scholarly journals Fatal Intra-Abdominal Hemorrhage in a Middle Aged Lady with Severe COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-85
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mahfuzul Hoque ◽  
Ponkaj Kanti Datta
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Lumbar Region ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Iliac Region ◽  
Abdominal Hemorrhage

Contrast enhance CT scan of Abdomen showing a large encysted collection at the left of the abdomen extending from lumbar region to left iliac region pushing the surrounding viscera forward. Collection was due to retro-peritoneal hemorrhage in a Middle aged Lady with COVID-19 who was on therapeutic dose of anticoagulation with Low Molecular Weight Heparin. J MEDICINE JAN 2021; 22 (1) : 84-85

Pharmacodynamics and Tolerance of Two Nadroparin Formulations (10,250 and 20,500 Anti Xa IU·ml-1) Delivered for 10 Days at Therapeutic Dose

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (02) ◽  
pp. 338-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Navarro ◽  
J. P. Cambus ◽  
H. Caplain ◽  
P. d’Azemar ◽  
J. Necciari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Dose Effect ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Circadian Effect

SummaryVenous thromboembolism may be efficiently treated by once-a-day (o.d.) administration of a high dose of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) instead of administration of the same total dose in two injections a day (b.i. d.). To reduce the volume of the subcutaneous (s.c.) injection, a more concentrated form of the drug is advisable. This study was designed to compare the bioavailability of 2 formulations of nadroparin containing 10,250 and 20,500 anti-Xa IU·ml-1 respectively. This was an open, randomized, cross-over study where 12 healthy volunteers (age 18-35) were enrolled. They received either 90 anti-Xa IU·kg-1 b.i. d. of the 10,250 IU preparation (treatment A), or 180 anti-Xa IU·kg-1 o.d. of the 20,500 IU preparation (treatment B) for 10 days. On day 1, the subjects were sampled between 0 and 12 h (treatment A) or between 0 and 24 h (treatment B). On day 10, they were sampled between 0 and 12 h and between 12 and 24 h (treatment A) or between 0 and 24 h (treatment B). Anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities were determined by specific chromogenic assays. The main result of the study was that the bioavailability of the anti-Xa activity of the 2 nadroparin formulations was equivalent, as shown by the comparison of the AUC0-12 h plus AUC12-24 h (treatment A) and the AUC0-24 h (treatment B), calculated on day 10. This study also allowed a number of interesting observations to be made. 1) Between day 1 and day 10, there was an accumulation of the anti-Xa activity for treatment A but not for treatment B (accumulation factors: 1.6 and 1.1 respectively); 2) On day 10, the AUC0-12 h were slightly but significantly lower than the AUC12-24 h suggesting a circadian effect for anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities; 3) the clearance of the anti-Xa activity was comparable at the 2-dose regimens, while that of the anti-IIa activity was lower in treatment B than in treatment A, indicating a significant dose effect for the pharmacodynamics of the longer heparin chains; 4) On average, the clearance of the anti-IIa activity was twice as high as that of the anti-Xa activity; 5) For treatment B, significant APTT prolongations were noticed at Tmax (prolongation factor: 1.7 ± 0.25), in relation with the anti-IIa activity (0.3 ± 0.1 IU·ml–1).

Tromboseprofylaxe na doorgemaakte Covid-19: een onopgelost raadsel

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. WOUTERS ◽  
A. GADISSEUR ◽  
C. KENYON
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Epigastric Pain ◽  
Abrupt Onset ◽  
Splenic Infarction ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Prophylactic Dose

Thromboprophylaxis after discharge for COVID-19: an unsolved puzzle Whilst recovering from severe COVID-19, a 61-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with abrupt onset epigastric pain, nausea and constipation for 2 days. Four days earlier, he had been released from the hospital after 2 weeks of hospitalization for severe bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia. A CT scan of the abdomen revealed a splenic infarction despite treatment with a prophylactic dose of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The incidence, pathophysiology and prevention of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy are discussed.

