scholarly journals Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy: A prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 161-166
Author(s):  
Nilesh P Mangam
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Time Required

Background: Appendicitis is one of the common pathologies encountered in surgical practice. Except in minority of the cases, the treatment is usually surgical. Till recent past, open appendectomy has been the procedure of choice for appendicitis. With increasing expertise in laparoscopic surgeries more and more surgeons are utilizing the laparoscopic approach for appendectomy. Laparoscopic surgeries have distinct advantages such as less surgical trauma, improved and quick postoperative recovery, and esthetic results. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is rapidly gaining acceptability in young population because of its cosmetic advantages. Moreover, these surgeries also avoid the risk of port-site hernias and the possibility of wound infection. Aims and Objective: The purpose of this study is to present our initial experience with this surgery using a single incision laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) using conventional instruments. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective cohort study conducted in the department of surgery of a tertiary care medical college situated in an urban area. The duration of the study was 2 years. All adult patients diagnosed to be having uncomplicated appendicitis and undergoing appendectomy by SILS were included in this study on the basis of a predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pre-operative data collected included age, sex, weight, duration of complaint, concomitant medical conditions (like ischemic heart disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, and liver cirrhosis) and previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. All patients were treated by SILS except 1 patient in whom the procedure was converted to open surgery. Mean surgical time, Intraoperative procedure details and postoperative complications were studied in all the cases. p < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was done using SSPS 21.0 software. Results: Out of 30 patients in this study 26 patients were female and 4 patients were male. The male to female ratio was found to be 1:6.15. Mean age of studied cases was found to be 26.2 years. Operative time required for the first 15 cases in an average was 120.00 min however it was reduced for the next 15 cases was 73.73 min. Overall time required in an average was 96.86 min. Out of 30 cases, The procedure was completed with Single Incision LA in 23 Patients, i.e., 76.6 %. In the initial cases, we started with two 5 mm and one 10mm port. To reduce crowding we replaced the 5 mm port to 3 mm port. The 10 mm port was also replaced by 5 mm in the past few cases in 1 patient the procedure was converted to open surgery. The analysis of postoperative complications showed that five patients had Post-Operative wound Infection. One patient had post-operative peritonitis. Conclusion: SILS is a feasible and safe surgical method for appendectomy and is being increasingly preferred particularly by young patients due to its excellent cosmetic results.

scholarly journals Complications after Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 34-41
Author(s):  
Andrej Nikolovski ◽  
Shenol Tahir ◽  
Dragoslav Mladenovikj
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Open Group ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
Low Incidence

Background. Laparoscopic appendectomy is established method in the treatment of complicated appendicitis. Certain advantages of the technique do not fulfill the expectations for its superiority over the open appendectomy as when it is used for uncomplicated appendicitis. This is generally caused because of the high variety of postoperative complications reported in different series for complicated appendicitis. Material and methods. This prospective interventional clinical study analyzes 61 patients operated with laparoscopic and open appendectomy due to complicated appendicitis, with an end point of comparing the intra and postoperative complications in both groups. Results. Conversion in open appendectomy was forced in one patient (1.63%). The operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.048). Wound infection was significantly predominant in the open group (p = 0.045). Postoperative intraabdominal abscess occurred in one patient in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.52). The overall morbidity was 26.2% (7 patients in the laparoscopic, and 9 in the open group; p = 0.59). Length of stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.00001). Conclusion. Certain significant advantages of the laparoscopic appendectomy as low incidence of wound infection, short hospitalization, less postoperative pain and faster socialization makes the laparoscopy up to date method in the treatment of complicated appendicitis.

scholarly journals Comparative study of single incision versus conventional three port laparoscopic appendectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 3852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Rometra ◽  
Rahil Rometra ◽  
Neeraj Koul ◽  
R. K. Chrungoo
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Abdominal Incision ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Appendicitis is primarily a disease of adolescents and young adults with a peak incidence in the second and third decades of life. Appendectomy for appendicitis is the most commonly performed emergency operation in the world.For more than a century, open appendectomy remained the gold standard for the treatment of acute appendicitis.  Laparoscopic surgery has become popular universally during the last couple of decades.   Efforts are still being made to decrease abdominal incision and visible scars after laparoscopy.  Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new innovation allowing minimal access surgery to be performed through a single umbilical incision.Methods: It was a prospective study carried out on 50 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis. They were divided into two groups of 25 each. One group underwent Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy (CLA) and other group underwent Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS).  Results were compared with regard to mean operative time,   complications, post-operative pain and discomfort (vas score at 12 hours), post-operative morbidity, duration of hospital stay and condition at discharge and cosmesis.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the parameters like postoperative pain, hospital stay and complication profile. However, operative time for SILS appendectomy were found to be significantly higher compared to conventional group.Conclusions: Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy using standard laparoscopic instruments is safe and effective, feasible surgery with better cosmetic results.

