scholarly journals STUDY ON SIMPLE MODELING FOR LATERAL RESISTANCE OF RETAINING WALL IN COLLISION WITH A BASE-ISOLATED STRUCTURE

2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (713) ◽  
pp. 1033-1043
Author(s):  
Tetsushi INUBUSHI ◽  
Yuji MIYAMOTO ◽  
Tadamichi YAMASHITA ◽  
Takahisa ENOMOTO
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Lateral Resistance ◽  
Simple Modeling

scholarly journals Impact of slopes on the lateral resistance of steel piles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Cumming
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Cohesionless Soils ◽  
Passive Resistance ◽  
Finite Element Software ◽  
Ground Anchors ◽  
Lateral Resistance ◽  
Steel Piles ◽  
Laterally Loaded ◽  
Soldier Pile

A soldier pile and lagging wall is one of the most common types of retaining wall. Solider pile walls develop lateral resistance through the stiffness of the piles and the passive resistance of the soil acting upon the embedded portion of the piles. Ground anchors can also be used when additional lateral resistance is required. Using Broms’ methods, a parametric study was completed to investigate the performance of laterally loaded short and long steel piles installed in a variety of cohesive and cohesionless soils. The results were compared to those generated using RocScience finite element software. RocScience software was then used to evaluate the lateral resistance of piles installed at various distances from the crest of a 2:1 slope. Finally, two soldier pile walls, to be installed within a sloping railway embankment, were designed.

scholarly journals Impact of slopes on the lateral resistance of steel piles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Cumming
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Cohesionless Soils ◽  
Passive Resistance ◽  
Finite Element Software ◽  
Ground Anchors ◽  
Lateral Resistance ◽  
Steel Piles ◽  
Laterally Loaded ◽  
Soldier Pile

A soldier pile and lagging wall is one of the most common types of retaining wall. Solider pile walls develop lateral resistance through the stiffness of the piles and the passive resistance of the soil acting upon the embedded portion of the piles. Ground anchors can also be used when additional lateral resistance is required. Using Broms’ methods, a parametric study was completed to investigate the performance of laterally loaded short and long steel piles installed in a variety of cohesive and cohesionless soils. The results were compared to those generated using RocScience finite element software. RocScience software was then used to evaluate the lateral resistance of piles installed at various distances from the crest of a 2:1 slope. Finally, two soldier pile walls, to be installed within a sloping railway embankment, were designed.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Dinding Silang Pada Galian Dalam Di Tanah Sangat Lunak: Studi Kasus Proyek Apartemen DI Jalan Kebun Sirih Jakarta

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 257
Author(s):  
Oktaffian Widjaja ◽  
Chaidir Anwar Makarim
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Soft Clay ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Cross Wall ◽  
Deep Excavation ◽  
Top Down ◽  
Adjacent Buildings ◽  
Clay Deposits ◽  
Lateral Resistance

Deep excavation in areas with very soft clay deposits need a good soil retaining system and excavation method. Using a diapraghm wall as a soil retaining system for deep excavation is a good choice can be done. Diapraghm wall is expected to limit the movement that occurs in the retaining walls and avoid leaks that occur in walls, this is needed to minimize damage to adjacent buildings. The top down excavation method by utilizing the basement floor as lateral resistance can be carried out to reduce the movement that occurs on the ground. In very soft soil areas with excavation distances to neighbors very close, the movement on the ground must be limited to minimize damage to adjacent buildings. Cross walls can be used to reduce the movement that occurs on the ground. Analysis of finite element with using the Plaxis program was carried out to investigate the performance of the retaining wall. From the results of the analysis conducted shows that using a cross wall at a location below the raft pile can be reduced the movement that occurs in the retaining wall and the excavation stages can be reduced. Keywords: cross wall; deep excavation; diapraghm wall; very soft soil ABSTRAKGalian dalam pada daerah dengan endapan tanah liat sangat lunak yang cukup dalam diperlukan sistem penahan tanah dan metode galian yang direncanakan dengan baik. Menggunakan dinding dipraghm sebagai sistem penahan tanah untuk galian dalam merupakan pilihan yang dapat dilakukan. Penggunaan dinding diapraghm diharapkan dapat membatasi pergerakan yang terjadi pada dinding dan menghindari kebocoran yang yang terjadi pada dinding penahan tanah karena sistem pengecoran yang saling mengunci dan pertemuan antara panel dinding dapat dipasang waterstop, hal ini diperlukan untuk menghindari kerusakan pada bangunan yang berdekatan dengan daerah galian. Metode galian top down yaitu galian bertahap dengan memanfaatkan lantai besmen sebagai tahanan lateral dapat dilakukan untuk mengurangi pergerakan yang terjadi pada tanah. Pada daerah tanah sangat lunak dengan jarak galian dengan tetangga sangat berdekatan pergerakan pada tanah harus dibatasi untuk meminimalkan kerusakan pada bangunan yang berdekatan. Dinding silang merupakan sistem tahanan lateral yang dapat dipergunakan untuk mengurangi pergerakan yang terjadi pada tanah. Analisis elemen hingga menggunakan program Plaxis 2D dilakukan untuk mengetahui kinerja dinding penahan tanah dan pergerakan yang terjadi. Dari hasil analisis yang dilakukan diperoleh hasil bahwa dengan menggunakan dinding silang yang terletak pada di bawah raft pile dapat menurunkan pergerakan yang terjadi pada dinding penahan tanah dan tahapan galian dapat dikurangi. 

