Meningkatkan Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Gedung Abipraya Mojo Kabupaten Kediri Menggunakan Metode Begemann

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Arif Fathur Rohman ◽  
Edy Gardjito ◽  
Agata Iwan Candra ◽  
Andri Dwi Cahyono

The foundation is a lower structural element that serves to with stand the load of the upper structure. Pile foundation is one type of deep foundation, which is widely used in the construction of buildings. Pile foundation used in hard soil cases is located at a very deep depth. Abipraya Building is a building located in kediri regency which later functioned as a rural office. This study aims to increase the carrying capacity of pile foundation in the abipraya building project using the begemann method. Calculations carried out include the calculation of loading, carrying capacity, buckling factor and determination of foundation point.  Based on the calculations obtained the results of axial load (sigma Vertical Ultimate) Σνυ of 99.70. with a single-pole carrying capacity of 38.89 tons and a group pole carrying capacity of 117,917 tons. These results will be planned the foundation of the stake with a diameter of 30 with a depth of 8 meters, amounting to 4 poles. Calculation factor buckling results in 194.14 kg/cm2 smaller than the allowed maximum 2400 kg/cm2. Thus, with the known components of the planning of the pile foundation, it can be used as a reference in the construction of the abipraya building.

Author(s):  
Yogesh K S

Pile foundation is one of the effective forms of deep foundation. This is to be used where the load has to be transferred to deeper layers of soil and it can with stand uplift forces in foundations in expansive soil and also in case of floating foundations. The finite element method is one of the most versatile and comprehensive numerical technique which can be used for analysis of structures or solids of complex shapes and complicated boundary conditions. There are different variables which influence the load carrying capacity of pile foundation. But only some of those have significant influence on load carrying capacity. Here those variables are considered and the variation of load carrying capacity with the change in value of those variables is observed. Those variables are pile length and pile diameter, analysis of pile foundation was carried out to determine the ultimate load carrying capacity of pile for different lengths and diameters in cohesive soil, the corresponding settlement was also determined.


2012 ◽  
Vol 204-208 ◽  
pp. 308-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Li ◽  
Yi Qiao ◽  
Yong Jie Liu

As the population growth and land resources declining, high-rise building project is increasingly common in the construction work. Through in-depth thinking and active exploration, specific attention to matters of deep foundation pit and pile foundation construction technique, which is the key construction techniques in the high-rise building project, was summarized in this article. It suggests to make a careful and detailed geological survey, and then choose the right design program and develop a reliable construction plans. This scheme was proved to be a useful reference and guidance for the development of high-rise building construction technology.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Rizaludin Rizaludin ◽  
Sigit Winarto ◽  
Ahmad Ridwan

The foundation is a part of the structure that functions as a support for the building and distributes the burden on it (upper fabric) or the soil layer with a stable enough carrying capacity. In planning the foundation for a structure can use several types. The selection of the foundation to be used based on the weight of the building. The construction of the C story building seven-story University requires a strong foundation. The pile foundation was chosen because it was relatively fast, easy, and yielded hard soil at 5.6 m. In this calculation, three methods as a Trofimankove method and the Meyerhoff method and the General Method Method. Pile foundation planning has a planned load of Qu 231 Ton. The calculation of the three ways obtained more efficient results, namely the count with a Meyerhoff method equal to 82.21. The number of single piles that are close to one pile cap is four poles, so the calculation formula of the Pall piles group is 232.82 tons. Thus it can be concluded that Pmax <Pall 231 Ton <232.82 Ton, which means that it meets the requirements.Pondasi adalah bagian struktur yang berfungsi sebagai penopang bangunan dan menyalurkan beban diatasnya (upper structure) atau lapisan tanah yang memiliki daya dukung yang cukup kuat . Dalam merencanakan pondasi untuk suatu struktur dapat menggunakan beberapa macam tipe pondasi. Pemilihan pondasi berdasarkan fungsi bangunan atas yang akan dipikul oleh pondasi tersebut, berdasarkan beban dan beratnya bangunan atas kedalaman tanah dimana bangunan tersebut didirikan. Pembangunan gedung C berlantai 7 Universitas Kadiri memerlukan pondasi yang kuat. Pondasi tiang pancang dipilih karena pekerjaan relatif cepat, mudah dan hasil sondir tanah keras pada 5,6 m. Pada perhitungan ini digunakan tiga metode yaitu metode Trofimankove dan metode mayerhoff serta Metode cara Umum. Perencanaan pondasi tiang pancang memiliki beban rencana sebesar Qu 231 Ton. Dari perhitungan ketiga metode didapat hasil yang lebih efisien yaitu pada perhitungan dengaan metode mayerhoff yaitu sebesar 82,21. Jumlah tiang tunggal yang mendekati pada satu pile cap adalah 4 tiang, sehingga diperoleh dari rumus perhitungan Pall tiang kelompok 232,82 Ton. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan Pmaks < Pall 231 Ton < 232,82 Ton, yang artinya memenuhi syarat.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
Amanda Rachmad Pratama ◽  
Rida Respati ◽  
Norseta Ajie Saputra

