scholarly journals Petrophysical Analysis to Determine Reservoir and Source Rocks in Berau Basin, West Papua Waters

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Popy Dwi Indriyani ◽  
Asep Harja ◽  
Tumpal Bernhard Nainggolan
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Effective Porosity ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Petrophysical Analysis ◽  
Shale Volume ◽  
Clastic Sediments ◽  
Volume Porosity ◽  
West Papua

Berau Basin is assessed to have same potential in clastic sediments with Mesozoic and Paleozoic ages, where reservoirs and source rocks are similar to productive areas of hydrocarbons in Northwest Shield Australia. This study aims to identify the hydrocarbon prospect zones and potential rocks zones using petrophysical parameters, such as shale volume, porosity, water saturation and permeability. Petrophysical analysis of reservoir and source rock are carried out on three wells located in the Berau Basin, namely DI-1, DI-2 and DI-3 in Kembelangan and Tipuma Formation. Qualitative analysis shows that there are 4 reservoir rock zones and 4 source rock zones from thorough analysis of these three wells. Based on quantitative analysis of DI-1 well, it has an average shale volume (Vsh) 9.253%, effective porosity (PHIE) 20.68%, water saturation (Sw) 93.3% and permeability (k) 55.69 mD. DI-2 well’s average shale volume, effective porosity, water saturation and permeability values are 29.16%, 2.97%, 67.9% and 0.05 mD, respectively. In DI-3 well, average shale volume, effective porosity, water saturation and permeability values are 6.205%, 19.36%, 80.2% and 242.05 mD, respectively. From the reservoir zone of these three wells in Kembelangan Formation, there are no show any hydrocarbon prospect.

scholarly journals DETERMINING OF FORMATION WATER SATURATION TO ESTIMATE REMINING HYDROCARBON SATURATION IN THE X LAYER Y FIELD

PETRO ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Ratnayu Sitaresmi ◽  
Guntur Herlambang Wijanarko ◽  
Puri Wijayanti ◽  
Danaparamita Kusumawardhani
Keyword(s):  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Effective Porosity ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Formation Water ◽  
Core Data ◽  
Shale Volume ◽  
Average Water ◽  
Hydrocarbon Saturation ◽  
Exploratory Wells

<p>Efforts are made to find the remaining hydrocarbons in the reservoir, requiring several methods to calculate the parameters of reservoir rock characteristics. For this reason, logging and core data are required. The purpose of this research is to estimate the Remaining Hydrocarbon Saturation that can be obtained from log data and core data. With several methods used, can determine petrophysical parameters such as rock resistivity, shale volume, effective porosity, formation water resistivity, mudfiltrate resistivity and rock resistivity in the flushed zone (Rxo) and rock resistivity in the Uninvaded Zone which will then be used to calculate the Water Saturation value Formation (Sw) and Mudfiltrat Saturation. (Sxo) In this study four exploratory wells were analyzed. Shale volume is calculated using data from Gamma Ray Log while effective Porosity is corrected for shale volume. Rw value obtained from the Pickett Plot Method is 0.5 μm. The average water saturation by Simandoux Method were 33.6%, 43.4%, 67.0% and 39.7% respectively in GW-1, GW-2, GW-3 and GW-4 wells. While the average water saturation value by the Indonesian Method were 43.9%, 48.8%, 72.3% and 44% respectively in GW-1, GW-2, GW-3 and GW-4 wells. From comparison with Sw Core, the Simandoux Method looks more appropriate. Average mudfiltrate (Sxo) saturation by Simandoux Method were 65.5%, 68.2%, 77.0% and 64.6% respectively in GW-1, GW-2, GW-3 and GW wells -4. Remaining Hydrocarbon Saturation (Shr) was obtained by 34.5%, 31.8, 23%, 35.4% of the results of parameters measured in the flushed zone namely Rxo, Rmf and Sxo data. For the price of Moving Hydrocarbons Saturation or production (Shm) is 31.9%, 24.8%, 10%, 24.9% in wells GW-1, GW-2, GW-3 and GW-4.</p>

scholarly journals PETROPHYSICAL ANALYSIS AND SEISMIC STRATIGRAPHY INTERPRETATION TO DETERMINE HYDROCARBON RESERVOIR IN TARAKAN BASIN, BUNYU ISLAND WATERS

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daffa Dzakwan Shiddiq ◽  
Eleonora Agustine ◽  
Tumpal Bernhard Nainggolan ◽  
Imam Setiadi ◽  
Shaska Zulivandama
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Seismic Stratigraphy ◽  
Effective Porosity ◽  
Geological Structures ◽  
Seismic Line ◽  
Petrophysical Analysis ◽  
Hydrocarbon Reservoir ◽  
Shale Volume ◽  
Basin Area

