scholarly journals Spatial Pattern of Precipitation in GPM-Era Satellite Products against Rain Gauge Measurements over Nepal

Jalawaayu ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-56
Author(s):  
Bharat Badayar Joshi ◽  
Munawar Ali ◽  
Dibit Aryal ◽  
Laxman Paneru ◽  
Bhaskar Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
High Elevation ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Precipitation Pattern ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Critical Success Index ◽  
Precipitation Events ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Better Than

Precipitation in a mountainous region is highly variable due to the complex terrain. Satellite-based precipitation estimates are potential alternatives to gauge measurements in these regions, as these typical measurements are not available or are scarce in high elevation areas. However, the accuracy of these gridded precipitation datasets need to be addressed before further usage. In this study, an evaluation of the spatial precipitation pattern in satellite-based precipitation products is provided, including satellite-only (Integrated Multi satellite Retrievals for GPM IMERG-UCORR and Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP-MVK) and gauge calibrated (IMERG-CORR and GSMaP-Gauge) products, with a spatial resolution of 0.1°, which is compared to 387-gauge measurements in Nepal from April 2014 to December 2016. The major results are as follows: (1) The gauge calibrated version 5 IMERG-CORR and version 6 GSMaP-Gauge are relatively better than the satellite-only datasets, although they all underestimate the observed precipitation. (2) The daily gauge calibrated GSMaP-Gauge performs fairly well in low and mid-elevation areas, whereas the monthly gauge calibrated IMERG-C performs better in high-elevation areas. (3) For the daily time scale, IMERG-CORR shows a better ability to detect the true precipitation (higher Probability of Detection (POD)) and (lowest False Alarm Ratio (FAR)) events among all datasets. However, all four satellite-based precipitation datasets accurately detect (Critical Success Index (CSI) >40%) precipitation and no-precipitation events. The results of this work provide the systematic quantification of IMERG and GSMaP of satellite precipitation products over Nepal using station observations and delivers a helpful statistical basis for the selection of these datasets for future scientific research.

scholarly journals Assessment of IMERG-V06, TRMM-3B42V7, SM2RAIN-ASCAT, and PERSIANN-CDR Precipitation Products over the Hindu Kush Mountains of Pakistan, South Asia

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3871
Author(s):  
Ali Hamza ◽  
Muhammad Naveed Anjum ◽  
Muhammad Jehanzeb Masud Cheema ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Arslan Afzal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Hindu Kush ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Critical Success Index ◽  
Precipitation Events ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Daily Time

In this study, the performances of four satellite-based precipitation products (IMERG-V06 Final-Run, TRMM-3B42V7, SM2Rain-ASCAT, and PERSIANN-CDR) were assessed with reference to the measurements of in-situ gauges at daily, monthly, seasonal, and annual scales from 2010 to 2017, over the Hindu Kush Mountains of Pakistan. The products were evaluated over the entire domain and at point-to-pixel scales. Different evaluation indices (Correlation Coefficient (CC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Bias, and relative Bias (rBias)) and categorical indices (False Alarm Ration (FAR), Critical Success Index (CSI), Success Ratio (SR), and Probability of Detection (POD)) were used to assess the performances of the products considered in this study. Our results indicated the following. (1) IMERG-V06 and PERSIANN capably tracked the spatio-temporal variation of precipitation over the studied region. (2) All satellite-based products were in better agreement with the reference data on the monthly scales than on daily time scales. (3) On seasonal scale, the precipitation detection skills of IMERG-V06 and PERSIANN-CDR were better than those of SM2Rain-ASCAT and TRMM-3B42V7. In all seasons, overall performance of IMERG-V06 and PERSIANN-CDR was better than TRMM-3B42V7 and SM2Rain-ASCAT. (4) However, all products were uncertain in detecting light and moderate precipitation events. Consequently, we recommend the use of IMERG-V06 and PERSIANN-CDR products for subsequent hydro-meteorological studies in the Hindu Kush range.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Precipitation Estimates CMORPH-CRT on Regions of Mexico with Different Climates

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1722
Author(s):  
José L. Bruster-Flores ◽  
Ruperto Ortiz-Gómez ◽  
Adrian L. Ferriño-Fierro ◽  
Víctor H. Guerra-Cobián ◽  
Dagoberto Burgos-Flores ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Absolute Error ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Global Coverage ◽  
Climate Prediction Center ◽  
Critical Success Index ◽  
Precipitation Events