Use of Therapeutic Dose Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Patients with Renal Insufficiency: Analysis of Anti-Xa Levels and Creatinine Clearance.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 884-884
Author(s):  
Wendy Lim ◽  
Manasa Sridhara ◽  
Luqi Wang ◽  
Krystyna Kinnon ◽  
James Douketis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Renal Insufficiency ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Dose Adjustment ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Recurrent Vte ◽  
Dependent Patient

Abstract Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is predominantly eliminated by the kidneys. In patients with severe renal impairment, use of therapeutic dose LMWH may be associated with accumulation and a resultant bleeding risk. Tinzaparin may be less dependent on renal clearance due to its higher molecular mass and greater negative charge compared to other LMWHs. The objective of this prospective cohort study was to serially measure the anti-Xa anticoagulant effect of therapeutic dose tinzaparin over 5–7 days, used for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with varying degrees of renal insufficiency. We present the anti-Xa results from the first 78 patients enrolled in the study, correlated with renal function. In this study, consecutive in- and outpatients with objectively confirmed VTE requiring anticoagulation were enrolled and stratified into 4 groups based on the calculated Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl): > 60 mL/min, 30–60 mL/min, ≤ 30 mL/min and hemodialysis-dependent. Tinzaparin 175 IU/kg was administered subcutaneously once daily for 5–7 days or until the INR ≥ 2.0 with warfarin therapy. Trough anti-Xa levels were measured prior to the 3rd, 5th and/or 7th tinzaparin doses. Patients with anti-Xa level > 0.5 IU/mL received tinzaparin dose adjustment using a standardized nomogram. Bleeding and recurrent VTE events were recorded. The relationship between anti-Xa levels and CrCl is shown in Figure 1. Based on our predefined anti-Xa threshold of 0.5 IU/mL, 5 of 78 patients (6.4%) required dose adjustment; 1 hemodialysis dependent patient, 2 patients with CrCl < 30 mL/min, 1 patient each with CrCl 30–60 and > 60 mL/min, respectively. None of these patients developed bleeding or recurrent VTE. Among all 78 patients, 1 hemodialysis-dependent patient developed a hematoma following a traumatic line insertion, and no patients developed recurrent VTE. In conclusion, in a cohort of 78 patients with differing degrees of renal function including patients requiring hemodialysis, use of therapeutic-dose tinzaparin for the initial treatment of VTE resulted in accumulation (defined by trough anti-Xa > 0.5 IU/mL) in 6% of patients. There appears to be a weak inverse relationship between renal function and trough anti-Xa levels, but does not result in clinically significant accumulation when tinzaparin is used for up to 7 days. Further evaluation of tinzaparin in patients with severe renal insufficiency is required. Figure Figure

Bridging with enoxaparin using a half-therapeutic dose regimen: safety and efficacy

VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klamroth ◽  
Gottstein ◽  
Essers ◽  
Landgraf
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Thromboembolic Risk

Background: Low molecular weight heparin is widely used during the interruption of long-term oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing surgery. The optimal dose is still a matter of debate. The 8th ACCP Guidelines primarily recommend therapeutic-dose or low-dose low molecular weight heparin after stratification of the thromboembolic risk. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a standardized bridging therapy with enoxaparin in a half-therapeutic dose in patients with a target INR of 2,0 to 3,0. Patients and methods: In our prospective registry we studied 198 consecutive patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy with phenprocuomon and a planned surgery. Phenprocoumon was stopped 7 days before surgery and after reaching an INR less than 2,0 all patients received enoxaparin in a half-therapeutic dose (1 × 1 mg / kg body weight (bw)/day) until the day before surgery. Enoxaparin was continued with the same dose split into 2 × 0,5 mg / kg bw / day after the procedure. Phenprocoumon was resumed within day 1 to 14 after surgery depending on the bleeding risk as determined by the surgeon. All patients were followed up for 28 days after surgery. Results: Major surgery was performed in 148 patients (75 %). 175 patients (88 % of the total) had an intermediate thromboembolic risk. On average, enoxaparin was administered for 19,5 days. One patient (0,5 %) experienced arterial thrombosis after surgery, and one patient (0,5 %) required a second surgical intervention due to severe bleeding. Conclusions: In patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy with a target INR of 2,0-3,0 and at an intermediate risk of thromboembolic events who require interruption of oral anticoagulant therapy a half therapeutic dose of enoxaparin seems to be safe and effective for bridging.

