scholarly journals Penicillin Allergy De-labeling Results in Significant Changes in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Hills ◽  
Nicola Arroll ◽  
Eamon Duffy ◽  
Janice Capstick ◽  
Anthony Jordan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Penicillin Allergy ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Data Repository ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Dispensing Data ◽  
Antibiotic Courses

Unverified penicillin allergies are common but most patients with a penicillin allergy label can safely use penicillin antibiotics. Penicillin allergy labels are associated with poor clinical outcomes and overuse of second-line antibiotics. There is increasing focus on penicillin allergy “de-labeling” as a tool to improve antibiotic prescribing and antimicrobial stewardship. The effect of outpatient penicillin allergy de-labeling on long-term antibiotic use is uncertain. We performed a retrospective pre- and post- study of antibiotic dispensing patterns, from an electronic dispensing data repository, in patients undergoing penicillin allergy assessment at Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand. Over a mean follow-up of 4.55 years, 215/304 (70.7%) of de-labeled patients were dispensed a penicillin antibiotic. Rates of penicillin antibiotic dispensing were 0.24 (0.18–0.30) penicillin courses per year before de-labeling and 0.80 (0.67–0.93) following de-labeling with a reduction in total antibiotic use from 2.30 (2.06–2.54) to 1.79 (1.59–1.99) antibiotic courses per year. In de-labeled patients, the proportion of antibiotic courses that were penicillin antibiotics increased from 12.81 to 39.62%. Rates of macrolide, cephalosporin, trimethoprim/co-trimoxazole, fluoroquinolone, “other” non-penicillin antibiotic use, and broad-spectrum antibiotic use were all lower following de-labeling. Further, antibiotic costs were lower following de-labeling. In this study, penicillin allergy de-labeling was associated with significant changes in antibiotic dispensing patterns.

scholarly journals 199. Evaluating long-term care pharmacy dispense data to monitor antibiotic use in U.S. nursing homes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S104-S104
Author(s):  
Katryna A Gouin ◽  
Stephen M Creasy ◽  
Manjiri Kulkarni ◽  
Martha Wdowicki ◽  
Nimalie D Stone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
National Level ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Days Of Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Courses

Abstract Background Automated reporting of antibiotic use (AU) in nursing homes (NHs) may help to identify opportunities to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and inform implementation of stewardship activities. The majority of U.S. NHs contract with long-term care (LTC) pharmacies to dispense prescriptions and provide medication monitoring and reviews. We investigated the feasibility of leveraging LTC pharmacy electronic dispensing data to describe AU in NHs. Methods We analyzed all NH antibiotic dispenses and monthly resident-days in 2017 reported by a large LTC pharmacy. The dispense-level data included facility and resident identifiers, antibiotic class and agent, dispense date and days of therapy (DOT) dispensed. We identified NH antibiotic courses, inclusive of both antibiotic starts and continuations from hospital-initiated courses, by collapsing dispenses of the same drug to the same resident if the subsequent dispense was within three days of the preceding end date. The course duration was the sum of DOT for all dispenses in the course. The AU rate was reported as DOT and courses per 1,000 resident-days. Results AU was described in 326,713 residents admitted to 1,348 NHs (9% of U.S. NHs), covering 38.1 million resident-days. There were 576,228 dispenses for a total of 3.3 million antibiotic DOT at a rate of 86 DOT/1,000 resident-days. After collapsing dispenses, 324,306 antibiotic courses were defined at a rate of 9 courses/1,000 resident-days. During the year, 45% of residents received an antibiotic. The most frequently prescribed classes by DOT and courses were cephalosporins, penicillins, urinary anti-infectives and quinolones (Fig. 1). The top agents by DOT were levofloxacin (12%), sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (12%) and cephalexin (11%). Most course durations were 1–7 days (54%) or 8–14 days (35%) (Fig. 2). Long-term antibiotic courses (> 30 days) contributed to 5% of courses and 30% of overall DOT. The mean duration per course was 7.5 days when courses > 30 days were excluded. Figure 1. Distribution of antibiotic courses and days of therapy by antibiotic class for 324,306 antibiotic courses and 3.3 million days of antibiotic therapy dispensed to 1,348 nursing homes from a long-term care pharmacy in 2017 Figure 2. Distribution of antibiotic course duration and cumulative percent of total antibiotic days of therapy for 324,306 antibiotic courses dispensed to 1,348 nursing homes from a long-term care pharmacy in 2017 Conclusion LTC pharmacy dispenses may be an accessible data source to report NH AU rates and prescribing patterns by antibiotic class and agent. Further evaluation of data sources for facility- and national-level AU reporting in NHs is needed to support stewardship implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Informing the development of a standardised approach to measure antibiotic use in secondary care: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e026792
Author(s):  
Selina Patel ◽  
Arnoupe Jhass ◽  
Susan Hopkins ◽  
Laura Shallcross
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Care ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption ◽  
Antibiotic Usage ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Antibiotic Consumption Surveillance

