UJI KELAYAKAN INSTRUMEN UNTUK PENGUKURAN HUBUNGAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR DAN DUKUNGAN KELUARGA DENGAN PRODUKTIVITAS MAHASISWA DALAM MELAKSANAKAN PENGALAMAN BELAJAR LAPANGAN  PADA MASA PANDEMI

Pendahuluan:Peningkatan kasus covid-19 di Indonesia menjadikan pemerintah membuat kebijakan untuk dapat melakukan semua aktivitas dirumah, termasuk proses pembelajaran, dan aktivitas akademik seperti Pengalaman Belajar Lapangan (PBL) berubah menjadi online. Hal tersebutmenjadi suatu tantangan bagi mahasiswa untuk dapat menyelesaikan pendidikannya dengan baik. Sehingga tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan motivasi belajar dan dukungan keluarga terhadap produktivitas mahasiswa/i PBL di masa pandemi Covid-19 serta mengetahui hasil uji kelayakan pada instrumen yang digunakan. Metodologi:Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian analitik dengan pendekatan Cross Sectional dan jumlah sampel sebanyak 65 peserta Pengalaman Belajar Lapangan (PBL) Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Mulawarman tahun 2020 dengan menggunakan total sampling. Instrumen penelitian diuji menggunakan Content Validity Index (CVI). Data di analisis menggunakan analisis univariat dan analisis bivariat dengan uji korelasi Spearman Rank. Hasil: Hasil menunjukkan bahwa CVI yang dihasilkan ≤0.78. Pada akhirnya tercipta instrumen layak untuk digunakan serta tidak terdapat hubungan antara motivasi belajar terhadap produktivitas, namun terdapat hubungan positif antara dukungan keluarga terhadap produktivitas mahasiswa yang sedang melaksanakan PBL di masa pandemi(p-value= 0,033). Diskusi: Instrumen layak digunakan namun terdapat beberapa pertanyaan yang tidak digunakan karena hasil perhitungan CVI pada butir tersebut tidak valid. Hubungan yang terbentuk antara dukungan keluarga dengan produktivitas adalah hubungan yang positif walaupun memiliki korelasi yang lemah (r = 0,265).; Kata Kunci: pandemi covid-19, kelayakan instrumen, produktivitas

Download Full-text

Chinesisation, adaptation and validation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional observational study

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045550 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. e045550

Author(s):

Zhigang Zhang ◽

Guoqiang Wang ◽

Yuchen Wu ◽

Jin Guo ◽

Nannan Ding ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Critical Care ◽

Observational Study ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Content Validity ◽

Assessment Tool ◽

Western China ◽

Validity Index ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Physical Assessment ◽

Content Validity Index

PurposeTo translate and adapt the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx) into Chinese version (‘CPAx-Chi’), test the reliability and validity of CPAx-Chi, and verify the cut-off point for the diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW).Study designCross-sectional observational study.MethodsForward and back translation, cross-cultural adaptation and pretesting of CPAx into CPAx-Chi were based on the Brislin model. Participants were recruited from the general ICU of five third-grade class-A hospitals in western China. Two hundred critically ill adult patients (median age: 53 years; 64% men) with duration of ICU stay ≥48 hours and Glasgow Coma Scale ≥11 were included in this study. Two researchers simultaneously and independently assessed eligible patients using the Medical Research Council Muscle Score (MRC-Score) and CPAx-Chi.ResultsThe content validity index of items was 0.889. The content validity index of scale was 0.955. Taking the MRC-Score scale as standard, the criterion validity of CPAx-Chi was r=0.758 (p<0.001) for researcher A, and r=0.65 (p<0.001) for researcher B. Cronbach’s α was 0.939. The inter-rater reliability was 0.902 (p<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of CPAx-Chi for diagnosing ICU-AW based on MRC-Score ≤48 were 0.899 (95% CI 0.862 to 1.025) and 0.874 (95% CI 0.824 to 0.925) for researcher B. The best cut-off point for CPAx-Chi for the diagnosis of ICU-AW was 31.5. The sensitivity was 87% and specificity was 77% for researcher A, whereas it was 0.621, 31.5, 75% and 87% for researcher B, respectively. The consistency was high when taking CPAx-Chi ≤31 and MRC-Score ≤48 as the cut-off points for the diagnosis of ICU-AW. Cohen’s kappa=0.845 (p=0.02) in researcher A and 0.839 (p=0.04) for researcher B.ConclusionsCPAx-Chi demonstrated content validity, criterion-related validity and reliability. CPAx-Chi showed the best accuracy in assessment of patients at risk of ICU-AW with good sensitivity and specificity at a recommended cut-off of 31.

