scholarly journals Pressure Injury Surveillance and Prevention in Australia: Monash Partners Capacity Building Framework

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Team ◽  
Angela Jones ◽  
Helena Teede ◽  
Carolina D. Weller

Pressure injury is a common hospital acquired complication across the globe. The severity of hospital acquired pressure injury ranges from skin redness and no skin breakdown to full skin and tissue loss, exposing tendons and bones. Pressure injury can significantly impact on quality of life. In addition to the human cost, hospital acquired pressure injury carries a high economic burden with the cost of treatment far outweighing preventative measures. Hospital acquired pressure injury rates are a key indicator of health services performance. Globally, health care services aim to reduce its incidence. In Australia, the federal health minister has prioritised the need for improvement in hospital acquired pressure injury surveillance and prevention. Capacity building is vital to optimise pressure injury surveillance and prevention in acute care services. In this perspective article, we provide a framework for capacity building to optimise hospital acquired pressure injury prevention and surveillance in a large cross-sector collaborative partnership in Australia. This framework comprises six key action areas in capacity building to optimise pressure injury outcomes, this include: research, organizational development, workforce development, leadership, collaboration, and consumer involvement.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Team ◽  
Angela Jones ◽  
Helena Teede ◽  
Carolina D. Weller

A hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) is a common complication across the globe. The severity of HAPI ranges from skin redness and no skin breakdown to full skin and tissue loss, exposing the tendons and bones. HAPI can significantly impact the quality of life. In addition to the human cost, this injury carries a high economic burden with the cost of treatment far outweighing the preventative measures. The HAPI rates are a key indicator of health services performance. Globally, healthcare services aim to reduce its incidence. In Australia, the federal health minister has prioritised the need for improvement in HAPI surveillance and prevention. Capacity building is vital to optimise pressure injury (PI) surveillance and prevention in acute care services. In this perspective article, we provide a framework for capacity building to optimise HAPI prevention and surveillance in a large cross-sector collaborative partnership in Australia. This framework comprises six key action areas in capacity building to optimise the HAPI outcomes, such as research, organisational development, workforce development, leadership, collaboration, and consumer involvement.


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 493-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Royle ◽  
Sandy Oliver

Objectives: This study aims to describe a cycle of development leading to sustainable methods for involving consumers in the management of a program commissioning health technology assessment.Methods: Staff time was dedicated to developing procedures for recruiting and briefing consumers to participate in prioritizing, commissioning, and reporting research. Resources and support were developed in light of early feedback from consumers and those working with them. These were piloted and amended before being used routinely.Results: Over 4 years, procedures and resources have been developed to support six consumers attending seven to eight prioritization meetings a year; thirty to forty-five consumers each year commenting on research need for particular topics; thirty consumers a year commenting on research proposals, and twenty a year commenting on research reports. The procedures include clear job descriptions, induction and development days, clear briefing materials, payment for substantial tasks, and regularly seeking feedback to improve procedures.Conclusions: Explicit, inclusive, and reproducible methods for supporting consumer involvement that satisfy National Health Service policy recommendations for involving consumers in research require dedicated staff time to support a cycle of organizational development.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152483992110241
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Bloom ◽  
Kisha C. Hampton ◽  
Kimber Blackwell ◽  
Gary A. Gibson ◽  
Christopher Roberson ◽  
...  

