scholarly journals Legal technique of interpretation of the law: theoretical and legal aspecks

2021 ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
Zh. O. Dzeiko

In her work, the author proposes a system of means, methods, techniques and rules for the exercise of legal activity by subjects of law to understand and, if necessary, to explain the content of the law, aimed at obtaining a legal result. It is true that the main features of legal technology for the interpretation of norms of law are: it is a relatively autonomous element of the legal situation, which derives from its qualitative and quantitative characteristics; The essence of the legal technique of interpreting norms of law is that it corresponds to the essence of the law and the level of development of the legal system; its application is carried out as a result of the thoughtful, willful activity of subjects of law; The content of the legal technique for interpreting the law includes a system of means, means, techniques and rules for understanding and, where necessary, explaining the law; In the form in which its content is expressed, the legal technique of interpreting the rules of law is embodied in certain means, methods, techniques and rules; the legal technique of interpreting the rules of law may be classified into types; The role and importance of the legal technique in the interpretation of norms of law is revealed in the law-making and in the implementation of norms; the legal technique of the interpretation of norms of law is mainly based on the achievements of the legal science, namely the theory of law; The application of the legal technique to the interpretation of the law must be within the limits of the law. The legal technique of interpreting the norms of law should serve to affirm, safeguard and realize human and civil rights and freedoms. The essence and social function of legal technology in the interpretation of norms of law is manifested in law-making and in the implementation of norms of law. Keywords: rule of law, law-making, realization rule of law, interpretation rule of law, legal technique, legal technique of interpretation of the law

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Shoxrukhkhon Saidov ◽  

This article describes the specifics of the law-making process conducted by the prosecutor's office. The purpose and principles of the prosecutor's office's participation in this process have been studied scientifically and theoretically. Taking into account the high relevance of ensuring legality in the law-making process, opinions were expressed about the need for adequate regulation and organization of solving this task by the prosecutor's office at the level of law and legality. The participation of the prosecutor's office in law-making activities contradicts the needs of the population, the protection of human and civil rights and freedoms, ensuring the rule of law, promoting the formation of a unified legal space and improving legislation, ensuring consistency legal instructions, systematization of legislation, scientifically based analysis are aimed at reducing the influence of bureaucratic interests and preventing the inclusion of factors that generate corruption in normative acts and their projects


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianlan Wu

The rule of law as a globally recognised concept is multi-faceted (Chesterman, 2008). In the common-law tradition, it is conceived through a formal and substantive framework. In essence, it centres on the supremacy of the law over the arbitrary exercise of power and the formal legality of the law (Tamanaha, 2004, p. 115; Cotterrell, 1992, p. 157). The rule-of-law concept has been criticised as being of unique European origin, where plural social organisation and universal natural law constitute its two preconditions (Unger, 1977, pp. 80–110). It has, however, been advocated around the world as one essential principle leading to modernity, where the legitimacy of the law based on the formal and substantive rule of law serves as a strong symbol for a modern society (Deflem, 1996, p. 5).


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Olga A. Fomicheva ◽  

The people’s participation forms in the legislative process are analyzes in article. To essence of understanding the legislative process changing are given arguments. The necessary to form national projects for the democratic foundations development in Russian, including within the framework of ensuring the implementation of citizens’ rights to participate in the legislative process are author concludes.


Author(s):  
Вадим Павлов ◽  
Vadim Pavlov

the article deals with the development of the modern theory of law-making process. The main changes that took place in the sphere of law-making in the post-Soviet period are analyzed. The importance of the use of such a modern law-making tool as regulatory impact assessment is considered. The analysis of the process of lawmaking from the perspective of anthropology of law is offered. The rule of law and its normativity in the anthropological approach do not precisely express the essence of law, but are only its substantive basis. The essence of law is necessarily expressed with the participation of a person in law, a subject involved in legal interaction. In addition to the rule of law and human rights in law, the third element of legal reality is significant – the fact of legal life, which reveals both the normative properties of the legal system, and reveals the legal properties of a person in law. Thus, in the anthropological approach, the rule of law and the normativity of law in comparison with the classical theory of law-making acquire a new meaning, characterized by the fact that in a General sense it can be called anthropologization of law, the acquisition of its human dimension. On this basis, the theory and practice of lawmaking should focus on the development of the doctrine of the interpretation of law, as well as on the practice of its implementation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (XXI) ◽  
pp. 117-133
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Wentkowska ◽  
Sławomir Tkacz
Keyword(s):  
The Law ◽  
The One ◽  

