scholarly journals Vaccines against Covid-19: the Comparative Estimates of Risks in Adenovirus Vectors

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-17
Author(s):  
E. P. Kharchenko
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Homologous Sequences ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Epitope ◽  
Human Proteins ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Adenovirus Vectors ◽  
A Current ◽  
Human Nervous System

Relevance. The vaccine against the SARS-Cov-2 coronavirus is considered as the most promising approach to curb (tame) a current pandemic and prevent new one. Three vaccines (AstraZeneca’s СhAdOx1 nCov-19, CanSino’s vaccine and Russia’s Sputnik V one) are in Phase III clinical trials and have the S protein as immunogen but different adenovirus vectors. It is known adverse neurological events associated with the СhAdOx1 nCov-19 vacсine.Aim is to investigate the distribution of homologous sequences of adenovirus proteins in human nervous and immune systems proteins, estimate potential risks of using adenovirus vectors in vaccines and discuss possible mechanisms inducing immune damage in the nervous system.Materials and methods. For the computer analysis of peptide (immune epitope) relationship between adenovirus structural proteins and human proteins, the search of homologous sequences was made. All protein sequences were used from databases available on the INTERNET.Results. Among adenoviruses (НАд5, НАд26 , ChАдY25, and SAd3) ChАдY25 has the highest content of sequences homologous to human nervous system proteins that may be the cause of autoimmune complications in vaccination.Conclusion: In AstraZeneca’s СhAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine there are a large number of peptide sequences homologous to human nervous system proteins and it allows to predict the possible risks with this vaccine.

scholarly journals Frontrunners in the race to develop a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Russell ◽  
Peter Pelka ◽  
Brian L Mark
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Viral Vector ◽  
Protective Efficacy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Protein Subunit ◽  
Vaccine Strategy ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Virus Recombinant ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Cellular Immune

Numerous studies continue to be published on the COVID-19 pandemic that is being caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Given the rapidly evolving global response to SARS-CoV-2, here we primarily review the leading COVID-19 vaccine strategies that are currently in Phase III clinical trials. Non-replicating viral vector strategies, inactivated virus, recombinant protein subunit vaccines, and nucleic acid vaccine platforms are all being pursued in an effort to combat the infection. Preclinical and clinal trial results of these efforts are examined as well as the characteristics of each vaccine strategy from the humoral and cellular immune responses they stimulate, effects of any adjuvants used, and the potential risks associated with immunization such as antibody dependent enhancement (ADE). A number of promising advancements have been made toward the development of multiple vaccine candidates. Preliminary data now emerging from phase III clinical trials show encouraging results for the protective efficacy and safety of at least three frontrunning candidates. There is hope that one or more will emerge as potent weapons to protect against SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Feasibility of progesterone treatment for ischaemic stroke

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 487-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire L Gibson ◽  
Philip M Bath
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Clinical Development ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Progesterone Treatment

Two multi-centre phase III clinical trials examining the protective potential of progesterone following traumatic brain injury have recently failed to demonstrate any improvement in outcome. Thus, it is timely to consider how this impacts on the translational potential of progesterone treatment for ischaemic stroke. A wealth of experimental evidence supports the neuroprotective properties of progesterone, and associated metabolites, following various types of central nervous system injury. In particular, for ischaemic stroke, studies have also begun to reveal possible mechanisms of such neuroprotection. However, the results in traumatic brain injury now question whether further clinical development of progesterone for ischaemic stroke is relevant.

Rome I versus Rome II; Overlap in patients enrolled in tegaserod phase III clinical trials for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A284-A284
Author(s):  
B NAULT ◽  
S SUE ◽  
J HEGGLAND ◽  
S GOHARI ◽  
G LIGOZIO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Irritable Bowel ◽  
Rome I

Neovastat, a naturally occurring multifunctional antiangiogenic drug, in phase III clinical trials

2001 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 620-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Falardeau ◽  
Pierre Champagne ◽  
Patrick Poyet ◽  
Claude Hariton ◽  
[Eacute]ric Dupont
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Antiangiogenic Drug

scholarly journals Animal and Human Vaccines against West Nile Virus

Pathogens ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1073
Author(s):  
Juan-Carlos Saiz
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
West Nile Virus ◽  
Vaccine Development ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
West Nile ◽  
Specific Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Neuroinvasive Disease ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Status

West Nile virus (WNV) is a widely distributed enveloped flavivirus transmitted by mosquitoes, which main hosts are birds. The virus sporadically infects equids and humans with serious economic and health consequences, as infected individuals can develop a severe neuroinvasive disease that can even lead to death. Nowadays, no WNV-specific therapy is available and vaccines are only licensed for use in horses but not for humans. While several methodologies for WNV vaccine development have been successfully applied and have contributed to significantly reducing its incidence in horses in the US, none have progressed to phase III clinical trials in humans. This review addresses the status of WNV vaccines for horses, birds, and humans, summarizing and discussing the challenges they face for their clinical advance and their introduction to the market.

