scholarly journals Gluten-free Diet Reduces the Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhao Sun ◽  
Xuejie Chen ◽  
Shuyang Wang ◽  
Minzi Deng ◽  
Ying Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Gluten Free Diet ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Gluten Free ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Irritable Bowel

Background: Whether a gluten-free diet (GFD) is a cause of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remains controversial. We aim at exploring the causal relationship between gluten intake and IBS within Mendelian randomization (MR) design.Methods: We conducted a two-sample MR and selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with GFD as instrumental variables (IVs). SNPs and genetic associations with GFD and IBS were obtained from the latest genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in Europeans (GFD: cases: 1,376; controls: 63,573; IBS: cases:1,121; controls: 360,073). We performed inverse variance weighting (IVW) as the primary method with several sensitivity analyses like MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO for quality control. The above analyses were re-run using another large dataset of IBS, as well as changing the p-value threshold when screening IVs, to verify the stability of the results.Results: The final estimate indicated significant causal association [per one copy of effect allele predicted log odds ratio (OR) change in GFD intake: OR = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 0.99, p < 0.01] without heterogeneity statistically (Q = 2.48, p = 0.78) nor horizontal pleiotropy biasing the causality (p = 0.92). Consistent results were found in validation analyses. Results of MR Steiger directionality test indicated the accuracy of our estimate of the causal direction (Steiger p < 0.001).Conclusion: GFD might be a protective factor of IBS. Therefore, we suggest taking a diet of lower gluten intake into account in IBS prevention and clinical practice.

scholarly journals Univariable and Multivariable Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Investigating the Effects of Leisure Sedentary Behaviors on the Risk of Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoxin Peng ◽  
Xiangrong Wu ◽  
Yaokai Wen ◽  
Yiyuan Ao ◽  
Yutian Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Computer Use ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Sedentary Behaviors ◽  
Watching Tv

Background:Leisure sedentary behaviors (LSB) are widespread, and observational studies have provided emerging evidence that LSB play a role in the development of lung cancer (LC). However, the causal inference between LSB and LC remains unknown.Methods: We utilized univariable (UVMR) and multivariable two-sample Mendelian randomization (MVMR) analysis to disentangle the effects of LSB on the risk of LC. MR analysis was conducted with genetic variants from genome-wide association studies of LSB (408,815 persons from UK Biobank), containing 152 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for television (TV) watching, 37 SNPs for computer use, and four SNPs for driving, and LC from the International Lung Cancer Consortium (11,348 cases and 15,861 controls). Multiple sensitivity analyses were further performed to verify the causality.Results: UVMR demonstrated that genetically predisposed 1.5-h increase in LSB spent on watching TV increased the odds of LC by 90% [odds ratio (OR), 1.90; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44–2.50; p < 0.001]. Similar trends were observed for squamous cell lung cancer (OR, 1.97; 95%CI, 1.31–2.94; p = 0.0010) and lung adenocarcinoma (OR, 1.64; 95%CI 1.12–2.39; p = 0.0110). The causal effects remained significant after adjusting for education (OR, 1.97; 95%CI, 1.44–2.68; p < 0.001) and body mass index (OR, 1.86; 95%CI, 1.36–2.54; p < 0.001) through MVMR approach. No association was found between prolonged LSB spent on computer use and driving and LC risk. Genetically predisposed prolonged LSB was additionally correlated with smoking (OR, 1.557; 95%CI, 1.287–1.884; p < 0.001) and alcohol consumption (OR, 1.010; 95%CI, 1.004–1.016; p = 0.0016). Consistency of results across complementary sensitivity MR methods further strengthened the causality.Conclusion: Robust evidence was demonstrated for an independent, causal effect of LSB spent on watching TV in increasing the risk of LC. Further work is necessary to investigate the potential mechanisms.

scholarly journals Physical activity and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian E Baumeister ◽  
André Karch ◽  
Martin Bahls ◽  
Alexander Teumer ◽  
Michael F Leitzmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Inverse Variance

