Optional Stopping in a Heteroscedastic World
When making decisions, animals must trade off the benefits of information harvesting against the opportunity cost of prolonged deliberation. Deciding when to stop accumulating information and commit to a choice is challenging in natural environments, where the reliability of decision-relevant information may itself vary unpredictably over time (variable variance or “heteroscedasticity”). We asked humans to perform a categorisation task in which discrete, continuously-valued samples (oriented gratings) arrived in series until the observer made a choice. Human behaviour was best described by a model that adaptively weighted sensory signals by their inverse prediction error, and integrated the resulting quantities to a collapsing decision threshold. This model approximated the output of a Bayesian model that computed the full posterior probability of a correct response, and successfully predicted adaptive weighting of decision information in neural signals. Adaptive weighting of decision information may have evolved to promote optional stopping in hetereoscedastic natural environments.