Tarakan Basin area of Bunyu Island Waters is known to have hydrocarbon potential with complex geological structures. This study aims to determine reservoir characterization and to obtain prospect of hydrocarbon reservoir zones based on petrophysical and seismic stratigraphy analysis with reference to Well DDS-1 and 2D seismic Line S88. Petrophysical analysis results 3 zones that have potential as hydrocarbon reservoirs. Based on petrophysical quantitative analysis, Zone 1 has values of 52.25% for shale volume, 18.48% for effective porosity, 39.84% for water saturation and 13.03 mD for permeability. Zone 2 has values of 54.66% for shale volume, 10.27% for effective porosity, 40.9% for water saturation and 1.14 mD for permeability. Zone 3 has values of 49.22% for shale volume, 9.33% for effective porosity, 56.33% for water saturation and 0.22 mD for permeability. Out of these three reservoir zones in Well DDS- 1, Zone 1 has the prospect of hydrocarbons which is supported by the net pay value. Based on seismic stratigraphy interpretation, the reservoir zone is correlated to the Tabul Formation, which comprises calcareous clay and limestone.

scholarly journals ntegration of Petrophysical Analysis and Elastic Log Properties as an Input to Optimize the Development Wells Target in Unique Globigerina Limestone Gas Reservoir in Madura Strait

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-70
Author(s):  
Hendra Himawan ◽  
◽  
Indra Sumantri ◽  
Okky Yuditya Pahlevi
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Properties ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Velocity Ratio ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
High Porosity ◽  
Gas Reservoir ◽  
Petrophysical Analysis ◽  
Gas Saturation ◽  
Rock Quality ◽  
Volume Porosity

The Madura Strait PSC is located in the southern part of North East Java Basin with biogenic gas from Globigerina limestone Pliocene Mundu and Selorejo sequence as main target. At early stage of field development,understanding and knowledge about petrophysical and elastic properties of reservoir rock quality is required and very important. The petrophysical analysis provide properties such as clay volume, porosity, permeability, water saturation and mineral volume to separate reservoir and non-reservoir zone. The elastic rock properties such as acoustic impedance (AI), shear impedance (SI), velocity ratio (Vp/Vs), and Poisson’s ratio (σ) were generated to identify clay zone, gas and non-gas also focused to distinguish reservoir rock quality inside gas zone as an effective reservoir characterization. This research is done by utilize core data, quad combo logs from eleven wells and shear velocity from eight wells. The purpose of this research is to optimize development well target in Globigerina limestone gas reservoir, which have good to best reservoir rock quality shown with high porosity and permeability,low clay volume and water saturation. Results from this research indicate that lime mud matrix have significant impact in the reservoir rock quality. Meanwhile, gas saturation can affect the elastic properties due to this high gas saturation can decrease compressional velocity (Vp) value. Finally, the integration of petrophysical result and combination of elastic properties implementation can help in distinguishing the best reservoir rock quality, which contains gas that should be penetrated by the development wells

The Uniqueness of Heterogeneous Globigerina Limestone Reservoir and The Importance of Integrated Rock Type Definition for Field Development Plan: Case Study in Madura Strait, East Java

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. P. Putra
Keyword(s):  
Water Saturation ◽  
Rock Type ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Reservoir Quality ◽  
Secondary Porosity ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Core Data ◽  
Type Definition ◽  
Volume Porosity ◽  
Porosity And Permeability

The Globigerina Limestone (GL) is the main reservoir of the seven gas fields that will be developed in the Madura Strait Block. The GL is a heterogeneous and unique clastic carbonate. However, the understanding of reservoir rock type of this reservoir are quite limited. Rock type definition in heterogeneous GL is very important aspect for reservoir modeling and will influences field development strategy. Rock type analysis in this study is using integration of core data, wireline logs and formation test data. Rock type determination applies porosity and permeability relationship approach from core data, which related to pore size distribution, lithofacies, and diagenesis. The analysis resulted eight rock types in the Globigerina Limestone reservoir. Result suggests that rock type definition is strongly influenced by lithofacies, which is dominated by packstone and wackestone - packstone. The diagenetic process in the deep burial environment causes decreasing of reservoir quality. Then the diagenesis process turns to be shallower in marine phreatic zone and causes dissolution which increasing the reservoir quality. Moreover, the analysis of rock type properties consist of clay volume, porosity, permeability, and water saturation. The good quality of a rock type will have the higher the porosity and permeability. The dominant rock type in this study area is RT4, which is identical to packstone lithofasies that has 0.40 v/v porosity and 5.2 mD as average permeability. The packstone litofacies could be found in RT 5, 6, 7, even 8 due to the increased of secondary porosity. It could also be found at a lower RT which is caused by intensive cementation.