ABSTRACTIntroductionEvidence from observational studies for the effect of physical activity on the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is inconclusive. We performed Mendelian randomization analysis to examine whether physical activity is a protective factor for AD.MethodsSummary data of genome-wide association studies on physical activity and AD were identified using PubMed and the GWAS catalog. The study population included 21,982 AD cases and 41,944 cognitively normal controls. Eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) known at P < 5×10−8 to be associated with accelerometer-assessed physical activity served as instrumental variables.ResultsGenetically predicted accelerometer-assessed physical activity had no effect on the risk of AD (inverse variance weighted odds ratio [OR] per standard deviation (SD) increment: 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.10, P=0.332).DiscussionThe present study does not support a relationship between physical activity and risk of AD, and suggests that previous observational studies might have been biased.

scholarly journals Assessing the role of blood pressure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a Mendelian randomization study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kailin Xia ◽  
Linjing Zhang ◽  
Lu Tang ◽  
Tao Huang ◽  
Dongsheng Fan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Inverse Variance ◽  
High Level ◽  
Lateral Sclerosis

Abstract Background Observational studies have suggested a close but controversial relationship between blood pressure (BP) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, it remains unclear whether this association is causal. The authors employed a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate whether there is a causal relationship between BP and ALS. Genetic proxies for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), antihypertension drugs (AHDs), ALS, and their corresponding genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary datasets were obtained from the updated largest studies. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was adopted as the main approach to examine the effect of BP on ALS and four other MR methods for sensitivity analyses. To exclude the interference between SBP and DBP, multivariable MR was used. Results We found that genetically determined increased DBP was a protective factor for ALS (OR = 0.978, 95% CI 0.960–0.996, P = 0.017), and increased SBP was an independent risk factor for ALS (OR = 1.014, 95% CI 1.003–1.025, P = 0.015). The high level of targeted protein of Calcium channel blocker (CCB) showed a causative relationship with ALS (OR = 0.985, 95% CI 0.971-1.000, P = 0.049). No evidence was revealed that ALS caused results change of BP measurements. Conclusions This study demonstrated that an increase in DBP is a protective factor for ALS, and increased SBP is independently risk for ALS, which may be related to sympathetic excitability. Blood pressure management is important in ALS, in which CCB may be a promising candidate.

scholarly journals Type 2 Diabetes and Glycemic Traits Are Not Causal Factors of Osteoarthritis: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Cui ◽  
Hui Feng ◽  
Baichuan He ◽  
Yong Xing ◽  
Zhaorui Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Increased Risk

BackgroundIt remains unclear whether an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects the risk of osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsHere, we used two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to obtain non-confounded estimates of the effect of T2D and glycemic traits on hip and knee OA. We identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with T2D, fasting glucose (FG), and 2-h postprandial glucose (2hGlu) from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We used the MR inverse variance weighted (IVW), the MR–Egger method, the weighted median (WM), and the Robust Adjusted Profile Score (MR.RAPS) to reveal the associations of T2D, FG, and 2hGlu with hip and knee OA risks. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to verify whether heterogeneity and pleiotropy can bias the MR results.ResultsWe did not find statistically significant causal effects of genetically increased T2D risk, FG, and 2hGlu on hip and knee OA (e.g., T2D and hip OA, MR–Egger OR = 1.1708, 95% CI 0.9469–1.4476, p = 0.1547). It was confirmed that horizontal pleiotropy was unlikely to bias the causality (e.g., T2D and hip OA, MR–Egger, intercept = −0.0105, p = 0.1367). No evidence of heterogeneity was found between the genetic variants (e.g., T2D and hip OA, MR–Egger Q = 30.1362, I2 &lt; 0.0001, p = 0.6104).ConclusionOur MR study did not support causal effects of a genetically increased T2D risk, FG, and 2hGlu on hip and knee OA risk.

