scholarly journals Comparative Study of Intraprostatic Infiltration With Lidocaine Injection and Periprostatic Nerve Block for Pain Free Trus Guided Prostate Biopsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-93
Author(s):  
Amirul Islam ◽  
Md Nazrul Islam ◽  
Md Jahangir Alam ◽  
Maruf Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Group I ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Periprostatic Nerve Block

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of intraprostatic infiltration of lidocain injection and periprostatic nerve block for pain free TRUS guided prostate biopsies. Methods: A hospital based prospective experimental study was conducted in the Department of Urology of Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka from July 2007 to June 2009 to compare the different anesthesia technique for TRUS guided prostate biopsy for the detection of carcinoma prostate. All male patients aged over 55 years having lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attending to urology OPD as well as in patient department were evaluated by history, physical examination including D/R/E and necessary investigations to identify the potential candidates for prostate biopsy and potential participants were counselled for prostate biopsy. Before taking biopsy patients were again judged by selection and exclusion criteria. Overall general examination as well as examination of urinary system and anorectal region was done. DRE was done to see the size, consistency and nodularity of prostate prior to biopsy. Who fulfilled the selection criteria included in this study in out patient basis or admitted in the urology ward and numbered chronologically, odd numbers for group-I includes periprostatic nerve block and even numbers for group-II includes intraprostatic infiltration of lidocain injection. They underwent 10 core prostate biopsy (standard 6 plus lateral 4 core) and hypoechoic lesion directed biopsy to see the unique cancer detection rate in each lobe. Data were analyzed using SPSS (Statistical package for social science) software program. The test of significance were chi-square, student t test, Fisher exact test, Mann Whitney test. Probability value (P Value<0.05) was considered significant. Results: Intensity of pain using visual analogue scale (VAS) demonstrates that the mean pain intensity during probe insertion was significantly less in Group-I than that in Group-II (5.8 ± 1.3 vs. 6.7 ± 1.3, p = 0.007). The mean pain intensity during anesthesia was also significantly less in the former group compared to the latter group (4.5 ± 1.2 vs. 5.1 ± 1.1, p = 0.036). Then the pain intensity of both the groups decreased, but the decrease was significantly faster and steeper in Group-II than in Group-I (p = 0.001). The pain intensity of Group-II 30 minutes after biopsy further decreased to 1.9 cm on visual analogue scale, while the pain intensity of Group-I increased from 4.1 cm during biopsy to 4.4 cm 30 minutes after biopsy (p < 0.001) . Results of the study revealed that -intraprostatic administration of local anesthesia significantly decreases the pain associated with prostate biopsy compared with conventional periprostatic nerve block. Conclusions: Intraprostatic administration of local anesthesia significantly decreases the pain associated with prostate biopsy compared with periprostatic nerve block. It is a simple, safe and rapid technique that should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 20, No. 2, July 2017 p.87-93

Comparative study on Periprostatic local anesthesia with Intraprostatic local anesthesia for ultrasonoguided transrectal prostatic biopsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-39
Author(s):  
AM Anamur Rashid Choudhury ◽  
Md waliul Islam ◽  
Sharif Shahjamal ◽  
Kazi Rafiqul Abedin ◽  
Abu Bakar Siddique ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Prostatic Biopsy ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Group I ◽  
Transrectal Prostate Biopsy ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Objectives: To compare pain, systemic lidocaine toxicity and complications between periprostatic with intraprostatic local anaesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: This study was carried out in the Department of Urology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka Medical College (DMCH) and Comfort Nursing Home, Dhaka during the period of January 2009 to October 2009, For this purpose, a total number of 60 consecutive patients having increased prostate specific antigen (PSA >4.0ng/ml), abnormal DRE/transrectal ultrasound were admitted in the above mentioned hospitals were enrolled in this study for surgical management. Results: The age ranged from 50 to 90 years and the maximum number was found in the age group of 61-70 years in both groups. The mean(±SD) age was 68.5±7.5 years and 70.3±8.2 years in group I and group II respectively. The mean(±SD) PSA was 17.0±12.8ng/ ml with their PSA ranged from 5.9- 62.8ng/ml in group I and in group II was 17.2±17.3ng/ml with their PSA ranged from 4.6 – 55.1ng/ml, which was not significant (p>0.05) between two groups. Normal digital rectal was found 14(46.7%) and 16(53.3%) in group I and group II respectively. Carcinoma was found 13(43.3%) and 14(46.7%) in group I and group II respectively and rest of them were benign in group I and group II respectively. The mean(±SD) pain degree during biopsy was 2.6±1.1 and 2.0±1.2 in group I and group II respectively according to allocated pain score. Pain degree after 30 minutes of biopsy, most of the patients had no pain in both groups. Pain during anesthesia it was found that 4(13.3%) and 13(43.3%) of the patients had no pain in group I and group II respectively. The mean(±SD) pain degree during anesthesia was 2.7±1.2 and 2.1±1.2 in group I and group II respectively. Conclusion: It is a simple and safe method that is less painful and it should be considered in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. The decreased discomfort of this procedure may enable more core biopsies to be taken in patients at high risk for prostate cancer or in those with an enlarged prostate Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 15, No. 2, July 2012 p.33-39

