scholarly journals Visual Acuity Comparison of Alternate Esotropia for Different Amount of Deviation

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Eye Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Ocular Deviation ◽  
The Mean

Purpose: Aim of the present study is to compare visual acuity in different amounts of deviation of Alternate Esotropia. Methods: Pilot, cross sectional, observational study was performed at tertiary eye care centers. Subjects with Ocular deviation between 10 to 40 prism diopters, Corrected distance Visual Acuity should be greater than 6/18 and Age should be between 10 to 40 years of age were included in the study. Visual Acuity was assessed with Log Mar chart. Results: 30 subjects were included in the study. Out of that, 16 subjects were in the age group of 11-20 years, 12 subjects were in the age group of 21-30 years and 2 subjects were in the age group of 31-40 years. 60% subjects were Female and 40% subjects were Male. The mean visual acuity was considered in each amount of deviation. It shows that maximum acuity is deteriorated in the ocular deviation of 31-40 prism diopters of Alternate Esotropia. Conclusion: As the amount of ocular deviation increases, visual acuity will be more deteriorated in cases of Alternate Esotropia.

Outcomes of a 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus: Results of a 6-month follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Andrade do Nascimento Rocha ◽  
Paulo Ferrara de Almeida Cunha ◽  
Leonardo Torquetti Costa ◽  
Luciene Barbosa de Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Intrastromal Corneal Ring ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Ring Segment ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Corneal Tomography

Importance: This study shows that a newer long-arc length intrastromal corneal ring segment is efficient and safe for keratoconus treatment. Background: To evaluate visual, tomographic results and complications of a 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation with the femtosecond laser for keratoconus treatment. Design: A prospective, nonrandomized, and interventional study. Participants: A total of 34 eyes of 31 patients diagnosed with keratoconus were enrolled. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups based on the strategy used for 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment thickness selection. In one group, this selection was based on spherical equivalent (SE group) and in the other on the mean asphericity (Q group). The uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities, spherical equivalent, K1, K2, Km, Kmax, and mean asphericity ( Q) on corneal tomography were evaluated preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. For astigmatism improvement, we analyzed the corneal tomographic vectorial astigmatism change preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 6.63 ± 0.96 months. Results: The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity improved with a significant spherical equivalent improvement ( p < 0.05), with no differences between the 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment groups. All corneal tomographic parameters improved significantly ( p < 0.05) between the preoperative and postoperative intervals, with a significant better performance when we used spherical equivalent for the 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment thickness selection. Finally, the mean vectorial corneal tomographic astigmatism significantly improved after 6 months, again with no differences between groups. Conclusion: This study suggests that implanting a 320-degree intrastromal corneal ring segment is a safe and effective procedure for treating patients with keratoconus. It also suggests that for thickness selection spherical equivalent is the better strategy.

scholarly journals Prospective Randomized Multicenter Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of V4c and V5 Implantable Collamer Lenses: A Contralateral Eye Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Kojima ◽  
Yoshihiro Kitazawa ◽  
Tomoaki Nakamura ◽  
Masahide Takahashi ◽  
Kazutaka Kamiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Refractive Surgery ◽  
Night Vision ◽  
Visual Performance ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Refractive Outcomes ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Contralateral Eye

Purpose. To compare the visual and refractive outcomes and night vision performance questionnaire results between V4c and V5 implantable Collamer lenses in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.Settings. Four refractive surgery centers.Design. Prospective randomized multicenter single-masked comparative study.Methods. Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this study. A conventional V4c model (EVO Visian ICL) was implanted in one eye, and a V5 model (EVO+ Visian ICL), which has a larger optic diameter than the V4c model, was implanted in the contralateral eye. The uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were evaluated before and 6 months after surgery. At 6 months after surgery, a questionnaire on night vision disturbances was administered. The efficacy, safety, and predictability of the two implanted ICL models were compared.Results. There were no significant differences in the postoperative UDVA and CDVA between the two ICL models. The mean efficacy indexes for the V4c and V5 lenses were 1.16 ± 0.22 and 1.03 ± 0.23, respectively. The mean safety indexes of the V4c and V5 lenses were 1.21 ± 0.20 and 1.19 ± 0.20, respectively. The night vision performance questionnaire revealed that 7 patients (37%) noticed a difference in visual performance between the eyes, and all of them reported that they could see better at night with the V5-implanted eye compared with the V4c-implanted eye.Conclusion. The V4c and V5 ICL models achieved similar visual and refractive outcomes, whereas the V5 model showed a possible advantage in reducing night vision disturbances.

