scholarly journals Evaluation of the Conformity Between Chest CT Scan Results With Molecular Diagnosis Test in Patients With COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 766-773
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Nasrollahzadeh Sabet ◽  
◽  
Mohammad Foad Heidari ◽  
Mohammad Khanalipour ◽  
Saadat Allah Ghaffari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Ethical Considerations ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
New Type ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

Background and Aim: Since late 2019, with the emergence of a new type of coronavirus that causes a new respiratory disease called COVID-19, there have been many concerns about the spread of this disease and how to deal with it. Due to the ability of the virus to be transmitted rapidly, diagnosing the infected individuals in the early stages for isolating them is critical. This study aims to evaluate the reliability of Computed Tomography (CT) scan in diagnosing COVID-19. Methods & Materials: Participants were 212 patients admitted to hospital with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Demographic information, medical history, symptoms, and the chest CT scan results were collected and analyzed. Finally, the power of CT scans in the diagnosis of this disease was compared with the Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) molecular test. Ethical Considerations: This study received ethical approval from the ethics committee of AJA University of Medical Sciences (Code: IR.AJAUMS.REC.1399.091). Results: The sensitivity of CT scan in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was relatively high, but its false-positive results were also high. Conclusion: CT scan is a relatively sensitive method for diagnosing COVID-19, but caution should be made due to its high false-positive results which can lead to increased financial burden on the health system.

scholarly journals Association of laboratory parameters with chest CT findings in COVID-19 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-119
Author(s):  
Ayeshna Gurung ◽  
Reetu Baral ◽  
Binit Koirala ◽  
Suman Kumar Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Radiology Department ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Chest Ct Scan ◽  
D Dimer

Aims: To analyze the Chest CT Scan and association of the severity score with the serum biomarkers D- dimer, C-reactive protein (CRP), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Ferritin levels. Methods: This is a retrospective study done from the database of Department of Radiology and Department of Pathology at Nobel medical college and teaching hospital during the peak of the second wave of the pandemic from 1st April 2021 to 31 st May 2021. Data for the Chest CT scan and lab parameters were analyzed and correlated. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional review committee of Nobel Medical College and Teaching Hospital. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: A total of 263 cases of Chest CT scan were done in 2 months period who were diagnosed as cases of COVID 19. In this study the severity and scores were taken from the database in the Radiology department. The lab parameters like D-dimer, CRP, LDH and Ferritin levels were studied from the database in the lab. Age of the patients ranged from 19 to 89 years with maximum cases 68 (25.8%) seen in the age group of 50-59 years. According to the chest CT Scan the severity score was in between 11-15 in 92 (48.3%) cases. Fifty six cases showed abnormal levels of D-dimer, Ferritin, CRP and LDH. D-dimer was raised in 26 (46.4%), LDH was raised in 48 (87.2%) while Ferritin and CRP was also raised in all 56 cases. Conclusions: There was a positive correlation between the biomarkers and the Chest CT severity score. The severity of the disease with involvement of the lungs can be estimated by correlating with the lab parameters.

Cancer surgery during the COVID‐19 pandemic: The experience of a comprehensive cancer center performing preoperative screening by RT‐PCR and chest CT scan

2021 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 815-822
Author(s):  
Joanne Guerlain ◽  
Fabienne Haroun ◽  
Alexandra Voicu ◽  
Charles Honoré ◽  
Franck Griscelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Preoperative Screening ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

scholarly journals A meta-analysis of accuracy and sensitivity of chest CT and RT-PCR in COVID-19 diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Khatami ◽  
Mohammad Saatchi ◽  
Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh ◽  
Zahra Sadat Aghamir ◽  
Alireza Namazi Shabestari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