scholarly journals APPLICATION OF SIMPLE MODELING METHOD TO RETAINING WALL WITH ELASTO-PLASTIC PROPERTY

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (730) ◽  
pp. 1993-2003
Author(s):  
Tetsushi INUBUSHI ◽  
Yuji MIYAMOTO ◽  
Takahisa ENOMOTO ◽  
Tadamichi YAMASHITA
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Plastic Property ◽  
Modeling Method ◽  
Simple Modeling

scholarly journals Effect of ballast retaining walls on the lateral resistance of railway tracks

2020 ◽  
pp. 095440972093017
Author(s):  
P Aela ◽  
WL Jia ◽  
GQ Jing
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Retaining Walls ◽  
Railway Tracks ◽  
Lateral Resistance ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Optimum Width

In this study, the application of a retaining wall was proposed as a solution for reducing the lateral displacement of the ballast layer, particularly in sharp curves and bridges. In this regard, a series of single tie push tests were performed on panels with shoulder ballast widths of 300 mm, 400 mm, 500 mm with and without the presence of L-shaped and T-shaped retaining walls. Overall, it was proven that the application of an L-shaped wall led to a 15.8% increase in the lateral resistance, and that T-shaped walls have a higher impact on the stability of the track. A shoulder width of 400 mm was proposed as the optimum width for ballasted tracks with retaining walls.

ANALISIS PENANGGULANGAN KELONGSORAN TANAH PADA RUAS JALAN GUNUNG TUGEL PATIKRAJA BANYUMAS

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Arwan Apriyono ◽  
Sumiyanto Sumiyanto ◽  
Nanang Gunawan Wariyatno
Keyword(s):  
Limit Equilibrium ◽  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Limit Equilibrium Method ◽  
Pile Foundations ◽  
Soil Parameters ◽  
The Road ◽  
Realistic Option ◽  
Stable Conditions ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Wall Slope