scholarly journals Single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 3685
Author(s):  
Jawahar K. ◽  
Sharanya R. ◽  
Sanjay Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Satisfaction Score ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Patient Satisfaction Score ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic ◽  
Lower Pain Score

Background: Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) is a new technique of minimally invasive surgery using a single incision to minimize all ports to one site, hence a single scar that can be strategically placed in the umbilicus for a perceived scar less abdomen.Methods: We report this study evaluating the possible advantages of SILS versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy through a randomized controlled trial. The study population includes patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis. A total of 50 patients underwent appendectomy, patients were randomly assigned to either SILS appendectomy or conventional appendectomy in 1:1 ratio. Primary end points were operative time, complication rate, postoperative pain, post-operative hospital stay and patient satisfaction.Results: The pain scores measured at 48 hours were significantly lower in SILS group than conventional Lap appendectomy group. Patients had significant satisfaction score and lower pain score in SILS group than Lap appendectomy group measured at 6 weeks after appendectomy. However, the post-operative stay was similar in both the groups. There was no conversion to open appendectomy in both the groups. Patient satisfaction score in SILA was found to be higher than CLA. Operating times were similar and post-operative stay was apparently lower.Conclusions: SIL appendectomy is as safe and effective as conventional lap appendectomy.

Association of Wound Infection with Various Surgical Technique Applied for Appendectomy in Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2163-2165
Author(s):  
Muhammad Armughan ◽  
Imran Sadiq ◽  
Shafqat Mukhtar ◽  
Hafiz Ahmad Altaf
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Perforated Appendix

Background: Perforated appendix in diabetic as well as hypertensive patients is associated with elevated risks of postoperative infectious complications such as wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess. Objective: To identify better appendectomy procedure for diabetic and hypertensive patients. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery, Unit l, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur from 10th October 2020 to 9th April 2021. Methodology: Ninety eight patients meeting the criteria of perforated appendix were divided in two groups; one group consisted of 49 patients who were managed by open surgical procedure. Second group was consisted of 49 patients who were managed by laparoscopic surgical procedure. Patient outcomes in-terms of wound infections, operative time and duration of surgery was assessed. Results: Mean age of patients was 25.49±6.03 years. There were 17 hypertensive while 15 diabetic patients. Wound infection was seen in 21% and 28% open surgery diabetic and hypertensive patients respectively in comparison to 10%and 8% in laparoscopic appendectomy diabetic and hypertensive patients respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is associated with significantly lower rates of post-operative wound infections and shorter hospital stay in comparison to open appendectomy in diabetic and hypertensive patients of perforated appendicitis. Key Words: Perforated appendix, laparoscopic, open appendectomy

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy in Children: Evolution over Time

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-46
Author(s):  
Laura Dumitrică ◽  
Luminiţa Dobrotă ◽  
Bogdan Neamţu
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Ileus ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
The World ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Reduced Risk

Abstract Laparoscopic appendicitis surgery is accepted in more and more centers around the world. Studies and meta-analyses of studies have shown that laparoscopic appendicitis is a feasible and safe procedure with numerous clinical benefits, such as shorter postoperative ileus, lower incidence of wound infection, lower postoperative pain and duration, recurrence faster to activities. Because laparoscopic appendectomy has been associated with a reduced risk of surgical complications, it may provide a better alternative versus open surgery. A review of data relevant to the evaluation of laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy as reflected in the literature of the last 2 decades would be relevant for the growing progressive interest of laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis and for its comparative evaluation with classical open appendicitis intervention.

scholarly journals Unligature method of laparoscopic appendectomy in children

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
Vyacheslav G. Svarich ◽  
Evgeniy G. Perevozchikov ◽  
Ilya M. Kagantsov
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Inflammatory Infiltration ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Clinical Hospital ◽  
Digital Assessment

Aim. On the basis of the accumulated clinical material to show the possibility of a ligature-free method of laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Materials and methods. From 2000 to 2019, 2044 children with acute appendicitis were treated in the surgical department of the Republican childrens clinical hospital in Syktyvkar. Of these, 651 patients had an open appendectomy with treatment of the stump of the vermiform process by the submersible method, 1363 children had a laparoscopic appendectomy with ligature treatment of the stump of the process, and 32 patients had their first non-ligature laparoscopic appendectomy with the intersection of the vermiform process with the Ligasure device. Results. On average, surgery for ligature-free laparoscopic appendectomy lasted 7 3 minutes less than for laparoscopic appendectomy using the ligature method for treating the stump of the worm-like process. Experimentally, it was found that this method of appendectomy should not be used when the thickness of the worm-like process is more than 1.5 cm, with pronounced inflammatory infiltration of the caecum dome and perforation at the base of the process. With ligature-free appendectomy, the operation time was reduced. In the period from 1 to 6 months, there were no intra-abdominal postoperative complications associated with the new method of surgery. Conclusion. Ligar-free laparoscopic appendectomy in children using modern high-energy platforms with a digital assessment of the degree of tissue coagulation readiness made it possible to avoid intraoperative and postoperative complications, simplify the technique of its implementation, and reduce the time of surgery.