AbstractNowadays there is an ongoing acute respiratory outbreak caused by the novel highly contagious coronavirus (COVID-19). The diagnostic protocol is based on quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and chests CT scan, with uncertain accuracy. This meta-analysis study determines the diagnostic value of an initial chest CT scan in patients with COVID-19 infection in comparison with RT-PCR. Three main databases; PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for all published literature from January 1st, 2019, to the 21st May 2020 with the keywords "COVID19 virus", "2019 novel coronavirus", "Wuhan coronavirus", "2019-nCoV", "X-Ray Computed Tomography", "Polymerase Chain Reaction", "Reverse Transcriptase PCR", and "PCR Reverse Transcriptase". All relevant case-series, cross-sectional, and cohort studies were selected. Data extraction and analysis were performed using STATA v.14.0SE (College Station, TX, USA) and RevMan 5. Among 1022 articles, 60 studies were eligible for totalizing 5744 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of chest CT scan compared to RT-PCR were 87% (95% CI 85–90%), 46% (95% CI 29–63%), 69% (95% CI 56–72%), and 89% (95% CI 82–96%), respectively. It is important to rely on the repeated RT-PCR three times to give 99% accuracy, especially in negative samples. Regarding the overall diagnostic sensitivity of 87% for chest CT, the RT-PCR testing is essential and should be repeated to escape misdiagnosis.

scholarly journals The role of CT imaging for management of COVID-19 in epidemic area: early experience from a University Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram rao Bollineni ◽  
Koenraad Hans Nieboer ◽  
Seema Döring ◽  
Nico Buls ◽  
Johan de Mey
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Ct Findings ◽  
Epidemic Area ◽  
Chest Ct Scan ◽  
Pcr Test

Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical value of the chest CT scan compared to the reference standard real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in COVID-19 patients. Methods From March 29th to April 15th of 2020, a total of 240 patients with respiratory distress underwent both a low-dose chest CT scan and RT-PCR tests. The performance of chest CT in diagnosing COVID-19 was assessed with reference to the RT-PCR result. Two board-certified radiologists (mean 24 years of experience chest CT), blinded for the RT-PCR result, reviewed all scans and decided positive or negative chest CT findings by consensus. Results Out of 240 patients, 60% (144/240) had positive RT-PCR results and 89% (213/240) had a positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 were 100% (95% CI: 97–100%, 144/240), 28% (95% CI: 19–38%, 27/240), 68% (95% CI: 65–70%) and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the chest CT suggesting COVID-19 was 71% (95% CI: 65–77%). Thirty-three patients with positive chest CT scan and negative RT-PCR test at baseline underwent repeat RT-PCR assay. In this subgroup, 21.2% (7/33) cases became RT-PCR positive. Conclusion Chest CT imaging has high sensitivity and high NPV for diagnosing COVID-19 and can be considered as an alternative primary screening tool for COVID-19 in epidemic areas. In addition, a negative RT-PCR test, but positive CT findings can still be suggestive of COVID-19 infection.

A 71-Year-Old Man With Fever, Productive Cough, and Tree-in-Bud Pattern on Chest CT Scan

CHEST Journal ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 700-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Bastawrous ◽  
Jan V. Hirschmann
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Productive Cough ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

PULMONARY BIRT-HOGG-DUBE SYNDROME: A GOOD REASON TO ROUTINELY PERFORM A LOW DOSE CHEST CT SCAN IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SPONTANEOUS PNEUMOTHORAX?

CHEST Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 576A
Author(s):  
JINCEY SRIRAM ◽  
IRMA VAN DE BEEK ◽  
PAUL JOHANNESMA ◽  
MICHIEL VAN WERKUM ◽  
TIJMEN VAN DER WEL ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Good Reason ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

scholarly journals Chest CT scan as an initial diagnostic method for tuberculosis infection detected by mass screening