scholarly journals Prospect evaluation and hydrocarbon potential assessment: the Lower Eocene Facha non-clastic reservoirs, Hakim Oil Field (NC74A), Sirte basin, Libya—a case study

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 351-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Kassab ◽  
Ali El-Said Abbas ◽  
Mostafa A. Teama ◽  
Musa A. S. Khalifa
Keyword(s):  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Thickness Variation ◽  
Oil Accumulation ◽  
Lower Eocene ◽  
Log Data ◽  
Shale Volume ◽  
Volume Porosity ◽  
Sirte Basin

Abstract Petrophysical assessment of Facha Formation based on log data of six wells A1, A3, A4, A5, A8 and A13 recorded over the entire reservoir interval was established. Hakim Oil Field produces from the Lower Eocene Facha reservoir, which is located at the western side of Sirte basin. Limestone, dolostone and dolomitic limestone are the main lithologies of the Facha reservoir. This lithology is defined by neutron porosity—density cross-plot. Noteworthily, limestone increases in the lowermost intervals of the reservoir. Structurally, the field is traversed by three northwest–southeast faults. The shale of the Upper Cretaceous Sirte Formation is thought to be the source rock of the Facha Formation, whereas the seals are the limestone and anhydrite of the Lower Eocene Gir Formation. In this study, the Facha reservoir’s cutoff values were obtained from the cross-plots of the calculated shale volume, porosity and water saturation values accompanied with gamma ray log data and were set as 20%, 10% and 70%, respectively. Isoparametric maps for the thickness variation of net pay, average porosity, shale volume and water saturation were prepared, and the authors found out that the Facha Formation has promising reservoir characteristics in the area of study; a prospective region for oil accumulation trends is in the north and south of the study area.

scholarly journals PREDIKSI PERMEABILITAS MENGGUNAKAN METODE LOG DAN PORE GEOMETRY STRUCTURE (PGS) PADA DAERAH CEKUNGAN JAWA BARAT UTARA

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17
Author(s):  
Ayu Yuliani ◽  
Ordas Dewanto ◽  
Karyanto Karyanto ◽  
Ade Yogi
Keyword(s):  
Water Saturation ◽  
Effective Porosity ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Rock Properties ◽  
Pore Geometry ◽  
Rock Permeability ◽  
Zone Formation ◽  
Geometry Structure ◽  
Rock Typing

Determination of reservoir rock properties is very important to be able to understand the reservoir better. One of these rock properties is permeability. Permeability is the ability of a rock to pass fluid. In this study, the calculation of permeability was carried out using log and PGS (Pore Geometry Structure) methods based on core data, logs, and CT scans. In the log method, the calculation of permeability is done by petrophysical analysis which aims to evaluate the target zone formation in the form of calculation of the distribution of shale content (effective volume), effective porosity, water saturation, and permeability. Next, the determination of porosity values from CT Scan. Performed on 2 data cores of 20 tubes, each tube was plotted as many as 15 points. The output of this stage is the CT Porosity value that will be used for the distribution of predictions of PGS permeability values. In the PGS method, rock typing is based on geological descriptions, then calculation of permeability predictions. Using these two methods, permeability can be calculated in the study area. The results of log and PGS permeability calculations that show good correlation are the results of calculation of PGS permeability. It can be seen from the data from the calculation of PGS permeability approaching a gradient of one value with R2 of 0.906, it will increasingly approach the core rock permeability value. Whereas the log permeability calculation for core rock permeability is 0.845.

scholarly journals Petrophysics Analysis for Reservoir Characterization of Upper Plover Formation in the Field “A”, Bonaparte Basin, Offshore Timor, Maluku, Indonesia

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sugeng Sapto Surjono ◽  
Indra Arifianto
Keyword(s):  
Reservoir Characterization ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Reservoir Properties ◽  
Core Data ◽  
Class A ◽  
Rock Types ◽  
Rock Typing ◽  
Volume Porosity ◽  
Potential Reservoir

