scholarly journals THE DISPOSITION OF INDIVIDUAL АРЕС COUNTIES IN THE GLOBAL ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Author(s):  
Liudmyla Tsymbal ◽  
Nataliya Moskalyuk ◽  
Svitlana Gromenkova

The formation of a new global system and systemic global interdependence generates new factors of com- petitiveness of market participants, determining their appropriate strategic behavior to ensure a high competitive position and leadership. This determines the relevance of the research topic. The aim of the study is to determine the peculiarities of the deve¬ lopment of individual countries and key determinants of advanced development in Asia which are members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. The following research methods were used in the article: models of multifactor regression, cluster analysis, methods of comparative analysis. Method (methodology). Using a multifactor regression model and cluster analysis, four clusters of countries were identified according to key indicators of intellectual leadership. For each cluster, the specializa- tion of the two countries in terms of merchandise exports was analyzed, namely, 1 cluster – the United States and Germany; 2nd cluster – Israel and Italy; 3rd cluster – Brazil and Ukraine; Cluster 4 – China and the Republic of Korea. Based on the author’s methodology for assessing the intellectual leadership of countries, the clustering of countries in the global economy is determined. The evaluation algorithm was based on three stages: first – the resource level; secondly – the level of intermediate results of intellectual activity; third – the level of the final results of overall progress. Based on clustering, it is determined that Asian countries are characterized by different from other countries features of development, determined by historical and economic preconditions. addition, the normative basis for the development of human resources in Asian countries which are members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, the peculiarities of the production of high-tech goods and the rating of high-tech exports of selected countries are determined. The superdynamic development of Asian countries indicates the formation of a specific cluster on the global economic map, characterized by faster development, significant attention to the development of key factors of intellectualization and increasing their own positions in global rankings.

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
José César Navarro Chávez ◽  
América Ivonne Zamora Torres ◽  
Montserrat Cano Torres

Tourism has become an important industry for most of the economies, especially for non industrialized countries where it represent the main source of income. This paper focuses on the analysis of 14 competitiveness tourism factors for 20 country members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, which represents the most dynamic region in the world according to its participation on the global GDP and international trade, highlighting the performance of Mexico and doing a benchmark with the rest of APEC countries. The authors analyze secondary data from the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index to create clusters and then multidimensional scaling techniques were employed for detecting the more or less effective determinants of destination competitiveness.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (6) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Zhang DONGYANG ◽  

The status and prospects of development of trade and economic relations between Ukraine and China are considered. It is proved that bilateral cooperation in the trade and economic sphere has made significant progress. In 2012–2017, China was the second largest trading partner of Ukraine after Russia. However, the problem of imbalance in imports and exports between Ukraine and China has not yet been resolved. In addition, the scale and number of projects in which Ukraine attracts Chinese investment is much less than investments from European countries and the United States. It is justified that trade and economic cooperation between Ukraine and China is at a new historical stage. On the one hand, Ukraine signed the Association Agreement with the European Union, and on January 1, 2016, the rules of the free trade zone between Ukraine and the EU entered into force. This helps to accelerate the integration of Ukrainian economy into European one. On the other hand, the global economic downturn requires the introduction of innovations in the model of cooperation. The Chinese initiative “One belt is one way” is one of the variants of the innovation model of cooperation. Its significance is to unite the Asia-Pacific region with the EU in order to join the Eurasian Economic Union, create a new space and opportunities for development and achieve prosperity with the Eurasian countries. All this forms unprecedented opportunities for development of bilateral economic and trade relations. It seems that to fully open the potential of Ukrainian economy and expand bilateral trade and economic cooperation, it is necessary to take into account such proposals as the establishment of the Sino-Ukrainian industrial park, the promotion of cooperation in the field of electronic commerce, the formation of the Sino-Ukrainian free trade zone and enhanced interaction within multilateral mechanisms (for example, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the interaction of China and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in the 16 + 1 format).


Author(s):  
SABURO OKITA

The Asia-Pacific countries achieved rapid economic growth with the flying-goose model in the 1980s, growth buttressed by export-oriented development strategies and the policy culture in these countries. While Japan and the other Asia-Pacific countries still have strong growth potential, many problems remain, including trade imbalances with the United States and the rise of protectionism there, the Asia-Pacific economies' vulnerability, and the need to consolidate the infrastructure for growth. It is imperative that Japan contribute to the development of the region by responding effectively to these issues and that it strengthen the international trading arrangements by promoting Asia-Pacific cooperation premised on openness. Given the region's great internal diversity, Asia-Pacific economic cooperation can well serve as a model for international economic coordination.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (05) ◽  
pp. 1077-1095 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUNG HUR ◽  
HYUN-HOON LEE

The Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, whose approach is voluntary and non-binding in open regionalism, has been criticized for its alleged failure to develop a rapid liberalization process and to contribute to a greater level of intra-regional trade in the APEC region. Nonetheless, we find that APEC has been contributing to intra-regional trade creation, particularly in trade in manufactured goods as compared to trade in non-manufactured goods. This finding is robust to the various fixed-effect models and the first-differencing models which are applied to the gravity equation.


Author(s):  
V.A. Shumaev ◽  
N.A. Divueva ◽  
N.A. Lukasheva

The article summarizes the experience of the United States, Germany and Asian countries in creating and organizing the development and functioning of innovative systems, technology transfer, building a high-tech industry, which is advisable to use in Russia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document