Soil bearing capacity is the ability of the soil to support the foundation load acting on it. To produce an accurate bearing capacity, it is necessary to know the properties and characteristics of the soil. For this reason, a comparison of the carrying capacity of the soil is carried out based on the calculation of CPT / Sondir and SPT to be able to plan a safe and economical pile foundation. The purpose of this study was to determine the amount of soil bearing capacity of the deep foundation in the environment around the Ataqwa Mosque, Baringin Village, Palangkaraya City based on field tests, and based on laboratory tests, and to determine the value of the comparison between the Mayerhof Method and the Schmertmann-Nottingham Method. Based on the Sondir value, it is continued with the calculation of the carrying capacity of the soil, then the calculation results are analyzed and concluded. From the calculation of the value of the carrying capacity of the foundation pile implementation of point 1 (one), the highest value of 400 mm diameter piles in the Meyerhoff method is 75,319 kg, while the lowest bearing capacity value is also at 400 mm piles of 10,676 kg. For point 2 (two), the highest value is obtained at 400 mm diameter piles in the Shmertmann-Nottingham method of 65,853 kg, while the lowest bearing capacity value is also at 400 mm piles of 10,676 kg


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Sintyawati ◽  
Sigit Winarto ◽  
Ahmad Ridwan

ABSTRACTThe foundation is a basic construction of a building that functions to carry away dead loads, live loads and angina loads and earthquake loads of a building to the soil layer which is at the bottom without causing excessive soil collapse. In this calculation I use the mayerhoff method and the calculation based on the results of the analysis of the carrying capacity of single and group foundations can be concluded that: 1. the results of loading analysis that occurred in the IAIN Ponorogo Sharia Faculty Building 379,198.5 kg. 2. the calculation of the sondir which is carried out by the hard soil depth reaches a depth of 5.8 meters. Calculation of pile foundation using a diameter of 40 cm with reinforced iron D16 iron spacing 125 with 5 reinforcement contents, and said SAFE. 3. The results of the shear force control calculation: a. Calculation of One-Way Shear Control = 1,085.34 tons> Nominal Shear Force = 348.05 tons said SAFE b. Calculation of Two-Way Shear Control = 1.272.45 tons> Nominal Shear Force = 877.91 tons said SAFE, 4. The pile foundation will experience cracking when there is a moment of 58,278,400 tons / m2 <150 tons / m2 maximum moment SAFE is permitted and said the decrease that will occur is 4,644 mm <360 mm, a decrease that is permitted and said SAFE. Keywords: pile foundation, meyerhoff method, fracture of pile foundation, reduction / pile foundation stability.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Zulhady Zuhri ◽  
Istiatun Istiatun