Sickle cell disease (SCD) was once a disease of childhood because of a limited life expectancy. Due to medical advances, it is now common for people with SCD to live into adulthood. Funding and resources for adults with SCD, however, remain limited. Adult patients would benefit from increased access to medical care, mental health care services, and workforce development. The Indiana Sickle Cell Consortium, a group of medical providers and community-based organizations, worked closely with people living with SCD and their family members to create a campaign advocating for state funding for programs for adults with SCD. This campaign culminated with the passage of a bill that provides $250,000 in funding for program development for adults with SCD. The bill also directs the Indiana Department of Health to carry out a needs assessment for people with SCD in Indiana. However, continued efforts are needed to reduce health disparities for people with SCD. The Indiana Sickle Cell Consortium will continue advocacy efforts in future legislative cycles and bring attention to the health inequities that affect people with SCD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Alderden ◽  
Kathryn P. Drake ◽  
Andrew Wilson ◽  
Jonathan Dimas ◽  
Mollie R. Cummins ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPrIs) are areas of damage to the skin occurring among 5–10% of surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients. HAPrIs are mostly preventable; however, prevention may require measures not feasible for every patient because of the cost or intensity of nursing care. Therefore, recommended standards of practice include HAPrI risk assessment at routine intervals. However, no HAPrI risk-prediction tools demonstrate adequate predictive validity in the ICU population. The purpose of the current study was to develop and compare models predicting HAPrIs among surgical ICU patients using electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we obtained data for patients admitted to the surgical ICU or cardiovascular surgical ICU between 2014 and 2018 via query of our institution's EHR. We developed predictive models utilizing three sets of variables: (1) variables obtained during routine care + the Braden Scale (a pressure-injury risk-assessment scale); (2) routine care only; and (3) a parsimonious set of five routine-care variables chosen based on availability from an EHR and data warehouse perspective. Aiming to select the best model for predicting HAPrIs, we split each data set into standard 80:20 train:test sets and applied five classification algorithms. We performed this process on each of the three data sets, evaluating model performance based on continuous performance on the receiver operating characteristic curve and the F1 score. Results Among 5,101 patients included in analysis, 333 (6.5%) developed a HAPrI. F1 scores of the five classification algorithms proved to be a valuable evaluation metric for model performance considering the class imbalance. Models developed with the parsimonious data set had comparable F1 scores to those developed with the larger set of predictor variables. Conclusions Results from this study show the feasibility of using EHR data for accurately predicting HAPrIs and that good performance can be found with a small group of easily accessible predictor variables. Future study is needed to test the models in an external sample.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-51
Author(s):  
Marisa Raynaldo

Practice Problem: Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury (HAPI) is a serious problem in patient care and has deleterious implications for the patient and the healthcare system. A 530-bed acute care hospital in the Rio Grande Valley identified a similar challenge and implemented a HAPI preventive program. PICOT: This evidence-based practice (EBP) project was guided by the following PICOT question: In the Intensive Care Unit/Medical Intensive Care Unit (ICU/MICU) patients aged 18 and older, does a pressure preventive bundle, compared to routine pressure injury care, reduce the incidence of pressure injury, within 21 days? Evidence: The reviewed literature supported evidence of effective use of a pressure injury preventive bundle in reducing the incidence of pressure injuries in an acute care setting. Seven articles met the inclusion criteria and were used for this literature review. Intervention: The evidence-based pressure injury preventive bundle are interventions that included consistent skin risk assessment and the application of a group of clinical practice guidelines composing of moisture management, optimizing nutrition and hydration and minimizing pressure, shear, and friction that were proven to prevent the occurrence of pressure injuries. Outcome: Post-implementation findings showed that there was no reduction in the incidence of HAPI but significant decrease in the severity of the pressure injury from Stage two to Stage one. Conclusion: The staff education, training, and implementation of an evidence-based bundle intervention to prevent the incidence of HAPI proved a positive outcome on reducing the pressure injury severity from Stage Two pressure injuries to Stage One pressure injuries.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Alderden ◽  
Allen Cadavero ◽  
Yunchuan “Lucy” Zhao ◽  
Desiree Dougherty ◽  
Se-Hee Jung ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 54-63
Author(s):  
Jessica Schroeder ◽  
Verna Sitzer

Background Nurses certified in wound, ostomy, and continence monitored an increasing incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injury of the nares due to medical devices, specifically nasogastric tubes, in a metropolitan hospital. A majority of these pressure injuries occurred in patients in the intensive care unit. The organization lacked formal guidelines for preventing such injuries. Objective To decrease the incidence of nasogastric tube–related hospital-acquired pressure injury. Methods The organization’s process improvement model, comprising steps to define, measure, analyze, improve, and control, guided the project. The incidence rate of nasogastric tube–related hospital-acquired pressure injury before the intervention was determined for calendar year 2015 and compared with data obtained after the intervention, for calendar year 2016. An interprofessional team created, implemented, and evaluated the effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines and surveillance strategies for preventing nasogastric tube–related hospital-acquired pressure injury. The team implemented guidelines using the simple mnemonic “CLEAN”: correct tube position, stabilize tube, evaluate area under/near tube, alleviate pressure, note date and time. Results The incidence rate of nasogastric tube–related hospital-acquired pressure injury (0.13 per 1000 patient days in 2015) decreased 100% (0.0 per 1000 patient days in 2016) after the guidelines were implemented in the organization. This rate was sustained for a full year, after which it increased slightly because temporary and new staff lacked knowledge of the guidelines. Conclusions The creation and implementation of clear and specific guidelines for assessing and securing nasogastric tubes successfully reduced nasogastric tube–related hospital-acquired pressure injury.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document