scholarly journals Longitudinal Body Weight Change, Visit-To-Visit Body Weight Fluctuation, and Cognitive Decline Among Older Adults

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yu-Tung Lan ◽  
Deborah Blacker ◽  
Changzheng Yuan ◽  
Lori B. Chibnik ◽  
Albert Hofman ◽  
...  

Background: The evidence regarding dementia and late-life weight change is inconsistent, and data on body weight fluctuation and dementia are limited. Objective: To test the hypothesis that weight loss and substantial weight fluctuation predict cognitive decline independent of body weight and traditional risk factors of dementia. Methods: This study utilized longitudinal data from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center for 10,639 stroke- and dementia-free older adults (60.9%female, mean age 71.6 years, median follow-up 5.5 years). Trends in weight change and weight fluctuation were estimated for each individual by regressing repeated body weight measurements on time. Cognitive decline was examined as diagnostic progression from normal to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia and from MCI to dementia. Results: Compared to participants with stable weight, those with weight loss had increased odds of diagnostic progression (adjusted OR = 1.35, 95%CI [1.21, 1.51]). Also, large weight fluctuation was associated with increased odds of diagnostic progression (OR comparing the extreme quartiles = 1.20, 95%CI [1.04, 1.39]) after adjusting for traditional risk factors for dementia and body weight change. The magnitude of the association appeared larger among those older than 80 and those with 3 or more cardiometabolic risk factors at baseline (both p for interaction <  0.05). Conclusion: Weight loss and substantial weight fluctuation during late-life were associated with increased odds of cognitive decline independent of body weight and traditional risk factors of dementia. Our results suggested the linkage between late-life body weight instability and cognitive decline especially among those with greater age or higher cardiometabolic risk.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A10-A10
Author(s):  
John P H Wilding ◽  
Rachel L Batterham ◽  
Salvatore Calanna ◽  
Melanie Davies ◽  
Luc F Van Gaal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Despite the increasing global adverse health impact of obesity, there are few pharmacological options for effective weight management. STEP 1 investigated the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at 129 sites across 16 countries (NCT03548935). Adults aged ≥18 years with either body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 or BMI ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity, without type 2 diabetes, were randomized 2:1 to 68 weeks’ treatment with once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, both as adjunct to lifestyle intervention. The co-primary endpoints were percentage change in body weight and achievement of weight loss ≥5%. Cardiometabolic risk factors, patient-reported outcomes, and safety/tolerability were also assessed. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy (effect regardless of treatment adherence and use of rescue intervention) and trial product (effect assuming treatment adherence and without rescue intervention); results are presented for the treatment policy estimand, unless stated otherwise. P values for parameters marked with # were not controlled for multiplicity. Results: 1961 randomized participants (mean age 46 years, body weight 105.3 kg, BMI 37.9 kg/m2; 74.1% female) were included. Mean body weight change from baseline to week 68 was −14.9% in the semaglutide group vs −2.4% with placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: −12.4%; 95% confidence interval (CI): −13.4, −11.5; p&lt;0.0001). Similar results were obtained with the trial product estimand: mean body weight change# was -16.9% for semaglutide vs -2.4% for placebo (ETD: -14.4%; 95% CI: -15.3, -13.6; p&lt;0.0001). Participants were more likely to achieve weight loss ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15%, and ≥20%# with semaglutide vs placebo (86.4% vs 31.5%, 69.1% vs 12.0%, 50.5% vs 4.9%, and 32.0% vs 1.7%, respectively; p&lt;0.0001 for all). Greater improvements were seen with semaglutide vs placebo in waist circumference, BMI#, systolic and diastolic# blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin#, fasting plasma glucose#, C-reactive protein#, fasting lipid profile#, and self-reported physical functioning (p&lt;0.05 for all). No new safety signals with semaglutide were observed. The most frequent adverse events with semaglutide were gastrointestinal disorders (typically transient and mild-to-moderate). Conclusion: In adults with overweight or obesity, once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg plus lifestyle intervention induced a mean weight loss of approximately 15% by week 68. Clinically beneficial weight loss of ≥10% was achieved by over two-thirds of participants and ≥20% by one-third of participants, along with associated improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors and physical functioning.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Te Morenga ◽  
AJ Howatson ◽  
RM Jones ◽  
J Mann