Gunung Tugel is an area that located Patikraja Region, Southern Banyumas. Thetopography of the area is mostly mountainous with a slope that varies from flat to steep. Thiscondition makes to many areas of this region potentially landslide. In 2015, a landslideoccurred in Jalan Gunung Tugel. The Landslide occurred along 70 meters on the half of theroad and causing traffic Patikraja-Purwokerto disturbed. To repair the damage of the road andavoid further landslides, necessary to analyze slope stability. This study is to analyze landslidereinforcement that occurred at Gunung Tugel and divides into 3 step. The first step is fieldinvestigation to determine the condition of the location and dimensions of landslides. Thesecond step is to know the soil parameters and analyzes data were obtained from the field. Andthe final step is analyzed of the landslide reinforcement by using data obtained from thepreceding step. In this research, will be applied three variations of reinforcement i.e. retainingwall, pile foundation and combine both of pile foundations and retaining wall. Slope stabilityanalysis was conducted using limit equilibrium method. Based on the analysis conducted onthe three variations reinforcement, combine both of pile foundations and retaining wall morerecommended. Application of and combine both of pile foundations and retaining wall is themost realistic option in consideration of ease of implementation at the field. From thecalculations have been done, in order to achieve stable conditions need retaining wall withdimensions of 2 meters high with 2,5 meters of width. DPT is supported by two piles of eachcross-section with 0.3 meters of diameter along 10 meters with 1-meter in space. Abstrak: Gunung Tugel adalah salah satu daerah yang terletak di Kecamatan PatikrajaKabupaten Banyumas bagian selatan. Kondisi topografi daerah tersebut sebagian besar berupapegunungan dengan kemiringan yang bervariasi dari landai sampai curam. Hal inimenyebabkan banyak daerah di wilayah Gunung Tugel yang berpotensi terjadi bencana tanahlongsor. Pada tahun 2015, peristiwa longsor kembali terjadi di ruas Jalan Gunung Tugel.Kelongsoran yang terjadi sepanjang 70 meter pada separuh badan jalan tersebut menyebabkanarus lalu lintas patikraja-purwokerto menjadi terganggu. Untuk memperbaiki kerusakan jalandan mencegah kelongsoran kembali, diperlukan analisis perkuatan tanah terhadap lerengtersebut. Studi analisis penanggulangan kelongsoran jalan yang terjadi di Gunung Tugel inidilakukan dengan tiga tahapan. Tahapan pertama adalah investigasi lapangan untukmengetahui kondisi lokasi dan dimensi longsor serta mengambil sampel tanah di lapangan.Tahap kedua adalah melakukan pengujian parameter tanah dan analisis data yang diperolehdari lapangan. Tahapan yang terakhir adalah analisis penanggulangan longsor denganmenggunakan data yang diperoleh dari tahapan sebelumnya. Pada penelitan ini, akanditerapkan tiga variasi perkuatan lereng yaitu dinding penahan tanah (DPT), turap dan DPTyang dikombinasikan dengan pondasi tiang. Analisis stabilitas lereng dilakukan dengan metodekeseimbangan batas. Berdasarkan hasil analisis yang dilakukan terhadap ketiga variasiperkuatan, DPT dengan kombinasi tiang pancang lebih direkomendasikan. Penerapan DPTyang dikombinasikan dengan minipile merupakan pilihan yang paling realistis denganpertimbangan tingkat kemudahan pelaksanaan di lapangan. Dari perhitungan yang telahdilakukan, untuk mencapai kondisi stabil diperlukan DPT dengan dimensi tinggi 2 meterdengan lebar bawah 2,5 meter. DPT tersebut ditopang oleh dua tiang tiap penampangmelintang dengan diameter 0,3 meter sepanjang 10 meter dengan jarak antar tiang 1 meter.kata kunci: tanah longsor, perkuatan tanah, metode keseimbangan batas

DEVELOPING AND SELECTING SLOPE STABILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN MANAGING SLOPE FAILURES

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ari Sandyavitri
Keyword(s):  
Retaining Wall ◽  
Value Engineering ◽  
Rating Systems ◽  
Slope Stabilization ◽  
Rockfall Hazard ◽  
Proactive Approach ◽  
West Sumatra ◽  
Hazard Rating ◽  
Hazard Rating Systems ◽  
Steep Slopes

This paper objectives are to; (i) identification of risky slopes (within 4 Provinces in Sumatra including Provinces of Riau, West Sumatra, Jambi and South Sumatra encompassing 840 kms of the “Jalan Lintas Sumatra” highway) based on Rockfall Hazard Rating Systems (RHRS) method; (ii) developing alternatives to stabilize slope hazards, and (iii) selecting appropriate slopes stabilization techniques based on both proactive approach and value engineering one. Based on the Rockfall Hazard Rating Systems (RHRS) method, it was identified 109 steep slopes prone to failure within this highway section. Approximately, 15 slopes were identified as potential high-risk slopes (RHRS scores were calculated >200 points). Based on the proactive approach, seven riskiest slopes ware identified. The preferred stabilization alternatives to remedy most of these slopes are suggested as follow; either (i) a combination of retaining wall and drainage, or (ii) gabion structure and drainage. However, different approaches may yield different results, there are at least 2 main consideration in prioritizing slope stabilization; (i) based on the riskiest slopes, and(ii) the least expensive stabilization alternatives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document