Satellite-based precipitation (SBP) products with global coverage have the potential to overcome the lack of information in places where there are no rain gauges to perform hydrological analyses; however, it is necessary to evaluate the reliability of the SBP products. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Climate Prediction Center morphing technique with corrected bias (CMORPH-CRT) product in 14 sites in Mexico. The evaluation was carried out using two approaches: (1) using categorical metrics that include indicators of probability of detection (POD), false alarm rate (FAR), critical success index (CSI), and frequency bias index (FBI); and (2) through statistical indicators such as the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), relative bias (RB), and correlation coefficient (CC). The analysis was carried out with two levels of temporal aggregation: 30 min and daily. The results indicate that the CMORPH-CRT product overestimates the number of precipitation events in most cases since FBI values greater than 1 in 78.6% of analyzed stations were obtained. Also, we obtained CC values in the range of 0.018 to 0.625, which implied weak to moderate correlations, and found that in all stations, the CMORPH-CRT product overestimates the precipitation (RB > 0).

scholarly journals A comparison between high-resolution satellite precipitation estimates and gauge measured data: case study of Gorganrood basin, Iran

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donya Dezfooli ◽  
Banafsheh Abdollahi ◽  
Seyed-Mohammad Hosseini-Moghari ◽  
Kumars Ebrahimi
Keyword(s):  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Absolute Error ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Seasonal Basis ◽  
Precipitation Gauge ◽  
Critical Success Index ◽  
Trmm 3B42

Abstract The aim of this paper is to evaluate the accuracy of the precipitation data gathered from satellites including PERSIANN, TRMM-3B42V7, TRMM-3B42RTV7, and CMORPH, over Gorganrood basin, Iran. The data collected from these satellites (2003–2007) were then compared with precipitation gauge observations at six stations, namely, Tamar, Ramiyan, Bahlakeh-Dashli, Sadegorgan, Fazel-Abad, and Ghaffar-Haji. To compare these two groups, mean absolute error (MAE), bias, root mean square error (RMSE), and Pearson correlation coefficient criteria were calculated on daily, monthly, and seasonal basis. Furthermore, probability of detection (POD), false alarm ratio (FAR), and critical success index (CSI) were calculated for these datasets. Results indicate that, on a monthly scale, the highest correlation between observed and satellite-gathered data calculated is 0.404 for TRMM-3B42 at Bahlakeh-Dashli station. At a seasonal scale, the highest correlation is calculated for winter data and using PERSIANN data, while for the other seasons, TRMM-3B42 data showed the best correlation with observed data. The high values of RMSE and MAE for winter data showed that the satellites provided poor estimations at this season. The best and the worst values of RMSE for studied satellites belonged to Sadegorgan and Ramiyan stations, respectively. Furthermore, the PERSIANN gains a better CSI and POD while TRMM-3B42V7 showed a better FAR.

scholarly journals Assessment of PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-CDR, SM2RAIN-ASCAT, and CHIRPS-2.0 Rainfall Products over a Semi-Arid Subtropical Climatic Region

Water ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 147
Author(s):  
Muhammad Naveed Anjum ◽  
Muhammad Irfan ◽  
Muhammad Waseem ◽  
Megersa Kebede Leta ◽  
Usama Muhammad Niazi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Spatiotemporal Variability ◽  
Annual Rainfall ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Punjab Province ◽  
Critical Success Index ◽  
Semi Arid ◽  
Better Than

This study compares the performance of four satellite-based rainfall products (SRPs) (PERSIANN-CCS, PERSIANN-CDR, SM2RAIN-ASCAT, and CHIRPS-2.0) in a semi-arid subtropical region. As a case study, Punjab Province of Pakistan was considered for this assessment. Using observations from in-situ meteorological stations, the uncertainty in daily, monthly, seasonal, and annual rainfall estimates of SRPs at pixel and regional scales during 2010–2018 were examined. Several evaluation indices (Correlation Coefficient (CC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Bias, and relative Bias (rBias), as well as categorical indices (Probability of Detection (POD), Critical Success Index (CSI), and False Alarm Ration (FAR)) were used to assess the performance of the SRPs. The following findings were found: (1) CHIRPS-2.0 and SM2RAIN-ASCAT products were capable of tracking the spatiotemporal variability of observed rainfall, (2) all SRPs had higher overall performances in the northwestern parts of the province than the other parts, (3) all SRP estimates were in better agreement with ground-based monthly observations than daily records, and (4) on the seasonal scale, CHIRPS-2.0 and SM2RAIN-ASCAT were better than PERSIANN-CCS and PERSIANN. In all seasons, CHIRPS-2.0 and SM2RAIN-ASCAT outperformed PERSIANN-CCS and PERSIANN-CDR. Based on our findings, we recommend that hydrometeorological investigations in Pakistan’s Punjab Province employ monthly estimates of CHIRPS-2.0 and SM2RAIN-ASCAT products.