Background: Dietary sugars have been suggested as a cause of obesity, several chronic diseases, and a range of cardiometabolic risk factors, but there is no convincing evidence of a causal relation between sugars and risk factors other than body weight. Objective: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that examined effects of the modification of dietary free sugars on blood pressure and lipids. Design: Systematic searches were conducted in OVID Medline, Embase, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science databases (to August 2013) to identify studies that reported intakes of free sugars and at least one lipid or blood pressure outcome. The minimum trial duration was 2 wk. We pooled data by using inverse-variance methods with random-effects models. Results: A total of 39 of 11,517 trials identified were included; 37 trials reported lipid outcomes, and 12 trials reported blood pressure outcomes. Higher compared with lower sugar intakes significantly raised triglyceride concentrations [mean difference (MD):0.11 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.07, 0.15 mmol/L; P < 0.0001], total cholesterol (MD: 0.16 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.10, 0.24 mmol/L; P < 0.0001), lowdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (0.12 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.19 mmol/L; P = 0.0001), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD: 0.02 mmol/L; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.03 mmol/L; P = 0.03). Subgroup analyses showed the most marked relation between sugar intakes and lipids in studies in which efforts were made to ensure an energy balance and when no difference in weight change was reported. Potential explanatory factors, including a weight change, in most instances explained <15% of the heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 36-75%). The effect of sugar intake on blood pressure was greatest in trials ≥8 wk in duration [MD: 6.9 mm Hg (95% CI: 3.4, 10.3 mm Hg; P<0.001) for systolic blood pressure and 5.6 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.5, 8.8 mm Hg; P = 0.0005) for diastolic blood pressure]. Conclusions: Dietary sugars influence blood pressure and serum lipids. The relation is independent of effects of sugars on body weight. Protocols for this review were registered separately for effects of sugars on blood pressure and lipids in the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews as PROSPERO 2012: CRD42012002379 and 2012: CRD42012002437, respectively. © 2014 American Society for Nutrition.


1999 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S56
Author(s):  
H. Ishida ◽  
Y. Oguma ◽  
T. Takeda ◽  
F. Katsukawa ◽  
N. Kinoshita ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 61 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 274-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Jovanovic ◽  
Branko Jakovljevic ◽  
Katarina Paunovic ◽  
Dusan Grubor ◽  
Aleksandar Milovanovic

Introduction Weight variations are a common phenomenon. Therefore, concern has been raised about the association between weight changes and weight variations and coronary heart disease (CHD). The aim of this study was to estimate the influence of weight change and weight variations as risk factors for coronary heart disease. Materials and methods The investigation was conducted as an observational cross-sectional study, including 102 participants of both genders: 61 patients with CHD and 41 healthy controls. All participants underwent anthropometric measurements and completed a questionnaire that included 1) weight changes in adulthood (maximum and minimum weight), 2) presence and number of weight variations in the 10 years prior to the onset of disease and 3) the size of weight change (weight gain or weight loss in kg). One weight variation was defined as weight loss followed by weight gain for more than 10% of body weight, or about 7 kg. Multivariant logistic regression was used for the estimation of significant predictors for the occurrence of coronary heart disease. Results Participants with CHD had higher values of body weight in adulthood compared to healthy controls, larger number of weight variations in the last 10 years, and more frequently reported weight gain and weight loss for more than 10 kg. The highest risk for the occurrence of coronary heart disease was observed for participants who had more than 3 weight variations for 10% (OR=2.13; 95%CI=0.98-5.48), those with weight loss over 10 kg (OR=2.16; 95%CI=1.71-2.72) and those with weight gain over 10 kg (OR=2.71; 95%CI=1.08-6.83), regardless of gender, age, smoking, body mass index and blood pressure. Discussion Several mechanisms are suggested to explain the relationship between weight changes and variations and coronary heart disease, including changes in plasma lipid levels, insulin levels, decrease of HDL cholesterol, increase of C-reactive protein and increase of blood pressure. Conclusion This study suggests that frequent and very intense weight changes can be considered important predictors for the occurrence of coronary heart disease.


PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9390
Author(s):  
Qiuju Tian ◽  
Liyuan Qin ◽  
Weiyi Zhu ◽  
Shaojie Xiong ◽  
Beiwen Wu

Aims The study aimed to explore factors contributing to body weight change over time in gastric cancer patients after gastrectomy, in order to find risk factors to implement nutritional intervention beforehand. Methods A cohort of gastric cancer patients who were treated with gastrectomy from January to March 2019 at a university affiliated hospital in Shanghai were consecutively identified in this study. Demographics, disease related information, nutrition knowledge, attitude, and practice score were collected before gastrectomy. In addition, body weight before surgery (T0), body weight at one month (T1), two months (T2), and three months (T3) after gastrectomy were recorded. Generalized estimation equation was used to describe body weight change and analyze factors contributing to body weight change after surgery. Results There were 49 patients recruited in the study. Patient body weight decreased by 9.2% at T1 (Wald χ = 271.173, P <0.001), 11.0% at T2 (Wald χ2 = 277.267, P <0.001), and 11.4% at T3 compared to baseline at T0 (Wald χ = 284.076, P <0.001). The results of GEE for multivariable analysis showed that surgery type (Wald χ = 6.027, P = 0.014) and preoperative BMI (Wald χ = 12.662, P = 0.005) were contributing factors of body weight change. Compared with distal gastrectomy patients, total gastrectomy patients experienced greater body weight loss (β = 2.8%, P = 0.014). Compared with patients with BMI&λτ; 18.5 kg/m2, patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2experienced greater body weight loss (β = 4.5% P = 0.026). Conclusion Gastric cancer patients experienced significant weight loss during 3 months after gastrectomy. Total gastrectomy and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2were risk factors to postoperative body weight loss for GC patients. The results suggested hinted that clinician should pay attention to postoperative nutrition status of patient undergoing total gastrectomy and obesity patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A7-A7
Author(s):  
Ofri Mosenzon ◽  
W Timothy Garvey ◽  
Dan Hesse ◽  
Anna Koroleva ◽  
Robert F Kushner ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, is being investigated in people with overweight or obesity. A post-hoc analysis of the STEP 4 trial was conducted to identify whether early weight loss is predictive of later weight loss with maintenance once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 2.4 mg. Methods: STEP 4 was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 withdrawal trial (NCT03548987). Adults aged ≥18 years with either body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity or BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, underwent a 20-week run-in period. Participants reaching the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 (regardless of weight loss achieved) were randomized 2:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, as adjunct to lifestyle intervention, for an additional 48 weeks. Percent change in body weight from week 0 to 68 was estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurements analysis with treatment, week 20 responder status, and the interaction between treatment and week 20 responder status as factors, and baseline body weight as a covariate, all nested within visit (based on the trial product estimand [treatment effect assuming treatment adherence and without use of rescue intervention] for the on-treatment period). Participants were considered responders if they achieved ≥5% weight loss at week 20. Whether the week 20 response to semaglutide predicted the achievement of clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) by week 68 was also assessed. Results: In STEP 4, 902 participants initiated semaglutide at week 0, of whom 803 were randomized at week 20 (semaglutide: n=535, placebo: n=268; characteristics at week 0 for all randomized participants: mean age 46 years, body weight 107.2 kg, BMI 38.4 kg/m2; 79.0% female; 83.7% white). For the 88.0% of participants randomized to semaglutide and who were responders at week 20, mean body weight change from week 0 to 68 was -19.7%. For non-responders at week 20, mean body weight change was -6.4% with continued semaglutide vs -0.3% with switch to placebo. Of all participants randomized to semaglutide, 86.2% achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) at week 68. Being a responder at week 20 was highly predictive of achieving this outcome (positive predictive value: 96.4%), whereas being a non-responder at week 20 had limited predictive value (negative predictive value: 42.9%). Conclusion: In the STEP 4 trial, the vast majority of participants who were randomized to the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 had lost ≥5% body weight by week 68, with most achieving this by week 20. Overall weight loss with semaglutide was greater among early responders, but non-responders also achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss by week 68 if semaglutide treatment was continued.


