scholarly journals Antisynthetase Syndrome-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Monitoring of Immunosuppressive Treatment Effects by Chest Computed Tomography

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Korsten ◽  
Jan-Gerd Rademacher ◽  
Linn Riedel ◽  
Eva-Maria Schnitzler ◽  
Ulrike Olgemöller ◽  
...  

Background: Antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) is a rare autoimmune disease characterized by inflammatory myopathy, arthritis, fever, and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Pulmonary involvement in ASyS significantly increases morbidity and mortality and, therefore, requires prompt and effective immunosuppressive treatment. Owing to the rarity of ASyS, limited data exists on progression and prognosis of ILD under immunosuppression.Objectives: The objective of the study was to evaluate the radiological progression and outcome measures of ILD with immunosuppressive therapy in patients with ASyS.Methods: Twelve patients with ASyS-associated ILD (ASyS-ILD) were included. Demographic and clinical data, including organ involvement, pulmonary function tests (PFT), laboratory parameters, imaging studies, and treatment regimens were retrospectively analyzed from routinely collected data. The extent of ground glass opacities, fibrotic changes and honeycombing was analyzed and scored using high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT) scans. HRCT findings were compared between baseline and follow-up examinations. In addition, patients were stratified depending on whether they had received rituximab (RTX) or not.Results: Pulmonary function tests revealed stable lung function and follow-up HRCT scans showed an improvement of radiological alterations in the majority of ASyS patients under immunosuppressive therapy. We did not detect significant differences between the RTX- and non-RTX-treated groups, but the RTX-treated patients more frequently had myositis and relapsing disease.Conclusions: Radiographic alterations in ASyS-associated ILD respond to immunosuppressive treatment. RTX is a feasible treatment option with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with relapsing disease and clinically apparent myositis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1678-1686
Author(s):  
Vincent Langlois ◽  
André Gillibert ◽  
Yurdagül Uzunhan ◽  
Marie-Laure Chabi ◽  
Eric Hachulla ◽  
...  

ObjectiveAntisynthetase syndrome (AS)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) has a poor prognosis. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV CYC) and rituximab (RTX) are the main treatments currently used for moderate to severe ILD. Here, we compare the efficacy of CYC followed by standard immunosuppressive treatment (IST) versus RTX in AS-related ILD.MethodsThis observational retrospective study was conducted between 2003 and 2016 in 3 tertiary care centers. All patients with AS-related ILD and treated with CYC or RTX with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Pulmonary progression-free survival (PFS), defined according to the American Thoracic Society guidelines, was assessed at 6 months and 2 years. All severe adverse events (AE) were recorded.ResultsSixty-two patients were included. Thirty-four patients received 2–12 monthly IV CYC pulses, followed by standard IST in 30 cases (88%). The RTX group included 28 patients. Following the initial Day 1 to Day 15 infusions, RTX was repeated every 6 months in 26 cases (93%) and 15 patients (54%) concomitantly received another IST. The median steroid dose was similar between both groups. Although RTX and CYC demonstrated similar PFS at 6 months (92% vs 85%, respectively), RTX was superior at 2 years (HR 0.263, 95% CI 0.094–0.732, P = 0.011). Interestingly, lower diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) at baseline was independently predictive of poor 2-year PFS [0.965 (0.936–0.995), P = 0.023]. Forced vital capacity and DLCO improved in both groups without significant differences. Serious AE were similar in both groups.ConclusionDespite similar PFS at 6 months, RTX was associated with a better 2-year PFS compared to CYC in patients with AS-related ILD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 00235-2020
Author(s):  
Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold ◽  
Toby M. Maher ◽  
Edward E. Philpot ◽  
Ali Ashrafzadeh ◽  
Oliver Distler

This systematic review summarises current evidence to help guide treatment decisions for patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). A systematic search of the literature (January 2012 to April 2018), including grey literature (searched between 1992 and 2011), was conducted using multiple electronic databases. Guidelines, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and observational studies reporting on risk stratification, screening, diagnosis, treatment and management outcomes for patients with SSc-ILD were included. A quality assessment of the included evidence was undertaken.In total, 2464 publications were identified and 280 included. Multiple independent risk factors for ILD in patients with SSc were identified, including older age, male sex and baseline pulmonary function. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) has been used for characterising ILD in patients with SSc, and pulmonary function tests are a key adjunctive component in the diagnostic and monitoring pathway. The clinical value of biomarkers relating to SSc-ILD diagnosis or assessment for disease progression is unknown at present. Immunosuppressive therapy (monotherapy or combined therapy) is the current standard of care for SSc-ILD; long-term evidence for effective and safe treatment of SSc-ILD is limited.Identification of patients at risk for SSc-ILD remains challenging. HRCT and pulmonary function tests are key to diagnosing and monitoring for disease progression. Although immunosuppressive therapy is considered current first-line treatment, it is partly associated with adverse effects and long-term follow-up evidence is limited. Novel therapies and biomarkers should be further explored in well-controlled clinical studies.