scholarly journals A comparative study of tapentadol versus tramadol in the treatment of low back pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1064
Author(s):  
Laxman Verma ◽  
Pankaj Kumar Chaudhary ◽  
Chandresh Gupta ◽  
Umesh Saroj
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Medical Assessment ◽  
Group I ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Reduction Of Pain ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
The Difference

Background: Nontraumatic musculoskeletal disorders are the main reason for presentation to the emergency department with Rachialgia being the most common reason to request medical assessment among them. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, parallel group open labelled study conducted in a district level tertiary care hospital attached to a medical teaching institute. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group I (63 patients) received tablet tramadol 50 mg twice daily orally and group II (63 patients) received tablet tapentadol 50 mg twice daily orally.Results: The mean age of the patients of group I was 40.6±9.6 years and in the group II was 42.7±10.6 years. A total of 61 males participated in the study of which 31 males were enrolled in group I and 30 in group II while 65 females participated in the study of which 32 females were enrolled in group I and 33 in group II. The mean reduction of pain intensity VAS score at the end of 4 weeks from baseline in group I and group II were 34.57 and 37.55 respectively. The difference in the mean reduction of pain intensity VAS between the two groups was not statistically significant.Conclusions: We conclude that both the drugs show significant reduction in the pain intensity in moderate to severe CLBP patients. Tapentadol is as efficacious as tramadol in moderate to severe CLBP. However, tapentadol is better tolerated than tramadol.

scholarly journals PREOPERATIVE KETOROLAC EFFECT ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN ON TURP PATIENTS

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Choirul Hadi ◽  
Trisula Utomo
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Transurethral Prostatectomy ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Vas Score ◽  
Group I ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group Ii

Objective: The aim of this study is to study the effect of preoperative Ketorolac on postoperative pain after transurethral prostatectomy at Sardjito Hospital Yogyakarta. Material & Methods: This is a cross sectional, analytic, prospective study. We divided benign prostatic hyperplasia patients, from October 2011 until February 2012 into two groups. Group I was given Ketorolac 30 mg intravenously twice daily starting one day before operation and in the morning before procedure. Group II did not receive Ketorolac preoperatively. Patients underwent transurethral operation with spinal anesthesia. We assessed postoperative pain at 24 hours using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Results: Twenty four patients were included in this study with mean age 66 years old with the youngest 45 years old and the oldest 80 years old (SD 8,77744). Group I (17 patients), VAS score 1 to 7 with median 3 and mean 3,4118 (SD 1,66053). Group II (7 patients) VAS score 1 to 8 with median 3 and mean 3,8571 (SD 2,8357). We count it using Mann-Whitney U (p = 0,951). Conclusion: There is no significance difference in post-operative pain after transurethral prostatectomy with preoperative ketorolac administration.Keywords: Ketorolac, bupivacaine, visual analogue scale, transurethral prostatectomy.