Download Full-text

Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Evaluate Knowledge on Healthy Eating in Schoolchildren

Aquichan ◽

10.5294/aqui.2019.19.2.6 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 19 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Celia Maria Ribeiro de Vasconcelos ◽

Eliane Maria Ribeiro de Vasconcelos ◽

Maria Gorete Lucena de Vasconcelos ◽

Viviane Cristina Fonseca Jardim ◽

Maria Cristina Falcão Raposo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Content Validity ◽

School Health ◽

Health Program ◽

Family Health ◽

P Value ◽

Validity Index ◽

Significance Level ◽

Content Validity Index ◽

Family Health Program ◽

School Health Program

Objective: To validate the content and appearance of an instrument to evaluate knowledge on healthy feeding. Materials and Methods: Methodological study of validation of content, appeareance with 22 judges, and semantic validation with 12 schoolchildren from 4th and 5th grades in primary school education, ranging in age between nine and ten years. The Scale-Level Content Validity Index (S-CVI) ≥ 0.90 and the Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI) ≥ 0.80 were considered approved in the validation. The Binomial test was used through the p value of the proportion (rejecting the H0 if p ≤ 0.80) to select items that should be revised or modified (items validated at significance level ≤ 0.05). Results: The instrument was validated with S-CVI = 0.93 and I-CVI ≥ 0.80 in the 12 items evaluated, with the mean proportion of “non-discordance” among judges = 0.93. The instrument with the suggested modifications was submitted to the target audience and completely approved by all the participating students. Conclusion: This instrument can be used during the health education activities of the School Health Program and the Family Health Program to promote healthy feeding with children between nine and ten years of age.

Download Full-text

Validation of an educational tool on healthy eating for schoolchildren

Revista de Nutrição ◽

10.1590/1678-98652018000500005 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 31 (5) ◽

pp. 479-488

Author(s):

Celia Maria Ribeiro de VASCONCELOS ◽

Eliane Maria Ribeiro de VASCONCELOS ◽

Maria Gorete Lucena de VASCONCELOS ◽

Suelen Brito de AZEVEDO ◽

Maria Cristina Falcão RAPOSO ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthy Eating ◽

Content Validity ◽

Target Population ◽

P Value ◽

Card Game ◽

Educational Tool ◽

Scale Level ◽

Validity Index ◽

Content Validity Index ◽

Item Level

ABSTRACT Objective The purpose of this study was to validate the card game The Enigma of the Pyramid about healthy eating, using judges (expert) for the validation of content and design; and the target population (students from the 4th and 5th grades, aged 9-10 years) for the semantic validation (pilot test). Methods The Item-Level Content Validity Index was used to verify the degree of agreement among the experts’ opinions, item by item; and the Scale Level Content Validity Index to determine the arithmetic mean of the proportion of items that receive judgments of “non-disagreement” by the judges. The item that obtained Item-Level Content Validity Index greater or equal to 0.80 and Scale Level Content Validity Index greater or equal to 0.90 was considered validated, which was the coefficient of validity. The binominal test was used to select the items that should be revised/modified, using the p-value of ratio (reject H0 if p≤0.8). Items were validated at significance level of ≤0.05. Results Twenty-two judges and 12 schoolchildren participated in the study. Of the 23 items of the card game, nine were selected for review/modification, of which five were from the language component and four from the suitability component for the target population. Conclusion Once the modifications were made, they were all approved by all participating students, making this educational tool on healthy eating habits available for use with the student population.

