scholarly journals Evaluation of Left ventricular systolic function by Myocardial Deformation Imaging in Hypertensive patients with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Bishow Raj Baral ◽  
Arun Maskey ◽  
Rabi Malla ◽  
Sujeeb Rajbhandari ◽  
Krishna Chandra Adhikari ◽  
...  

Background and Aims:  Hypertension being one of the commonest non communicable diseases is major risk factor leading to premature death.1 With development of, the left ventricular strain imaging technique by echocardiography the consequences of hypertension may be identified and intervene earlier. The aim of study was to show abnormalities in cardiac function in the form of left ventricular strain imaging in hypertensive patients with preserved Ejection fraction. Methods: This  was a cross-sectional, comparative and observational study done in Shahid Gangalal National Heart Centre and National Academy of Medical Sciences, Bir Hospital Kathmandu which included hypertensive patients with baseline examination including a medical history, clinical examination and a standardized trans thoracic echocardiography and strain imaging examination and the findings were compared among age and sex frequency matched 82 healthy adults in 1 : 2 ratio. The independent paired t test was used for the comparative statistical analysis. Results: We enrolled 240 patients in this study, 158 were hypertensive (mean age 48.5 ±6.1 years with 50.6 % female) and 82 healthy control (mean age 45.62 ±6.3 years with 51.2% female). There was no significant difference in conventional echocardiographic parameters between two groups except for left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness that was highest in hypertensive group (p value of <0.001). The hypertensive population has lower mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) value of -18.6% ± 2.06 SD compared to the healthy control population with mean of -19.5% ± 1.1 SD (p value of <0.001). Conclusion: Hypertensive patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction have subclinical left ventricular dysfunction revealed by GLS imaging technique.

Author(s):  
Akinsanya Daniel Olusegun-Joseph ◽  
Kamilu M Karaye ◽  
Adeseye A Akintunde ◽  
Bolanle O Okunowo ◽  
Oladimeji G Opadijo ◽  
...  

Introduction The impact of preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) has been well studied in heart failure, but not in hypertension. We aimed to highlight the prevalence, clinical characteristics, comorbidities and outcomes of hospitalized hypertensives with preserved and reduced LVEF from three teaching hospitals in Nigeria. Methods: This is a retrospective study of hypertensives admitted in 2013 in three teaching hospitals in Lagos, Kano and Ogbomosho, who had echocardiography done while on admission. Medical records and echocardiography parameters of the patients were retrieved and analyzed. Results: 54 admitted hypertensive patients who had echocardiography were recruited, of which 30 (55.6%) had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (RLVEF), defined as ejection fraction <50%; while 24 (44.4%) had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (PLVEF). There were 37(61.5%) females and 17 (31.5%) males. Of the male patients 64.7% had RLVEF, while 35.3% had PLVEF. 19(51.4%) of females had RLVEF, while 48.6% had PLVEF. Mean age of patients with PLVEF was 58.83±12.09 vs 54.83± 18.78 of RLVEF; p-0.19. Commonest comorbidity was Heart failure (HF) followed by stroke (found among 59.3% and 27.8% of patients respectively). RLVEF was significantly commoner than PLVEF in HF patients (68.8% vs 31.3%; p- 0.019); no significant difference in stroke patients (46.7% vs 53.3%; p-0.44). Mortality occurred in 1 (1.85%) patient who had RLVEF.         Conclusion: RLVEF was more common than PLVEF among admitted hypertensive patients; they also have more comorbidities. In-hospital mortality is, however, very low in both groups.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Gavara ◽  
V Marcos-Garces ◽  
C Rios-Navarro ◽  
MP Lopez-Lereu ◽  
JV Monmeneu ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by “Instituto de Salud Carlos III” and “Fondos Europeos de Desarrollo Regional FEDER” Background. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the best tool for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification, but as yet the prognostic value of sequential LVEF assessment for major adverse cardiac event (MACE) prediction after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is uncertain. Purpose. We explored the prognostic impact of sequential assessment of CMR-derived LVEF after STEMI to predict subsequent MACE. Methods. We recruited 1036 STEMI patients in a large multicenter registry. LVEF (reduced [r]: &lt;40%; mid-range [mr]: 40-49%; preserved [p]: ≥50%) was sequentially quantified by CMR at 1 week and after &gt;3 months of follow-up. MACE was regarded as cardiovascular death or re-admission for acute heart failure after follow-up CMR. Results. During a 5.7-year mean follow-up, 82 MACE (8%) were registered. The MACE rate was higher only in patients with LVEF &lt; 40% at follow-up CMR (r-LVEF 22%, mr-LVEF 7%, p-LVEF 6%; p-value &lt; 0.001). Based on LVEF dynamics from 1-week to follow-up CMR, incidence of MACE was 5% for sustained LVEF³40% (n = 783), 13% for improved LVEF (from &lt;40 to ³40%, n = 96), 21% for worsened LVEF (from ³40% to &lt;40%, n = 34) and 22% for sustained LVEF &lt;40% (n = 100), p-value &lt; 0.001. Using a Markov approach that considered all studies performed, transitions towards improved LVEF predominated and only r-LVEF (at any time assessed) was significantly related to higher incidence of subsequent MACE. Conclusions. LVEF constitutes a pivotal CMR index for simple and dynamic post-STEMI risk stratification. Detection of reduced LVEF (&lt;40%) by CMR at any time during follow-up identifies a small subset of patients at high risk of subsequent events.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Tabata ◽  
Kazuhiro Shimizu ◽  
Yukihiro Morinaga ◽  
Naoaki Tanji ◽  
Ruiko Yoshida ◽  
...  

