scholarly journals Study on Risk And Return Factors of Selected Banks in Bombay Stock Exchange BSE

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume-2 (Issue-3) ◽  
pp. 663-667
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Al-gamal ◽  
Dr. Abbokar Siddiq ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 2314-2318

Financial market of a country signifies the monetary strength of its economy. Smart monetary health of a rustic helps in enhancing the money flows and creates capital, that contributes to the event of the country. Post economic process innovate India he monetary market has entered into a replacement phase of worldwide integration and alleviation with variety of recent and innovative monetary instruments. The objective of the is to find the nature and extent of technical relationship between Nifty Bank on other selected sectorial indices of National Stock Exchange and to examine the risk and return factors of the sectorial indices. The major use of stock market indices are as a forecasting tool. Studying the historical performance of the stock market indices, you can forecast trends in the market. All the sectors of NSE are not considered in this study. Only five sectors other than bank nifty are considered. Six different sectors are compared individually with the Nifty Bank by the tools called correlation and Regression. Correlation and regression between the indices has been used to identify the relationship and extent of impact between Nifty Bank and other selected sectorial indices. From the results and findings of this study, one can understand that there is a significant relationship between Bank Nifty and other selected sectors (Energy, FMCG, IT, Media, Pharma) except Infrastructure. It is showing a poor relationship with Bank Nifty.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahma Yudi Astuti ◽  
Asad Arsya Brilliant Fani

Sukuk and Bonds has differences and similarities. Fundamental differences between sukuk and bonds are first, underlying asset in every sukuk issuance, concept of profit loss sharing and the use of Islamic contracts. Whereas conducted research in practice of differences between sukuk and bonds are still an on-going discussion. This study aims to add the evidence in the discussion regarding whether there is differences between sukuk and bonds in the world of practice, provide investment preferences as well as educating investors in choosing sukuk or bonds as a sustainable and smooth instrument. The method used is Mann Whitney U-Test to test whether there is a different between yield to maturity (return) and standard deviation (risk) of both instruments. Using secondary data of Retail Sukuk (SR) and Retail Bonds (ORI) period 2008-2017 obtained from Indonesia Stock Exchange, Indonesia Bond Market Directory and Indonesia Bond Pricing Agency. The result shows that there is no significance difference of retail sukuk return and risk with retail bonds in Indonesia. Besides retail bonds are show higher return than retail sukuk because of higher coupon and longest mature date. While, retail sukuk is more stable rather than bonds as it backed up by the real underlying asset. Keywords: Retail Sukuk (SR), Retail Bonds (ORI), Yield to Maturity


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-192
Author(s):  
Sumair Farooq ◽  

This research paper focusing on twofold purposes: where the first part focuses on providing positive evidence on the nature of relationship between risk and return. Moreover, the second part of the paper deals with analyzing the role of risk and return and social structures on the investor’s behaviour in specific consideration with Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) (formerly Karachi Stock Exchange; KSE). This research paper has employed a quantitative approach for the purpose of collection of data and analysis of the results in order to fulfil the aim and objectives of the study. The data for risk and return has been collected from secondary sources. The risk and return for 50 companies that are listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange and at least once paid dividend have been calculated for 11 years which is from 2007 to 2017. Moreover, in order to collect the data for social structure and investor  behaviour  the  researcher  has  used  survey  questionnaire  as  the  research  instrument.  The  questionnaire was filled by 558 individual investors who have invested their capital in the stock of companies listed on Pakistan Stock Exchange. The sampling method that was used for the purpose of selecting respondents for getting the questionnaires filled was non-probability method. For all the independent variables the null hypotheses are rejected thus showing significance of relationship. The results from  the  regression  analysis  has  shown  that  among  all  the  predicting  variables  social  structure explains the lowest amount of variation in investor’s behaviour. Thus, overall it can be said that the results of this study are in alignment with the previous researches.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-65
Author(s):  
Ankur Shukla ◽  
Narayanasamy Sivasankaran ◽  
Prakash Singh ◽  
Ayyaluswamy Kanagaraj ◽  
Shibashish Chakraborty

The purpose of the paper is to investigate whether women directors impact the risk and return of Indian banks. This study employs panel data models for a sample of 29 Indian banks that form part of the National Stock Exchange 500 index for the period 2009–2016. This paper concludes that women directors influence the accounting returns (measured through Return on Assets) of Indian banks. However, it was found that women directors did not affect the risks (measured through Equity Beta and gross NPA to Total Assets) of the sample banks. This paper contributes to the literature and practitioners in several ways. To the best of the knowledge of the authors, no study has examined the impact of women directors on the risk and return of banks operating in India. Hence, the findings of this article have substantial implications both to academia and practitioners.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Maryam Nazari Nafooti ◽  
Nikoo Mohammad Sharifi ◽  
Faezeh Rashid Shomali ◽  
Hajar Gholi Pasandeh ◽  
Elham Tadrisi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kléber Formiga Miranda ◽  
Jefferson Ricardo do Amaral Melo ◽  
Orleans Silva Martins

Purpose This study aims to examine the listing of firms at the highest corporate governance level of the Brazilian stock exchange (B3) as a means of legitimation and its relationship with risk and return on investment. Design/methodology/approach This paper analyzes 205 companies from 2010 to 2019, in which firms listed at the Novo Mercado level were compared with groups composed of other firms traded on B3. Findings The main results demonstrate that a listing at the supposedly higher level of corporate governance in Brazil does not indicate lower risk, a higher return or even a better risk-return ratio. Research limitations/implications The findings are restricted to this sample, representing the association identified between the analyzed phenomena and not a cause-effect relationship. Practical implications The highest level of corporate governance in Brazil brings together firms that present a higher risk (at least systematic) and lower returns (at least financial) because they seek to legitimize themselves in the market as firms committed to better management practices. Social implications These findings are useful to investors, the stock exchange, regulatory agents and the companies themselves to reflect on the purpose and usefulness of different levels of corporate governance in Brazil. Originality/value This study differs from the others that relate corporate governance to risk or return because it does not deal individually with corporate governance practices, but rather the phenomenon that is listed in a special governance level, created by the stock exchange, serving as a kind of seal legitimation.


Author(s):  
Restu Hayati ◽  
Mimelientesa Irman ◽  
Lintang Nur Agia

Sell in May and go away is a phenomenon of return anomaly that starts in May and lasts until October. These months are called the worst months of stocks. Conversely, the months of November to April are often referred to as the best months of the stock where a higher rate of return is achieved throughout the year. Although it has not been proven academically, this phenomenon has been mentioned by various media in Indonesia such as Kontan, CNN Indonesia, and Tempo Business which are predicted to correct the JCI throughout 2017.  The purpose of this study is to prove the phenomenon of sell in May and go away on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, and find out whether the average best return of the month is affected by the high return in January.  The results prove that even though the average returns increase in November-April was due to the high return in January, but there was no sell in May and go away on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Under these conditions, the direction of the relationship between risk and return is the opposite that directs the Indonesia Stock Exchange to the efficient market hypothesis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document