scholarly journals Public Governance and Intellectual Property Management in Research Funding Agencies

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 233-245
Author(s):  
Josenito Oliveira Santos ◽  
José Ricardo de Santana ◽  
Cleide Mara Barbosa da Cruz ◽  
Anderson Rosa da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
International Development ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
National Council ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
Development Agencies

This article aims to analyze the position of the Research Support Foundations (FAPs) regarding the obligation of co-ownership in patent deposits, arising from financial support promoted by them. To this end, a search was proposed in the database of the National Institute of Industrial Property – INPI for FAPs and federal development agencies. For the search of international development agencies, the Orbit Intelligence database was used. The results of this study show that the Foundation for Research Support of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) remains the holder with 522 deposits, followed by the Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP) with 275 deposits and the other FAPs with rare cases. Although the three federal agencies do not require joint ownership, 522 deposits with joint ownership by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) and 27 deposits with joint ownership by the Financier of Studies and Projects (FINEP) were found, however, no deposit was found on behalf of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES). And among the 4 main countries analyzed, France is the only one in which there is a concentration of ownership in a central development agency, this can be explained by the fact that France's Intellectual Property Policy makes this type of requirement. In the other countries surveyed, there is no such requirement for participation in co-ownership of patent deposits. In interviews with managers of the FAPs, it was evident that a percentage of them claim that the arguments for participation or not show advantages, and from the point of view of those who do not defend participation, pointing out disadvantages.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Indicators in the Mesoregions of the State of Alagoas-Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 594-609
Author(s):  
Luanna Pereira de Morais ◽  
Silvana Nunes de Queiroz ◽  
Cristiano Quintino Furtado ◽  
Gabriel Francisco da Silva
Keyword(s):  
Sustainable Development ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Computer Programs ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Secondary Sources

The objective of this study is to analyze local, innovative and sustainable development in the three Mesoregions of Alagoas, through intellectual property indicators (patents, trademarks, industrial design and geographical indications). The methodology consists of the analysis of secondary sources extracted from the Statistical Database on Industrial Property (BADEPI), available on the website of the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), for the years 2010 to 2017. The results point out marked differences, with the eastern Alagoas mesoregion concentrating the intellectual property indicators with two geographical indications, 95.93% of the patent deposits and 84.73% of the deposits of trademark registrations, as well as industrial designs and computer programs. Agreste Alagoano presents a reasonable amount of intellectual protection, with emphasis on the municipality of Arapiraca. Sertão Alagoano, on the other hand, has the worst situation, low amount of intellectual property, even in a region with a diversified cultural and environmental environment. Thus, it was found that the Mesoregions of Alagoas need an ecosystem that invests in the innovation process in the region, especially the Sertão Alagoano.

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN SERTA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK PATEN DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA DAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoyon M Darusman ,
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Patent Holder ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Legal Perspective

<p>Abstract<br />Intellectual Property Rights as a part of property rights which belongs to human. The word property means ideas, creations, imaginations and thought. One of the intellectual property rights involves the field of industry (industrial property rights), especially related to technology which is called Invention, Based on legal perspective, it called as Patent. Patent is the exclusive rights which is given by the state to the inventor as the results of its invention in the field of technology, is given for a periode of time done by himself or appointed to other parties to do it. Then “Invention” is Inventor idea which is applicated in one activity of problem solving which specific in the field of technology, as a product, process, or improvement and development product or process. Then the Patent as one of the other Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has the importance position to the respective holder and getting protection on national and international law.<br /><em>Keywords: Position, Protection, Patent Holder</em></p><p>Abstrak<br />Hak Kekayaan Intelektual merupakan bagian dari pada hak kekayaan yang dimiliki oleh manusia. Kekayaan tersebut lahir karena adanya ide, kreasi, imajinasi dan pikiran. Salah satu kekayaan intelektual tersebut dapat dilihat dibidang industri. Khususnya yang berkaitan dengan teknologi yang dalam hal ini disebut dengan paten. Paten merupakan hak ekslusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada Inventor atas hasil invensinya di bidang teknologi, yang untuk selama waktu tertentu melaksanakan sendiri invensinya tersebut atau memberikan persetujuannya kepada pihak lain untuk melaksanakannya. Selanjutnya invensi adalah ide inventor yang dituangkan ke dalam suatu kegiatan pemecahan permasalahan yang spesifik di bidang teknologi, dapat berupa produk atau proses, atau penyempurnaan dan pengembangan produk atau proses. Sebagai salah satu dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI), paten memeliki kedudukan yang<br />sangat penting bagi pemiliknya serta mendapatkan perlindungan dalam kerangka nasional maupun internasional.<br /><em>Kata Kunci: Kedudukan, Perlindungan, Pemegang Hak Paten</em></p>

scholarly journals KEDUDUKAN SERTA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK PATEN DALAM KERANGKA HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA DAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoyon M Darusman
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Patent Holder ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Legal Perspective

