scholarly journals Supervisory Function on Judges: Prevent Corruption Context

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Edy Hasmi
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Intellectual Character ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
High Integrity

<p align="justify">The purpose of this research was to determined the effectiveness of the supervision of the Supreme Court judges in Indonesia. Supervision the code of ethics and code of conduct of judges can be seen from the number of public complaints on judges are immoral and detention of judges by the Corruption Eradication Commission. The method used in this research was normative legal research/normative juridical, the data were analyzed descriptively qualitative. The research founded that The Supreme Court’s role in the framework of the supervision of judges has not been effective. This research suggested that judges should have high integrity, visionary, and also understanding for law and social sciences, and also should have the intellectual character, thus judges feel protected by the presence of the Supreme Court.</p>

scholarly journals INDONESIAN JUSTICE LEGAL POLITICS POST AMENDMENT OF 1945 CONSTITUTION

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-56
Author(s):  
Aladin Sirait
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
House Of Representatives ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Checks And Balances ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Creation

The essence of change in the field of justice after the amendment is a change in the system of judicial power at the constitutional and statutory levels. The creation of new supreme judicial institutions namely the Constitutional Court, in addition to the Supreme Court as the bearer and executor of the highest judicial powers in the presence of an independent Judicial Commission and cannot be separated from the powers of the judiciary. Legal politics that gave birth to the Constitutional Court Institution in its scope of duties and authority has played a large and important role in the goal of realizing justice. The Judicial Commission in its duties and authorities can substantially improve law enforcement in the environment and justice within the Supreme Court by proposing the appointment of a Chief Justice to the House of Representatives (DPR). The Supreme Court made progress with the issuance of Guidelines for the Implementation of Oversight within the Judiciary and the Joint Decree of the Chair of the Supreme Court and the Chair of the Judicial Commission on the Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct for Judges. The Constitutional Court and Judicial Commission in its position as a high state institution with a strict division of tasks and authority has played a role in the creation of checks and balances mechanisms.

scholarly journals FUNGSI PENGAWASAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN YANG IMPARSIAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28
Author(s):  
Said Sampara
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
The Supreme Court

Implementation of judicial power in the realization of judicial impartiality rests on their independence and the independence of judiciary in performing the duties of his judicial is not affected by any power, as well as the responsibilities imposed on judges in carrying out the task of checking and deciding cases and functions of the Supreme Court under the supervision of the judiciary the impartiality in the administration of judicial power, manifested in the form of preventive supervision, in the form of signs norms enshrined in both the legislation and the code of ethics and code of conduct of judges. In addition, there are forms of repressive supervision which in practice is carried out by the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission.  Abstrak Implementasi kekuasaan kehakiman dalam perwujudan imparsialitas yudisial bertumpu pada independensi mereka dan independensi kehakiman dalam menjalankan tugas-tugas kehakimannya tidak dipengaruhi oleh kekuasaan apa pun, serta tanggung jawab yang dibebankan pada hakim dalam melaksanakan tugas memeriksa dan memutuskan kasus dan fungsi Mahkamah Agung di bawah pengawasan pengadilan, ketidakberpihakan dalam administrasi kekuasaan kehakiman, yang diwujudkan dalam bentuk pengawasan preventif, dalam bentuk tanda-tanda norma yang diabadikan baik dalam undang-undang dan kode etik serta kode perilaku hakim. Selain itu, ada bentuk pengawasan represif yang dalam praktiknya dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dan Komisi Yudisial.

scholarly journals Eksistensi Etika Hakim Dalam Persidangan Peradilan Pidana Guna Mewujudkan Lembaga Peradilan Yang Bersih dari KKN

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Ririn Oktaviani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Public Trust ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Selection Mechanism ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
High Integrity ◽  
Internal Supervision

Judges in carrying out their duties and authorities have clear rules. To create a judiciary that is clean from corrupt practices, the performance of judges receives comprehensive and comprehensive supervision. The Supreme Court (MA), as the highest judicial power agency, carries out internal supervision, while external supervision is carried out by the Judicial Professional Honorary Commission of IKAHI and the Judicial Commission (KY). However, the facts show that bribery cases which ensnared judges are increasing and have tarnished legal institutions especially public trust in the justice system in Indonesia. This is interesting because there are still judges who do not comply with the code of ethics for judges as a guideline in carrying out their duties, this shows that the oversight function by the MA and KY has not been able to run properly. The method used is normative juridical. The results obtained state that efforts to overcome public distrust in the judiciary caused by judges who are entangled in corruption cases are by improving the selection mechanism for prospective judges so that judges are selected with professional personality and high integrity. In addition, the need to improve the MA and KY supervisory functions by increasing sanctions for violators of the judge's code of ethics.