scholarly journals Toric phakic IOLs in keratoconus—evaluation of preoperative parameters on the outcome of phakic anterior chamber lens implantation in patients with keratoconus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaak R. Fischinger ◽  
Jascha Wendelstein ◽  
Kristin Tetz ◽  
Matthias Bolz ◽  
Manfred R. Tetz
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Anterior Chamber ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Lens Implantation ◽  
Efficacy Index ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the influence of the type of the keratectasia and preoperative keratometry readings on the efficacy of implantation of iris-fixated phakic anterior chamber intraocular lenses (pIOL) in patients with keratoconus. Methods In this retrospective study, iris-fixated pIOLs (Artisan/Artiflex (Ophtec®), Verisyse/Veriflex (AMO®)) were implanted in 38 eyes of 22 patients with stable keratoconus. Thirty-six eyes underwent corneal crosslinking (CXL) prior to the lens implantation. The refractive outcome was evaluated 6 weeks postoperatively and the influence of preoperative refraction and topo- and tomographical factors were analyzed. Results The mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVApost) was 0.25 ± 0.15 logMAR and was not statistically different from the mean preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVApre), which was 0.24 ± 0.13 logMAR. Twenty-seven eyes (71%) reached UDVApost/CDVApre ≥ 1 (efficacy index), whereas patients with PMD-like ectasia (n = 14) showed significantly (p = 0.003) higher efficacy index (100%) than patients diagnosed with keratoconus (n = 24) (54%). Higher eccentricity of the maximum posterior elevation showed a significant beneficial influence on the efficacy index (p = 0.021). Furthermore, a higher Amsler-Krumeich stage and preoperative MAE were correlated with a worse UDVApost. The mean absolute spherical equivalent was significantly decreased from 5.71 ± 4.96 D to 1.25 ± 1.20 D (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in endothelial cell count. Conclusion The results indicate that the implantation of phakic iris-fixated anterior chamber IOLs is a reasonable refractive option for patients with keratoconus. Keratoconus patients with a pellucidal marginal degeneration (PMD)-like appearance ectasia seem to benefit most from such procedures.

scholarly journals Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with phacoemulsification: the FACT non-inferiority RCT

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-68
Author(s):  
Alexander C Day ◽  
Jennifer M Burr ◽  
Kate Bennett ◽  
Rachael Hunter ◽  
Catey Bunce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean