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>Intellectua</em><em>l Property Rights as a part of property rights which belongs to human. The word property means ideas, creations, imaginations and thought. One of the intellectual property  rights involves the field of industry (industrial property rights), especially related to technology which is called Invention, Based on legal perspective, it called as Patent. Patent is the exclusive rights which is given by the state to the inventor as the results of its invention in the field of technology, is given for a periode of time  done by   himself or appointed to other parties to do it. Then “Invention” is Inventor idea which is applicated in one activity of problem solving which specific in the  field of technology, as a product, process, or improvement and development product or process. Then the Patent as one of the other Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has the importance position to the respective holder and getting protection on national and international law.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Position, Protection, Patent Holder</em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Hak Kekayaan Intelektual merupakan bagian dari pada hak kekayaan yang dimiliki oleh manusia. Kekayaan tersebut lahir karena adanya ide, kreasi, imajinasi dan pikiran. Salah satu kekayaan intelektual tersebut dapat dilihat dibidang industri. Khususnya yang berkaitan dengan teknologi yang dalam hal ini disebut dengan paten. Paten merupakan hak ekslusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada Inventor atas hasil invensinya di bidang teknologi, yang untuk selama waktu tertentu melaksanakan sendiri invensinya tersebut atau memberikan persetujuannya kepada pihak lain untuk melaksanakannya. Selanjutnya invensi adalah ide inventor yang dituangkan ke dalam suatu kegiatan pemecahan permasalahan yang spesifik di bidang teknologi, dapat berupa produk atau proses, atau penyempurnaan dan pengembangan produk atau proses. Sebagai salah satu dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI), paten memeliki kedudukan yang sangat penting bagi pemiliknya serta mendapatkan perlindungan dalam kerangka nasional maupun internasional.</p><strong>Kata Kunci: </strong>Kedudukan, Perlindungan, Pemegang Hak Paten

scholarly journals Public Research Institutions and Their Connections with Patents of Companies in Technological and Regional Development

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 95-108
Author(s):  
Robson Almeida Borges de Freitas ◽  
Antônio Martins de Oliveira Júnior ◽  
Humbérila Da Costa e Silva Melo ◽  
Margarete Almeida Freitas de Azevedo ◽  
Marina Bezerra da Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regional Development ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
The State ◽  
European Patent ◽  
Public Research ◽  
Research Institutions ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Social Mission ◽  
Public Research Institutions

The interaction between companies and universities is a central theme in discussions on technology transfer. In Brazil, there is an urgent need to raise awareness of the importance of this cooperative relationship for local and regional development. In this sense, it is observed that the innovation process is strategic so that an institution is strengthened and can fulfill its social mission in economic and regional development. Piauí, according to the IBGE census, has a population estimate of 3,273,227 in 2019. Piaui's per capita income is R$ 817.00 and ranks 24th in Brazil in this regard. With these data, the need arises to intervene scientifically in this reality. The objective of this study is to investigate the partnership relationships between companies and public research institutions in Piauí, in the development and transfer of technologies. Research Institutions are the main promoters of technological development in the state, however, for these technologies to reach productive arrangements, strategic alignment in the management of these technologies is necessary. Documentary research was used, with a quantitative approach. In the exploratory search, INPI's databases (National Institute of Industrial Property) and of Espacenet ( European Patent Office ) was used. We sought to select the companies with relevant economic representativeness in the state scenario and investigated the patent information. In the analysis of the data obtained, the Competitiveness Ranking of the CLP States (Public Leadership) was used to compare Piauí with well positioned states. According to the results found, it is observed that the transfer of technology between research institutions and companies is not evident. However, we can see that there are partnership initiatives with small companies in conducting research that can project a change in this scenario. The low number of patents and public/private partnerships in driving innovation in the state of Piauí, may be related to the low index evidenced by the Competitiveness Ranking of States - CLP.

scholarly journals Realities

2021 ◽  
pp. 59-84
Author(s):  
Jean-Michel Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Private Sector ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
The State ◽  
The Other ◽  
Social Connections ◽  
Technical Knowledge ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Social ◽  
Private Citizens ◽  
The One

This chapter highlights the collaboration between individuals in state institutions and the private sector during the 1840s in Bremen, Bavaria, Prussia, and Austria. Earlier expectations for the potential of telegraphy were confronted with the sobering reality of technological development. On the one hand, the efforts of the state, scientists, and railway companies were supported by the increasingly free circulation of technical knowledge between institutions, experts, and private citizens scattered across the German ‘landscape of innovation’. This circulation is illustrated by an examination of various technical periodicals, while the example of Werner Siemens, a Prussian lieutenant posted in Berlin, is used to illustrate the social connections which also often supported these exchanges of information. On the other hand, the period also witnessed an accentuation of the tensions between and within the private sector and the state, as the latter sought to establish its own interest in obtaining the technology. This combination of necessary collaboration and disagreement caused frustrations which, by 1847, threatened to stall the process of development.