Download Full-text

Prosthetic and orthotic students’ attitudes toward addressing sexual health in their future profession

Prosthetics and Orthotics International ◽

10.1177/0309364618775444 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 42 (6) ◽

pp. 612-619 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Kristina Areskoug-Josefsson ◽

Fredrik Thidell ◽

Bo Rolander ◽

Nerrolyn Ramstrand

Keyword(s):

Sexual Health ◽

Content Validity ◽

Reliability And Validity ◽

Assistive Technologies ◽

Health Questionnaire ◽

Health Issues ◽

Validity Index ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Content Validity Index ◽

Students Attitudes

Background: Prosthetists and orthotists have a responsibility to direct treatment toward enabling their clients to perform desired activities and to facilitate participation of their clients in all areas of life. This may include provision of assistive technologies to help clients meet goals related to participation in sexual activities. To help prosthetic and orthotic students develop competencies in dealing with the sexual health of their future clients, it is necessary to generate knowledge of their own perceived competence and capacity. Objectives: To explore prosthetic and orthotic students’ attitudes and competence toward working with sexual health and to evaluate reliability and validity of the Students’ Attitudes Towards Addressing Sexual Health questionnaire. Study design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Students enrolled in all three years of an undergraduate prosthetic and orthotic program were requested to complete the Students’ Attitudes Towards Addressing Sexual Health questionnaire ( n = 65). Reliability and validity were evaluated using the content validity index and Cronbach’s alpha. Results: Students felt unprepared to talk about sexual health with future clients and thought that they would be embarrassed if they raised the issue. No differences were identified between students enrolled in each of the three years of the program and few differences were observed between male and female students. The content validity index values were low but improved as the students’ level of education increased. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was acceptable ( α = 0.86). Conclusion: Prosthetic and orthotic students are unprepared to address sexual health issues with their future clients. There is a need to provide students with training related to sexual health issues. Clinical relevance This study indicates the need for additional education of prosthetic and orthotic students in issues related to sexual health and how to address sexual health issues with clients. Results can be used to develop training programs for students and will serve to improve the sexual health of individuals who receive prosthetic and orthotic services.

Download Full-text

Translation and Validation of the Hungarian Version of the Infection Control Standardized Questionnaire: A Cross-sectional Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1231304/v1 ◽

2022 ◽

Author(s):

Sahar Hammoud ◽

Faten Amer ◽

Haitham Khatatbeh ◽

Huda Alfatafta ◽

Miklós Zrínyi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Infection Control ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Content Validity ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Infection Prevention And Control ◽

Validity Index ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Content Validity Index ◽

Hungarian Version

Abstract Background: Up to our knowledge, there is currently no psychometrically validated Hungarian scale to evaluate nurses’ knowledge about infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. Thus, we aim in this study to assess the validity and reliability of the infection control standardized questionnaire Hungarian version (ICSQ-H).Methods: A cross-sectional, multisite study was conducted among 591 nurses in Hungary. The original ICSQ including 25 items was translated into Hungarian. A panel of four experts assessed the content validity of the questionnaire by calculating the item content validity index and scale content validity index. Then, construct validity was evaluated using principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. The goodness of fit for the model was measured through fit indices. Convergent validity was assessed by calculating the average variance extracted. Additionally, discriminant validity was evaluated by computing the spearman correlation coefficient between the constructs. Finally, the interitem correlations, the corrected item-total correlations, and the internal consistency were calculated.Results: Content validity of the questionnaire was established with 23 items. The final four-construct ICSQ-H including 10 items showed a good fit model. Convergent validity was met except for the alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) construct, while discriminant validity was met for all constructs. The interitem correlations and the corrected item-total correlations were met for all constructs but, the internal consistency of ABHR was unsatisfactory due to the low number of items.Conclusions: The results did not support the original three-factor structure of the ICSQ. However, the four-factor ICSQ-H demonstrated an adequate degree of good fit and was found to be reliable. Based on our findings, we believe that the ICSQ-H could pave the way for more research regarding nurses’ IPC knowledge to be conducted in Hungary. Nevertheless, its validation among other healthcare workers is important to tailor effective interventions to enhance knowledge and awareness.

