scholarly journals Plasma FIB Delayering and Nanoprobing with EBIRCH for Localizing Metal Shorts in DRAM

Author(s):  
Euiseok Kim ◽  
Jaeyun Lee ◽  
Jihyun Lee

Abstract This paper demonstrates how to localize metal-to-metal short failures in DRAM, where defects can occur over a large area including the aluminum layer, by using the means of mechanical grinding, plasma FIB delayering, and EBIRCH (Electron Beam Induced Resistance Change). Our experiments show that a uniform mechanical grinding of an aluminum layer, and DX PFIB delayering, results in a high quality planer surface in the target layer and site, as the slope created during the grinding is compensated by PFIB delayering. This approach has advantages that are conducive to EBIRCH analysis. First, the target layer can be prepared at any given location (site-free). Second, the defective layer can be delayered to a desired depth without damage (layer-free). Last, after delayering, the surface of the device becomes evenly flat enough to allow the electron beam to evenly penetrate the device for EBIRCH analysis (higher-flatness).With the use of more advanced device preparation methods, EBIRCH analysis has a higher chance of successfully localizing metal line/via shorts even in a large region, which includes the aluminum layer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 2357-2366 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Sethian ◽  
S. P. Obenschain ◽  
K. A. Gerber ◽  
C. J. Pawley ◽  
V. Serlin ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 311 ◽  
pp. 534-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Walker ◽  
J.W. Murray ◽  
M. Nie ◽  
R.B. Cook ◽  
A.T. Clare

AIP Advances ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 075104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Tae Yoo ◽  
Byeongchan So ◽  
Hye In Lee ◽  
Okhyun Nam ◽  
Kyu Chang Park

Vacuum ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 203-207
Author(s):  
H Homyara ◽  
S Ahmad ◽  
S Ikezawa ◽  
K Baba ◽  
T Yoshioka ◽  
...  

Vacuum ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 41 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 796-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.C Du ◽  
H Wang ◽  
B.Z Li ◽  
D.C Sun ◽  
Z.Q Yu ◽  
...  

Procedia CIRP ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 178-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Togo Shinonaga ◽  
Yasuaki Kimura ◽  
Tsubasa Sakai ◽  
Akira Okada

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 30-35
Author(s):  
S.D. Walck ◽  
J.R. Porter ◽  
H-W. Yang ◽  
S.S. Dheda

Good sample preparation is essential for acquiring successful electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) patterns in the SEM. Mechanical polishing to obtain the required surface quality with minimal sub-surface defects and deformation that does not interfere with the quality of the diffraction data is, more often than not, an art form. Special polishing techniques, such as low force lapping fixtures, electrochemical-mechanical polishing, and vibratory polishing, have been used to minimize the sub-surface damage, but have not eliminated it. Ion polishing has been used to reduce the damage layer further. However, the commercially available ion systems suffer several drawbacks, including: 1) small area treatment (≤ 1 cm) 2) decreasing beam current density with accelerating voltages, and 3) the inability to process non-conducting samples. Barna and Pecz have shown that at 3 keV with an incident angle of 5° relative to the surface, approximately 25 nm of ion damage occurs in Si and GaAs, but at 250 eV, there is less than 1 nm of amorphization of the surface. They also showed that a glancing angle across the surface is essential for removing topographic features. The ion guns that have been available for ion polishing and ion etching of SEM samples typically cannot operate effectively below 3 keV because of the low current density.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document