scholarly journals Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Haematologica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (11) ◽  
pp. 2524-2539
Author(s):  
Hiroto Inaba ◽  
Charles G. Mullighan

The last decade has witnessed great advances in our understanding of the genetic and biological basis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the development of experimental models to probe mechanisms and evaluate new therapies, and the development of more efficacious treatment stratification. Genomic analyses have revolutionized our understanding of the molecular taxonomy of ALL, and these advances have led the push to implement genome and transcriptome characterization in the clinical management of ALL to facilitate more accurate risk-stratification and, in some cases, targeted therapy. Although mutation- or pathway-directed targeted therapy (e.g., using tyrosine kinase inhibitors to treat Philadelphia chromosome [Ph]-positive and Phlike B-cell-ALL) is currently available for only a minority of children with ALL, many of the newly identified molecular alterations have led to the exploration of approaches targeting deregulated cell pathways. The efficacy of cellular or humoral immunotherapy has been demonstrated with the success of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and the bispecific engager blinatumomab in treating advanced disease. This review describes key advances in our understanding of the biology of ALL and optimal approaches to risk-stratification and therapy, and it suggests key areas for basic and clinical research.

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 689-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Hon Pui

AbstractThe cure rate of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has exceeded 90% in some contemporary clinical trials. However, the dose intensity of conventional chemotherapy has been pushed to its limit. Further improvement in outcome will need to rely more heavily on molecular therapeutic as well as immuno-and cellular-therapy approaches together with precise risk stratification. Children with ETV6-RUNX1 or hyperdiploid > 50 ALL who achieve negative minimal residual disease during early remission induction are suitable candidates for reduction in treatment. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive or Ph-like ALL with ABL-class fusion should be treated with dasatinib. BH3 profiling and other preclinical methods have identified several high-risk subtypes, such as hypodiplod, early T-cell precursor, immature T-cell, KMT2A-rearranged, Ph-positive and TCF-HLF-positive ALL, that may respond to BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax. There are other fusions or mutations that may serve as putative targets, but effective targeted therapy has yet to be established. For other high-risk patients or poor early treatment responders who do not have targetable genetic lesions, current approaches that offer hope include blinatumomab, inotuzumab and CAR-T cell therapy for B-ALL, and daratumumab and nelarabine for T-ALL. With the expanding therapeutic armamentarium, we should start focus on rational combinations of targeted therapy with non-overlapping toxicities.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (15) ◽  
pp. 1786-1789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Saini ◽  
David Marin ◽  
Celina Ledesma ◽  
Ruby Delgado ◽  
Gabriela Rondon ◽  
...  

How to best use tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of BCR-ABL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is unknown but will almost certainly not be addressed by a definitive randomized trial. Saini and colleagues provide a large body of observational data to reinforce earlier circumstantial evidence favoring prophylactic use of TKIs for at least 2 years posttransplant.


Chemotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingying Ma ◽  
Quanchao Zhang ◽  
Peiyan Kong ◽  
Jingkang Xiong ◽  
Xi Zhang ◽  
...  

With the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has entered a new era. The efficacy of TKIs compared with other ALL treatment options is emphasized by a rapid increase in the number of TKI clinical trials. Subsequently, the use of traditional approaches, such as combined chemotherapy and even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), for the treatment of ALL is being challenged in the clinic. In light of the increased use of TKIs in the clinic, several questions have been raised. First, is it necessary to use intensive chemotherapy during the induction course of therapy to achieve a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status? Must a patient reach a complete molecular response/major molecular response before receiving allo-HSCT? Does MRD status affect long-term survival after allo-HSCT? Is auto-HSCT an appropriate alternative for allo-HSCT in those Ph+ ALL patients who lack suitable donors? Here, we review the recent literature in an attempt to summarize the current status of TKI usage in the clinic, including several new therapeutic approaches, provide answers for the above questions, and speculate on the future direction of TKI utilization for the treatment of Ph+ ALL patients.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2909-2909
Author(s):  
Justine Yu ◽  
Giovannino Silvestri ◽  
Lorenzo Stramucci ◽  
Masashi Sanada ◽  
Tomoyuki Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with chemotherapy significantly improved outcomes in adult Philadelphia-chromosome-positive (Ph+) B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL). However, high relapse rates due to development of TKI resistance or chemotherapy-induced adverse effects remain the major therapeutic challenges. Furthermore, all TKIs are not effective against Ph+leukemia-initiating cells (LICs). The tumor suppressor protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is inactive in almost all solid and hematopoietic tumors. Suppression of PP2A activity correlates with poor outcome and disease progression, and largely relies on the aberrant expression of CIP2A, SET and/or SETBP1. SETBP1 was discovered as a SET-interacting protein, and recently described as mutated or overexpressed in several myeloid malignancies where it acts as an independent negative prognostic factor and as an inhibitor of PP2A, however its role in lymphoid malignancies is still unknown. Thus, we postulated that SETBP1 regulates survival and self-renewal of Ph+B-ALL LICs and progenitors through inhibition of PP2A. We reported that BCR-ABL1 kinase-dependent and -independent mechanisms induce SET-dependent PP2A inhibition in Ph+ (CMLand B-ALL) progenitors and quiescent TKI-resistant CML LICs, respectively, and that SET downregulation or pharmacologic (i.e. SET-interacting PP2A-activating drugs; PADs) restoration of PP2A activity strongly impaired malignant but not normal hematopoiesis by selectively killing Ph+progenitors (CML and ALL) and TKI-resistant quiescent stem (CML) cells. Here, we show that wild type SETBP1 is markedly induced in an imatinib (IM)-insensitive manner in primary CD34+CD19+ Ph+ B-ALL progenitors and Ph+ B-ALL cell lines (BV173 and SUP-B15) and barely detectable in CD34+ cells from CML patients in chronic and blastic phase. Overexpression of SETBP1 was found essential for PP2A inhibition in Ph+ B-ALL blasts. Accordingly, shRNA-dependent SETBP1 downregulation impaired clonogenic potential and self-renewal of CD34+CD19+ Ph+ B-ALL cells in CFC and serial replating assays. Furthermore, we have evidence that a SETBP1-SET/CIP2A inhibitory complex may exist in Ph+ cells, suggesting that SETBP1 might serve to recruit SET and CIP2A to suppress PP2A activity. Indeed, we found that CIP2A, like SET and SETBP1, is also overexpressed in CD34+CD19+ Ph+ B-ALL compared to CD34+CD19+cell from BM of healthy donors. Because, SETBP1 stabilizes SET and augments PP2A inhibition, and ectopic SETBP1 expression confers self-renewal to mouse myeloid progenitors and cooperates with BCR-ABL1 to induce a CML blast crisis-like disease in mice, our data suggest that aberrant SETBP1 expression might significantly contributes to the development of Ph+ B-ALL and persistence of TKI-resistant Ph+ B-ALL LICs. Disclosures Milojkovic: Ariad: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Roy:Paladin: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Kiadis Pharma: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document