Download Full-text

PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF FILIPINO VERSION OF PATIENT SATISFACTION INSTRUMENT

Belitung Nursing Journal ◽

10.33546/bnj.867 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 5 (6) ◽

pp. 251-256

Author(s):

Gil P Soriano ◽

Kathyrine A Calong Calong

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Construct Validity ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Content Validity ◽

Psychometric Evaluation ◽

Internal Consistency Reliability ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Validity Index ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Content Validity Index

Background: Patient satisfaction has been revealed to affect patient outcomes and has been used as an indicator for measuring quality in health care. However, there are no culturally appropriate instruments that measure Filipino patient satisfaction receiving nursing care.Objective: The objective of the study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Filipino version of Patient Satisfaction Instrument (F-PSI).Methods: The study utilized a cross-sectional study and included 131 Filipino patients in selected hospitals in Manila and were selected through convenience sampling. The tool undergone cross cultural adaptation following the WHO guidelines. Also, content validity following Davis technique and construct validity through confirmatory factor analysis was done to assessed its validity. To measure its internal consistency reliability, Cronbach’s α, inter-item and total-item correlation was conducted.Results: The construct validity of the Filipino version of PSI showed a good model fit while the item content validity index (I-CVI) ranges from 0.83-1.0 and a scale content validity index (S-CVI) of 0.96. Also, the translated tool showed an acceptable internal consistency reliability.Conclusion: The Filipino PSI is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring satisfaction among Filipino patients. Supplementary studies are needed to ascertain its validity and reliability for clinical use.

Download Full-text

Validation of an instrument for systematizing nursing care in pediatrics

Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem ◽

10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0222 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 74 (suppl 4) ◽

Author(s):

Thalys Maynnard Costa Ferreira ◽

Josefa Danielma Lopes Ferreira ◽

Carla Lidiane Jácome dos Santos ◽

Kenya de Lima Silva ◽

Jacira dos Santos Oliveira ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Data Collection ◽

Content Validity ◽

Pediatric Care ◽

Hospitalized Children ◽

Methodological Study ◽

Validity Index ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Content Validity Index ◽

Pediatric Clinic ◽

Kappa Agreement

ABSTRACT Objective: to verify the validity of indicators’ content referring to the instrument for data collection in children aged 0 to 5 years hospitalized in a pediatric clinic. Method: a cross-sectional methodological study was carried out with 11 experts between January and May 2018. For data collection, the steps for validating the instrument’s content were respected. For data analysis, Content Validity Index and Kappa agreement analysis were used. Results: after content analysis, a Content Validity Index of 0.94 and Kappa 0.71 was issued according to the experts’ suggestions 81.9%. Therefore, the instrument was suitable for applicability. Conclusion: the instrument proved to be valid in terms of content for pediatric care, contributing significantly to improving care for hospitalized children aged 0 to 5 years.

Download Full-text

Content Validity of A Questionnaire Exploring the Knowledge Translation Network Among Nursing Professionals

10.21203/rs.3.rs-144672/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

MARIA-LARA MARTINEZ-GIMENO ◽

GEMA ESCOBAR-AGUILAR ◽

NÉLIDA FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ ◽

MARIA-ANTONIA OVALLE-PERANDONES ◽

JOSE-ALBERTO BENÍTEZ-ANDRADES ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Practice ◽

Knowledge Translation ◽

Content Validity ◽

Research Utilization ◽

Total Content ◽

Validity Index ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Content Validity Index ◽

Validated Questionnaire ◽

Nursing Professionals

Abstract Background: For more than four decades, studies have reported the existence of a large gap between research and clinical practice. This means that research results are not contributing to the improvement of care, and there is a high level of variability which complicates deciding on and implementing the “best care” available. In this context, it is important to understand how nurses use the research by generating different knowledge translation networks in clinical practice. Therefore, a tool is required to detect the structure of the links that are generated during the research utilization. Aim: to validate the content of a questionnaire for exploring the knowledge translation networks established among nursing professionals. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional content validity study of an instrument created to explore the knowledge translation network between nurses was carried out. The participants were divided into two groups: experts in Social Network Analysis (SNA) and practicing nurses. The instrument was a questionnaire with items that collected both the network's variables, and those of the individual. The content of the items of the questionnaire was validated as set out in the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: The total Content Validity Index (CVI) of the survey was 0.91. All items received an excellent rating (K*>0.81). The modified kappa coefficient for the whole scale was 0.9. Conclusions: The validated questionnaire has good content validity for exploring social networks for knowledge translation and research utilization among nursing professionals.

