Measurement Discrepancies Between Logged and Self-Reported Digital Media Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The influence of digital media on personal and social well-being is a question of immense public and academic interest. Scholars in this domain often use retrospective self-report measures of the quantity or duration of media use as a proxy for more objective measures, but the validity of these self-report measures remains unclear. Recent advancements in log-based data collection techniques have produced a growing collection of studies indexing both self-reported media use and device-logged measurements. Herein, we report a meta-analysis of this body of research. Based on 104 effect sizes, we found that self-reported media use was only moderately correlated with device-logged measurements, and that these self-report measures were rarely an accurate reflection of logged media use. These results demonstrate that self-reported measures of the quantity or duration of media use are not a valid index of the amount of time people actually spend using media. These findings have serious implications for the study of media use and well- being, suggesting that cautiousness is warranted in drawing conclusions regarding media effects from studies relying solely on self-reported measures of media use.

Download Full-text

A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use

Nature Human Behaviour ◽

10.1038/s41562-021-01117-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Douglas A. Parry ◽

Brittany I. Davidson ◽

Craig J. R. Sewall ◽

Jacob T. Fisher ◽

Hannah Mieczkowski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Digital Media ◽

Media Use ◽

Meta Analysis

Download Full-text

Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the relationship between reported racism and health and well-being for children and youth: a protocol

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043722 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (6) ◽

pp. e043722

Author(s):

Naomi Priest ◽

Kate Doery ◽

Mandy Truong ◽

Shuaijun Guo ◽

Ryan Perry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Health Outcomes ◽

Research Policy ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Well Being ◽

Children And Youth ◽

Effect Sizes ◽

Future Research ◽

Critical Determinant ◽

Health And Well Being

IntroductionRacism is a critical determinant of health and health inequities for children and youth. This protocol aims to update the first systematic review conducted by Priest et al (2013), including a meta-analysis of findings. Based on previous empirical data, it is anticipated that child and youth health will be negatively impacted by racism. Findings from this review will provide updated evidence of effect sizes across outcomes and identify moderators and mediators of relationships between racism and health.Methods and analysisThis systematic review and meta-analysis will include studies that examine associations between experiences of racism and racial discrimination with health outcomes of children and youth aged 0–24 years. Exposure measures include self-reported or proxy reported systemic, interpersonal and intrapersonal racism. Outcome measures include general health and well-being, physical health, mental health, biological markers, healthcare utilisation and health behaviours. A comprehensive search of studies from the earliest time available to October 2020 will be conducted. A random effects meta-analysis will examine the average effect of racism on a range of health outcomes. Study-level moderation will test the difference in effect sizes with regard to various sample and exposure characteristics. This review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.Ethics and disseminationThis review will provide evidence for future research within the field and help to support policy and practice development. Results will be widely disseminated to both academic and non-academic audiences through peer-review publications, community summaries and presentations to research, policy, practice and community audiences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020184055.

Download Full-text

Four decades of military posttraumatic stress: Protocol for a meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment approaches and efficacy (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.33151 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jenny Jing Wen Liu ◽

Anthony Nazarov ◽

Bethany Easterbrook ◽

Rachel A. Plouffe ◽

Tri Le ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Treatment Outcomes ◽

Posttraumatic Stress ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Ptsd Symptom ◽

Service Providers ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Well Being ◽

Effect Sizes ◽

Treatment Approaches

BACKGROUND Over 85% of active members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) have been exposed to potentially traumatic events linked to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). At the time of transition to civilian life, as high as one in eight Veterans has a diagnosis of PTSD. Given high rates of PTSD in military and Veteran populations, the provision of effective treatment with considerations for their unique challenges and lived experiences is critical in the support of their mental health and well-being. OBJECTIVE The current paper overviews the protocol for conducting a meta-analysis and systematic review substantiating evidence of treatment approaches and effectiveness in treating military-related PTSD. METHODS The PROSPERO pre-registered meta-analysis is being conducted in accordance with PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using the databases PsycInfo, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. After removal of duplicates, a total of 12,002 studies were screened for inclusion. RESULTS Effect sizes will be computed based on changes in PTSD symptom scores over time across studies using validated PTSD scales. A multi-level meta-analysis will examine the overall effects, between-studies effects, and within-studies effects of available evidence for PTSD treatments in military populations. Effect sizes will be compared between pharmacotherapeutic, psychotherapeutic, and alternative/emerging treatment interventions. Finally, meta-regression and sub-group analyses will explore the moderating roles of clinical characteristics (e.g., PTSD symptom clusters), treatment approaches (e.g., therapeutic orientations in psychotherapy and alternative therapies and classifications of drugs in pharmacotherapy), and treatment characteristics (e.g., length of intervention) on treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis will provide the current state of evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of various treatment approaches in military-related PTSD while identifying factors that may influence treatment outcomes. Results will inform clinical decision-making for service providers and service users. Finally, findings will provide insights for future treatment development and practice recommendations to better support the well-being of military and Veteran populations.

