scholarly journals Disease Severity Determines Timing of Initiating Continuous Renal Replacement Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zi-Jing Xia ◽  
Lin-ye He ◽  
Shu-Yue Pan ◽  
Rui-Juan Cheng ◽  
Qiu-Ping Zhang ◽  
...  

Background: Timing of initiating continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) among the patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care units (ICU) has been discussed over decades, but the definition of early and late CRRT initiation is still unclear.Methods: The English language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library on July 19, 2019, by the two researchers independently. The study characteristics; early and late definitions; outcomes, such as all-cause, in-hospital, 28- or 30-, 60-, 90-day mortality; and renal recovery were extracted from the 18 eligible studies. Pooled relative risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were estimated with the fixed effects model and random effects model as appropriate. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42020158653).Results: Eighteen studies including 3,914 patients showed benefit in earlier CRRT (n = 1,882) over later CRRT (n = 2,032) in all-cause mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.92), in-hospital mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.99), and 28- or 30-day mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.88), but in 60- and 90-day mortalities, no significant benefit was observed. The subgroup analysis showed significant benefit in the disease-severity-based subgroups on early CRRT initiation in terms of in-hospital mortality and 28- or 30-day mortality rather than the time-based subgroups. Moreover, early CRRT was found to have beneficial effects on renal recovery after CRRT (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.45).Conclusions: Overall, compared with late CRRT, early CRRT is beneficial for short-term survival and renal recovery, especially when the timing was defined based on the disease severity. CRRT initiation on Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) stage 1 or Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE)-Risk or less may lead to a better prognosis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 205435812110277
Author(s):  
Tyler Pitre ◽  
Angela (Hong Tian) Dong ◽  
Aaron Jones ◽  
Jessica Kapralik ◽  
Sonya Cui ◽  
...  

Background: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with COVID-19 and its association with mortality and disease severity is understudied in the Canadian population. Objective: To determine the incidence of AKI in a cohort of patients with COVID-19 admitted to medicine and intensive care unit (ICU) wards, its association with in-hospital mortality, and disease severity. Our aim was to stratify these outcomes by out-of-hospital AKI and in-hospital AKI. Design: Retrospective cohort study from a registry of patients with COVID-19. Setting: Three community and 3 academic hospitals. Patients: A total of 815 patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 between March 4, 2020, and April 23, 2021. Measurements: Stage of AKI, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. Methods: We classified AKI by comparing highest to lowest recorded serum creatinine in hospital and staged AKI based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) system. We calculated the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio for the stage of AKI and the outcomes of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of the 815 patients registered, 439 (53.9%) developed AKI, 253 (57.6%) presented with AKI, and 186 (42.4%) developed AKI in-hospital. The odds of ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and death increased as the AKI stage worsened. Stage 3 AKI that occurred during hospitalization increased the odds of death (odds ratio [OR] = 7.87 [4.35, 14.23]). Stage 3 AKI that occurred prior to hospitalization carried an increased odds of death (OR = 5.28 [2.60, 10.73]). Limitations: Observational study with small sample size limits precision of estimates. Lack of nonhospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hospitalized patients without COVID-19 as controls limits causal inferences. Conclusions: Acute kidney injury, whether it occurs prior to or after hospitalization, is associated with a high risk of poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Routine assessment of kidney function in patients with COVID-19 may improve risk stratification. Trial registration: The study was not registered on a publicly accessible registry because it did not involve any health care intervention on human participants.


2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 1230-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Helgadottir ◽  
M. I. Sigurdsson ◽  
R. Palsson ◽  
D. Helgason ◽  
G. H. Sigurdsson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lishan Tan ◽  
Li Chen ◽  
Lingyan Li ◽  
Jinwei Wang ◽  
Xiaoyan Huang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : With the increasing worldwide prevalence and disease burden of diabetic mellitus, data on the impact of diabetes on acute kidney injury (AKI) patients in China are limited.Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional and retrospective study was conducted in China, which included 2,223,230 hospitalized adult patients and covered 82% of the country’s population. Diabetes was identified according to blood glucose, hemoglobin A1c levels, physician diagnosis and drug use. In total, 7604 AKI patients were identified, and 1404 and 6200 cases were defined as diabetic and non-diabetic respectively. Clinical characteristics, outcome, in-hospital stay, and costs of AKI patients with and without diabetes were compared. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the association of diabetes with mortality and renal recovery in the admitted AKI patients.Results: In this survey, AKI patients with diabetes were older, male-dominated (61.9%), with more comorbidities, and higher serum creatinine levels. Compared to patients without diabetes, a significant upswing in all-cause in-hospital mortality, hospital stay, and costs were found in those with diabetes ( p <0.05). After adjusted for relevant covariables, diabetes was independently associated with failed renal recovery (OR=1.13, p =0.04), rather than all-cause in-hospital mortality (OR=1.09, p =0.39). Also, diabetic status was positively associated with length of stay ( β =0.04, p =0.04) and costs ( β =0.09, p <0.01) in hospital after adjusted for possible confounders. Conclusions: Failed renal recovery, rather than all-cause in-hospital mortality, is independently associated with diabetes in hospitalized AKI patients. Moreover, diabetes is significantly correlated with in-hospital stay and expenditures in AKI.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumar Digvijay ◽  
Mauro Neri ◽  
Weixuan Fan ◽  
Zaccaria Ricci ◽  
Claudio Ronco