Randomized Trial of the Effect of the Low Molecular Weight Heparin Nadroparin on Survival in Patients With Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 2071-2076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederiek F. van Doormaal ◽  
Marcello Di Nisio ◽  
Hans-Martin Otten ◽  
Dick J. Richel ◽  
Martin Prins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Purpose Earlier studies showed that low molecular weight heparin significantly prolongs the survival of a wide variety of patients with cancer without venous thromboembolism. This study was designed to confirm these findings in a more homogeneous group of patients with cancer. Patients and Methods In this multicenter, randomized, open-label study, patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (stage IIIB), hormone-refractory prostate cancer, or locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to nadroparin or to no nadroparin in addition to their standard anticancer treatment. In the nadroparin arm, subcutaneous nadroparin was administered for 6 weeks (2 weeks at therapeutic dose, and 4 weeks at half therapeutic dose). The patients were eligible to receive additional cycles of nadroparin (2 weeks at therapeutic dose, and 4 weeks of washout period). Outcomes were overall survival, time to progression, and major bleeding. All study outcomes were adjudicated by an independent, blinded committee. Results A total of 244 patients were allocated to nadroparin, and 259 were allocated to the control group. A median survival of 13.1 months was observed in the nadroparin recipients compared with 11.9 months in the no-treatment arm (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.18, adjusted for cancer type). No difference in time to progression was observed. The number of major bleedings was comparable at 4.1% in the nadroparin set and 3.5% in the control set. Conclusion This study did not show a survival benefit of nadroparin in patients with advanced prostate, lung, or pancreatic cancer. Given the ongoing studies in this area and the previous data, the role of low molecular weight heparins in cancer survival remains undefined.

scholarly journals Therapeutic dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin may decrease mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-468
Author(s):  
Kadir Canoglu ◽  
Bengu Saylan
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Coagulation Parameters ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Prophylactic Dose

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism or extensive thrombosis is relatively common in patients with severe COVID-19 infection and has been associated with increased mortality. During the current COVID-19 pandemic, several prophylactic doses and types of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) are being used worldwide; however, there are no high-quality studies or recommendations for an optimal prophylactic LMWH dose. OBJECTIVES: Investigate the relationship between coagulation parameters and the LMWH dose, and mortality and ICU admission in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on clinical features, coagulation parameters and anticoagulant medications of inpatients with severe COVID-19 were collected for the period between 11 March 2020 and 31 April 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and ICU admission for prophylactic dose LMWH (0.5 mg/kg twice daily) and therapeutic dose LMWH (1 mg/kg twice daily). SAMPLE SIZE: 154 cases. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (63.6%) patients were treated with the LMWH prophylactic dose and 56 (36.4%) patients were treated with the therapeutic dose. Forty-four (44.9%) of 98 patients using the prophylactic dose LMWH died, while 10 (17.9%) of 56 patients using the therapeutic dose LMWH died ( P =.001). Mortality was 6.4-fold higher in the prophylactic dose LMWH users than in the therapeutic dose LMWH users (OR=6.5, 95% CI: 2.4–17.6, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic dosing of LMWH may decrease mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 infected pneumonia. More aggressive thromboprophylaxis regimens using higher doses of heparin should be evaluated in prospective studies. LIMITATIONS: Lack of information about bleeding complications. LMWH was not compared with other anticoagulant therapies. There was no comparison between our two groups on the APACHE score. Used different doses of LMWH in different clinics in our hospital. Single-center, retrospective study. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

scholarly journals Feasibility of Anticoagulation Using Low Molecular‑Weight Heparin During Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis 

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghui Li ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Rongzhou He ◽  
Junmeng Zheng ◽  
Zhibo Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Infusion Rate ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis

Abstract Background: The optimal anticoagulant scheme during catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) remains unknown. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin (LMWH) during CDT for DVT.Methods: The clinical data of DVT patients who underwent CDT during the past six years was retrospectively collected and reviewed. Patients were divided into therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (TPDA) and sub therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (sub-TPDA) groups according to LMWH dosage.Results: A total of 61 patients involving 61 limbs were comprised. Acute and subacute DVT were identified in 39 (63.9%) and 22 (36.1%) patients, respectively. Thrombosis involving the iliac vein was identified in 34 (55.7%) patients. Inferior vena cava filter placement was performed in 38 (62.3%) patients. Intraoperatively, adjunctive balloons, stents, and thrombectomy were provided for nine (14.8%), four (6.6%), and one (1.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty (32.8%) patients accepted TPDA therapy, while 41 (67.2%) patients were administrated with sub-TPDA therapy. Median urokinase infusion rate was 2.5 (0.83 to 5) x 104 U/h. Median infusion duration time was 4 (2 to 14) days, and median urokinase dose infused was 2.4 (0.6 to 10.80) x 106 U. During CDT, five (8.2%) cases of minor bleeding were observed, and blood transfusion was not required. No major bleeding, symptomatic pulmonary embolisms, or death occurred. Complete (>90%) and partial thrombolysis (50~90%) were achieved in 56 (91.8%) patients. In comparison with sub-TPDA group, TPDA group exhibited no significant difference in baseline characteristics, clinical improvement, thrombolysis results, and complications. Conclusions: Anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin during CDT with low infusion rate for DVT is likely to be feasible and safe. Sub-therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and therapeutic-dose could be used for CDT with similar clinical outcome and bleeding complications.