Hydrocarbon potential within Upper Plover Formation in the Field “A” has not been produced due to unclear in understanding of reservoir problem. This formation consists of heterogeneous reservoir rock with their own physical characteristics. Reservoir characterization has been done by applying rock typing (RT) method utilizing wireline logs data to obtain reservoir properties including clay volume, porosity, water saturation, and permeability. Rock types are classified on the basis of porosity and permeability distribution from routines core analysis (RCAL) data. Meanwhile, conventional core data is utilized to depositional environment interpretations. This study also applied neural network methods to rock types analyze for intervals reservoir without core data. The Upper Plover Formation in the study area indicates potential reservoir distributes into 7 parasequences. Their were deposited during transgressive systems in coastal environments (foreshore - offshore) with coarsening upward pattern during Middle to Late Jurassic. The porosity of reservoir ranges from 1–19 % and permeability varies from 0.01 mD to 1300 mD. Based on the facies association and its physical properties from rock typing analysis, the reservoir within Upper Plover Formation can be grouped into 4 reservoir class: Class A (Excellent), Class B (Good), Class C (Poor), and Class D (Very Poor). For further analysis, only class A-C are considered as potential reservoir, and the remain is neglected.

scholarly journals Stratigraphic development and petroleum prospectivity of northern Zealandia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Zelia Dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Papua New Guinea ◽  
Source Rock ◽  
New Caledonia ◽  
New Guinea ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Seismic Unit ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
Basin Floor

<p>Northern Zealandia lies between Australia, New Zealandia, and New Caledonia. It has an area of 3,000,000 km2 and is made up of bathymetric rises and troughs with typical water depths of 1000 to 4000 m. I use 39,309 line km of seismic-reflection profiles tied to recent International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) drilling and three boreholes near the coast of New Zealand to investigate stratigraphic architecture and assess the petroleum prospectivity of northern Zealandia.  Sparse sampling requires that stratigraphic and petroleum prospectivity inferences are drawn from better-known basins in New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, TimorLeste and Papua New Guinea. Five existing seismic-stratigraphic units are reviewed. Zealandia Seismic Unit U3 is sampled near New Zealand and may contain Jurassic Muhiriku Group coals. Elsewhere, Seismic Unit 3 may have oil-prone equivalents of the Jurassic Walloon Coal Measure in eastern Australia; or may contain Triassic-Jurassic marine source rocks, as found in offshore Bonaparte Basin, onshore Timor-Leste, and the Papuan Basin in Papua New Guinea. Seismic Unit U2b (Mid-Cretaceous) is syn-rift and may contain coal measures, as found in Taranaki-Aotea Basin and New Caledonia. Seismic Unit U2a (Late Cretaceous to Eocene) contains coaly source rocks in the southeastern part of the study area, and may also contain marine equivalent carbonaceous mudstone, as found at Site IODP U1509. Unit U2a is transgressive, with coaly source rocks and reservoir sandstones near its base, and clay, marl and chalk above that provides a regional seal. Seismic Unit U1b (Eocene-Oligocene) is mass-transport complexes and basin floor fans related to a brief phase of convergent deformation that created folds in the southern part of the study area and regionally uplifted ridges to create new sediment source areas. Basin floor fans may contain reservoir rock and Eocene folding created structural traps. Seismic Unit U1a is Oligocene and Neogene chalk, calcareous ooze, and marl that represents overburden. Mass accumulation rates (MAR) and climatic temperatures were high in the late Miocene and early Pliocene, resulting in peak thermal maturity and hydrocarbon expulsion at ~ 3 Ma.  Approximately one-fifth of the region has adequate source rock maturity for petroleum expulsion at the base of Seismic Unit U2: Fairway Basin (FWAY), southern New Caledonia Trough (NCTS) and Reinga Basin (REIN). Plays may exist in either Seismic Unit U3 or U2, with many plausible reservoir-seal combinations, and several possible trapping mechanisms: unconformities, normal faults, folds, or stratigraphic pinch-out. The rest of the region could be prospective, but requires a source rock to exist within Seismic Unit U3, which is mostly unsampled and remains poorly understood.</p>

Stratigraphic development and petroleum prospectivity of northern Zealandia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Zelia Dos Santos
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Papua New Guinea ◽  
Source Rock ◽  
New Caledonia ◽  
New Guinea ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Seismic Unit ◽  
Eastern Australia ◽  
Basin Floor