IntroductionEcological and individual-level evidence indicates that there is an association between level of antibiotic exposure and the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance. The Global Point Prevalence Survey in 2015 estimated that 34.4% of hospital inpatients globally received at least one antimicrobial. Antimicrobial stewardship to optimise antibiotic use in secondary care can reduce the high risk of patients acquiring and transmitting drug-resistant infections in this setting. However, differences in the availability of data on antibiotic use in this context make it difficult to develop a consensus of how to comparably monitor antibiotic prescribing patterns across secondary care. This review will aim to document and critically evaluate methods and measures to monitor antibiotic use in secondary care.Methods and analysisWe will search Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and websites of key organisations for published reports where an attempt to measure antibiotic usage among adult inpatients in high-income hospital settings has been made. Two independent reviewers will screen the studies for eligibility, extract data and assess the study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A description of the methods and measures used in antibiotic consumption surveillance will be presented. An adaptation of the Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects Equity framework will be used to consider the practicality of implementing different approaches to measuring antibiotic usage in secondary care settings. A descriptive comparison of definitions and estimates of (in)appropriate antibiotic usage will also be carried out.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required for this study as no primary data will be collected. The results will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences or meetings where possible. This review will inform future approaches to scale up antibiotic consumption surveillance strategies to attempt to maximise impact through standardisation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018103375

scholarly journals Trends and patterns of antibiotic prescribing at orthopedic inpatient departments of two private-sector hospitals in Central India: A 10-year observational study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245902
Author(s):  
Kristina Skender ◽  
Vivek Singh ◽  
Cecilia Stalsby-Lundborg ◽  
Megha Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Design Patterns ◽  
Central India ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Essential Medicines ◽  
World Health ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Defined Daily Doses

Background Frequent antibiotic prescribing in departments with high infection risk like orthopedics prominently contributes to the global increase of antibiotic resistance. However, few studies present antibiotic prescribing patterns and trends among orthopedic inpatients. Aim To compare and present the patterns and trends of antibiotic prescription over 10 years for orthopedic inpatients in a teaching (TH) and a non-teaching hospital (NTH) in Central India. Methods Data from orthopedic inpatients (TH-6446; NTH-4397) were collected using a prospective cross-sectional study design. Patterns were compared based on the indications and corresponding antibiotic treatments, mean Defined Daily Doses (DDD)/1000 patient-days, adherence to the National List of Essential Medicines India (NLEMI) and the World Health Organization Model List of Essential Medicines (WHOMLEM). Antibiotic prescriptions were analyzed separately for the operated and the non-operated inpatients. Linear regression was used to analyze the time trends of antibiotic prescribing; in total through DDD/1000 patient-days and by antibiotic groups. Results Third generation cephalosporins were the most prescribed antibiotic class (TH-39%; NTH-65%) and fractures were the most common indications (TH-48%; NTH-48%). Majority of the operated inpatients (TH-99%; NTH-97%) were prescribed pre-operative prophylactic antibiotics. The non-operated inpatients were also prescribed antibiotics (TH-40%; NTH-75%), although few of them had infectious diagnoses (TH-8%; NTH-14%). Adherence to the NLEMI was lower (TH-31%; NTH-34%) than adherence to the WHOMLEM (TH-65%; NTH-62%) in both hospitals. Mean DDD/1000 patient-days was 16 times higher in the TH (2658) compared to the NTH (162). Total antibiotic prescribing increased over 10 years (TH-β = 3.23; NTH-β = 1.02). Conclusion Substantial number of inpatients were prescribed antibiotics without clear infectious indications. Adherence to the NLEMI and the WHOMLEM was low in both hospitals. Antibiotic use increased in both hospitals over 10 years and was higher in the TH than in the NTH. The need for developing and implementing local antibiotic prescribing guidelines is emphasized.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of antiepileptic drugs in children and adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-228
Author(s):  
Roza M. Shaimardanova ◽  
Rimma G. Gamirova
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Antiepileptic Drugs ◽  
Focal Epilepsy ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Long Term Observation ◽  
Patients With Epilepsy