1974 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Robinson ◽  
C. Fraser ◽  
J. C. Gill ◽  
I. McHattie

SUMMARYTwenty-seven North Country Cheviot ewes, each carrying twin foetuses and having a mean body weight at 6 weeks prior to parturition of 81 kg were individually penned and offered a constant daily intake of 16·75 MJ metabolizable energy during the last 6 weeks of gestation. At parturition the ewes were allocated to one of three dried grass/concentrate diets containing (1) 10·3, (2) 13·6 or (3) 16·9 % crude protein (CP) and 10 MJ metabolizable energy (ME) per kg. The mean daily CP intakes for diets 1 to 3 were 273, 340 and 415 g respectively and the mean daily ME intake was 25 MJ. Within each level of dietary CP intake the lambs were weaned at either 25, 35 or 41 days of age.There were no significant diet × stage of weaning interactions in milk yield or ewe body-weight change during lactation. The mean daily levels of milk production were 2·4, 2·9 and 3·1 kg for diets 1 to 3 respectively. The corresponding values for ewe body-weight loss were 118, 170 and 265 g per day. When the diet contained 13·8% CP the incremental increase in milk production per unit increase in protein intake was 4·2 g/g. This gave an incremental increase in lamb growth rate of 0·79 g/g and was equivalent to the associated incremental increase in ewe body-weight loss.A reduction in the concentration of CP in the ewes' diet when the lambs are 3 weeks of age may be a useful practical procedure for decreasing milk production and for reducing the body-weight loss of the ewe in a frequent breeding system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1651-1651
Author(s):  
Mindy Lee ◽  
Annabelle Shaffer ◽  
Nouf Alfouzan ◽  
Catherine Applegate ◽  
Jennie Hsu-Lumetta ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Individualized Diet Improvement Program (iDip) has been developed for a sustainable diet for weight management through self-experimentation with emphasis on increasing protein and fiber and reducing caloric intake. Upon a successful feasibility test with the first study completed in 2018 (iDip 1), we hypothesized that assigning homework and advising based on response would improve weight loss along with the dietary changes. Methods Thirty adults (BMI &gt;25 kg/m2) were enrolled in a 2-year study (iDip 2). The study comprised of 22 dietary sessions over 12 months, identical to iDip 1. Participants were assigned to complete a self-experimentation homework after each session and received advising based on responses. As visual feedback, weekly weight charts and dietary analyses in the form of Protein-Fiber (PF) plot were offered. Daily weights, body composition, waist circumference were collected and 24-hour dietary records were obtained. Results Six participants dropped out, leaving 24 participants (80%). Mean body weight change (n = 24) in iDip 2 at 8 months was −6.2 ± 1.5% while mean body weight change (n = 12) in iDip 1 was −5.2 ± 1.1%. Nine out of 24 participants (38%) achieved clinically meaningful weight loss (&gt;5% of initial body weight) with a mean body weight change of −12.9% ± 2.8. The magnitude of weight loss of the successful group in iDip 2 was significantly greater (P &lt; 0.05) than that of the successful group in iDip 1 where 5 out of 12 participants (42%) achieved &gt;5% weight loss (mean body weight change: −8.9 ± 1.3%). Skeletal muscle mass was well-maintained with a mean change (n = 18) of −0.7 ± 0.2% at 6 months. Waist circumference (n = 18) was significantly decreased (P &lt; 0.05) from baseline by −6.5 ± 1.3 cm. 24-hr records showed improvements in protein and fiber intake throughout the study. Although no significant differences were found in protein and fiber intake between two studies, higher mean protein and fiber intake were observed at 6 months in iDip 2. Conclusions Self-experimentation assignments followed by individualized feedback significantly increased the magnitude of weight loss over the previous study with protein intake to maintain skeletal muscle mass as evidenced by its minimal loss. The success rate of participants achieving &gt;5% weight loss did not improve in this study. Funding Sources USDA NIFA ILLU-698–908; NIBIB NIH (CA).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document