scholarly journals Comprehensive Comparisons of State-of-the-Art Gridded Precipitation Estimates for Hydrological Applications over Southern China

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3997
Author(s):  
Zhen Gao ◽  
Bensheng Huang ◽  
Ziqiang Ma ◽  
Xiaohong Chen ◽  
Jing Qiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Southern China ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Accumulated Rainfall ◽  
Daily Scale ◽  
Global Precipitation ◽  
Better Than

Satellite-based precipitation estimates with high quality and spatial-temporal resolutions play a vital role in forcing global or regional meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural models, which are especially useful over large poorly gauged regions. In this study, we apply various statistical indicators to comprehensively analyze the quality and compare the performance of five newly released satellite and reanalysis precipitation products against China Merged Precipitation Analysis (CMPA) rain gauge data, respectively, with 0.1° × 0.1° spatial resolution and two temporal scales (daily and hourly) over southern China from June to August in 2019. These include Precipitation Estimates from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS), European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis v5 (ERA5-Land), Fengyun-4 (FY-4A), Global Satellite Mapping of Precipitation (GSMaP), and Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG). Results indicate that: (1) all five products overestimate the accumulated rainfall in the summer, with FY-4A being the most severe; additionally, FY-4A cannot capture the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of precipitation over southern China. (2) IMERG and GSMaP perform better than the other three datasets at both daily and hourly scales; IMERG correlates slightly better than GSMaP against CMPA data, while it performs worse than GSMaP in terms of probability of detection (POD). (3) ERA5-Land performs better than PERSIANN-CCS and FY-4A at daily scale but shows the worst correlation coefficient (CC), false alarm ratio (FAR), and equitable threat score (ETS) of all precipitation products at hourly scale. (4) The rankings of overall performance on precipitation estimations for this region are IMERG, GSMaP, ERA5-Land, PERSIANN-CCS, and FY-4A at daily scale; and IMERG, GSMaP, PERSIANN-CCS, FY-4A, and ERA5-Land at hourly scale. These findings will provide valuable feedback for improving the current satellite-based precipitation retrieval algorithms and also provide preliminary references for flood forecasting and natural disaster early warning.

scholarly journals RAINBOW: An Operational Oriented Combined IR-Algorithm

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (15) ◽  
pp. 2444
Author(s):  
Leo Pio D’Adderio ◽  
Silvia Puca ◽  
Gianfranco Vulpiani ◽  
Marco Petracca ◽  
Paolo Sanò ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Precipitation Rate ◽  
Precipitation Pattern ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Surface Precipitation ◽  
Radar Network ◽  
Infrared Imager ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

In this paper, precipitation estimates derived from the Italian ground radar network (IT GR) are used in conjunction with Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI) measurements to develop an operational oriented algorithm (RAdar INfrared Blending algorithm for Operational Weather monitoring (RAINBOW)) able to provide precipitation pattern and intensity. The algorithm evaluates surface precipitation over five geographical boxes (in which the study area is divided). It is composed of two main modules that exploit a second-degree polynomial relationship between the SEVIRI brightness temperature at 10.8 µm TB10.8 and the precipitation rate estimates from IT GR. These relationships are applied to each acquisition of SEVIRI in order to provide a surface precipitation map. The results, based on a number of case studies, show good performance of RAINBOW when it is compared with ground reference (precipitation rate map from interpolated rain gauge measurements), with high Probability of Detection (POD) and low False Alarm Ratio (FAR) values, especially for light to moderate precipitation range. At the same time, the mean error (ME) values are about 0 mmh−1, while root mean square error (RMSE) is about 2 mmh−1, highlighting a limited variability of the RAINBOW estimations. The precipitation retrievals from RAINBOW have been also compared with the European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT) Satellite Application Facility on Support to Operational Hydrology and Water Management (H SAF) official microwave (MW)/infrared (IR) combined product (P-IN-SEVIRI). RAINBOW shows better performances than P-IN-SEVIRI, in terms of both detection and estimates of precipitation fields when they are compared to the ground reference. RAINBOW has been designed as an operational product, to provide complementary information to that of the national radar network where the IT GR coverage is absent, or the quality (expressed in terms of Quality Index (QI)) of the RAINBOW estimates is low. The aim of RAINBOW is to complement the radar and rain gauge network supporting the operational precipitation monitoring.