Download Full-text

HUBUNGAN DUKUNGAN KELUARGA DENGAN KECEMASAN PASIEN PRE-OPERASI

Malahayati Nursing Journal ◽

10.33024/manuju.v2i3.2888 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (3) ◽

pp. 469-479

Author(s):

Esta Pandiangan ◽

Imanuel Sri Mei Wulandari

Keyword(s):

P Value ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Spearman Rank

Latar Belakang: Sekitar 80% pasien pre operasi mengalami kecemasan yang dapat mempengaruhi perubahan tanda-tanda vital pasien, diperlukan dukungan keluarga yang optimal untuk membantu pasien mengatasi kecemasan yang dihadapi sehingga pasien mampu menjalani proses pengobatan.Tujuan: Penelitian ini mempunyai tujuan untuk mengetahui adanya hubungan antara dukungan keluarga dengan kecemasan yang dihadapi oleh pasien pre operasi di Rumah Sakit Advent Bandung.Metode: Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif korelasi analitik dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah pasien yang dijadwalkan menjalani operasi pada bulan maret 2020, dan terdapat 48 responden yang sesuai dengan kriteria penelitian.Hasil Penelitian: Hasil yang didapatkan adalah sebagian besar dukungan keluarga dalam kategori baik (45,8%), tingkat kecemasan pasien pre operasi sebagian besar berada pada tingkat kecemasan sedang (56,3%), uji spearman rank menunjukan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara kedua variabel dengan nilai p value < 0,05, dengan keeratan hubungan kuat (0,529).Kesimpulan: Dukungan keluarga yang baik mampu mengurangi kecemasan yang dihadapi oleh pasien saat akan menjalani tindakan operasi, hal ini perlu ditingkatkan sehingga mampu mengurangi beban psikologi yang dialami oleh pasien.

Download Full-text

Self Management Menentukan Kualitas Hidup Pasien Diabetes Mellitus

Jurnal Endurance ◽

10.22216/jen.v4i2.4026 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

pp. 402

Author(s):

Iskim Luthfa ◽

Nurul Fadhilah

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Correlation Study ◽

Self Management ◽

Rank Test ◽

P Value ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Spearman Rank ◽

Consecutive Sampling

People with diabetes mellitus are at risk of developing complications, so that it affects the quality of life. These complications can be minimized through self-care management. This study aims to determine the relationship between self management with the quality of life for people with diabetes mellitus. This research is a kind of quantitative research with correlation study. This research used cross sectional design. The sampling technique uses non probability with estimation consecutive sampling. The number of respondents in this research are 118 respondents. Instrument for measuring self management used diabetes self management questionnaire (DSMQ), and instruments to measure quality of life used quality of life WHOQOL-BREEF. The data obtained were processed statistically by using spearman rank test formula and p value of 0,000 There is a significant relationship of self management with the quality of life of people with diabetes mellitus. Penderita Diabetes mellitus beresiko mengalami komplikasi yang dapat mempengaruhi kualitas hidupnya. Komplikasi tersebut dapat diminimalkan melalui manajemen perawatan diri (self management). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan self management dengan kualitas hidup pasien diabetes melitus. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif korelasi dengan desain cross sectional. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan non probability sampling dengan pendekatan consecutive sampling. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 118 responden. Instrumen penelitian untuk mengukur self management menggunakan diabetes self management questionnaire (DSMQ), dan instrumen untuk mengukur kualitas hidup menggunakan quality of life WHOQOL-BREEF. Analisis data menggunakan spearman rank dan didapatkan hasil nilai p value 0,000 dan r 0,394.Terdapat hubungan antara self management dengan kualitas hidup pasien diabetes mellitus dengan arah korelasi positif.

Download Full-text