Background Cataract surgery is one of the most common operations. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) is a technique that automates a number of operative steps. Objectives To compare FLACS with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). Design Multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Setting Three collaborating NHS hospitals. Participants A total of 785 patients with age-related cataract in one or both eyes were randomised between May 2015 and September 2017. Intervention FLACS (n = 392 participants) or PCS (n = 393 participants). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was uncorrected distance visual acuity in the study eye after 3 months, expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR): 0.00 logMAR (or 6/6 if expressed in Snellen) is normal (good visual acuity). Secondary outcomes included corrected distance visual acuity, refractive outcomes (within 0.5 dioptre and 1.0 dioptre of target), safety and patient-reported outcome measures at 3 and 12 months, and resource use. All trial follow-ups were performed by optometrists who were masked to the trial intervention. Results A total of 353 (90%) participants allocated to the FLACS arm and 317 (81%) participants allocated to the PCS arm attended follow-up at 3 months. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was similar in both treatment arms [0.13 logMAR, standard deviation 0.23 logMAR, for FLACS, vs. 0.14 logMAR, standard deviation 0.27 logMAR, for PCS, with a difference of –0.01 logMAR (95% confidence interval –0.05 to 0.03 logMAR; p = 0.63)]. The mean corrected distance visual acuity values were again similar in both treatment arms (–0.01 logMAR, standard deviation 0.19 logMAR FLACS vs. 0.01 logMAR, standard deviation 0.21 logMAR PCS; p = 0.34). There were two posterior capsule tears in the PCS arm. There were no significant differences between the treatment arms for any secondary outcome at 3 months. At 12 months, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.14 logMAR (standard deviation 0.22 logMAR) for FLACS and 0.17 logMAR (standard deviation 0.25 logMAR) for PCS, with a difference between the treatment arms of –0.03 logMAR (95% confidence interval –0.06 to 0.01 logMAR; p = 0.17). The mean corrected distance visual acuity was 0.003 logMAR (standard deviation 0.18 logMAR) for FLACS and 0.03 logMAR (standard deviation 0.23 logMAR) for PCS, with a difference of –0.03 logMAR (95% confidence interval –0.06 to 0.01 logMAR; p = 0.11). There were no significant differences between the arms for any other outcomes, with the exception of the mean binocular corrected distance visual acuity with a difference of –0.02 logMAR (95% confidence interval –0.05 to 0.00 logMAR) (p = 0.036), which favoured FLACS. There were no significant differences between the arms for any health, social care or societal costs. For the economic evaluation, the mean cost difference was £167.62 per patient higher for FLACS (95% of iterations between –£14.12 and £341.67) than for PCS. The mean QALY difference (FLACS minus PCS) was 0.001 (95% of iterations between –0.011 and 0.015), which equates to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost difference divided by QALY difference) of £167,620. Limitations Although the measurement of outcomes was carried out by optometrists who were masked to the treatment arm, the participants were not masked. Conclusions The evidence suggests that FLACS is not inferior to PCS in terms of vision after 3 months’ follow-up, and there were no significant differences in patient-reported health and safety outcomes after 12 months’ follow-up. In addition, the statistically significant difference in binocular corrected distance visual acuity was not clinically significant. FLACS is not cost-effective. Future work To explore the possible differences in vision in patients without ocular co-pathology. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN77602616. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 6. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Moorfields Eye Charity (grant references GR000233 and GR000449 for the endothelial cell counter and femtosecond laser used).

scholarly journals Comparison of visual acuity measured by ETDRS based smart phone applications I sight pro and Peek acuity versus traditional Snellen\\\'s chart visual acuity in children 6-14 years in a tertiary care institute in India

2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 634-637
Author(s):  
Abhilash B ◽  
Sinchana Adyanthaya
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Smart Phone ◽  
Eye Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Home Based ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
Level Of Significance

Covid-19 pandemic has led to children missing schools due to which eye care screening activities at schools have taken a backseat. To mitigate this home based visual acuity estimation smartphone applications are increasingly being used for the purpose of tele-ophthalmology purposes, although with no validation of the same. We aim to fulfil this lacunae. Current study was a cross sectional analysis on 286 eyes of 148 children aged between 6years to 14years attending our OPD from April 2021 to June 2021, with non-acute ocular symptomatology. Snellen’s distant visual acuity was compared against the visual acuity recorded by smart phone based Isight pro app and Peek acuity smart phone app. Statistical analysis was performed by Bland Altmann analysis by using SPSS version 21 and p&#60;0.05 was taken as the level of significance. The mean differences between the smartphone-based test Isight pro and the Snellen’s chart and the smartphone-based test Peek acuity and Snellen’s acuity data were 0.06 (95%CI, 0.04–0.08) and 0.07 (95%CI,0.05–0.09) logMAR, respectively. Time taken to test visual acuity by Snellen’s chart was approximately 118.2±21.38 seconds, whereas with Isight pro and Peek acuity smart phone apps the time for testing was approximately 92±15.88 seconds and 94.03±19.73 seconds respectively. P&#60;0.05.The mean visual acuity was comparable with Snellen’s chart and ETDRS based smart phone apps like Isight pro and Peek acuity. The mean time to assess visual acuity was slightly more in Snellen’s acuity than with smart phone based apps. Inability to access eye care services through screening activities in schools has been mitigated effectively by using these smart phone apps. Hence these smart phone apps can be effectively used in tele-ophthalmologic practice and screening activities in these COVID-19 pandemic times.

scholarly journals Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Children with Keratoconus