scholarly journals Rainfall Threshold for Flash Flood Warning Based on Model Output of Soil Moisture: Case Study Wernersbach, Germany

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1061
Author(s):  
Thanh Thi Luong ◽  
Judith Pöschmann ◽  
Rico Kronenberg ◽  
Christian Bernhofer
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Rainfall Threshold ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Water Levels ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Flood Warning ◽  
Critical Discharge ◽  
Critical Success Index

Convective rainfall can cause dangerous flash floods within less than six hours. Thus, simple approaches are required for issuing quick warnings. The flash flood guidance (FFG) approach pre-calculates rainfall levels (thresholds) potentially causing critical water levels for a specific catchment. Afterwards, only rainfall and soil moisture information are required to issue warnings. This study applied the principle of FFG to the Wernersbach Catchment (Germany) with excellent data coverage using the BROOK90 water budget model. The rainfall thresholds were determined for durations of 1 to 24 h, by running BROOK90 in “inverse” mode, identifying rainfall values for each duration that led to exceedance of critical discharge (fixed value). After calibrating the model based on its runoff, we ran it in hourly mode with four precipitation types and various levels of initial soil moisture for the period 1996–2010. The rainfall threshold curves showed a very high probability of detection (POD) of 91% for the 40 extracted flash flood events in the study period, however, the false alarm rate (FAR) of 56% and the critical success index (CSI) of 42% should be improved in further studies. The proposed adjusted FFG approach has the potential to provide reliable support in flash flood forecasting.

scholarly journals APPLICATION OF A SPATIAL VERIFICATION METHOD TO GFS PRECIPITATION FORECASTS

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 561
Author(s):  
Fabiani Denise Bender ◽  
Rita Yuri Ynoue
Keyword(s):  
Weather Forecast ◽  
Sao Paulo ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
São Paulo ◽  
Verification Method ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Object Based ◽  
Centroid Distance ◽  
Critical Success Index

BSTRACT. This study aims to describe a spatial analysis of precipitation field with the MODE tool, which consists in comparing features converted from griddedforecast and observed precipitation values. This evaluation was performed daily from April 2010 to March 2011, for the 36-h GFS precipitation forecast started at00 UTC over the state of São Paulo and neighborhood. Besides traditional verification measures, such as accuracy (A), critical success index (CSI), bias (BIAS),probability of detection (POD), and false alarm ratio (FAR); new verification measures are proposed, such as area ratio (AR), centroid distance (CD) and 50th and 90thpercentiles ratio of intensity (PR50 and PR90). Better performance was attained during the rainy season. Part of the errors in the simulations was due to overestimationof the forecasted intensity and precipitation areas.Keywords: object-based verification, weather forecast, precipitation, MODE, São Paulo. RESUMO. Este estudo tem como objetivo descrever uma análise espacial do campo de precipitação com a ferramenta MODE, que consiste em converter valores deprecipitação de grade do campo previsto e observado em objetos, que posteriormente serão comparados entre si. A avaliação é realizada diariamente sobre o estadode São Paulo e vizinhança, para o período de abril de 2010 a março de 2011, para as simulações do modelo GFS iniciadas às 00 UTC, na integração de 36 horas. Além da verificação através de índices tradicionais, como probabilidade de acerto (PA), índice crítico de sucesso (ICS), viés (VIÉS), probabilidade de detecção (PD)e razão de falso alarme (RFA), novos índices de avaliação são propostos, como razão de área (RA), distância do centroide (DC) e razão dos percentis 50 e 90 deintensidade (RP50 e RP90). O melhor desempenho ocorreu para a estação chuvosa. Parte dos erros nas simulações foi devido à superestimativa da intensidade e da área de abrangência dos eventos de precipitação em relação ao observado.Palavras-chave: avaliação baseada em objetos, previsão do tempo, precipitação, MODE, São Paulo.