AIM: To conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of epilepsy therapy with antiepileptic drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis of the treatment of 428 patients with epilepsy at the Childrens City Hospital No. 8 in Kazan, receiving antiepileptic drugs. RESULTS: It was found that valproic acid is more effective in the treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsies compared to focal epilepsies (p = 0.0006). Valproate and carbamazepine were the most effective in the treatment of focal epilepsy with short- and long-term follow-up. Valproic acid is more effective than topiramate (p = 0.02), oxcarbazepine (p = 0.003), and levetiracetam (p = 0.003) in the treatment of focal epilepsy in short- and long-term follow-up. Carbamazepine is more effective than topiramate (p = 0.01), oxcarbazepine (p = 0.02), and levetiracetam (p = 0.001) in the treatment of focal epilepsy in long-term follow-up. It was revealed that more often they complained about side effects when using carbamazepine (63.2%). Levetiracetam was found to be better tolerated compared to valproate (p = 0.0006) and carbamazepine (p = 0.0006). Topiramate is better tolerated than carbamazepine (p = 0.02) and valproate (p = 0.03). Oxcarbazepine is better tolerated than carbamazepine in women (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: When choosing an antiepileptic drug, it is necessary to be guided by the principle: first the basic, and then the drugs of the next generations, in the future, rely on information about the tolerability of the drug. It is necessary to evaluate the therapeutic effect of antiepileptic drugs with long-term observation, and use the criterion of complete absence of seizures as an indicator of the effectiveness of drugs.

scholarly journals The Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Program: A Multicenter Whole-of-Hospital Health Services Intervention and Comparative Effectiveness Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyra Y L Chua ◽  
Sara Vogrin ◽  
Susan Bury ◽  
Abby Douglas ◽  
Natasha E Holmes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Propensity Score Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Penicillin Allergy ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Relative Risk Ratio ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Narrow Spectrum ◽  
Oral Penicillin

Abstract Background Penicillin allergies are associated with inferior patient and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes. We implemented a whole-of-hospital program to assess the efficacy of inpatient delabeling for low-risk penicillin allergies in hospitalized inpatients. Methods Patients ≥ 18 years of age with a low-risk penicillin allergy were offered a single-dose oral penicillin challenge or direct label removal based on history (direct delabeling). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients delabeled. Key secondary endpoints were antibiotic utilization pre- (index admission) and post-delabeling (index admission and 90 days). Results Between 21 January 2019 and 31 August 2019, we assessed 1791 patients reporting 2315 antibiotic allergies, 1225 with a penicillin allergy. Three hundred fifty-five patients were delabeled: 161 by direct delabeling and 194 via oral penicillin challenge. Ninety-seven percent (194/200) of patients were negative upon oral penicillin challenge. In the delabeled patients, we observed an increase in narrow-spectrum penicillin usage (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 10.51 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.39–20.48]), improved appropriate antibiotic prescribing (adjusted OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.45–3.13]), and a reduction in restricted antibiotic usage (adjusted OR, 0.38 [95% CI, .27–.54]). In the propensity score analysis, there was an increase in narrow-spectrum penicillins (OR, 10.89 [95% CI, 5.09–23.31]) and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (OR, 6.68 [95% CI, 3.94–11.35]) and a reduction in restricted antibiotic use (OR, 0.52 [95% CI, .36–.74]) and inappropriate prescriptions (relative risk ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, .26–.72]) in the delabeled group compared with the group who retained their allergy label. Conclusions This health services program using a combination of direct delabeling and oral penicillin challenge resulted in significant impacts on the use of preferred antibiotics and appropriate prescribing.