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Paulo Ferrara ◽  
Leonardo Torquetti ◽  
Guilherme Ferrara
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Intrastromal Corneal Ring ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Corneal Asphericity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Belo Horizonte ◽  
Corneal Flattening

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the long-term follow-up of Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRSs) (Ferrara Ophthalmics, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) implantation for the management of keratoconus in children. Study design Paulo Ferrara Eye Clinic, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Materials and methods A total of 58 eyes of 37 children with keratoconus were included. One or two ring segments were inserted into the cornea, embracing the keratoconus area. Statistical analysis included preoperative and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), asphericity, pachymetry, and keratometry. Results Ferrara ICRS implantation significantly improved the mean UDVA and CDVA. Corneal tomography (Pentacam®) showed corneal flattening in all eyes implanted with the Ferrara ring. The mean K decreased, and the corneal asphericity and pachymetry increased in all cases. Conclusion The Ferrara ICRS improved all parameters after 2 years of implantation in children with keratoconus. There was significant corneal flattening after ring implantation with improvement of the UDVA and the CDVA. All studied parameters remained stable over time. How to cite this article Ferrara G, Ferrara P, Torquetti L. Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Children with Keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2017;6(2):45-48.

scholarly journals Central corneal regularization (CCR): an alternative approach in keratoconus treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Mulè ◽  
Shihao Chen ◽  
Jia Zhang ◽  
Wen Zhou ◽  
Vasileios Selimis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Refractive Error ◽  
Corneal Tissue ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Tissue Removal ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Stromal Tissue ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Novel Concept

Abstract Background To evaluate the safety and efficacy of an approach that combines corneal customized transepithelial therapeutic ablation to treat irregular corneal optics and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) to strengthen the corneal tissue and stop the progression of keratoconus. The transepithelial therapeutic ablation applied a novel concept named central corneal regularization (CCR) which could correct the corneal morphological irregularities and the eye’s spherocylindrical refractive error with minimal stromal tissue removal. Methods Retrospective study. Eyes that underwent CCR combined with CXL were evaluated preoperatively and up to 12 months postoperatively for visual acuity, subjective refraction, corneal haze, pachymetry and maximum keratometry (Kmax). Results Twenty four eyes of 24 patients with a mean age of 28.92 ± 9.88 years were treated. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error changed from − 0.74 ± 1.17 D preoperatively to − 1.05 ± 1.52 D at 12 months postoperatively. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved. No eye lost lines of CDVA, 21 had a mean improvement of 3.21 lines. The mean cylinder error and Kmax value dropped from − 3.06 ± 1.83 D and 51.38 ± 3.29 D to − 1.04 ± 0.80 D and 48.70 ± 2.58 D, respectively. The mean haze score at 3, 6 and 12 months was 0.56, 0.19 and 0.06, respectively. Conclusions CCR combined with CXL offers promising results as a safe and effective treatment in keratoconic patients.

scholarly journals Changes in Corneal Asphericity after MyoRing Implantation in Moderate and Severe Keratoconus

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Khorrami-Nejad ◽  
Ozra Aghili ◽  
Hesam Hashemian ◽  
Mohamad Aghazadeh-Amiri ◽  
Bahram Khosravi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Refractive Errors ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Manifest Refraction ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corneal Asphericity

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of MyoRing implantation on corneal asphericity in moderate and severe keratoconus (KCN). Methods: This cross-sectional observational study comprised 32 eyes of 28 patients with KCN, who had femtosecond-assisted MyoRing corneal implantation. The primary outcome measures were preoperative and six-month postoperative corneal asphericity in 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10-mm optical zones in the superior, inferior, nasal, temporal, and central areas. The secondary outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, thinnest location value, and keratometry readings. Results: A significant improvement in the UDVA and CDVA was observed six months after the surgery (P < 0.001) with a significant reduction in the spherical (4.67 diopters (D)) and cylindrical (2.19 D) refractive errors. A significant reduction in the corneal asphericity in all the optical zones and in the superior, inferior, nasal, temporal, and central areas was noted (P < 0.001). The mean thickness at the thinnest location of the cornea decreased from 437.15 ± 30.69 to 422.81 ± 36.91 μm. A significant corneal flattening was seen. The K1, K2, and Km changes were 5.32 D, 7 D, and 6.17 D, respectively (P < 0.001). Conclusion: MyoRing implantation is effective for improving corneal asphericity in patients with KCN. It allows successful corneal remodeling and provides a significant improvement in UDVA, CDVA, and refractive errors.