scholarly journals Long-term Prednisolone in Post-stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 8;19 (8;11) ◽  
pp. 565-574
Author(s):  
Jayantee Kalita
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Post Stroke ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background: There is no study on the long-term use of prednisolone in post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome-1 (CRPS1). Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-term low dose prednisolone in post-stroke CRPS-I. Study Design: Open-labeled randomized controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary care teaching institute. Methods: Seventy-seven out of 396 (19.4%) patients with stroke had CRPS-1 and 58 met the inclusion criteria. Their clinical details and CRPS, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and Barthel Index (BI) scores were noted. The patients were prescribed 40 mg prednisolone for 2 weeks followed by tapering in the next 2 weeks. Patients who responded were randomly assigned prednisolone 10 mg daily (group I) or no prednisolone (group II). They were followed up for the first and second month of randomization and their CRPS, VAS, mRS, and BI scores were noted. The primary outcome was improvement in CRPS score and secondary outcomes were VAS, mRS, BI scores, and severe adverse events (SAE). Results: Fifty-six of fifty-eight (96.5%) patients responded to the initial high dose prednisolone and 26 each were assigned group I and group II treatment. Group I patients had further improvement in CRPS score. Fifty percent of patients in group II had deterioration at one month and needed reinstitution of prednisolone; following which 77% of them improved in the next month. The improvement in CRPS score paralleled the VAS score but not mRS and BI scores in the first and second months in group I compared to group II. There was no SAE necessitating withdrawal of prednisolone. Limitation: The design of the study is not double blind. Conclusion: In post-stroke CRPS-I, continuation of low dose prednisolone for 2 months is safe and effective. Key words: Shoulder hand syndrome, CRPS, corticosteroid, prednisolone, stroke, Visual Analogue Scale

scholarly journals A COMPARISON OF SUPRASCAPULAR NERVE BLOCK VS INTRAARTICULAR STEROID INJECTION IN IMPROVEMENT OF HEMIPLEGIC SHOULDER PAIN

2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1971-75
Author(s):  
Musab Bin Noor ◽  
Aamir Waheed Butt ◽  
Waseem Iqbal ◽  
Maimuna Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Nerve Block ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Steroid Injection ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve ◽  
Suprascapular Nerve Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare the mean improvement in pain on Visual Analogue Scale by Suprascapular Nerve block and Intra-articular steroid injection in patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Place and Duration of Study: Pain Clinic, Armed Forces Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine Rawalpindi from 25th October 2017 to 24th April 2018 Patients & Methods: 60 patients with CVA and shoulder pain on hemiplegic side for at least 2 weeks were included in study after non-probability consecutive sampling after meeting inclusion criteria. Subjects were randomized by lottery into two groups; Group A receiving Suprascapular Nerve block with 5ml of 1% Lignocaine with Group B receiving Intra-articular 40mg Triamcinolone Acetonide plus 1 ml of 1% Lignocaine injections. Mean change in pain scores on VAS was calculated between score at baseline and at 4 weeks post-intervention Results: The mean age of patients in group A was 59.17 ± 9.81 years and in group B was 39.96 ± 11.11 years. Out of 60 patients, 34 (56.67%) were males and 26 (43.33%) were females with male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Mean duration of stroke was 7.50 ± 2.66 months. Mean pain change on VAS in Group A (Suprascapular Nerve block) was 3.83 ± 1.12 cm while in Group B (Intra-articular steroid injection) it was 2.17 ± 0.99 cm (p-value = 0.0001). Conclusion: This study concluded that Suprascapular Nerve block offered better improvement in hemiplegic shoulder pain on Visual Analogue Scale at 4 weeks as compared to intraarticular steroid injection.

Assessment of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
ABMM Alam ◽  
M Moniruzzaman ◽  
MB Alam ◽  
N Islam ◽  
F Khatoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Contrast Media ◽  
Creatinine Level ◽  
Ace Inhibitor ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Group I ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Background: CIN has gained increased attention in the clinical setting, particularly during cardiac intervention but also in many other radiological procedures in which iodinated contrast media are used. There is at present good clinical evidence from well-controlled randomized studies that CIN is a common cause of acute renal dysfunction.Methodology: This was a prospective study conducted among the patients who underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the Department of Cardiology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital during January 2010 to December 2010. A total of 111 patients age range from 25 to 75 years were included in the study. Serum creatinine level at baseline and at the end of 48 hours was done in all these patients. Study population was divided into two groups according to development of acute kidney injury (AKI). Group-I = AKI, Group II = Not developed AKI. Results: AKI developed 11.7% of the study patient. DM and Preexisting renal insufficiency were significantly higher in group I patients. HTN was (61.5% Vs 44.9%) higher in group I but not significantly. History of ACE inhibitor/ARB, NSAID intake and LVEF <40% were significantly higher in group I patients. The mean±SD volume of CM (Contrast Media) were 156.9±44.8 ml and 115.4±30.0 ml in group I and group II respectively, which was significant. The mean±SD of serum creatinine after 48-72 hours of CAG/PCI was 1.4±0.37 mg/dl and 1.1±0.2 mg/dl in group I and group II respectively. The serum creatinine level increased significantly (p<0.05) after 48-72 hours of CAG/PCI in group I. In group II, S. creatinine level increased but not significant (p>0.05). Impaired renal function was found 76.9% and 2.0% in group I and group II respectively. DM, HTN, preexisting renal insufficiency, ACE inhibitor/ARB, NSAIDs, contrast volume (>150 ml), eGFR (<60 ml/min/ 1.73m2) and LVEF (<40%) are significantly (p0.05) associated for CIN development.Conclusion: CIN is an iatrogenic but preventable disorder results from the administration of contract media. Although rare in the general population, CIN occurs frequently in patients with underlying renal dysfunction and diabetes. In patients with pre angiographic normal renal function, the prevalence is low but in pre-existing renal impairment it may pose a serious threat. Thus risk factors are synergistic in their ability to predispose to the development of CIN. A careful risk-benefit analysis must always be performed prior to the administration of contrast media to patients at risk for CIN. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v5i1.12227 Cardiovasc. j. 2012; 5(1): 37-43