2021 ◽  
pp. 239719832098537
Author(s):  
Johan Clukers ◽  
Maarten Lanclus ◽  
Dennis Belmans ◽  
Cedric Van Holsbeke ◽  
Wilfried De Backer ◽  
...  

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis–associated interstitial lung disease accounts for up to 20% of mortality in these patients and has a highly variable prognosis. Functional respiratory imaging, a quantitative computed tomography imaging technique which allows mapping of regional information, can provide a detailed view of lung structures. It thereby shows potential to better characterize this disease. Purpose: To evaluate the use of functional respiratory imaging quantitative computed tomography in systemic sclerosis–associated interstitial lung disease staging, as well as the relationship between short-term changes in pulmonary function tests and functional respiratory imaging quantitative computed tomography with respect to disease severity. Materials and methods: An observational cohort of 35 patients with systemic sclerosis was retrospectively studied by comparing serial pulmonary function tests and in- and expiratory high-resolution computed tomography over 1.5-year interval. After classification into moderate to severe lung disease and limited lung disease (using a hybrid method integrating quantitative computed tomography and pulmonary function tests), post hoc analysis was performed using mixed-effects models and estimated marginal means in terms of functional respiratory imaging parameters. Results: At follow-up, relative mean forced vital capacity percentage change was not significantly different in the limited (6.37%; N = 13; p = 0.053) and moderate to severe disease (−3.54%; N = 16; p = 0.102) groups, respectively. Specific airway resistance decreased from baseline for both groups. (Least square mean changes −25.11% predicted ( p = 0.006) and −14.02% predicted ( p = 0.001) for limited and moderate to severe diseases.) In contrast to limited disease from baseline, specific airway radius increased in moderate to severe disease by 8.57% predicted ( p = 0.011) with decline of lower lobe volumes of 2.97% predicted ( p = 0.031). Conclusion: Functional respiratory imaging is able to differentiate moderate to severe disease versus limited disease and to detect disease progression in systemic sclerosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Guiot ◽  
Makon-Sébastien Njock ◽  
Béatrice André ◽  
Fanny Gester ◽  
Monique Henket ◽  
...  

AbstractSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disease associated with rapid evolving interstitial lung disease (ILD), driving its mortality. Specific biomarkers associated with the progression of this lung disease are highly needed. We aimed to identify specific biomarkers of SSc-ILD to predict the evolution of the disease. For this, we compared prospectively serum levels of several biomarkers associated with lung fibrosis in SSc patients (n = 102), among which SSc-no ILD (n = 63) and SSc-ILD (n = 39), compared to healthy subjects (HS) (n = 39). We also performed a longitudinal study in a subgroup of 28 patients analyzing biomarkers variations and pulmonary function tests over a period of 2 years. Serum level of IGFBP-2 was significantly increased in SSc patients compared to HS, and negatively correlated with pulmonary function (assessed by carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO)) (r = − 0.29, p < 0.01). Two-year longitudinal analysis in a subgroup of 28 SSc patients determined that IGFBP-2 variation was positively correlated with KCO at 2-year follow-up (r = 0.6, p < 0.001). SSc patients with a lower variation of IGFBP-2 (less than 22%) presented significant deterioration of pulmonary function at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.01). ROC curve analysis enabled us to identify that baseline IGFBP-2 > 105 ng/ml was associated with a poor outcome (KCO < 70% predicted) at 2-year follow-up (AUC = 0.75, p < 0.05). We showed for the first time that serum levels of IGFBP-2 might be a prognostic factor of the development of SSc-ILD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 688-689
Author(s):  
C. Meier ◽  
M. Maciukiewicz ◽  
M. Brunner ◽  
J. Schniering ◽  
H. Gabrys ◽  
...  