scholarly journals Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Patients with Mild Keratoconus

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-126
Author(s):  
Pablo F Rodrigues ◽  
Wagner G Dias
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Intrastromal Corneal Ring ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corneal Volume ◽  
Corneal Asphericity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Early Indication ◽  
Better Than

ABSTRACT Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the topographic, topometric and visual changes after implantation of Ferrara intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in grades I and II keratoconus patients. Materials and methods The chart records of 50 consecutively operated keratoconus patients were reviewed. The patients were operated on by the same surgeon, with the manual technique. All patients were preoperatively and postoperatively evaluated with the Pentacam (OCULUS Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany). The studied parameters were: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), keratometry, corneal asphericity and corneal volume. Results Fifty eyes of 42 patients (26 males and 16 females) were analyzed. The mean preoperative UDVA was 0.91 ranging from LogMAR 0.10 to 1.30. The mean postoperative CDVA was 0.19 ranging from 0.00 to 0.54 LogMAR. The postoperative CDVA was equal or better than 0.18 in 37 cases (74%). The mean K1 decreased from 45.80D (±2.52) preoperatively to 44.27D (± 2.10) postoperatively and the mean K2 value, from 49.06D (± 2.09) to 46.22D (±1.89). The mean asphericity increased from −0.71 preoperatively to −0.29 postoperatively. The average preoperative corneal volume was 56.89 ± 3.11 mm3 while the average postoperative corneal volume was 57.64 ± 3.05 mm3. Conclusion The study supports the early indication of implantation of Ferrara ICRS in mild to moderate keratoconus cases in order to achieve good visual, keratometric and ashpericity outcomes. How to cite this article Rodrigues PF, Ferrara G, Ferrara P, Dias WG, Torquetti L. Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments Implantation in Patients with Mild Keratoconus. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2014;3(3):122-126.

Visual outcomes after progressive apodized diffractive intraocular lens implantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier García-Bella ◽  
Néstor Ventura-Abreu ◽  
Laura Morales-Fernández ◽  
Paula Talavero-González ◽  
Jesús Carballo-Álvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Pupil Diameter ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Distance Correction

Purpose: To assess photopic and mesopic vision in patients implanted with the Bi-Flex® M 677 MY bifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: In this prospective clinical study, 25 patients with cataract in both eyes were subjected to cataract surgery and bilateral implantation of the Bi-Flex® M 677MY (Medicontur, Hungary) IOL. Three months after surgery, high-contrast photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were determined. Intermediate at 65 cm (DCIVA) and near at 40 cm (DCNVA) visual acuity were also measured, both with best distance correction. The CSV-1000 test chart was used to assess contrast sensitivity (CS). Defocus curves were constructed under photopic and mesopic conditions, determining binocular best-corrected visual acuity over the range +1.50 D to -4.00 D in 0.50-D steps. A KR-1W Wavefront Analyzer was used to measure pupil size and aberrometric outcomes. Presence and type of dysphotopsia were evaluated with the Likert scale. Results: Mesopic mean pupil diameter was 4.58 ± 0.73 mm. The mean values at 3 months were UDVA 0.03 ± 0.09, CDVA -0.05 ± 0.06, DCIVA 0.20 ± 0.07, and DCNVA 0.11 ± 0.08. Mean CS for the 4 frequencies examined were 1.66 ± 0.16, 1.75 ± 0.14, 1.39 ± 0.22, and 0.96 ± 0.19. Significant differences were observed in defocus curves for photopic and mesopic conditions. A significant correlation between pupil diameter and the dysphotopic photopic was found (r = 0.62; p = 0.02). Conclusions: The evaluated progressive apodized diffractive design IOL provides effective restoration of visual function in far and near vision distance with an adequate intermediate visual quality between -1.00 and -1.50 focus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document