Download Full-text

Is Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Effective for People with Hypertension? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 30 Years of Evidence

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18062882 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (6) ◽

pp. 2882

Author(s):

Ciro Conversano ◽

Graziella Orrù ◽

Andrea Pozza ◽

Mario Miccoli ◽

Rebecca Ciacchini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Stress Reduction ◽

Effect Size ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Well Being ◽

Effect Sizes ◽

Medical Conditions ◽

Antihypertensive Medications ◽

Positive Effects ◽

Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction

Background: Hypertension is among the most important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases, which are considered high mortality risk medical conditions. To date, several studies have reported positive effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) interventions on physical and psychological well-being in other medical conditions, but no meta-analysis on MBSR programs for hypertension has been conducted. Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of MBSR programs for hypertension. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of MBSR on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), anxiety, depression, and perceived stress in people with hypertension or pre-hypertension was conducted. The PubMed/MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases were searched in November 2020 to identify relevant studies. Results: Six studies were included. The comparison of MBSR versus control conditions on diastolic BP was associated with a statistically significant mean effect size favoring MBSR over control conditions (MD = −2.029; 95% confidence interval (CI): −3.676 to −0.383, p = 0.016, k = 6; 22 effect sizes overall), without evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 0.000%). The comparison of MBSR versus control conditions on systolic BP was associated with a mean effect size which was statistically significant only at a marginal level (MD = −3.894; 95% CI: −7.736–0.053, p = 0.047, k = 6; 22 effect sizes overall), without evidence of high heterogeneity (I2 = 20.772%). The higher the proportion of participants on antihypertensive medications was, the larger the effects of MBSR were on systolic BP (B = −0.750, z = −2.73, p = 0.003). Conclusions: MBSR seems to be a promising intervention, particularly effective on the reduction of diastolic BP. More well-conducted trials are required.

Download Full-text

Sleep duration during COVID-19 lockdown: systematic review and meta-analysis

10.21203/rs.3.rs-778956/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Yelena Stukalin ◽

Anat Lan ◽

Noga Kronfeld-Schor ◽

Erez Shmueli ◽

Haim Einat

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Sleep Quality ◽

Sleep Duration ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Well Being ◽

Fixed Effect Model ◽

Effect Sizes ◽

Modern World ◽

Cohen’S D ◽

Cohen's D

Abstract In attempts to slow down the spread of COVID-19 pandemic, countries took different measures including lockdowns. Several studies reported the effects of lockdowns on sleep mostly suggesting an increase in sleep duration during lockdowns. This is an interesting outcome as life in the modern world were associated with insufficient sleep. The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of work regarding sleep duration during lockdowns. We searched PubMed using the terms “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “lockdown”, “stay at home”, “quarantine” and “sleep” and found 262 papers. After applying exclusion criteria, we identified 26 papers (with 35 discrete studies) for the meta-analysis. A fixed effect model was used with effect sizes estimated using Cohen’s d and heterogeneity of effect sizes tested using the Cochran’s Q test statistics. Most studies (31/35) report an increase in sleep duration during lockdown periods with a mean (± STD) of 31.5 ± 21.2 minutes. Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) ranged between 0.08 and 3.34, which are considered between very small and huge. Q statistics was 4859.3 (p < 0.0001) and with no indication for publication bias (Egger’s test, p = 0.45). Eight studies also reported measures of “sleep quality” with 6/8 reporting worsening of sleep quality with small to large effect sizes Cohen’s d range between 0.09 and 1.86). The study demonstrates increased sleep duration during lockdowns. Increased sleep duration is a positive change, but effects on well-being during lockdowns might be overshadowed by reduced sleep quality, increased stress, and lowered mood. It is interesting whether longer sleep duration habits may survive to post-COVID-19 days.