scholarly journals A prospective study on effectiveness of drotaverine in acceleration of labor

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-141
Author(s):  
Padma Raj Dhungana ◽  
Rajesh Adhikari ◽  
Prem Raj Pageni ◽  
Apsara Koirala ◽  
Anand Nepal
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Drug Administration ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Normal Delivery ◽  
Group I ◽  
Vacuum Delivery ◽  
Drotaverine Hydrochloride ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Background: Labor is a naturally occurring physiological process associated with uterine contractions, effacement, dilatation of cervix and descent of presenting part. Drotaverine hydrochloride is a non-anticholinergic isoquinoline derivative which acts by elevating intracellular cyclic Adenosine Mono Phosphate (cAMP) and cyclic Guanosine Mono Phosphate (cGMP) promoting smooth muscle relaxation. Materials and Method: This was a hospital based prospective study on effectiveness of Drotaverine Hydrochloride on enhancing dilatation of cervix and acceleration of active phase of labor. The sample size was 100. Fifty cases of women in active phase of labor received injection drotaverine hydrochloride 40 mg (group i) and fifty cases of women did not receive any drug (group ii) among those at term with singleton pregnancy and vertex presentation. Variables like maternal age, interval between administration of drug and delivery, mode of delivery, apgar score at 5 minutes, NCU (Neonatal Care Unit) admission and neonatal outcomes were recorded. Data analysis was done with the help of SPSS program. Results: The mean interval between drug administration to delivery in primipara and multipara in group i was 3.05 hours and 2.31 hours while in group ii was 4.5 hours and 3.75 hours respectively. The mean interval between drug administration and delivery was shorter in both groups of multipara. In group i, 96% had normal delivery and 4 % had vacuum delivery and in group ii 90% and 10% had normal delivery and vacuum delivery respectively. None of the participants had caeserian section. There were no perinatal mortalities. Conclusion: The administration of drug Drotaverine Hydrochloride is effective in shortening duration of labor with favorable feto-maternal outcome.  

Anterior bone cement augmentation in anterior lumbar interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in patients with osteoporosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 525-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong Hwan Kim ◽  
Sang-Ho Lee ◽  
Dong Yeob Lee ◽  
Chan Shik Shim ◽  
Dae Hyeon Maeng
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Cement Augmentation ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Group I ◽  
Cage Subsidence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Object The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of anterior polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement augmentation in instrumented anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) for patients with osteoporosis. Methods Sixty-two patients with osteoporosis who had undergone single-level instrumented ALIF for spondylolisthesis and were followed for more than 2 years were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: instrumented ALIF alone (Group I) and instrumented ALIF with anterior PMMA augmentation (Group II). Sixty-one patients were interviewed to evaluate the clinical results, and plain radiographs and 3D CT scans were obtained at the last follow-up in 46 patients. Results The mean degree of cage subsidence was significantly higher in Group I (19.6%) than in Group II (5.2%) (p = 0.001). The mean decrease of vertebral body height at the index level was also significantly higher in Group I (10.7%) than in Group II (3.9%) (p = 0.001). No significant intergroup differences were observed in the incidence of radiographic adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) or in terms of pain and functional improvement. The incidences of clinical ASD (23% in Group I and 10% in Group II) were not significantly different. There was 1 case of nonunion and 3 cases of screw migration in Group I, but none resulted in implant failure. Conclusions Anterior PMMA augmentation during instrumented ALIF in patients with osteoporosis was useful to prevent cage subsidence and vertebral body collapse. In addition, PMMA augmentation did not increase the nonunion rate and incidence of ASD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document