What Works for Forensic Psychiatric Patients: From Treatment Evaluations to Short and Long-Term Outcomes

2020 ◽  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0217127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Delfin ◽  
Hedvig Krona ◽  
Peter Andiné ◽  
Erik Ryding ◽  
Märta Wallinius ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Martin Hildebrand ◽  
Corine de Ruiter

In this article, the possibilities of forensic psychological assessment by means of several diagnostic methods (i.e., the MMPI-2 and the Rorschach Inkblot Method) are reviewed. A case example illustrates the serious personality pathology that is often present in forensic psychiatric patients. The basic premise of this case example is that the psychologist’s armamentarium of assessment techniques can be strengthened by using the MMPI-2 and the Rorschach together in a complimentary fashion, and these can be of value in evaluating progress (i.e., change in psychopathology) during long-term forensic psychiatric treatment. It is concluded that only the objective measurement of such change, using reliable and valid psychological tests, can increase our knowledge of the effectiveness of forensic psychiatric treatment


2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Clarke ◽  
Steffan Davies ◽  
Clive Hollin ◽  
Conor Duggan

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Janković ◽  
Geert van Boxtel ◽  
Erik Masthoff ◽  
Elien De Caluwé ◽  
Stefan Bogaerts

The long-term changes of dynamic risk and protective factors have rarely been studied in forensic psychiatric patients. We utilized a latent growth curve analysis to investigate trajectories of risk and protective factors over time in all 722 male forensic psychiatric patients who were unconditionally released between 2004 and 2014 from any of 12 Dutch forensic psychiatric centers (FPCs). The study covered the period from juridical observation until unconditional release. Moreover, we investigated whether these trajectories differ between patients depending on their psychiatric diagnosis namely substance use disorders (SUD), psychotic disorders, and cluster B personality disorders (PDs). In addition, we also investigated whether SUD may influence changes in risk and protective factors in a group of psychotic and cluster B PDs patients, respectively. Overall, findings suggest that all changes in dynamic risk and protective factors could be depicted by two phases of patients' stay in the FPCs. Specifically, most changes on dynamic risk and protective factors occurred at the beginning of treatment, that is, from the time of juridical assessment up to the time of unguided leave. Moreover, the moment of unguided leave could be considered the ‘turning point’ in the treatment of offenders. We also found that SUD and psychotic patients changed the most in the first phase of their stay, while cluster B PDs patients changed the most in the second phase. However, SUD did not modify changes in risk and protective factors in psychotic and cluster B PDs patients. These findings may help improve offender treatment and crime prevention strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document