Download Full-text

Digital Communication Media Use and Psychological Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis

Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication ◽

10.1093/jcmc/zmz013 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 24 (5) ◽

pp. 259-273 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Dong Liu ◽

Roy F Baumeister ◽

Chia-chen Yang ◽

Baijing Hu

Keyword(s):

Digital Media ◽

Instant Messaging ◽

Media Use ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Well Being ◽

Online Gaming ◽

Point Interaction ◽

Psychological Well Being ◽

Phone Calls ◽

Meta Analyses

Abstract The puzzle of whether digital media are improving or harming psychological well-being has been plaguing researchers and the public for decades. Derived from media richness theory, this study proposed that phone calls and texting improve well-being, while use of social network sites (SNSs), instant messaging (IM), and online gaming may displace other social contacts and, thereby, impair well-being. To test this hypothesis, a meta-analysis of 124 studies was conducted. The results showed that phone calls and texting were positively correlated with well-being, whereas online gaming was negatively associated with well-being. Furthermore, the relationship between digital media use and well-being was also contingent upon the way the technology was used. A series of meta-analyses of different types of SNS use and well-being was used to elucidate this point: interaction, self-presentation, and entertainment on SNSs were associated with better well-being, whereas consuming SNSs’ content was associated with poorer well-being.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of Nutritional Education for Obese Older Adults With Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Innovation in Aging ◽

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.1291 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 401-401

Author(s):

Yue-Heng Yin ◽

Liu Yat Justina

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Physical Function ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Experimental Studies ◽

Well Being ◽

Risk Of Bias ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Nutritional Education ◽

Hand Search ◽

Education Interventions

Abstract Obesity has been shown to intensify the decline of physical function and lead to frailty. Nutrition is an important method in managing obesity and frailty, while seldom reviews have ever explored the effects of nutritional education interventions. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42019142403) to explore the effectiveness of nutritional education interventions in managing body composition and physio-psychosocial parameters related to frailty. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies were searched in CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus from 2001 to 2019. Hand search for the reference lists of included papers was conducted as well. We assessed the quality of included studies by Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses and narrative synthesis were used to analyse the data. Two studies with low risk of bias were screened from 180 articles, which involved 177 older people with an average age of 69.69±4.08 years old. The results showed that nutritional education was significantly effective in reducing body weight and fat mass than exercises, and it was beneficial to enhancing physical function and psychosocial well-being. But the effects of nutritional education in increasing muscle strength were not better than exercises. The combined effects of nutritional education and exercises were superior than either exercises or nutritional education interventions solely in preventing the loss of lean mass and bone marrow density, and in improving physical function. Due to limited numbers of relevant studies, the strong evidence of effectiveness of nutritional education interventions on reversing frailty is still lacking.

Download Full-text

Medicine storage, wastage, and associated determinants among urban households: a systematic review and meta-analysis of household surveys

BMC Public Health ◽

10.1186/s12889-021-11100-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Adineh Jafarzadeh ◽

