1. In taste neurophysiology, from Pfaffmann's (49, 50) pioneering work until the present, the possibility of types of neurons corresponding in some sense with the "primary" taste qualities of Henning (33) has been entertained: recently types of gustatory neurons in peripheral nerves have been established according to which of the four classical stimuli is the "best stimulus." However, considerable variation occurs in the response profiles within neurons classified as belonging to the same type. The purpose of this research is to determine, using mathematical techniques where appropriate, if the within-type variation is spurious or, instead, indicates the absence of a typology of taste neurons. The data used were counts of the spike discharges of 50 individual taste neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat, evoked by 32 diverse chemical stimuli. 2. Using as input the matrix of Pearson r correlation coefficients calculated for the responses of all pairings of neurons to all stimuli, multidimensional scaling analysis revealed a two-dimensional space in which no clear groupings of neurons occurred. 3. In a hierarchical cluster analysis of the neuron response profile similarities, no evidence of grouping was found, suggesting a more-or-less continuous variation among neurons. 4. When the organization of the 32 stimuli utilized was studied by the same techniques, no clear evidence for stimulus types was found, although the possibility of two stimulus types--"sweet" and "nonsweet"--was raised. 5. Construction of a joint neuron-stimulus space supported a spatial model of taste neuron-stimulus interaction, while analysis of the number and pattern of high correlations among neurons--even after allowance for attenuation due to measurement error--failed to support the notion of types of taste neurons with identical response profiles. 6. Aspects of the logical role of types of neurons in gustatory coding were discussed, and the results and methods of the present investigation were related to classification schemes for neurons in general. Suggestions for a formal taxonomy of neurons were given. 7. It should be emphasized that the present study and conclusions are of second-order, CNS neurons, whereas the studies advocating the presence of neurons types were of peripheral neurons. Taken together, the implication to be drawn from these studies is that if neural types do exist in peripheral taste nerves, the typology is lost at the first synapse and is thus unavailable to the CNS for coding purposes, at least in the rat.
Intellectualist premise of folk names support their restoration in formal taxonomy
