scholarly journals PENERAPAN BANTUAN HUKUM DALAM PROSES PENYIDIKAN DENGAN PRINSIP ACCUSATOIR

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rusli Arafat
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Police Investigation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Investigation Process

<table width="605" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="406"><p><em>Investigation of criminal case through the criminal justice system must to base on the appropriate processes and procedure that can be accounted. One of the important procedures to investigation is the right to get legal protection.  Legal protection is one of the fundamental rights that every human being possesses, one form of legal protection is right to obtain legal aid in every steps of investigation process. The legal aid has an important meaning for someone who dealing with legal issues. This research is discussed about application of legal aid in the process of police investigation. This research also specializes in the approach using the rule of national law (legislation) to be able to know the application of legal aid with the principle of accusatoir. The result of this research is Legal aid can reduce the number of violence in the process of investigation of suspects by the police (investigation) in order to protect the human rights of the suspect, the role of legal aid is needed, the number of investigation of suspects not accompanied by advocate it cause torture of the suspect, because the investigator considers the suspect to be an object of inspection instead of placing the suspect as the subject of the investigation.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em><em>The criminal justice system, Investigation, legal aid, accusatoir principle</em></em></p></td></tr></tbody></table>

scholarly journals RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Rena Yulia
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Violent Crime ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Right

AbstractThe victim of domestic violence had needed of protection concept thatdifferent with another victim of violent crime. Participation of victim haswant to give justice for all. It is, because punishment to offender brings theimpact for victim. Restorative justice is a concept in criminal justice systemwhich is participation victim with it. The present of criminal justice system isthe offender oriented. Victim has not position to considerate offenderpunishment. Only offender can get the right and the victim hopeless. In thedomestic violence, victim and offender have relationship. Because there area family. · So, probability they have some interest in economic and relation.When wife become a victim and husband as offender, his wife hasdependency economic from her husband. It means, if husband get a decisionfrom judge, his wife will be suffer. Domestic violence is different crime. So, itis necessQ/y to made some different concept. In this article, will discussedabout alternative of legal protection for victim of domestic violence incriminal justice system to protect the victim

Trials in absentia and the cuts to criminal legal aid

2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (6) ◽  
pp. 486-510
Author(s):  
Paul Willey
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Aid ◽  
Magna Carta ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Irreparable Damage

The swingeing cuts to criminal legal aid may do irreparable damage to the defence side of the equality of arms. Coupled with this, the case of R v Jones gives the judge discretion to try in the defendant’s absence without representation or being present as a litigant-in-person. It is arguable that the defendant’s right to be heard will be chipped away at until the defence side is left legally crippled. The enactment of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is insular and neglects the defendant’s rights systemically. Without an adequate defence, squalid injustice will permeate and reverberate throughout the criminal justice system. Defendants cannot be corralled into court without the assistance of an advocate. The impact of the cuts falls on the litigant-in-person, thereby delimiting access to justice. Thus it disallows the opportunity to raise a proper defence. The sequela of the attack against the defence is a retreat back to the pre-1690s when defendants had very limited chances of being represented. Expense should not quell the right to be heard. Will the 2012 Act administer the coup de grace to the right to be heard or will Magna Carta be a heaven-sent ancient bulwark against this threat?

scholarly journals Optimization of The Role of State Storehouse for Seized Goods (RUPBASAN) Expansion of The Authority in The Perspective of Integrated Criminal Justice System

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 07003
Author(s):  
Irma Cahyaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
The State ◽  
The Future ◽  
Investigation Process ◽  
Business Correspondence

On the investigation process one of it forced effort by the investigator, namely seizure. Seized goods are saved n maintenance in The Role of State Storehouse for Seized Goods which namely RUPBASAN The problem of this paper are first, How is the implementation of authority process of the seized goods of state and the state booty in RUPBASAN; second, How is expansion of authority of RUPBASAN at the future. The method is used a normative juridical method which statute approach. The results show that the authority of RUPBASAN as effort to carry out its main duties are as follows: administering; conducting maintenance and transfer of State’s Confiscated and Seized Objects; conducting security and management of RUPBASAN; conducting business correspondence and filing but there is a facts in the RUPBASAN especially in management and maintenance of seized and spoiled goods of the state. Penal reforms of RUPBASAN are need to be realized which are not just to management and maintenance of seized and spoiled goods but it can also to strengthening of the RUPBASAN duties and authorities to extended to give the authority to auction the goods.

scholarly journals PEMBATASAN DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN RECIDIVE

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeha Dwanty El Rachma
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Criminal Offenders ◽  
The Family ◽  
Criminal Suspects ◽  
The Right ◽  
Positive Effect