scholarly journals 966. A Closer Look at Antibiotic Prescribing for Upper Respiratory Illnesses (URI) in People with HIV Compared with People Without HIV

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S31-S31
Author(s):  
Anum Abbas ◽  
Mackenzie R Keintz ◽  
Elizabeth Lyden ◽  
Jihyun Ma ◽  
Sara H Bares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Private Insurance ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Antibiotic Overuse ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Icd 10

Abstract Background Antibiotic overuse is widespread, increasing healthcare cost and promoting antimicrobial resistance. People with HIV (PWH) who develop URIs may be assumed “higher risk,” compared with non-PWH, but comparative antibiotic use evaluations have not been performed. We evaluated antibiotic prescribing patterns for URI diagnoses (cough, sinusitis, bronchitis, and cold) in PWH and non-PWH. Methods This was an observational, single-center study comparing PWH and non-PWH diagnosed with URI (using ICD 10 codes for URI syndromes: cough, sinusitis, bronchitis, and cold) between January 1, 2014 and April 30, 2018. Patients were empaneled in an outpatient primary care clinic or specialty care clinic in one healthcare system. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was defined based on published guidelines. Fisher’s exact test compared categorical variables with antibiotic prescribing patterns. Each encounter was considered an independent event. Results The two groups (PWH and non-PWH) were similar, with 34% of subjects in both groups being female. PWH had median CD4+ count of 610 cells/mm3 with 91% on antiretrovirals and 77% with HIV RNA < 20 copies/mL. Overall, 37% of visits resulted in antibiotic prescriptions, 92% of which were inappropriate (discordant with guidelines). Antibiotics were prescribed slightly more frequently in non-PWH (40% vs. 33%, P = 0.056; Figure 1) and inappropriate more often in non-PWH (37% vs. 30%, P = 0.029). Over 20% of PWH antibiotic prescriptions were too long, and 22% of non-PWH received the wrong drug (Figure 2; P = 0.011). 47% of the non-PWH receiving antibiotics for URI had private insurance (compared with other payers; P < 0.0001) vs. 33% in PWH (P = 0.32) (Figure 3). Conclusion Outpatient antibiotic overuse remains prevalent among patients evaluated for URIs. This is the first study, to our knowledge, comparing antibiotic use for URIs in PWH compared with non-PWH. Counterintuitively, we found less-frequent inappropriate antibiotic use in PWH. We speculate that PWH are more likely to be evaluated by infectious disease/HIV specialists, possibly explaining the lower rate of antibiotic prescriptions for URIs in this population. Future analyses will evaluate the association between provider specialty and inappropriate antibiotic use. Disclosures All Authors: No reported Disclosures.

scholarly journals Durability and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) Treatment in Patients with Recurrent C. difficile Infection

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S384-S385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yafet Mamo ◽  
Michael Woodworth ◽  
Kaitlin Sitchenko ◽  
Tanvi Dhere ◽  
Colleen Kraft
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Fecal Microbiota ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Fecal Microbiota Transplant