<p>Northern Zealandia lies between Australia, New Zealandia, and New Caledonia. It has an area of 3,000,000 km2 and is made up of bathymetric rises and troughs with typical water depths of 1000 to 4000 m. I use 39,309 line km of seismic-reflection profiles tied to recent International Ocean Discovery Program (IODP) drilling and three boreholes near the coast of New Zealand to investigate stratigraphic architecture and assess the petroleum prospectivity of northern Zealandia.  Sparse sampling requires that stratigraphic and petroleum prospectivity inferences are drawn from better-known basins in New Zealand, Australia, New Caledonia, TimorLeste and Papua New Guinea. Five existing seismic-stratigraphic units are reviewed. Zealandia Seismic Unit U3 is sampled near New Zealand and may contain Jurassic Muhiriku Group coals. Elsewhere, Seismic Unit 3 may have oil-prone equivalents of the Jurassic Walloon Coal Measure in eastern Australia; or may contain Triassic-Jurassic marine source rocks, as found in offshore Bonaparte Basin, onshore Timor-Leste, and the Papuan Basin in Papua New Guinea. Seismic Unit U2b (Mid-Cretaceous) is syn-rift and may contain coal measures, as found in Taranaki-Aotea Basin and New Caledonia. Seismic Unit U2a (Late Cretaceous to Eocene) contains coaly source rocks in the southeastern part of the study area, and may also contain marine equivalent carbonaceous mudstone, as found at Site IODP U1509. Unit U2a is transgressive, with coaly source rocks and reservoir sandstones near its base, and clay, marl and chalk above that provides a regional seal. Seismic Unit U1b (Eocene-Oligocene) is mass-transport complexes and basin floor fans related to a brief phase of convergent deformation that created folds in the southern part of the study area and regionally uplifted ridges to create new sediment source areas. Basin floor fans may contain reservoir rock and Eocene folding created structural traps. Seismic Unit U1a is Oligocene and Neogene chalk, calcareous ooze, and marl that represents overburden. Mass accumulation rates (MAR) and climatic temperatures were high in the late Miocene and early Pliocene, resulting in peak thermal maturity and hydrocarbon expulsion at ~ 3 Ma.  Approximately one-fifth of the region has adequate source rock maturity for petroleum expulsion at the base of Seismic Unit U2: Fairway Basin (FWAY), southern New Caledonia Trough (NCTS) and Reinga Basin (REIN). Plays may exist in either Seismic Unit U3 or U2, with many plausible reservoir-seal combinations, and several possible trapping mechanisms: unconformities, normal faults, folds, or stratigraphic pinch-out. The rest of the region could be prospective, but requires a source rock to exist within Seismic Unit U3, which is mostly unsampled and remains poorly understood.</p>

A practical petrophysical model for a source rock play: The Mancos Shale

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. T423-T435
Author(s):  
Jesús M. Salazar ◽  
Ron J. M. Bonnie ◽  
William W. Clopine ◽  
G. Eric Michael
Keyword(s):  
Source Rock ◽  
Water Saturation ◽  
Clay Content ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Crushed Rock ◽  
Organic Carbon Content ◽  
Hydrocarbon Generation ◽  
Niobrara Formation ◽  
Mancos Shale ◽  
Petrophysical Model

Recently, the focus in source rock exploration has moved from gas-rich to liquid-rich plays and warrants revisiting “bypassed” hydrocarbon charged source rocks, which were deemed uneconomic when first drilled. In North America’s oil fields, there are thousands of wells with different vintages of nuclear and electrical logs, yet these wells generally lack any advanced logs beyond the traditional triple combo. We have developed a workflow that uses a considerable amount of laboratory measurements made on crushed rock to upscale a petrophysical model based on a triple combo logging suite only. The model divides the field (laterally) in oil window and gas window fairways and (vertically) in petrophysical units. The remaining hydrocarbon generation potential is based on geochemical measurements, such as thermal maturity and total organic carbon content (TOC), from core and cuttings in the area. The petrophysical units reflect major geologic intervals with similar porosity and clay content. The workflow was sequentially built by correlating logs with core measurements, using TOC and maturity for organic matter, X-ray diffraction for mineralogy and grain density, porosity, and water saturation from fluids extraction, for volumetrics. The model is applied to the Mancos Shale (New Mexico, USA), a Cretaceous-age source rock, which includes the Niobrara Formation. The Mancos Shale has been penetrated in various fields while developing conventional sandstone reservoirs. The model is validated with measurements on a core recently acquired in the anticipated high-hydrocarbon-yield window. Petrophysical properties predicted from logs agree well with core measurements in blind tests, demonstrating the robustness of the model despite being based on a basic suite of logs and a simple deterministic approach. This model is now routinely used by the asset team as an automated workflow to generate fairway maps, locate sweet spots, and for landing lateral wells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document