scholarly journals Aconitine Neurotoxicity According to Administration Methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2149
Author(s):  
Ji Yeon Chung ◽  
Seung Jae Lee ◽  
Hyuck Jin Lee ◽  
Jeong Bin Bong ◽  
Chan-Hyuk Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Processing Method ◽  
Neurological Symptoms ◽  
Administration Method ◽  
Accompanying Symptoms ◽  
Administration Methods ◽  
Human Nervous System

We evaluated the toxic effects of aconitine on the human nervous system and its associated factors, and the general clinical characteristics of patients who visited the emergency room due to aconitine intoxication between 2008 and 2017. We also analyzed the differences related to aconitine processing and administration methods (oral pill, boiled in water, and alcohol-soaked), and the clinical characteristics of consciousness deterioration and neurological symptoms. Of the 41 patients who visited the hospital due to aconitine intoxication, 23 (56.1%) were female, and most were older. Aconitine was mainly used for pain control (28 patients, 68.3%) and taken as oral pills (19 patients, 46%). The patients showed a single symptom or a combination of symptoms; neurological symptoms were the most common (21 patients). All patients who took aconitine after processing with alcohol showed neurological symptoms and a higher prevalence of consciousness deterioration. Neurological symptoms occurred most frequently in patients with aconitine intoxication. Although aconitine intoxication presents with various symptoms, its prognosis may vary with the processing method and prevalence of consciousness deterioration during the early stages. Therefore, the administration method and accompanying symptoms should be comprehensively investigated in patients who have taken aconitine to facilitate prompt and effective treatment and better prognoses.

scholarly journals The role of future treatments in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Europe

2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110183
Author(s):  
Laurent Kodjikian ◽  
Carl Joe Mehanna ◽  
Salomon-Yves Cohen ◽  
François Devin ◽  
Sam Razavi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Macular Degeneration ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vascular Endothelial ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Injection Frequency ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have transformed the management of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) over the past two decades. However, as more long-term real-world data become available, it is clear that treatment outcomes are inferior to those reported in large, controlled clinical trials. This is largely driven by undertreatment, that is, not maintaining a consistent injection frequency to achieve sustained VEGF suppression, whether due to patient non-compliance, an important injection burden, or non/incomplete anatomical response. Newer therapeutic advances under evaluation hold promise in achieving more, for less. We review the latest drugs currently in or having successfully finished phase III clinical trials, and determine their potential place in the management of patients with nAMD in Europe.

scholarly journals Matching comparisons of therapeutic efficacy suggest better clinical outcomes for patients treated with peginterferon beta-1a than with glatiramer acetate

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642097591
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Scott ◽  
Ray Su ◽  
Kuangnan Xiong ◽  
Arman Altincatal ◽  
Carmen Castrillo-Viguera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Glatiramer Acetate ◽  
Therapeutic Efficacy ◽  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Lower Probability ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials

Background: Peginterferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate (GA) are approved first-line therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, but their therapeutic efficacy has not been compared directly. Methods: Clinical outcomes at 2 years, including no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or GA 20 mg/ml once daily (QD) were compared by propensity score matching analysis using individual patient data from ADVANCE and CONFIRM phase III clinical trials. In addition, clinical outcomes at 1–3 years for patients receiving peginterferon beta-1a Q2W or GA 40 mg/ml three times a week (TIW) were evaluated using a matching-adjusted comparison analysis of individual patient data from ADVANCE and the ADVANCE extension study, ATTAIN, and aggregate patient data from the phase III GALA and the GALA extension studies. Results: Propensity-score-matched peginterferon beta-1a patients ( n = 336) had a significantly lower annualized relapse rate [ARR (0.204 versus 0.282); rate ratio = 0.724; p = 0.045], a significantly lower probability of 12-week confirmed disability worsening (10.0% versus 14.6%; hazard ratio = 0.625; p = 0.048), and a significantly higher rate of NEDA (20.3% versus 11.5%; p = 0.047) compared with GA 20 mg/ml QD patients after 2 years of treatment. Matching-adjusted peginterferon beta-1a patients (effective n = 276) demonstrated a similar ARR at 1 year (0.278 versus 0.318; p = 0.375) and significantly lower ARR at 2 years (0.0901 versus 0.203; p = 0.032) and 3 years (0.109 versus 0.209; p = 0.047) compared with GA 40 mg/ml TIW patients ( n = 834). Conclusion: Results from separate matching comparisons of phase III clinical trials and extension studies suggest that peginterferon beta-1a 125 mcg Q2W may provide better clinical outcomes than GA (20 mg/ml QD or 40 mg/ml TIW).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document