scholarly journals FUNGSI PENGAWASAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PERADILAN YANG IMPARSIAL

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28
Author(s):  
Said Sampara
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
The Supreme Court

Implementation of judicial power in the realization of judicial impartiality rests on their independence and the independence of judiciary in performing the duties of his judicial is not affected by any power, as well as the responsibilities imposed on judges in carrying out the task of checking and deciding cases and functions of the Supreme Court under the supervision of the judiciary the impartiality in the administration of judicial power, manifested in the form of preventive supervision, in the form of signs norms enshrined in both the legislation and the code of ethics and code of conduct of judges. In addition, there are forms of repressive supervision which in practice is carried out by the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission.  Abstrak Implementasi kekuasaan kehakiman dalam perwujudan imparsialitas yudisial bertumpu pada independensi mereka dan independensi kehakiman dalam menjalankan tugas-tugas kehakimannya tidak dipengaruhi oleh kekuasaan apa pun, serta tanggung jawab yang dibebankan pada hakim dalam melaksanakan tugas memeriksa dan memutuskan kasus dan fungsi Mahkamah Agung di bawah pengawasan pengadilan, ketidakberpihakan dalam administrasi kekuasaan kehakiman, yang diwujudkan dalam bentuk pengawasan preventif, dalam bentuk tanda-tanda norma yang diabadikan baik dalam undang-undang dan kode etik serta kode perilaku hakim. Selain itu, ada bentuk pengawasan represif yang dalam praktiknya dilakukan oleh Mahkamah Agung dan Komisi Yudisial.

scholarly journals Urgensi Pembentukan Peradilan Khusus Pemilu dalam rangka Mewujudkan Integritas Pemilu

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Iwan Rois ◽  
Ratna Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
District Court ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Court ◽  
Provincial Level ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
General Elections

This study aims to analyze the need to establish a special election court which has the authority to solve various election law cases in order to realize elections with integrity; and analyzing the formulation of election special justice in order to realize the integrity of the election. The research method used is the method of normative legal research and the implementation of this research collects data from various sources in order to get an answer to the issues that have been formulated. The results of the study shows that  the purpose of the need for the formation of special judicial elections; First, to meet the growing demands of increasingly complex justice in society and more election law enforcement so as to realize the integrity of the elections; Second, To handle the election law cases quickly and simply so as to obey the integrity of the election. Formulation; First, the election special justice to be able to work quickly and simply in handling election law cases, domiciled at the central and provincial level, then entering the District Court or the High Court; Secondly, the Guidelines for the election special judicial law shall be based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 Year 2017 on Procedures for the Settlement of Administrative Offenses of the General Elections in the Supreme Court. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlunya membentuk peradilan khusus pemilu yang mempunyai kewenangan menyelesaikan berbagai perkara hukum pemilu agar terwujud pemilu yang berintegritas; dan menganalisis formulasi pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu dalam rangka mewujudkan integritas pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pelaksanaan dari penelitian ini mengumpulkan bahan hukum dari berbagai sumber guna mendapatkan suatu jawaban atas pokok-pokok permasalahan yang telah dirumuskan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tujuan perlunya pembentukan peradilan khusus pemilu; Pertama, Untuk memenuhi tuntutan perkembangan akan keadilan yang semakin kompleks dalam masyarakat dan lebih penegakan hukum pemilu sehingga mewujudkan integritas pemilu; Kedua, Untuk menangani perkara hukum pemilu dengan cepat dan sederhana sehingga mewudkan integritas pemilu. Formulasi; Pertama, Peradilan khusus pemilu agar bisa bekerja cepat dan sederhana dalam menangani perkara hukum pemilu, berkedudukan di tingkat pusat dan provinsi, selanjutnya masuk pada Pengadilan Negeri atau Pengadilan Tinggi; Kedua, Pedoman beracara pada peradilan khusus pemilu berdasarkan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilihan Umum Di Mahkamah Agung.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM SISTEM PENYELENGGARAAN PENGAWASAN KODE ETIK HAKIM PASCA PUTUSAN MK NO 43/PUU-XIII/2015

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Heru Nuswanto ◽  
Amri P. Sihotang,
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Constitutional System ◽  
Sense Of Justice