scholarly journals Impacts of a delayed and slow-paced vaccination on cases and deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic: a modelling study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Libotte ◽  
Lucas Anjos ◽  
Regina Célia Cerqueira de Almeida ◽  
Sandra Mara Malta ◽  
Roberto Medronho
Keyword(s):  
Rio De Janeiro ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression ◽  
Vaccination Rate ◽  
The State ◽  
National Council ◽  
Vaccination Rates ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
Credible Intervals ◽  
Modelling Study

Abstract Background: In Brazil, vaccination has always been cutting across party political and ideological lines, which have delayed its start and brought the whole process into disrepute. Such divergences put the immunisation of the population in the background and create additional hurdles beyond the pandemic, mistrust and scepticism over vaccines.Methods: We conduct a mathematical modelling study to analyse the impacts of late vaccination and with slowly increasing coverage, as well as how harmful it would be if part of the population refused to get vaccinated or missed the second dose. We analyse data from confirmed cases, deaths caused by COVID-19, and vaccination in the state of Rio de Janeiro in the period between March 10, 2020, and October 27, 2021. The classical SIR model is extended to consider the effect of vaccination (efficacy, interval between doses, and vaccination rate) and data sets are regularised using Gaussian Process Regression. The model parameter distributions are estimated using Bayesian inference, aiming to obtain credible intervals in the simulations.Findings: We estimate that if the start of vaccination had been 30 days earlier, combined with efforts to drive vaccination rates up, 31,657 (25,801–35,117) deaths could have been averted. Our results also indicate that the slow pace of vaccination and the low demand for the second dose could cause a resurgence of cases as early as 2022.Interpretation: The government's inaction and lack of a strategic plan to fight the pandemic meant that vaccination started late, leading to thousands of deaths that could have been prevented. Even when reaching the expected vaccination coverage for the first dose, it is still challenging to increase adherence to the second dose and maintain a high vaccination rate to avoid new outbreaks.Funding: Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Supporting Research in the State of Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) and Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq).

Analysis The Role of Law in Protecting Intellectual Rights and Their Relationship to Social Welfare

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Wandi Subroto
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Social Welfare ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
The State ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Binding Power

This study aims to analyze the role of law in protecting intellectual rights and their relationship to social welfare. This research belongs to the research that uses the juridical-normative method. The legal sources used in this study are secondary legal sources, which based on their legally binding power, consist of primary legal materials in the form of theories, norms, rules, and opinions of legal experts related to the intellectual property protection legal system associated with community welfare issues, and the role of strategy that the state can play besides the use of secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the study of legal sources, it can be seen that regarding the definition, recognition, and protection of intellectual property rights in Indonesia, it is regulated in the law and further regulated in Government Regulations. Intellectual property rights recognized and protected in Indonesia are Copyright and Industrial Property Rights, which consist of trademarks, patents, trade secrets, integrated circuit layout designs, and protection of plant varieties. This is very important to be maintained by the state, and the goal is to improve social welfare as mandated in the constitution.

scholarly journals Knowledge on intellectual property as an advantage for scientific research

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-116
Author(s):  
Jennifer Zermeño-Guerrero ◽  
Marisela Garza-Ruiz ◽  
María Cristina Rodríguez-Padilla
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Technological Development ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Jel Codes ◽  
Research Activities ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Protection Strategies ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract The protection of intellectual property represents a key factor for the establishment of the particular rights of the scientific sector, and the clear record of the technological development of a country. The protection strategies of industrial property and copyright are relevant to maintain control of knowledge management, confidentiality during its development and the security of exclusivity in research activities. The relationship between colleagues to present a paper should be trustworthy, however plagiarism is one of the main concerns of researchers when they have to disclose their work where experts in the field are generally present. The objective of this research was to identify the reasons why researchers do not usually protect their scientific works, and through the application of a survey it is described that it is due to the lack of knowledge in the area of protection of intellectual property. It is concluded that it is important to propose the generation of knowledge to researchers about the advantages of implementing a process to protect their works for a relationship of trust with colleagues and students. Keywords: copyright, scientific work, intellectual property, research. JEL Codes: K11 Received: 30/07/2020.  Accepted: 20/02/2021.  Published: 01/06/2021.

scholarly journals Accountability in International Development Aid

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Wenar
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
Financial Institutions ◽  
Development Aid ◽  
Aid Effectiveness ◽  
The State ◽  
International Financial Institutions ◽  
Poverty Relief ◽  
Government Aid ◽  
Development Agencies ◽  
International Development Aid

Concerns over aid effectiveness have led to calls for greater accountability in international development aid. This article examines the state of accountability within and between international development agencies: aid NGOs, the international financial institutions, and government aid ministries. The investigation finds that there is very little accountability in these agencies, and that the accountability that there is often works against poverty relief. Increasing accountability, however, is not always the solution: increased accountability may just amplify the complexities of development efforts. Only those reforms with real promise to make aid more effective in reducing poverty should be encouraged. One such proposal is set out here.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document