Background:Management of patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is complicated by high inter-patient variability. To date, no validated predictors of treatment response are available for routine use. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT)-based radiomics, i.e. the high-dimensional, quantitative analysis of imaging metadata, have previously been shown to be successful in discriminating (SSc-)ILD phenotypes in preclinical and clinical studies1. Since HRCT is an integral part of the routine work-up in SSc, HRCT-based radiomic features may hold potential as non-invasive biomarkers.Objectives:To predict treatment response using two-dimensional (2D) HRCT-based radiomics in SSc-ILD patients from a prospectively followed cohort.Methods:Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of SSc-ILD in HRCT, availability of a suitable chest HRCT scan within 12 months prior to initiation of a new treatment, and availability of clinical baseline and follow-up information. Treatment response was defined as the absence of all of the following over a follow-up period of 12-24 months: relative decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥5%, increase of ILD in HRCT as assessed by a radiologist, change in treatment regimen due to insufficient response, ILD-related death or lung transplantation. Of each pre-treatment HRCT, 6 slices (15±5 mm apart, starting from the basal lung margin) were manually segmented and 1513 2D radiomic features were extracted using the in-house software Z-Rad (Python 2.7). Features were Z-score transformed and pre-filtered for inter- and intra-reader robustness (intraclass correlation coefficient >0.85) and inter-feature correlation (Spearman’s rho <0.9). A categorical linear regression model was created using 3-fold cross-validated elastic nets for feature selection. Features were then summarized and divided by their number. For generation of a score cut-off, Youden’s score was used. For two-group analyses of continuous variables, Wilcoxon’s test was performed, whereas categorical data was assessed using Fisher’s exact test.Results:A total of 64 pre-treatment HRCTs from 54 patients were analyzed. In 9 patients, >1 asynchronous treatments were assessed, while 45 patients had only 1 eligible treatment approach. The response rate within the assessed follow-up period was 45.3% (n=29). For score generation, 13 radiomic features were selected and an optimal cut-off value of -0.1589 was determined. Univariate linear regression showed significant association between our categorical radiomics-based score and treatment response (p=0.007, area under the curve = 0.65 (0.51-0.79), sensitivity=0.90, specificity=0.43), whereby a high score was predictive for treatment response.No differences between patients with high (n=46) or low (n=18) scores were detected for baseline age (mean±SD=55.5±12.0 and 55.5±13.6 years, p=0.84), duration of SSc (mean±SD=6.2±8.4 and 4.7±4.4 years, p=0.79), time since ILD diagnosis (2.7±2.9 and 2.4±3.1 years, p=0.59), FVC (77.6±20.6 and 80.1±17.9, p=0.41) or DLco (54.4±21.0 and 57.6±18.9, p=0.40). Distribution of anti-Scl-70 positivity (45.7% vs. 55.6%, p=0.58) and diffuse cutaneous disease (47.7% vs. 61.1%, p=0.41) was not significantly different between patients with high and low scores, respectively, although a trend towards higher percentages in the high score group was observed.Conclusion:Our results indicate that, following validation in external cohorts, radiomics may be a promising tool for future pre-treatment patient stratification. Moreover, our radiomics-based score seems not to be associated with commonly studied clinical predictors such as anti-Scl-70 positivity or lung function, underlining a possible additive value to ‘traditional’ clinical parameters.References:[1]Schniering, J., et al. Resolving phenotypic and prognostic differences in interstitial lung disease related to systemic sclerosis by computed tomography-based radiomics. medRxiv [Preprint] doi:10.1101/2020.06.09.20124800 (2020).Disclosure of Interests:Chantal Meier: None declared, Malgorzata Maciukiewicz: None declared, Matthias Brunner: None declared, Janine Schniering: None declared, Hubert Gabrys: None declared, Anja Kühnis: None declared, Oliver Distler Speakers bureau: Speaker fee on Scleroderma and related complications: Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Novartis, Roche. Speaker fee on rheumatology topic other than Scleroderma: MSD, iQone, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: Consultancy fee for Scleroderma and its complications: Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Boehringer, CSL Behring, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, Kymera, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Roivant Sciences, Sanofi, UCB. Consultancy fee for rheumatology topic other than Scleroderma: Abbvie, Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Research Grants to investigate the pathophysiology and potential treatment of Scleroderma and its complications: Kymera Therapeutics, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Thomas Frauenfelder: None declared, Stephanie Tanadini-Lang: None declared, Britta Maurer Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from AbbVie, Protagen, Novartis Biomedical Research, congress support from Pfizer, Roche, Actelion, mepha, and MSD


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document