Background: To investigate the relationship between arterial stiffness, reflected by cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) value, and left atrial (LA) phasic function in hypertensive patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).Methods: We retrospectively studied 165 consecutive patients (mean age, 66.5 ± 11.7 years) diagnosed with hypertension with preserved LVEF who had undergone CAVI measurement and echocardiography on the same day. The latter included speckle-tracking echocardiography to assess LA phasic function (reservoir, conduit, and pump strain) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS).Results: The results of univariate analysis showed CAVI value to be correlated with LA reservoir strain and LA conduit strain (r = −0.387 and −0.448, respectively; both P &lt; 0.0001). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed CAVI value to be independently related to age (β = 0.241, P = 0.002) and LA conduit strain (β = −0.386, P = 0.021) but not LV mass index, LA volume index, or LV systolic function (including LVGLS).Conclusion: In hypertensive patients with preserved LVEF, increased CAVI value appears to be independently associated with impaired LA phasic function (particularly LA conduit function) before LA and LV remodeling. CAVI determination to assess arterial stiffness may be useful in the early detection of interactions between cardiovascular abnormalities in hypertensive patients.


EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Manfrin ◽  
G Mugnai ◽  
G B Chierchia ◽  
C Bilato ◽  
W G Rauhe

Abstract Background The clinical role of left atrial hypertension (LAH) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and its role as predictor in those undergoing pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is still unknown. Purpose The aim of the present study was to analyse the prevalence of LAH in patients with nonvalvular AF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction having undergone PV isolation and its implication for AF catheter ablation. Methods Consecutive patients with drug resistant AF who underwent PV isolation at San Maurizio Regional Hospital of Bolzano (Italy) as index procedure were retrospectively included in this analysis. Left atrial hypertension was defined as the LA mean pressure &gt;15 mm Hg. Results A total of 98 consecutive patients (71 males, 72%; mean age 60.3 ± 8.4 years) with drug resistant, non valvular AF and preserved LV ejection fraction having undergone index PV isolation procedure were included in the analysis. Eleven patients (11%) underwent radiofrequency ablation and 87 (89%) cryoballoon ablation. The mean LA pressure was 10.7 ± 4.5 mmHg; LAH occurred in 24 (24%) patients. At a mean follow up of 14.6 ± 7.1 months (median 14 months), the success rate without antiarrhythmic therapy was 71.4% (70/98; considering the blanking period). On multivariate analysis, LAH remained the only independent predictor of definitive AF recurrence (HR 3.02, 1.36-6.72, p = 0.007). Conclusion Left atrial hypertension was found in 24% of patients undergoing PV isolation and was found to be significantly related to both early and late AF recurrences. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressi Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis Early Recurrence (during BP) HR 95%CI P value HR 95%CI P value Age (years) 1.06 1.02-1.10 0.005 1.05 1.00-1.09 0.03 LA volume (ml/m2) 1.02 1.00-1.05 0.04 1.02 1.00-1.05 0.05 LA hypertension 2.46 1.32-4.57 0.004 1.97 1.03-3.79 0.04 Recurrence after the BP HR 95%CI P value HR 95%CI P value Age (years) 1.05 1.00-1.11 0.04 1.04 0.98-1.09 0.15 LA hypertension 3.51 1.62-7.60 0.001 3.02 1.36-6.72 0.007 BP recurrence 1.83 0.84-3.99 0.13 AF atrial fibrillation. BMI: body mass index. LA: left atrium. CAD: coronary artery disease. BP: blanking period. HR: hazard ratio. CI: confidence intervals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Islas ◽  
R Bottino ◽  
P Jimenez ◽  
L Nombela ◽  
P Marcos Alberca ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In severe aortic stenosis, the left ventricle faces the challenge of the valvular load and the arterial load caused by abnormalities in systemic arterial compliance and systemic vascular resistance. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of hypertension control on left ventricular performance in patients that underwent TAVR. Methods 68 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR were analyzed; all patients were evaluated to confirm severe aortic stenosis with transthoracic echo (TTE). Conventional echo parameters were assessed as well as left ventricular mechanics parameters and vascular parameters such as arterial elastance (Ea), ventricular elastance (Ees) and V/Ac; besides all patients underwent TTE prior to TAVR, at discharge and 90 days follow-up visit. Results Mean age was 82±5; mean aortic valve area was 0.69±0.19, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 58.3±12.1 and mean ventricular-arterial coupling was 1.6±0.9. At 90 days follow up we observed a significant worsening in V/Ac in those patients with poor control of blood pressure (&gt;140/90mmHg), (1.8±0.5 vs 2.1±0.3, p=0.03). Aortic impedance was significantly higher (4.4±1.4 vs 3.5±1.2, p=0.05); Ea and Ees were also significantly higher in hypertensive patients (2.3±0.8 vs 1.7±0.6, p=0.05) and (1.4±0.7 vs 0.9±0.6, p=0.01) respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed a slightly reduction in hypertensive patients, although not statistically significant. Conclusions Control of blood pressure seems to be an important factor that contributes to a better or rather worse LV performance and could have a potential role in systolic function and clinical outcome of patients after TAVR. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document