scholarly journals Pengaruh Penerapan Model Siklus Belajar (Learning Cycle) 5e Dengan Memanfaatkan Media Audio Visual Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA SD

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Yunita Jais ◽  
Samrin Samrin
Keyword(s):  

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan model siklus belajar (learning cycle) 5E dengan memanfaatkan media audio visual terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas IV SD Negeri 18 Baruga. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IV SD Negeri 18 Baruga tahun ajaran 2018/2019 yang terdiri 4 kelas. Penentuan sample penelitian dilakukan dengan cara acak. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini adalah observasi, dokumen-dokumen, dan tes. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan rancangan dua kelas yang terdiri dari kelas eksperimen dan kelas kontrol. Kelas eksperimen diberi perlakuan menggunakan model siklus belajar (learning cycle) 5E dengan memanfaatkan media audio visual, sedangkan  kelas  kontrol  menggunakan  model pembelajaran konvensional. Validasi instrumen dilakukan dengan validitas konstruk dan validitas isi dengan penghitungan menggunakan korelasi biserial. Uji reliabilitas instrumen dihitung menggunakan rumus KR 21 dengan hasil r11= 0,825. Teknik analisis data menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil belajar IPA siswa yang belajar menggunakan model siklus belajar (learning cycle) 5E dengan memanfaatkan media audio visual lebih baik daripada hasil belajar IPA siswa yang belajar menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional di kelas IV SD Negeri 18 Baruga. Hasil ini dibuktikan dengan nilai rata- rata posttest hasil belajar IPA kelompok eksperimen yaitu 83,92, lebih tinggi dari nilai rata-rata posttest hasil belajar IPA kelompok kontrol yaitu 58,92. Hal ini juga didukung dengan hasil uji t data posttest pada kedua kelompok. Dari hasil uji t diperoleh thitung > ttabel yaitu 7,136 > 2,010 dan nilai probabilitas signifikansi < 0,05 yaitu 0,000.Kata Kunci: Model siklus belajar (learning cycle) 5E , media audio visual ,hasil belajar IPA SD

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-324
Author(s):  
Syukrani Kadir

periodically in preparing learning plans, implementing learning, assessing learning achievement, carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement that can improve teacher performance. This performance improvement is through periodic collaborative educational supervision. Based on the results of educational supervision in cycle I and cycle II, teacher performance increased, namely in cycle I, teacher performance in preparing learning plans in cycle I reached 71.98%, while cycle II was 92.44%. Teacher performance in implementing learning cycle I reached 72.44% while cycle II reached 93.81%. Teacher performance in assessing learning achievement in cycle Im reached 81.30% while cycle II was 90.56%. Teacher performance in carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement in the first cycle reached 59.76% while the second cycle was 83.00%. Thus, the average action cycle II was above 75.00%. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the teacher's performance has increased in preparing learning plans, implementing learning, assessing learning achievement, carrying out follow-up assessments of student learning achievement.


Author(s):  
Rael Glen FUTERMAN

In innovative organisations we are seeing an increase in cross-functional teams being built around projects. The diverse perspectives of collaborators draw from personal world-views and organisational roles, which contributes to radical collaboration across traditional boundaries of work. This hands-on workshop aims at testing a rapid team alignment activity in which teams propose core values and align these to the innovation learning cycle, synthesising them into foundational work practices for each phase. These are then reframed as the teams' innovation narrative.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 368
Author(s):  
Yanson Yanson

Social science subjects are arranged in a systematic, comrehensive, and integrated in the learning processtowards succes in the life in the community. With the approach it is expected that learners will acquire a broaderunderstanding and dept in the field of science related. This reseach method in classroom action reseach usingtwo cycle the end of each cycle is given daily test given to students in as musc as 19 persons in the class VI SDN007 Teratak Air Hitam sub-district Sentajo Raya. The reseach result obtained the result of the study preliminarydata 65,3 increase by an average of learning outcomes of IPS to 75 in cycle I. I the second cycle obtained anaverage of 90 with the learning cycle I is 14,58% and from cycle I to cycle II amounted of 37,89%. Activities theteacher looks at the cycle I the first meeting of 66,67% with enough categories, while at the second meetingincreased so that the average obtained by 75%, with good categories. In cycle II it turns out that teacherlearning has increased sothat the obtained average 83,3% with good categories, while at the second meetingcycle II obtained average to 91,67 % with very good categories. Data activity studens looks at the cycle I the firsmeeting obatined an average of 61,11 with lee categories, at the second meeting obtained an average 72,22%with enough categories. In the second cycle obtained an average of the first meeting of 80,56% with goodcategory, while in the second meeting with average to 91,67% with the cagory very well. So it can be concludedthat the applicatin of cooperative medel type example non examplescan improve learning outcomes IPS.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-38
Author(s):  
Esti Munafiah ◽  
Agus Basir Ali Akbar S

The objective of this study is to see learning process using LCC model for chemistry course.  The study used classroom action research with three cycles each of which implements planning, acting, observing and reflection.  Subject of the study was 40 students of grade 8E of MTsN Blitar in the academic year 2009/2010. The findings of the study are as follows:  (1) Cycle I:  students participation 62.5%, mean score of worksheet 60, mean score of quiz 41,7, and mastery learning 3 students; (2) Cycle II: students participation 86.6%, mean score of worksheet 81, mean score of quiz 72.38, and mastery learning 26 students; (3) Cycle III:  students participation 100%, mean score of worksheet 89, mean score of quiz 72.44, and mastery learning 39 students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document