembangnya perusahaan maka semakin banyak pula jumlah proyek yang harus dikerjakan oleh karena itu dibutuhkan perhitungan waktu pengerjaan proyek yang lebih optimal oleh perusahaan perusahaan. PT. X merupakan perusahaan IT yang beroperasi di dalam bidang Konsultasi, dan pengadaan barang serta jasa memerlukan analisa serta cara untuk menjadi perusahaan yang berorientasi pada pelanggan menjadi tempat untuk melakukan percobaan penggunaan manajemen berbasis kegiatan dengan metode seperti Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) dan Critical Path Method (CPM) adalah untuk menganalisis proyek dengan  ilmu manajemen proyek yang telah teruji oleh para profesional untuk mencapai efektifitas dan efisiensi dalam suatu proyek di perusahaan. Proyek SIMPORA (Sistem Informasi Program Kerja dan Anggaran) bea cukai Tanjung Pandan di Pulau Belitung merupakan proyek yang dianalisa untuk percobaan yang dapat menjadi acuan proyek lainnya. Dari hasil perhitungan diketahui peluang untuk menyelesaikan proyek SIMPORA dengan waktu 37 hari adalah 20,33% sebaliknya bila diketahui proyek dikerjakan lebih lama yaitu 41 hari maka peluang keberhasilannya adalah 99,38%. Dari perhitungan manajer proyek mempunyai kemungkinan 1/5 lebih untuk mengerjakan proyek di 37 hari dan akan menjadi prestasi karena bisa mengerjakannya lebih awal dari target 38 hari yang dijadwalkan, target 37 hari adalah mungkin diraih selama ada kesempatanku hal tersebut adalah suatu keharusan yang harus dilakukan agar perusahaan dapat bertahan terhadap persaingan yang kompetitif.


Rekayasa ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Nailul Izzah

<p>Pada pembangunan proyek perumahan, perencanaan dibutuhkan untuk memperhitungkan berbagai variabel pekerjaan yang menyangkut sumber daya yang terbatas seperti waktu dan biaya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini  adalah mendeskripsikan aktivitas jaringan kerja yang optimal dengan metode <em>Critical Path Method </em>(CPM), perencananaan kelayakan yang optimal dengan metode <em>Program</em><em> </em><em>Evaluation and Review Technique</em> (PERT), dan mendeskripsikan waktu dan biaya proyek yang efisien dengan metode <em>Time Cost Trade Off </em>(TCTO) pada proses pembangunan perumahan. Jalur kritis dari penerapan metode <em>critical path method</em> (CPM) dimulai dari pekerjaan persiapan (A) sampai pekerjaan pagar (AB), tetapi ada satu yang tidak termasuk pada jalur kritis yaitu pekerjaan plafond (H). Pekerjaan tersebut memiliki nilai slack 25, artinya kegiatan tersebut memiliki kelonggaran waktu pengerjaan selama 25 hari. Dari penerapan metode <em>program</em><em> </em><em>evaluation and review technique</em> (PERT), proyek perumahan dapat diselesaikan lebih cepat dari kurun waktu normal selama 555 hari dengan waktu yang diharapkan 547 hari dengan peluang 64,8%. Sedangkan dari penerapan metode <em>time cost trade off</em> (TCTO), efisiensi waktu pengerjaan proyek dengan penambahan pekerja adalah 5,76% dengan selisih percepatan 32 hari kerja dan efisiensi biayanya adalah 0,156% dengan biaya optimal sebesar Rp. 6.753.245.793</p><p>Kata kunci: <em>Critical Path Method</em> (CPM), <em>Program Evaluation and Review Technique</em> (PERT), <em>Time Cost Trade Off</em> (TCTO).<strong> </strong></p><p align="center"><strong> </strong></p><p align="center">Time Exchange Analysis and Cost Using<em> Time Cost Trade Off </em>(TCTO) Method in Housing Development Projects in PT. X</p><p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p><em>In the construction of housing projects, planning is needed to account for the various work variables involving limited resources such as time and cost order to achieve the stated objectives and achieve the desired results. The purpose of this research is to describe optimal network activity from the application of Critical Path Method (CPM) method, to describe optimal feasibility planning from applying of Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) method, and to describe time and cost of efficient project from application of Time method Cost Trade Off (TCTO) on the housing development process. The critical path from the application of the method of critical path method (CPM) starts from the preparatory work (A) to the fence work (AB), but there is one that is not included in the critical path ie the ceiling work (H). The work has a slack value of 25, meaning that the activity has a working time clearance for 25 days. From the implementation of the evaluation and review technique (PERT) program method, the housing project can be completed faster than the normal time period of 555 days with the expected time 547 days with a chance of 64.8%. While from the time cost trade off (TCTO) method, the time efficiency of project work with the addition of worker is 5.76% with the acceleration difference of 32 working days and the cost efficiency is 0.156% with the optimum cost of Rp.</em><em>6.753.245.793.</em><em></em></p><em>Keywords: Critical Path Method (CPM), Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), Time Cost Trade Off (TCTO). </em>


Author(s):  
Shun Takai

At the end of a conceptual design phase, engineers choose a single (or a small set of) system concept from a large number of concept variants. In most cases, there is not enough design information to quantitatively evaluate how a final system developed from each concept would perform and cost. Thus engineers need to first perceptually evaluate and select a concept, and then design a system. On the other hand, if engineers know analytical relationships between system and part requirements, they can specify target values of part requirements such that a system achieves its target requirements. Furthermore, if engineers know how much it will cost to control part requirements within tolerances, they can minimize the cost of a system by optimizing tolerances of part requirements. This paper proposes and illustrates an approach to select a system concept when engineers know the relationship between system and part requirements, and how much it will cost to control part requirements within tolerances. Engineers choose a concept that minimizes cost.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Indra

Along with the industrial competition nowaydays, an exact and strategic planning is highly required particulary for project. There are alot of tasks and activities within, which need to be broken down, in this term for its time line. Every success and failure is caused by raw palnning. The obyective of this research is to find efective time needed to complete a project. Method used are Critical Path Method (CPM) , Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT), andGantt Chart.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-33
Author(s):  
Hasan Ahmad Alshafea ◽  
Abdelrahman Ahmad Saear ◽  
Abdelrahman Mohamad Megahed

The study aimed to identify the relationship between talent management and enhancing the competitive advantage of some sports federations in the Egyptian and Bahraini societies, in addition to the difference in this according to the variables of both experience and level of employment. To achieve this, the researchers used both Talent Management and Competitive Advantage quetionair as a tool to collect data and information from a sampling sample of (50) and a core sample of (247) board members and employees of Egyptian and Bahraini sports federations. The results of the study showed that there is no relationship between the methods of managing human talent between the Egyptian and Bahrain sports federations. There is a positive relationship in the quality of talent in the Bahraini unions and creativity in the Egyptian and Bahraini federations. The results also indicate that there is no difference between the Bahraini and Egyptian federations in the management of sports talents and the promotion of competitive advantage due to the variables of experience and level of employment. Researchers have recommended that specific criteria be used to attract sports talent and retain competencies to reduce the cost of spending on sports talent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document