scholarly journals Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (cGANs) for Near Real-Time Precipitation Estimation from Multispectral GOES-16 Satellite Imageries—PERSIANN-cGAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Negin Hayatbini ◽  
Bailey Kong ◽  
Kuo-lin Hsu ◽  
Phu Nguyen ◽  
Soroosh Sorooshian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Generative Adversarial Networks ◽  
Generative Adversarial Network ◽  
Convolutional Network ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Adversarial Network ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Global Precipitation

In this paper, we present a state-of-the-art precipitation estimation framework which leverages advances in satellite remote sensing as well as Deep Learning (DL). The framework takes advantage of the improvements in spatial, spectral and temporal resolutions of the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) onboard the GOES-16 platform along with elevation information to improve the precipitation estimates. The procedure begins by first deriving a Rain/No Rain (R/NR) binary mask through classification of the pixels and then applying regression to estimate the amount of rainfall for rainy pixels. A Fully Convolutional Network is used as a regressor to predict precipitation estimates. The network is trained using the non-saturating conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) and Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss terms to generate results that better learn the complex distribution of precipitation in the observed data. Common verification metrics such as Probability Of Detection (POD), False Alarm Ratio (FAR), Critical Success Index (CSI), Bias, Correlation and MSE are used to evaluate the accuracy of both R/NR classification and real-valued precipitation estimates. Statistics and visualizations of the evaluation measures show improvements in the precipitation retrieval accuracy in the proposed framework compared to the baseline models trained using conventional MSE loss terms. This framework is proposed as an augmentation for PERSIANN-CCS (Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Network- Cloud Classification System) algorithm for estimating global precipitation.

Spatial and temporal evaluation of multiple gridded precipitation datasets over complex topography and variable climate of Turkey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gokcen Uysal ◽  
Hamed Hafizi ◽  
Ali Arda Sorman
Keyword(s):  
Poor Performance ◽  
Temporal Consistency ◽  
Precipitation Data ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
Dry Seasons ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Autumn And Winter ◽  
Development And Management ◽  
Precipitation Events ◽  
Better Than

<p>Evaluation of problems related to water resources development and management require accurate precipitation estimates. Although ground-based stations provide direct physical measurement of precipitation, the accuracy of gauge-based precipitation data in terms of quality and spatial pattern may still be controversial. On the other hand, Gridded Precipitation Datasets (GPDs) provide high spatial and temporal precipitation estimates. GPDs are continuously changing with the improving technology and updating of retrospective algorithms, but they still need to be assessed over different regions both in space and time before being used for hydro-climatic studies. This study attempts to evaluate the spatio-temporal consistency of 13 different GPDs (CPCv1, MSWEPv2.2, ERA5, CHIRPSv2.0, CHIRPv2.0, IMERGHHFv06, IMERGHHEv06, IMERGHHLv06, TMPA-3b42v07, TMPA-3b42RTv07, PERSIANN-CDR, PERSIANN-CCS and PERSIANN) over Turkey which is a country characterized by diverse climate and complex terrain. The evaluation is performed for daily and monthly time scales considering the entire period of 2015-2019 as well as seasonal (spring, summer, autumn and winter) variability. Precipitation data from 130 stations are provided as reference data for point-to-grid comparison of GPDs. The modified Kling Gupta Efficiency (KGE) is selected for qualitative analysis whereas the Hanssen–Kuipers Score (HKS) is used to identify the ability of GPDs for capturing various precipitation events. The Probability Density Function (PDF) is selected to evaluate the intensity frequency of 13 GPDs for individual daily-based precipitation events. The results indicate that all GPDs have a median KGE performance ranging between -0.11 and 0.53 for daily precipitation while their performance increases in the monthly case (median KGE from 0.16 to 0.82). Gauge-corrected GPDs exhibit slightly better results over the uncorrected datasets in comparison with ground observations. GPDs from multi-source merging perform better than only satellite-based and reanalysis precipitation datasets. Among uncorrected GPDs, ERA5 and CHIRPv2.0 perform better while PERSIANN perform worse in all conditions. MSWEPv2.2 suffers from high-altitude conditions during winter and CHIRPSv2.0 shows poor performance during dry seasons. On the overall, MSWEPv2.2 performs better than CHIRPSv2.0 during daily/monthly, while CHIRPv2.0 performs better than CHIRPSv2.0 for daily time scale.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document