<p>Kedudukan komisi yudisial sebagai pengawas system peradilan di Indonesia di rasa sangat penting untuk menjadikan system peradilan di Indonesia professional dan berintegritas. Persoalan kemudian hadir pasca putusan <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky">MK No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> dimana dalam putusan menjadikan Komisi Yudisial tidak lagi sebagai pihak yang ikut serta mengawasi perekrutan hakim tingkat pertama. Padahal dalam system ketatanegaraan jika lembaga komisi yudisial peran dan fungsinya dibatasi akan menjadikan mahkamah agung sebagai lembaga absolute dalam kekuasaan yudikatif.</p><p>.</p><p>Pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi <a href="http://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/kegiatan/1181-putusan-mk-no-43-puu-xiii-2015-proses-seleksi-hakim-tingkat-pertama-tidak-perlu-melibatkan-ky"> No 43/PUU-XIII/2015</a> tidaklah menjadi penghambat Komisi Yudisial dalam melakukan penegakan kode etik. Bahkan pada sisi lain Komisi Yudisial harus mampu melakukan penerobosan penafsiran bahwa putusan tersebut semata-mata memberikan ruang dan kedudukan Komisi Yudisial untuk merespon upaya kemerdekaan kekuasaan kehakiman yang secara mandiri dan merdeka akan tetapi harus sesuai real nilai-nilai pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia dengan menempatkan Komisi Yudisial yang nantinya akan menguji idependensi hakim-hakim yang merupakan hasil seleksi dari Mahkamah Agung secara ketat dalam menjalankan tugas dan fungsinya sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip dasar kode etik yang telah telah dicanangkan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.</p><p>Status of the Judicial Commission as the regulatory system in the sense of justice in Indonesia Sangat system makes for a review of integrity and professional judiciary in Indonesia. Present Problems then after the Constitutional Court ruling No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 Where hearts Judicial Commission Decision making is NOT Again as parties Yang Participate oversee the recruitment of judges of first instance. Whereas hearts constitutional system if Institution Role and functions of the Judicial Commission shall be limited to make the Supreme Court as the Institute for Judicial power absolute hearts.</p><p>Post a Constitutional Court decision No. 43/PUU-XIII/2015 does not become an obstacle to the Judicial Commission in enforcing the code of conduct. Even on the other side of the Judicial Commission should be able to make a breakthrough interpretation that the decision merely provides the space and the position of the Judicial Commission to respond to the efforts of the independence of judiciary is independent and free but must be corresponding real values of Pancasila and the Constitution of the Republic Indonesia by placing the Judicial Commission which will examine idependensi judges were selected from the Supreme Court strictly in performing their duties and functions in accordance with the basic principles of the code of conduct that has been implemented in accordance with the legislation in force.</p>

scholarly journals The Problematics of Simple Lawsuit Implementation To Reduce Civil Cases In Supreme Court

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-194
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng ◽  
Zahry Vandawati Ch.
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Simple System ◽  
State Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Process

This research has purpose to analyze the implementation of a simple lawsuit settlement to reduce the accumulation of civil cases in the Supreme Court. Also to analyze the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases and investigate the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases. This research is normative legal research that used the approach of statute approach and conceptual approach. The result of this research indicated that the implementation of simple lawsuit mechanismin court process could be quite helpful for citizen to settle the civil cases on state court with a quick process, simple system and low cost. In the context of implementing a simple lawsuit mechanism in court proceedings, there are several obstacles and have not maximally utilized in society, such as the minimum limit for the value of material claims is at most Rp. 200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiahs).

scholarly journals PENERAPAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP NON MUSLIM DITINJAU DARI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI) STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 331/K/AG/2018/MA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Liana Noviyanti ◽  
Mulati Mulati
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Supreme Court Ruling ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court

Islamic law has stated that every person of different religion cannot inherit each other, both Muslims inherit for non-Muslims and from non-Muslims inherit for Muslims, but in practice, Judges at the Supreme Court level implement mandatory wills, this is required which has been decided in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This study aims to examine how to implement the mandatory non-Muslim wills in the Supreme Court ruling Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA based on the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and what the Supreme Court Judges consider in implementing mandatory testaments against non-Muslims in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This research is a normative legal research with the nature of qualitative research with the type of library research. Based on the studies that have been carried out, the Decision of the Supreme Court Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA does not include legal considerations in force in Indonesia concerning inheritance provisions and concerning the granting of an approved mandatory will set out in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The application of mandatory wills in the Supreme Court Decision is contrary to the provisions of Islamic Law and the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Article 209 paragraphs (1) and (2) concerning mandatory wills.

The Conception of Law and Legal Research

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-52
Author(s):  
Matías Bailone
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Past ◽  
Research Programs ◽  
Court Of Justice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Research Institute

The area of Research at the Research Institute and Foreign Reference of the Supreme Court of Justice has developed two scientific research programs during the past five years which we want to mention and comment on briefly. Both investigations were proposed, directed and supervised by Dr. Eugenio Raul Zaffaroni, one of the Supreme Court Justices on whom the whole structure depends.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document