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hyun Joo ◽  
Hyun Woo Lee ◽  
Seo-Young Yoon ◽  
Tae Yun Park ◽  
Eun Young Heo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Mass Screening ◽  
Diagnostic Method ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Tuberculosis Infection ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

scholarly journals Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis and its predictive factors: a prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Nabahati ◽  
Soheil Ebrahimpour ◽  
Reza Khaleghnejad Tabari ◽  
Rahele Mehraeen
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Fibrosis ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Lung Fibrosis ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

Abstract Background We aimed to prospectively assess the lung fibrotic-like changes, as well as to explore their predictive factors, in the patients who survived Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. In this prospective cross-sectional study, we recruited patients who had been treated for moderate or severe COVID-19 pneumonia as inpatients and discharged from Rohani hospital in Babol, northern Iran, during March 2020. The clinical severity of COVID-19 pneumonia was classified as per the definition by World Health Organization. We also calculated the CT severity score (CSS) for all patients at admission. Within the 3 months of follow-up, the next chest CT scan was performed. As the secondary outcome, the patients with fibrotic abnormalities in their second CT scan were followed up in the next 3 months. Results Totally, 173 COVID-19 patients were finally included in the study, of whom 57 (32.9%) were male and others were female. The mean age was 53.62 ± 13.67 years old. At 3-month CT follow-up, evidence of pulmonary fibrosis was observed in 90 patients (52.0%). Consolidation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.84), severe disease (OR 2.40), and a higher CSS (OR 1.10) at admission were associated with increased risk of fibrotic abnormalities found at 3-month CT follow-up. Of 62 patients who underwent chest CT scan again at 6 months of follow-up, 41 patients (66.1%) showed no considerable changes in the fibrotic findings, while the rest of 21 patients (33.9%) showed relatively diminished lung fibrosis. Conclusion Post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis was observed in about half of the survivors. Also, patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were at a higher risk of pulmonary fibrosis. Moreover, consolidation, as well as a higher CSS, in the initial chest CT scan, was associated with increased risk of post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis. In addition, some patients experienced diminished fibrotic abnormalities in their chest CT on 6-month follow-up, while some others did not.

Lung Ultrasound Findings Compared to Chest CT Scan in Patients with COVID-19 Associated Pneumonia: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Hatamabadi ◽  
Majid Shojaee ◽  
Mohammad Bagheri ◽  
Masoomeh Raoufi
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Ground Glass Opacity ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Ultrasound Evaluation ◽  
Chest Ct Scan

Introduction: Lung US has been reported to be as useful as a chest CT scan and much better than a chest x-ray for the evaluation of pneumonia. Objective: This study aimed to compare the findings of lung ultrasound (US) and chest CT scan of patients with COVID-19-associated pneumonia in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: This retrospective observational pilot study was carried out on confirmed COVID-19 patients in the isolation corona ward of the Imam Hussein Hospital ED from March 15 to March 22, 2020. After obtaining demographic data, the patients underwent a pulmonary bedside US examination, with the patients in the sitting position, turning their back to the examiner. A 10-point lung US was performed. Each lung was divided into two areas: posterior (three zones) and lateral (two zones). The patients’ lung ultrasound and chest CT scan as the standard imaging were blindly reviewed and recorded. The clinical value of ultrasound was evaluated with different severity of lung involvement according to CT severity score. Results: Nineteen patients (38 zones), including 13 males, were evaluated with a mean age of 62.5±16.8 years. B2 lines and consolidation observed in the US examinations were significantly correlated with ground-glass opacity and consolidation observed in CT scan examinations, respectively (p <0.0001). US sensitivity and specificity of finding B2 lines were 90% and 100%, respectively. Also, the sensitivity and specificity of US in identifying consolidation were 82% and 100%, respectively. In the lungs with moderate and severe lobar involvement, US findings were significantly correlated (p <0.05) with CT scan findings. Conclusions: Ultrasound evaluation is a safe, fast, and rapid technique for the evaluation of patients with moderate to severe COVID-19-associated pneumonia. It is a reproducible procedure and can be implemented by the operator after a short course of training.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document