scholarly journals Usefulness of laparoscopic restaging surgery for patients diagnosed with apparent early ovarian/fallopian tubal cancer by a prior surgery, a case control observational study in a single institute in Japan

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 960
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 1441-1448
Author(s):  
Putu Yuliawati ◽  
Cynthia Dewi M ◽  
A A A Sukartini Djelantik ◽  
Putu Budhiastra ◽  
N K Niti Susila

Pterygium is an eye disease with multifactorial etiopathogenesis. Molecular factors such as cell proliferation and inflammatory mediators are associated with increased calcium mobilization and activation of nuclear factor kβ mediated by histamine-1 receptors (H1R). This study aims to determine whether the expression of H1R primary pterygium tissue is higher than normal conjunctival tissue and the expression of H1R based on pterygium grades. This study was an analytic observational study with a case-control study approach at Sanglah General Hospital, Bali Mandara Eye Hospital, and Mangusada Hospital. The study was conducted from November 2017 to April 2018. The pterygium and conjunctival tissues obtained from 28 subjects in the same eye and examined for H1R expression by immunohistochemistry. The results of this study obtained 64.3% of women with a mean age of 54.2 ± 7.8 years. There was no difference in mean H1R expression between pterygium grades in the final score (P = 0.759). There was a mean difference of H1R between primary pterygium (42.50) and normal conjunctival tissue (14.50) with P <0.001. Only tissue types affected the expression of H1R in the final score (B = 4.893; 95% CI 4.363-5.423; P <0.001). It was concluded that the expression of H1R primary pterygium tissue was higher in primary pterygium than normal conjunctival tissue.


2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 1561-1565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Becker ◽  
Susan S Jick ◽  
Christoph R Meier

Background/AimUse of ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) has been associated with an increased risk of cataract in a previous observational study in humans. In contrast, ACEIs were associated with beneficial effects on cataract development in experimental studies. We assessed the risk of cataract in relation to exposure to ACEI and other antihypertensive drugs.MethodsThis is a case-control study based on data from the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). We included first-time cataract patients aged ≥40 years between 1995 and 2015 and an equal number of cataract-free controls. We matched the controls to cases on age, sex, general practice, date of first cataract (ie, index date) and years of history in the CPRD prior to the index date. We assessed the number of prescriptions for ACEI and other antihypertensive drugs in detail and explored the use of single ACEI substances. We performed conditional logistic regression and conducted various sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our findings. We calculated the risk of cataract associated with previous exposure to ACEI, measured as OR with 95% CIs, and adjusted the multivariable model for body mass index, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, prescriptions of systemic corticosteroids and other antihypertensive drugs.ResultsWe identified 206 931 cataract cases and the same number of matched controls. Use of ACEI was not associated with a materially altered risk of cataract compared with non-use of ACEI, neither in the main analysis (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.08) nor in any of the sensitivity or stratified analyses.ConclusionIn our large observational study, use of ACEI was not associated with an altered risk of cataract.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
W.K. Shin ◽  
J. Lim ◽  
M.C. Lim ◽  
Y.J. Won

2010 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. c1-c4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karlijn J. van Stralen ◽  
Friedo W. Dekker ◽  
Carmine Zoccali ◽  
Kitty J. Jager

Author(s):  
Marjan Drukker ◽  
Irene Weltens ◽  
Carmen F. M. van Hooijdonk ◽  
Emma Vandenberk ◽  
Maarten Bak

Background: Existing study quality and risk of bias lists for observational studies have important disadvantages. For this reason, a comprehensive widely applicable quality assessment tool for observational studies was developed.Methods: Criteria from three quality lists were merged into a new quality assessment tool: the observational study quality evaluation (OSQE). OSQE consists of a cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional version.Results: The OSQE cohort, the OSQE case–control, and the OSQE cross-sectional version include all items applicable to that type of study, for example, the representativeness of the study population, the validity of the independent and dependent variables, and the statistical methods used. Before scoring the OSQE, the rater is asked to define how to score items, in detail. A study can obtain a star for each item. Each item also has a veto cell. This cell can be checked when poor quality with respect to that specific item results in a low quality of the study despite stars on other items. Although stars add to a sum score, the comment field is the most important part of the OSQE.Conclusion: The OSQE presented in the current article provides a short, comprehensive, and widely applicable list to assess study quality and therewith risk of bias.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document