Assessment of Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications in Patients under Anticoagulant Therapy and Undergoing Extraction - A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Hasan Ghandhari ◽  
◽  
Ebrahim Ameri ◽  
Mohsen Motalebi ◽  
Mohamad-Mahdi Azizi ◽  
...  

Background: Various studies have shown the effects of morbid obesity on the adverse consequences of various surgeries, especially postoperative infections. However, some studies have shown that the complications of spinal surgery in obese and non-obese patients are not significantly different. Objectives: This study investigated and compared the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications after common spinal surgeries by orthopedic spine fellowship in obese and non-obese patients in a specialized spine center in Iran. Methods: All patients who underwent decompression with or without lumbar fusion were included in this retrospective study. These patients were classified into two groups: non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The data related to type and levels of surgery, 30-day hospital complications, length of hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, blood loss, and need for transfusion were all extracted and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 148 patients (74%) were in the non-obese group and 52 patients (26%) in the obese group. The number of patients that need packed cells was significantly higher in the obese group (51.8% vs 32.6%) (P=0.01). Otherwise, there were not a significant difference between type of treatment (fusion or only decompression) (P=0.78), interbody fusion (P=0.26), osteotomy (P=0.56), duration of surgery (P=0.25), length of hospital stay (P=0.72), mean amount of blood loss (P=0.09), and postoperative complications (P=0.68) between the two groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not associated with the BMI of the patients.


AORN Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (6) ◽  
pp. 741-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Luke Akers ◽  
Amanda C. Dupnick ◽  
Elisa L. Hillman ◽  
Andrew G. Bauer ◽  
Lauren M. Kinker ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Hirayama ◽  
Nobuyuki Nosaka ◽  
Yasumasa Okawa ◽  
Soichiro Ushio ◽  
Yoshihisa Kitamura ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nayani Radhakrishna ◽  
Ankur Khandelwal ◽  
Rajendra Singh Chouhan ◽  
Mihir Prakash Pandia ◽  
Sourav Burman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intraoperative aneurysmal rupture (IAR) is a catastrophic complication; however, its impact on neurological outcome is debatable. We studied the effects of IAR on intraoperative and postoperative complications and neurological outcome. Methods In this retrospective study, adult patients who underwent aneurysmal clipping over a period of 2 years were divided as follows: group R (with IAR) and group N (without IAR). Various perioperative parameters, intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted. Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) was noted at discharge from hospital and categorized as favorable (GOS IV and V) and unfavorable (GOS I, II and III). Collected data was statistically analyzed. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of IAR. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Thirty-two out of 195 (16.41%) patients suffered IAR, with majority involving anterior communicating artery aneurysm (46.88%). Duration of temporary clipping (p < 0.001), volume of blood loss, and fluid and blood transfusion were significantly more in group R. Postoperatively, significantly more patients in group R developed intracranial hematoma, cerebral infarct, and required prolonged ventilatory support (≥5 days). Unfavorable neurological outcome was observed more in group R (p = 0.013). In univariate analysis, blood loss > 500 mL, use of colloids, and duration of surgery > 5 hours were found to be associated with IAR. After multiple logistic regression analysis, only use of colloids and duration of surgery > 5 hours were the most predictive variables for IAR. Conclusions IAR is associated with serious intraoperative and postoperative complications and unfavorable neurological outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document