scholarly journals Appendectomized Patient and Infections after Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Asgary ◽  
Hosein Hemmati
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
The World ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
The Common

Appendicitis is one of the common surgeries all over the world, and its diagnosis is difficult and based on clinical examinations or its symptoms. Moreover, after the surgery is accomplished, it is probable that the patient is faced with certain problems and complications. In this regard, the present study was carried out in order to review the infections caused after appendicitis surgery. The databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct and relevant articles were collected, in which keywords like appendicitis surgery, perforation, laparoscopy, and infection had been used. A total number of 6,000 articles were retrieved, out of which, 74 relevant articles were examined. The results of the present study indicated that perforated appendix can be the biggest cause of infection and abscess after intra-abdominal surgery. An increase in the level of C-reactive protein and leukocytes is accompanied with the risk of postoperative complications including infection and abscess. Numerous studies have reported that formation of infection and abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy is a little more than open appendectomy. It is not necessary to consume antibiotics after a non-perforated appendectomy. It is sufficient to consume antibiotics for 3 to 5 days after a perforated appendectomy to prevent infection and abscess. With the above results now it is evident that the appendicitis and its complications are still a common problem among people all over the world. There is still much to discuss among the surgeons with regards to appendicitis and its complications.

scholarly journals Application of Iconport single incision sealing device in laparoscopic surgery.(Experience in 125 cases of appendectomy)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojun Wang ◽  
Haibo Jin ◽  
YongFeng Shuai ◽  
YiZhong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Peritoneal Effusion ◽  
Port Device ◽  
Sealing Device

Abstract Background To discuss the reliability and clinical value of Iconport, a Self-made single port device, which was applied for transumbilical single port laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods The incision was around 2.5 cm long with curved form around umbilicus. And the skin and each layer of the abdominal wall were cut in sequence. Then the silica gel sleeve of the self-made single-incision sealing device was folded, clamped by the forceps, and carefully inserted into the incision for sealing. The operation of laparoscopic appendectomy was accomplished by-use routine linetype laparoscopic instruments via Iconport. The specimen was discharged from peritoneal cavity through the single port device. Two layers of incision, linea alba abdominus and skin, were separately sutured by absorbable thread and each layer was sutured successively. Results Among the 125 patients, 119 were successfully performed single-port laparoscopic appendectomy, with the operation time ranging from 30 to 110 min (69.34±21.4 min on average). In 6 cases, auxiliary operating hole was added or laparotomy was performed. Total hospital stay was 5.0±1.8 (2-14) days. 5 cases of incision infection. All patients were followed up for 1 to 6 months after surgery, with an average of 3 months. There were no complications such as bleeding, intestinal leakage, intestinal obstruction, and residual peritoneal effusion. Conclusion In single-incision laparoscopic surgery, the u-shaped incision around the umbilical margin of 2.5cm for adult can not only meet the requirements of flexibility of instruments in the operation, but also meet the aesthetic requirements because the incision scar is hidden in the umbilical foramen or looks like the umbilical foramen after the operation. Iconport single-hole device, which has potential promotion value, can be used in relatively simple laparoscopic surgery alone or combined with a single puncture device for relatively complex laparoscopic surgery.

scholarly journals Transumblical Single Incision Two-Port Laparoscopic Assisted Appendectomy: Early Experience in Paediatric Patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-294
Author(s):  
MA Nowshad ◽  
A Mostaque ◽  
SMA Shahid ◽  
HK Emrul
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Safe Technique ◽  
Port System ◽  
Laparoscopic Assisted ◽  
Additional Port

Laparoscopic appendectomy considered as superior alternative to open appendectomy. Usual laparoscopic appendectomy is performed with the three port system. In this study, we performed a unique single transumblical incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy with the aim to reduce postoperative port site complication as well as improving cosmesis and patients satisfaction. From January 2010, 32 patients were admitted with clinically diagnosed acute appendicitis and were randomly assigned to single transumblical incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy. Transumblical single incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy was attempted in all patients (9 males and 23 females) with an average age of 9.2 years. Transumblical single incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy was successfully completed in 31 patients. In one patient, another additional port required due to severe adhesion of the appendix. Mean operation time was 25.2 minutes (range, 17-38), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 1.Sdays (range 1-2). Postoperative complications (local pericaecal abscess) occurred in one case that was treated conservatively. Transumblical single incision two-port laparoscopic assisted appendectomy appears to be a feasible and safe technique for the treatment of acute appendicitis in the paediatric setting. It allows nearly scar less abdominal surgery. The true benefit of the technique should be assessed by randomized controlled trials.TAJ 2009; 22(1): 289-294

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document