AbstractChildren are the most valuable treasure, for the family, society and nation. The constitution expressly states in Article 28B paragraph 2 which states that every child has the right to justice and legal protection in their development which is free from violence and discrimination. The explanation of this article is a basic human right that must be fulfilled. At this stage of searching for identity it is influenced by their mentality, so that children sometimes still do not understand whether the action is good or not. Sometimes children are easily affected by situations and conditions around them, especially if the environment is very bad for them. If the child is comfortable, there will be a concern if the child violates the law. Children who are already criminal offenders need a criminal justice system strategy that is to try to minimize intervention in the juvenile criminal justice system. Diversion is a policy carried out to prevent (diversion) the perpetrator from the formal criminal justice system, but there are conditions for diversion, which is not a criminal repetition. The research method used in this study is the normative juridical method. The results obtained are the results of the diversion show that the diversion has not fully had a positive effect on children who are criminal suspects, it is proven that by the recurrence of criminal acts by the suspect.Keywords: child; diversionAbstrakAnak merupakan harta yang paling berharga, bagi keluarga, masyarakat dan bangsa. Konstitusi secara tegas dalam Pasal 28B ayat (2) yang menyatakan  Setiap anak berhak mendapatkan keadilan serta perlindungan hukum dalam tumbuh kembangnya yang bebas dari kekerasan dan diskriminasi. Penjelasan dari pasal tersebut merupakan hak asasi anak yang wajib dipenuhi. pada tahapan pencarian jati diri ini dipengaruhi oleh mentalitasnya, sehingga anak terkadang masih belum paham apakah tindakan tersebut baik atau tidak. Terkadang anak mudah terpengaruh oleh situasi dan kondisi di sekitarnya, apalagi jika lingkungan tersebut sangat buruk bagi mereka. Apabila anak sudah nyaman maka akan dikhawatirkan bila anak tersebut melanggar hukumAnak yang terlanjur menjadi pelaku pidana diperlukan strategi sistem peradilan pidana yaitu mengupayakan seminimal mungkin intervensi sistem peradilan pidana anak.Diversi merupakan kebijakan yang dilakukan untuk menghindarkan (Pengalihan) pelaku dari sistem peradilan pidana formal,Tapi terdapat syarat untuk dilakukannya diversi yaitu bukan merupakan pengulangan Pidana. Metode Penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yang didapat adalah menunjukkan bahwa diversi belum sepenuhnya memberikan pengaruh positif bagi anak yang menjadi tersangka pidana, hal itu dibuktikan bahwa dengan berulangnya tindak pidana oleh tersangka.

Victim Participation in Parole Proceedings in South Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jamil Mujuzi
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
South African ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Prison Inmate ◽  
Parole Board ◽  
Victims Of Crime ◽  
The Right

South African law provides for circumstances in which victims of crime may participate in the criminal justice system at the investigation, prosecution (trial), sentencing and parole stages. In South Africa, a prison inmate has no right to parole although the courts have held that they have a right to be considered for parole. In some cases, the victims of crime have a right to make submissions to the Parole Board about whether the offender should be released on parole. Section 299A of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 provides for the right of victims of crime to participate in parole proceedings. The purpose of this article is to discuss section 299A and illustrate ways in which victims of crime participate in the parole process. The author also recommends ways in which victims’ rights in section 299A of the Criminal Procedure Act could be strengthened.

What of the Child? Preventing the Publication of Children's Names After the Age of 18

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Sophy Baird
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Child Victims ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
The Face ◽  
The Right

Children are afforded a number of protections when they encounter the criminal justice system. The need for special protection stems from the vulnerable position children occupy in society. When children form part of the criminal justice system, either by being an offender, victim, or witness, they may be subjected to harm. To mitigate against the potential harm that may be caused, our law provides that criminal proceedings involving children should not be open to the public, subject to the discretion of the court. This protection naturally seems at odds with the principle of open justice. However, the courts have reconciled the limitation with the legal purpose it serves. For all the protection and the lengths that the law goes to protect the identity of children in this regard, it appears there is an unofficial timer dictating when this protection should end. The media have been at the forefront of this conundrum to the extent that they believe that once a child (offender, victim, or witness) turns 18 years old, they are free to reveal the child's identity. This belief, grounded in the right to freedom of expression and the principle of open justice, is at odds with the principle of child's best interests, right to dignity and the right to privacy. It also stares incredulously in the face of the aims of the Child Justice Act and the principles of restorative justice. Measured against the detrimental psychological effects experienced by child victims, witnesses, and offenders, this article aims to critically analyse the legal and practical implications of revealing the identity of child victims, witnesses, and offenders after they turn 18 years old.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document