Abstract Background Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has been shown to be safe and effective for treatment of recurrent C. difficile infection (RCDI). The aim of this study is to determine factors impacting the durability of FMT and assess patient long-term clinical outcomes and satisfaction with the procedure. Methods Eligible patients who had received FMT for RCDI at Emory Hospital between July 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 were contacted via telephone for a follow up survey. Of 232 patients who received FMT, 27 were deceased and 15 were unable to be reached with listed phone number. Of the remaining 190 eligible patients, 137 patients completed the survey. Results The median time-period between FMT and follow up was 22 months. Median number of failed antibiotic courses for RCDI before FMT was 4. Overall, 82% (113/137) of patients experienced resolution of RCDI post-FMT (non-RCDI group) while 18% (24/137) of patients had recurrence of CDI post-FMT (RCDI group). In the RCDI and non-RCDI groups, antibiotic use post-FMT for non- C. difficile-related infections was 75% and 38% (P = 0.0004), respectively. PPI use post-FMT was 38% and 31% (P = 0.28), and probiotic use post-FMT was 63% and 41% (P = 0.026) in the RCDI and non-RCDI groups, respectively. There were 18 hospitalizations in the RCDI group and 9 were related to C. difficile complications; of the 36 hospitalizations in the non-RCDI group, only 1 was related to chronic complication of a previous C. difficile infection. Overall, 11% of patients reported improvement or resolution of medical conditions not related to CDI post-FMT while 33% reported diagnosis of a new medical condition or development of new symptoms; none of the new medical conditions or symptoms were attributable to the procedure. In all, 95% of patients indicated willingness to undergo FMT in the future if they experience another bout of C. difficile infection. Conclusion The findings show that FMT is a highly effective treatment option for RCDI with a cure rate, defined as resolution of RCDI post-FMT or recurrence attributable to antibiotic use post-FMT, of 96% (131/137) in the study group. Furthermore, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction post-FMT indicate the safety of the procedure. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Antibiotic Use in Long-Term–Care Facilities: Many Unanswered Questions

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 680-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Loeb
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Quantitative Relation ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

AbstractThe extensive use of antibiotics in long-term–care facilities has led to increasing concern about the potential for the development of antibiotic resistance. Relatively little is known, however, about the quantitative relation between antibiotic use and resistance in this population. A better understanding of the underlying factors that account for variance in antibiotic use, unexplained by detected infections, is needed. To optimize antibiotic use, evidence-based standards for empirical antibiotic prescribing need to be developed. Limitations in current diagnostic testing for infection in residents of long-term–care facilities pose a substantial challenge to developing such standards.

scholarly journals Diarrhoea and preadmission antibiotic exposure in COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study of 1153 hospitalised patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000593
Author(s):  
Bilal Akhter Mateen ◽  
Sandip Samanta ◽  
Sebastian Tullie ◽  
Sarah O’Neill ◽  
Zillah Cargill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Prescribing Patterns ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Hospitalised Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Residual Confounding

ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to describe community antibiotic prescribing patterns in individuals hospitalised with COVID-19, and to determine the association between experiencing diarrhoea, stratified by preadmission exposure to antibiotics, and mortality risk in this cohort.Design/methodsRetrospective study of the index presentations of 1153 adult patients with COVID-19, admitted between 1 March 2020 and 29 June 2020 in a South London NHS Trust. Data on patients’ medical history (presence of diarrhoea, antibiotic use in the previous 14 days, comorbidities); demographics (age, ethnicity, and body mass index); and blood test results were extracted. Time to event modelling was used to determine the risk of mortality for patients with diarrhoea and/or exposure to antibiotics.Results19.2% of the cohort reported diarrhoea on presentation; these patients tended to be younger, and were less likely to have recent exposure to antibiotics (unadjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.97). 19.1% of the cohort had a course of antibiotics in the 2 weeks preceding admission; this was associated with dementia (unadjusted OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.14 to 7.49). After adjusting for confounders, neither diarrhoea nor recent antibiotic exposure was associated with increased mortality risk. However, the absence of diarrhoea in the presence of recent antibiotic exposure was associated with a 30% increased risk of mortality.ConclusionCommunity antibiotic use in patients with COVID-19, prior to hospitalisation, is relatively common, and absence of diarrhoea in antibiotic-exposed patients may be associated with increased risk of mortality. However, it is unclear whether this represents a causal physiological relationship or residual confounding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document