Introduction: Definition, prevention, and management of acute kidney injury (AKI) and the optimal prescription and delivery of renal replacement therapy (RRT) are currently matters of ongoing discussion. Due to the lack of definitive published literature, a wide gap might exist between routine clinical practice and available recommendations. The aim of this survey was to explore the clinical approach to AKI and RRT in a broad population of nephrologists and intensivists participating in the 36th International course on AKI and Continuous RRT (CRRT), held in Vicenza in June 2018. The responses of the 369 participants to a questionnaire on several aspects of critical care nephrology were analyzed and detailed. Results: Approximately 450 participants attended the course; of these, 369 (82%) correctly filled the survey forms. According to the reported answers, the average incidence of AKI in respondents’ intensive care units (ICU) was 26.8% (SD ±15.99) and AKI requiring dialysis was 13% (SD ±29.7). Sixty-four percent of participants defined AKI as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) up to 0.99 mg/dL (SD ±0.88 mg/dL); 2.4% defined AKI as an increase in urea nitrogen up to 83.6 mg/dL (SD ±36.6 mg/dL); 33.6% defined AKI as decreased urine output to less than 1 mL/kg/h (SD ±0.6 mL/kg/h). The most common answer to classify AKI was Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO; 41%) criteria. Most of the participants (25%) think novel biomarkers should replace SCr on daily routine laboratory screening, and Cystatin C was the most commonly used biomarker (19%). The use of diuretics in AKI patients was high (62%). Continuous RRT (59%) and heparin anticoagulation (42%) appeared to be the most common approaches in ICU. Conclusions: KDIGO appeared to be widely applied. The use of novel biomarkers has also emerged in recent years even if some consistent cost-benefit evidence is still lacking. There is a trend of increased awareness about AKI and extracorporeal treatments seem to be increasingly applied, when compared to previous surveys. Educational efforts and AKI management standardization still appear to be a fundamental aspect to harmonize therapeutic approaches and improve patients’ outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunkumar Subbiah ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Agarwal

Abstract Background and Aims Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is an important determinant of outcome in hospitalized patients. Further, there is a risk for development of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) in the future. Though the long-term impact of AKI has been studied in developed countries, there is a paucity of data in this area from the Indian subcontinent. This single-centre study aimed to assess the pattern, clinical spectrum, short-term and long-term outcomes of AKI. Method In this prospective observational cohort study, detailed demographic and clinical data at presentation, during hospital stay and follow-up at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge were obtained prospectively for a cohort of patients with AKI. Both community (CAAKI) and hospital acquired AKI (HAAKI) were included. Patient with pre-existing CKD were excluded. Outcome variables examined were in-hospital mortality, renal function at discharge and on follow-up after discharge from hospital. Results In our study cohort with 476 patients, majority of the cases were CAAKI (395, 83%). The mean age at presentation was 44.8 ± 18.7 years. Medical causes (84%) contributed to the majority of AKI while the remaining were due to surgical (10%) and obstetrical (6%) causes. Sepsis (176/476; 36.9%) was the most common cause of AKI. The most common source for sepsis was respiratory (41%) followed by urological source (18.7%). The in-hospital mortality rate for patients with AKI was 38%. Age &gt;60 years (HR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.11 – 2.07), oliguria (HR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05 – 2.10), need for ventilator (HR = 2.45; 95% CI, 1.36 – 4.41) and/or inotropes (HR = 14.4; 95% CI, 6.28 – 33.05) were predictors of mortality. At discharge, 146 (30.7%) patients had complete renal recovery, while 149 (31.3%) had partial renal recovery. Oliguria (p &lt; 0.001), hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.001) and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with partial recovery. Of the 295 patients on follow-up at discharge, 211 (71.5%) patients had normal renal function, 4 (1.4%) died and 33 (11.2%) were lost to follow up; 47(15.9%) patients developed CKD of which 6 (2%) were dialysis dependent. Elderly patients, higher AKIN stage with oliguria and those requiring RRT were more likely to develop CKD. Among these, the need for in-hospital RRT was the single most important factor predicting the risk of CKD (OR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.12-2.78). Conclusion In conclusion, our data shows that AKI in hospitalized patients still has high mortality in emerging countries like India. Though a fairly good percentage of cases recovered, there is a definite risk of CKD development, especially in patients who required RRT during hospitalization.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Cardenas Campos ◽  
J Sabater Riera ◽  
G Moreno Gonzalez ◽  
VF Corral Velez ◽  
JM Vazquez Reveron ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenjian Xu ◽  
Ying Tang ◽  
Qiuyan Huang ◽  
Sha Fu ◽  
Xiaomei Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs among patients with coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and has also been indicated to be associated with in-hospital mortality. Remdesivir has been authorized for the treatment of COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the incidence of AKI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The incidence of AKI in different subgroups was also investigated.Methods: A thorough search was performed to find relevant studies in PubMed, Web of Science, medRxiv and EMBASE from 1 Jan 2020 until 1 June 2020. The systematic review was performed using the meta package in R (4.0.1).Results: A total of 16199 COVID-19 patients were included in our systematic review. The pooled estimated incidence of AKI in all hospitalized COVID-19 patients was 10.0% (95% CI: 7.0-12.0%). The pooled estimated proportion of COVID-19 patients who needed continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) was 4% (95% CI: 3-6%). According to our subgroup analysis, the incidence of AKI could be associated with age, disease severity and ethnicity. The incidence of AKI in hospitalized COVID-19 patients being treated with remdesivir was 7% (95% CI: 3-13%) in a total of 5 studies. Conclusion: We found that AKI was not rare in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The incidence of AKI could be associated with age, disease severity and ethnicity. Remdesivir probably did not induce AKI in COVID-19 patients. Our systematic review provides evidence that AKI might be closely associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection, which should be investigated in future studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document