scholarly journals Type 2 diabetes and glycemic traits are not causal factors of osteoarthritis: A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Cui ◽  
Hui Feng ◽  
Baichuan He ◽  
Yong Xing ◽  
Zhaorui Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Causal Effects ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background: It remains unclear whether an increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) affects the risk of osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Here, we used two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to obtain non-confounded estimates of the effect of T2D and glycemic traits on hip and knee OA. We identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with T2D, fasting glucose (FG) and 2-hour postprandial glucose (2hGlu) from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) . We used MR inverse variance weighted (IVW), the MR-Egger method, the weighted median (WM) and Robust Adjusted Profile Score (MR.RAPS) to reveal the associations of T2D, FG and 2hGlu with hip and knee OA risk. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to verify whether heterogeneity and pleiotropy can bias the MR results.Results: We did not find statistically significant causal effects of genetically increased T2D risk, FG and 2hGlu on hip and knee OA (e.g., T2D and hip OA, MR-Egger OR=0.9536, 95% CI 0.5585 to 1.6283, p=0.8629). It was confirmed that horizontal pleiotropy was unlikely to bias the causality (e.g., T2D and hip OA, MR-Egger, intercept=-0.0032, p=0.8518). No evidence of heterogeneity was found between the genetic variants (e.g., T2D and hip OA, MR-Egger Q=40.5481, I2=0.1368, p=0.2389). Conclusions: Our MR study did not support causal effects of a genetically increased T2D risk, FG and 2hGlu on hip and knee OA risk.

scholarly journals Impact of Liability to Periodontitis on Glycemic Control and Type II Diabetes Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parth D. Shah ◽  
C. M. Schooling ◽  
Luisa N. Borrell
Keyword(s):  
Type Ii Diabetes ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Fasting Glucose ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Causal Association ◽  
East Asians

While the association of periodontitis with Type II diabetes (T2DM) is well-established, the causal relationship remains uncertain. We examined the causal association of periodontitis with glycemic traits (HbA1c, fasting glucose, and fasting insulin) and T2DM using Mendelian randomization (MR) taking advantage of large genome-wide association studies of European and East Asian adults, i.e., the UK Biobank (n ≈ 350,000) (HbA1c), trans-ancestral MAGIC (HbA1c, fasting glucose, and insulin), and DIAMANTE (74,124 cases/824,006 controls), and AGEN for T2DM in Europeans and East Asians, respectively. Periodontitis was instrumented using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), strongly and independently predicting liability to periodontitis in each ancestry group. SNP-specific Wald estimates were combined using inverse variance weighting. Sensitivity analyses were performed using the weighted median and MR-Egger with meta-analysis of MR estimates for Europeans and East Asians. Genetically instrumented liability to periodontitis was not associated with glycemic traits or T2DM in either ancestry or when ancestry specific estimates were meta-analyzed. Our findings do not support a causal association of liability to periodontitis with glycemic traits or T2DM. However, further research is required confirming these findings among other racial/ethnic groups, especially groups who carry a heavy burden of both periodontitis and T2DM.

scholarly journals Causal Association between Periodontitis and Parkinson’s Disease: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 772
Author(s):  
João Botelho ◽  
Vanessa Machado ◽  
José João Mendes ◽  
Paulo Mascarenhas
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Instrumental Variables ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
European Ancestry ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Genetic Liability ◽  
Bidirectional Association

The latest evidence revealed a possible association between periodontitis and Parkinson’s disease (PD). We explored the causal relationship of this bidirectional association through two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) in European ancestry populations. To this end, we used openly accessible data of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on periodontitis and PD. As instrumental variables for periodontitis, seventeen single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from a GWAS of periodontitis (1817 periodontitis cases vs. 2215 controls) and eight non-overlapping SNPs of periodontitis from an additional GWAS for validation purposes. Instrumental variables to explore for the reverse causation included forty-five SNPs from a GWAS of PD (20,184 cases and 397,324 controls). Multiple approaches of MR were carried-out. There was no evidence of genetic liability of periodontitis being associated with a higher risk of PD (B = −0.0003, Standard Error [SE] 0.0003, p = 0.26). The eight independent SNPs (B = −0.0000, SE 0.0001, p = 0.99) validated this outcome. We also found no association of genetically primed PD towards periodontitis (B = −0.0001, SE 0.0001, p = 0.19). These MR study findings do not support a bidirectional causal genetic liability between periodontitis and PD. Further GWAS studies are needed to confirm the consistency of these results.

