A case of light chain (AL) amyloidosis associated with IgD multiple myeloma (MM): clinical features, laboratory findings and outcome

Amyloid ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (sup1) ◽  
pp. 117-118
Author(s):  
R. Rizzi ◽  
R. Miccolis ◽  
E. Rinaldi ◽  
B. Bonerba ◽  
M. Rossini ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 10-10
Author(s):  
Junichiro Nashimoto ◽  
Moe Nomura ◽  
Hirofumi Irita ◽  
Kota Sato ◽  
Kanji Miyazaki ◽  
...  

Background Multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis are both caused by the clonal proliferation of the abnormal plasma cells. Although, the difference of the genetic features of multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis has been reported, we see some patients present with both cases. We retrospectively investigated the clinical features of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. Methods We reviewed medical records of patients who were diagnosed with multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis before initiating treatment during January 2009 to November 2019 in our institution. We excluded patients who did not reach 10% of the plasma cells in the bone marrow. Patients diagnosed with light chain deposition disease were excluded. Treatment regimens were at the discretion of the treating physician. Results Forty-two patients were diagnosed with multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis. The median follow-up time since diagnosis was 20 months [0-89]. The median age was 63-year-old [43-85]. There was no difference between the sex (male: female=1:1). Twenty-nine (69.0%) patients had lambda type of light chain. Patients with ISS stage I, II, and III were 13(31.7%), 21(51.2%), and 7(17.1%). Patients with R-ISS stage I, II, and III were 4(10.3%), 30(76.9%), and 5(12.8%). Patients with Revised Mayo Clinic AL amyloidosis Staging System 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 3(10.0%), 4(13.3%), 8(26.7%), and 15(50.0%). Twelve (35.3%), 2 (6.9%), 1 (3.4%) and 1 (4.0%) patients had t(11;14), t(4;14), t(14;16) and del(17p) by FISH analysis, respectively. Fourteen (33.3%), 16(38.1%), and 8(19.0%) patients were diagnosed with cardiac, renal, and hepatic amyloidosis, respectively. Thirty-five (83.3%) patients received Bortezomib containing regimen for the initial treatment (e.g., Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(7.1%), Cyclophosphamide+Bortezomib+Dexamethasone(23.8%), Bortezomib+Melphalan+Dexamethasone(7.1%), Bortezomib+Melphalan+Prednisolone(9.5%), Bortezomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone(35.7%)). Thirteen (31.0%) patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation with high dose melphalan. Median PFS was 25 months and the median OS was 82 months. There were no significant differences in OS between the I-SSS, R-ISSS, and Revised Mayo Clinic AL amyloidosis Staging System groups. Patients diagnosed with cardiac or hepatic amyloidosis had significantly worse outcome. The median OS diagnosed with and without cardiac amyloidosis were 14 and 28 months (p value = 0.034), and the median OS diagnosed with and without hepatic amyloidosis were 8 and 24 months (p value = 0.012). Conclusion Multiple myeloma with AL amyloidosis, especially cardiac or hepatic amyloidosis, has a poor prognosis even if treated with novel agents. Searching for the optimal treatment for these patient groups remains to be an issue. Disclosures Nashimoto: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Tsukada:Takeda pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau. Ishida:Ono pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau; Takeda pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Suzuki:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene and Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, ONO, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie and Janssen: Honoraria.


2010 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumit Madan ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Francis Buadi ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Rita Becker ◽  
Rainer Rompel ◽  
Jörg Plum ◽  
Timo Gaiser

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522096353
Author(s):  
David M. Hughes ◽  
Andrew Staron ◽  
Vaishali Sanchorawala

Objective Systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is an uncommon hematologic plasma cell dyscrasia that is becoming increasingly recognized. Therapeutic agents used in AL amyloidosis overlap with those used in multiple myeloma; however, differences in disease features change treatment efficacy and tolerance. Pharmacists must be cognizant of these distinctions. Herein, this review article provides an up-to-date guide to treatment considerations for systemic AL amyloidosis in both the front-line and relapsed settings. Data sources: A comprehensive literature search was performed using the PubMed/Medline database for articles published through (June 2020) regarding treatments for AL amyloidosis. Search criteria included therapies that are FDA approved for multiple myeloma, as well as investigational agents. This review of chemotherapeutic agents reflects the current clinical practice guidelines endorsed by NCCN along with commentary based on the experience of pharmacists from a tertiary-referral center treating many patients with AL amyloidosis. Data consists of randomized controlled trials, observational cohorts, case reports, and ongoing clinical trials. Data summary: Frontline options discussed here include high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation and bortezomib-based regimens. Regarding the relapsed setting, supporting data are compiled and summarized for: bortezomib, ixazomib, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, daratumumab, elotuzumab, isatuximab, venetoclax, NEOD001, and melflufen. Conclusions The treatment platform for AL amyloidosis is expanding with novel agents traditionally used in multiple myeloma being adopted and modified for use in AL amyloidosis. The pharmacist’s familiarity with the clinical evidence base for these agents and how they fit into standard protocols for AL amyloidosis is critical as dosing and monitoring recommendations are unique from multiple myeloma.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietrich Sturm ◽  
Tobias Schmidt-Wilcke ◽  
Tineke Greiner ◽  
Christoph Maier ◽  
Marc Schargus ◽  
...  