Alireza Mahboub-Ahari ◽

Moslem Najafi ◽

Mahmood Yousefi ◽

Koustuv Dalal

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Supply And Demand ◽

Random Effect ◽

Effect Sizes ◽

Household Surveys ◽

Affective Factors ◽

Urban Households ◽

Medical Needs ◽

Geographical Regions

Abstract Background Irrational household storage of medicines is a world-wide problem, which triggers medicine wastage as well as its associated harms. This study aimed to include all available evidences from literature to perform a focused examination of the prevalence and factors associated with medicine storage and wastage among urban households. This systematic review and meta-analysis mapped the existing literature on the burden, outcomes, and affective socio-economic factors of medicine storage among urban households. In addition, this study estimated pooled effect sizes for storage and wastage rates. Methods Household surveys evaluating modality, size, costs, and affective factors of medicines storage at home were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, SCOPUS, ProQuest, and Google scholar databases in 2019. Random effect meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to pool effect sizes for medicine storage and wastage prevalence among different geographical regions. Results From the 2604 initial records, 20 studies were selected for systematic review and 16 articles were selected for meta-analysis. An overall pooled-prevalence of medicine storage and real wastage rate was 77 and 15%, respectively. In this regard, some significant differences were observed between geographical regions. Southwest Asia region had the highest storage and wastage rates. The most common classes of medicines found in households belonged to the Infective agents for systemic (17.4%) and the Nervous system (16.4%). Moreover, income, education, age, the presence of chronic illness, female gender, and insurance coverage were found to be associated with higher home storage. The most commonly used method of disposal was throwing them in the garbage. Conclusions Factors beyond medical needs were also found to be associated with medicine storage, which urges effective strategies in the supply and demand side of the medicine consumption chain. The first necessary step to mitigate home storage is establishing an adequate legislation and strict enforcement of regulations on dispensing, prescription, and marketing of medicines. Patient’s pressure on excessive prescription, irrational storage, and use of medicines deserve efficient community-centered programs, in order to increase awareness on these issues. So, hazardous consequences of inappropriate disposal should be mitigated by different take back programs, particularly in low and middle income countries.

Download Full-text

Long-term outcomes of psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Psychological Medicine ◽

10.1017/s003329172100163x ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Maxi Weber ◽

Sarah Schumacher ◽

Wiebke Hannig ◽

Jürgen Barth ◽

Annett Lotzin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Depressive Symptoms ◽

Stress Disorder ◽

Psychological Treatment ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Effect Sizes ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Psychological Treatments

Abstract Several types of psychological treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are considered well established and effective, but evidence of their long-term efficacy is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes across psychological treatments for PTSD. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PTSDpubs, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and related articles were searched for randomized controlled trials with at least 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-two studies (N = 2638) met inclusion criteria, and 43 comparisons of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) were available at follow-up. Active treatments for PTSD yielded large effect sizes from pretest to follow-up and a small controlled effect size compared with non-directive control groups at follow-up. Trauma-focused treatment (TFT) and non-TFT showed large improvements from pretest to follow-up, and effect sizes did not significantly differ from each other. Active treatments for comorbid depressive symptoms revealed small to medium effect sizes at follow-up, and improved PTSD and depressive symptoms remained stable from treatment end to follow-up. Military personnel, low proportion of female patients, and self-rated PTSD measures were associated with decreased effect sizes for PTSD at follow-up. The findings suggest that CBT for PTSD is efficacious in the long term. Future studies are needed to determine the lasting efficacy of other psychological treatments and to confirm benefits beyond 12-month follow-up.

Download Full-text

The effectiveness of hope-fostering interventions in palliative care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Palliative Medicine ◽

10.1177/0269216321994728 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 026921632199472

Author(s):

Natalia Salamanca-Balen ◽

Thomas V Merluzzi ◽

Man Chen

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Palliative Care ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Well Being ◽

Medium Effect ◽

Spiritual Well Being ◽

Quasi Experimental

Background: The concept of hope is an important theme in chronic illness and palliative care and has been associated with increased psycho-spiritual well-being and quality of life. Psycho-spiritual interventions have been described in this population, but no systematic review of hope-enhancing interventions or hopelessness-reducing interventions has been conducted for persons with palliative care diseases. Aim: To describe and assess the effectiveness of interventions in palliative care that measure hope and/or hopelessness as an outcome. Design: This systematic review and meta-analysis was pre-registered (Prospero ID: CRD42019119956). Data sources: Electronic databases, journals, and references were searched. We used the Cochrane criteria to assess the risk of bias within studies. Results: Thirty-five studies (24 randomized controlled trials, 5 quasi-experimental, 6 pre-post studies) involving a total of 3296 palliative care patients were included. Compared with usual/standard cancer care alone, interventions significantly increased hope levels at a medium effect size ( g = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.28–0.93) but did not significantly reduce hopelessness ( g = −0.08, 95% CI = −0.18 to 0.02). It was found that interventions significantly increase spirituality ( g = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.02–1.37) and decrease depression ( g = −0.29, 95% CI = −0.51 to −0.07), but had no significant effect over anxiety, quality of life, and symptom burden. Overall, quality of evidence across the included studies was rated as low. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that interventions can be effective in increasing hope in palliative care patients.

Download Full-text