scholarly journals Feasibility of Anticoagulation Using Low Molecular‑Weight Heparin During Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for  Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghui Li ◽  
Junwei Wang ◽  
Rongzhou He ◽  
Junmeng Zheng ◽  
Zhibo Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Infusion Rate ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis

Abstract Background: The optimal anticoagulant scheme during catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) remains unknown. This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin (LMWH) during CDT for DVT.Methods: The clinical data of DVT patients who underwent CDT during the past six years was retrospectively collected and reviewed. Patients were divided into therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (TPDA) and sub therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (sub-TPDA) groups according to LMWH dosage.Results: A total of 61 patients involving 61 limbs were comprised. Acute and subacute DVT were identified in 39 (63.9%) and 22 (36.1%) patients, respectively. Thrombosis involving the iliac vein was identified in 34 (55.7%) patients. Inferior vena cava filter placement was performed in 38 (62.3%) patients. Intraoperatively, adjunctive balloons, stents, and thrombectomy were provided for nine (14.8%), four (6.6%), and one (1.6%) patients, respectively. Twenty (32.8%) patients accepted TPDA therapy, while 41 (67.2%) patients were administrated with sub-TPDA therapy. Median urokinase infusion rate was 2.5 (0.83 to 5) x 104 U/h. Median infusion duration time was 4 (2 to 14) days, and median urokinase dose infused was 2.4 (0.6 to 10.80) x 106 U. During CDT, five (8.2%) cases of minor bleeding were observed, and blood transfusion was not required. No major bleeding, symptomatic pulmonary embolisms, or death occurred. Complete (>90%) and partial thrombolysis (50~90%) were achieved in 56 (91.8%) patients. In comparison with sub-TPDA group, TPDA group exhibited no significant differences in baseline characteristics, clinical improvement, thrombolysis results, and complications. Conclusions: Anticoagulation therapy using low molecular‑weight heparin during CDT with low infusion rate for DVT is likely to be feasible and safe. Sub-therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and therapeutic-dose could be used for CDT with similar clinical outcome and bleeding complications.

Bridging anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin after interruption of warfarin therapy is associated with a residual anticoagulant effect prior to surgery

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (09) ◽  
pp. 528-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Woods ◽  
Gary A. Foster ◽  
Mark A. Crowther ◽  
James D. Douketis
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Therapeutic Dose ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Warfarin Therapy ◽  
Anticoagulant Effect ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
Bridging Anticoagulation

SummaryBridging anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is common in patients who require temporary interruption of warfarin before surgery or a procedure, but whether such patients have a residual anticoagulant effect just before a procedure is not known. Consecutive patients who received bridging anticoagulation with LMWH had anti-Xa levels measured just before a procedure. The proportion of patients with a residual anticoagulant effect, defined as an anti-Xa level ≥0.10 IU/ml, was determined. Multivariable regression analysis identified predictors of a residual anticoagulant effect, expressed as an odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). A pre-procedure residual anticoagulant effect was detected in 12 of 73 (16%) patients overall, in 11 of 37 (30%) patients who received therapeutic-dose LMWH, and in 1 of 36 patients (3%) who received low-dose LMWH. Receiving therapeutic- dose LMWH (OR = 118.8; 95% CI: 5.8, 999.9), and increasing age (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.3, 12.5) were predictors of a residual pre-procedure anticoagulant effect. In patients who require bridging anticoagulation with LMWH, a residual anticoagulant effect from LMWH is detected in 1 of 6 patients, and receiving therapeutic-dose LMWH is the strongest predictor of such an effect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document