scholarly journals Bias in two-sample Mendelian randomization when using heritable covariable-adjusted summary associations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Pires Hartwig ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
George Davey Smith ◽  
Deborah A Lawlor ◽  
Maria Carolina Borges
Keyword(s):  
Waist Circumference ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Causal Effect ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Effect Estimate ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Residual Confounding

Abstract Background Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) allows the use of freely accessible summary association results from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to estimate causal effects of modifiable exposures on outcomes. Some GWAS adjust for heritable covariables in an attempt to estimate direct effects of genetic variants on the trait of interest. One, both or neither of the exposure GWAS and outcome GWAS may have been adjusted for covariables. Methods We performed a simulation study comprising different scenarios that could motivate covariable adjustment in a GWAS and analysed real data to assess the influence of using covariable-adjusted summary association results in two-sample MR. Results In the absence of residual confounding between exposure and covariable, between exposure and outcome, and between covariable and outcome, using covariable-adjusted summary associations for two-sample MR eliminated bias due to horizontal pleiotropy. However, covariable adjustment led to bias in the presence of residual confounding (especially between the covariable and the outcome), even in the absence of horizontal pleiotropy (when the genetic variants would be valid instruments without covariable adjustment). In an analysis using real data from the Genetic Investigation of ANthropometric Traits (GIANT) consortium and UK Biobank, the causal effect estimate of waist circumference on blood pressure changed direction upon adjustment of waist circumference for body mass index. Conclusions Our findings indicate that using covariable-adjusted summary associations in MR should generally be avoided. When that is not possible, careful consideration of the causal relationships underlying the data (including potentially unmeasured confounders) is required to direct sensitivity analyses and interpret results with appropriate caution.

scholarly journals Evaluation of glycemic traits in susceptibility to COVID-19 risk: a Mendelian randomization study

BMC Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiu Lun Au Yeung ◽  
Jie V Zhao ◽  
C Mary Schooling
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Genetic Predisposition ◽  
Mendelian Randomization ◽  
Fasting Glucose ◽  
Association Studies ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Genome Wide Association Studies ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Wide Confidence Interval

Abstract Background Observational studies suggest poorer glycemic traits and type 2 diabetes associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk although these findings could be confounded by socioeconomic position. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization to clarify their role in COVID-19 risk and specific COVID-19 phenotypes (hospitalized and severe cases). Method We identified genetic instruments for fasting glucose (n = 133,010), 2 h glucose (n = 42,854), glycated hemoglobin (n = 123,665), and type 2 diabetes (74,124 cases and 824,006 controls) from genome wide association studies and applied them to COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative summary statistics (17,965 COVID-19 cases and 1,370,547 population controls). We used inverse variance weighting to obtain the causal estimates of glycemic traits and genetic predisposition to type 2 diabetes in COVID-19 risk. Sensitivity analyses included MR-Egger and weighted median method. Results We found genetic predisposition to type 2 diabetes was not associated with any COVID-19 phenotype (OR: 1.00 per unit increase in log odds of having diabetes, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.04 for overall COVID-19; OR: 1.02, 95%CI 0.95 to 1.09 for hospitalized COVID-19; and OR: 1.00, 95%CI 0.93 to 1.08 for severe COVID-19). There were no strong evidence for an association of glycemic traits in COVID-19 phenotypes, apart from a potential inverse association for fasting glucose albeit with wide confidence interval. Conclusion We provide some genetic evidence that poorer glycemic traits and predisposition to type 2 diabetes unlikely increase the risk of COVID-19. Although our study did not indicate glycemic traits increase severity of COVID-19, additional studies are needed to verify our findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document