The time of COVID- 19 pandemia presents a number of challenges for policymakers and enforcement of law. On the one hand, they are related to the need to quickly respond to threats concerning the spread of the epidemic, on the other hand, the need to maintain standards related to the obligation to implement the values of law. The measures taken to protect the life and health of citizens, in particular the restrictions introduced by executive acts, undoubtedly undermine the assumption that the law creates a system. The first part of the article present philosophical and legal reference to the issues of law-making in the time of pandemia. The second part contains a study of cases of the Ombudsman. The text ends with short reflections presented as a summary


Author(s):  
Made Hendra Wijaya

This research titled, the existence of the concept of rule by law (state law) within thestate theories of law the rule of law, which is where the first problem: How can theadvantages of Rule by Law in the theory of law Rule of Law?, How is the dis advantages of aconcept of Rule by law in the theory of law Rule of Law.This research method using the method of normative, legal research that examines thewritten laws of the various aspects, ie aspects of the theory, history, philosophy, comparative,structure and composition, scope, and content, consistent, overview, and chapter by chapter,formality, and the binding force of a law, and the legal language used, but did not examine orimlementasi applied aspects. By using this approach of Historical analysis and approach oflegal conceptual analysis.In this research have found that the advantages of the concept of Rule by Law lies in theproviding of certainty, can also be social control for the community, thus ensuring all citizensin good order at all reciprocal relationships within the community. And Disadvantages of theconcept of Rule by Law if the Law which legalized state action is not supported by democracyand human rights, and the principles of justice, there will be a denial of human rights,widespread poverty, and racial segregation, and if the law is only utilized out by theauthorities as a means to legalize all forms of actions that violate human can inflicttotalitarian nature of the ruling


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 217-242
Author(s):  
Cian C. MURPHY

AbstractThis article examines counter-terrorism efforts in the EU as it matures as a field of law. It sets out three critiques of EU counter-terrorism law: that of ineffectiveness, of anti-constitutionalism, and of contrariness to human rights and the rule of law. It considers these critiques in light of the development of policies and legal initiatives—against foreign terrorist fighters and against radicalisation. It concludes that there are both persistent problems, and some improvements, in the law. The EU's capacity to meet the challenges posed by terrorism and the counter-terrorism imperative, and how it does so, has global impact. The article concludes with an argument for better law-making in the EU to ensure it serves as a better exemplar of transnational law.


Jus Cogens ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franco Peirone

Abstract There is a perennial ambiguity in the rule-of-law preposition: it predicates that the law shall rule, but which law? This legal loophole has led to a diverse array of interpretations of the concept. Of these, two appear particularly adverse to what the rule of law should primarily be—the rulership of the law—yet still remain dominant. On the one hand, the rule of law is intended to be the vehicle to deliver above-the-law goods such as human rights or other individual entitlements like property, and to forever shield them against any other force, including the law. On the other hand, the rule of law is believed to be a tool at the rulers’ disposal, who make use of the law but are not bound by it, for either legal or practical reasons. In both cases, a pre-legal setting for society allocates rulership to something but not the law, against the very essence of the ideal: an authoritative legal practice for the sake of regulating the present society. As such, the rule of law has to meet certain requirements of craftsmanship, like conditions in law-making and law-enforcement, and sources, which are to be democratically underpinned.


Author(s):  
I. E. Mikheeva

The author analyzes the application of the principle of good faith by courts when considering disputes as a rule of law The article concludes that since good faith is an evaluative concept, there are no criteria for it in the law, when applying the principle of good faith by courts, it is necessary to specify and clarify the criteria of good faith for the consideration of specifi c disputes. Courts form rules, in some cases different from the rules established by the law, after which they are widely applied as rules of law. The paper concludes that the recognition of the possibility of applying the principles of law as norms of law determines the appearance of the law- making role of courts. The article concludes that liability under article 10 of the civil code for violation of the principle of good faith also indicates the possibility of applying the principle of good faith as a rule of law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document