Changes in the subbasal corneal plexus detected by confocal cornea microscopy (CCM) have been described for various types of neuropathy. An involvement of these nerves within light-chain (AL) amyloid neuropathy (a rare cause of polyneuropathy) has never been shown. Here, we report on a case of a patient suffering from neuropathy caused by AL amyloidosis and underlying multiple myeloma. Small-fiber damage was detected by CCM.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e0172996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surbhi Sidana ◽  
Mayur Narkhede ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Debbie Hastings ◽  
Beth Faiman ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 625-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Milani ◽  
Marco Basset ◽  
Francesca Russo ◽  
Andrea Foli ◽  
Giampaolo Merlini ◽  
...  

Key PointsPatients with AL amyloidosis and low dFLC burden (<50 mg/L) have less severe heart involvement and better survival. These patients are evaluable for hematologic response with adapted criteria predicting improvement of overall and renal survival.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4051-4051
Author(s):  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
María-Belén Vidriales ◽  
Jose J. Perez ◽  
Maria-Consuelo López-Berges ◽  
Ramón García-Sanz ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4051 Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) immunophenotyping has shown to be of value for differential diagnosis and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. However, the clinical value of MFC immunophenotyping in other plasma cell disorders (PCD) remains largely unexplored. Systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare PCD characterized by the accumulation of monoclonal light chain fragments leading to end-organ damage and short survival. Bone marrow (BM) plasma cell (PC) infiltration in AL is usually low and thus the identification of clonal PC can be often difficult by immunohistochemistry and/or immunofluorescence. In the present study we focused on 34 BM samples sent to our institution with a suspected diagnosis of AL. MFC immunophenotypic studies were performed using the following 4-color combinations of MoAbs (FITC/PE/PerCP-Cy5.5/APC): CD38/CD56/CD19/CD45 (n=34); in addition cy-Kappa/cy-Lambda/CD19/CD38 staining was add to confirm the clonal or polyclonal nature of BMPC in equivocal cases. Ploidy and cell cycle analysis were additionally performed in a subset of cases (n=12/34). From the total 34 cases included in the present study, 28 had a confirmed diagnosis of AL. The remaining 6 cases were finally diagnosed with localized - amyloidoma - (n=2) and familial (n=1) forms of amyloidosis, multiple myeloma-associated amyloid (n=2) and congestive pericarditis (n=1). Interestingly, the presence of clonal PC was detected by MFC in 27 of the 28 (96%) patients with AL; in turn, clonal PC were undetectable in the BM of all cases with localized and familial forms of amyloidosis. The median overall level of PC (M-PC plus N-PC) seen in MFC immunophenotypic analyses of BM samples of the 28 patients with AL was 1.9% (range: 0.1% - 15%), with a significant positive correlation between PC enumerated by MFC and conventional morphology (r=0.5; p=.01). Within the BMPC compartment, the median proportion of clonal PC was of 94% (mean 81% ± 29%); in 6 cases all BMPC were clonal while in the remaining 22 patients residual normal PC persisted (median of normal PC/BMPC 13% ± 31%). The most common aberrant phenotypes were down-regulation of CD19 (92%) and CD45 (83%), followed by overexpression of CD56 (56%) and infra-expression of CD38 (42%). Aneuploidy was only found in 18% of cases, all of them hyperdiploid. Cell cycle analysis showed a median % of S-phase and G2-Mitosis PC of 0.7% and 3.5%, respectively. Concerning patients' outcome, cases with undetectable normal PC (6/28, 21%) had a significantly decreased overall survival (OS) compared to patients with persistent BM normal PC at diagnosis (22/28, 79%) with 3-year OS rates of 0% vs. 59%, respectively (p=.001). In summary, these preliminary data suggests that MFC immunophenotyping investigations may be clinically relevant in patients with suspected amyloidosis for i) differential diagnosis between AL and other forms of amyloidosis and, ii) prognostication of patients with AL according to the presence or absence of baseline persistent normal PC. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 5036-5036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beihui Huang ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Junru Liu ◽  
Dong Zheng ◽  
Mei Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 5036 Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of bortezomib with dexamethasone for patients with primary systemic light chain (AL) amyloidosis or multiple myeloma-associated AL amyloidosis. Methods: Twelve newly diagnosed patients with primary systemic AL amyloidosis and six patient with multiple myeloma-associated AL amyloidosis were treated with a combination of bortezomib (1. 3 mg/m2 d1, 4, 8, 11) and dexamethasone (20 mg d1–4). Results: Sixteen patients was evaluable. 12/16 had a hematologic response and 6/16 (37. 5%) a hematologic complete response. Median cycles to response was 1 cycle and median cycles to best response was 2 cycles. In patients with primary AL amyloidosis, 8/10 (80. 0%) had a hematologic response and 5/10 (50. 0%) a hematologic complete response. In patients with myeloma-associated AL amyloidosis, 7/10 (70. 0%) had a hematologic response and 1/6 (16. 7%) a hematologic complete response. Twelve patients (75. 0%) had a response in at least one affected organ, in which 7 in patients with primary AL amyloidosis and 5 in myeloma-associated AL amyloidosis. Person correlation between hematologic response and organ response was 0. 667 (p=0. 005). Fatigue, diarrhea and infection were the most frequent side effects. Three patients developed herpes zoster and had to stop chemotherapy. Conclusions: VD produces rapid and high hematological responses in the majority of patients with newly diagnosed AL regardless of primary or associated with myeloma. It is well tolerated with few side effects. This treatment may be a valid option as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed patients with primary systemic AL amyloidosis and multiple myeloma-associated AL amyloidosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document