ABSTRACTThe pile foundation is an sub-structure to load from the upper structure. Ultimate load carrying-capacity (qu) will be transfered into a hard soil layer by using a deep foundation system. To design the pile foundation, several methods are needed to obtain different bearing capacity values. This study determines the planned pile depth, pile dimensions and pile cap. The purpose of this final project is to plan the pile foundation for the Arandra Residance 2 tower construction project located in Cempaka Putih, Central Jakarta. The method used is the method of Meyerhof, U.S Army Corp, Tomlinson, α and λ. In addition, the calculation of reinforcement, immediate settlement and settlement of primary consolidation was also carried out. The results of the calculation of bearing capacity foundation are different values. The Meyerhof Qu method is 9846,786 kN, the U.S Army Corp method Qu = 11065.11 kN, the Tomlinson Qu method = 10409.68 kN, the method α = 9558.95 kN, and the method λ Qu = 10066.37 kN. Whereas according to Broms, the lateral bearing capacity is 10845 kN. In planning used reinforcement D25-270. Immediate settlement is 50.3 mm, primary consolidation settlement is 9.89 mm, and time rate of consolidation during 1.75 months. Keywords: Foundation, driven pile, bearing capacity, settlement, primary consolidation  ABSTRAKFondasi tiang merupakan fondasi yang menyalurkan beban struktur atas dan beban lainnya ke struktur lapisan tanah keras yang mempunyai daya dukung tinggi yang terletak jauh di dalam tanah. Untuk merencanakan fondasi tiang pancang diperlukan beberapa metode untuk mendapatkan nilai daya dukung yang berbeda. Studi ini menentukan kedalaman tiang pancang yang direncanakan, dimensi tiang pancang dan pilecap.  Tujuan dari tugas akhir ini adalah merencanakan pondasi tiang pancang untuk proyek pembangunan tower Arandra Residance 2 yang berlokasi di Cempaka Putih, Jakarta Pusat. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode Meyerhof, U.S Army Corp, Tomlinson, α dan λ. Daya dukung lateral menggunakan metode Broms. Selain itu juga dilakukan perhitungan penulangan, penurunan segera, dan penurunan konsolidasi primer. Hasil perhitungan daya dukung fondasi terdapat perbedaan nilai. Metode Meyeherhof Qu = 9846.786 kN, metode U.S Army Corp Qu = 11065.11 kN, metode Tomlinson Qu = 10409.68 kN, metode α = 9558.95 kN, dan metode λ Qu = 10066.37 kN. Sedangkan menurut broms daya dukung lateral sebesar 10845 kN. Pada perencanaan digunakan tulangan D25-270. Penurunan segera terjadi sebesar 50.3 mm, penurunan primer sebesar9.89 mm, dan kecepatan waktu penurunan konsolidasi selama 1.75 bulan. Kata kunci: Fondasi, tiang pancang, daya dukung, penurunan, dan konsolidasi primer


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Ruslan Hidayat ◽  
Saiful Arfaah

One of the most important factors in the structure of the pile foundation in the construction of the bridge is the carrying capacity of the soil so as not to collapse. Construction of a bridge in the village of Klitik in Jombang Regency to be built due to heavy traffic volume. The foundation plan to be used is a pile foundation with a diameter of 50 cm, the problem is what is the value of carrying capacity of soil and material. The equipment used is the Dutch Cone Penetrometer with a capacity of 2.50 tons with an Adhesion Jacket Cone. The detailed specifications of this sondir are as follows: Area conus 10 cm², piston area 10 cm², coat area 100 cm², as for the results obtained The carrying capacity of the soil is 60.00 tons for a diameter of 30 cm, 81,667 tons for a diameter of 35 cm, 106,667 tons for a diameter of 40 cm, 150,000 tons for a diameter of 50 cm for material strength of 54,00 tons for a diameter of 30 cm, 73,500 tons for a diameter of 35 cm, 96,00 tons for a diameter of 40 cm, 166,666 tons for a diameter of 50 cm


Structures ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 590-601
Author(s):  
Hamed Rahman Shokrgozar ◽  
Vahid Akrami ◽  
Tayebeh Jafari Ma'af ◽  
Naseraldin Shahbazi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document