scholarly journals Higher Animal Protein Intake During the Second Trimester of Pregnancy Is Associated With Risk of GDM

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heng Yaw Yong ◽  
Zalilah Mohd Shariff ◽  
Barakatun Nisak Mohd Yusof ◽  
Zulida Rejali ◽  
Yvonne Yee Siang Tee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Intake ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Red Meat ◽  
Animal Protein ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Food Frequency ◽  
Meat Protein ◽  
Total Protein Intake ◽  
Egg Protein ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy

Background and Aims: This study aimed to examine the associations between the total protein intake as well as types and sources of proteins with the gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk.Method and Results: This was a prospective cohort study of the pregnant women in Malaysia. In this study, the total, animal, and plant protein intakes were assessed using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Of the 452 women, 48 (10.62%) were diagnosed with GDM. From pre-pregnancy to second trimester, most of the women had 10–20% of energy intake from protein (88.9–90.3%) and ≥75% of recommended protein intake (74.6–86.5%). The women in the highest tertile (T3) of total animal protein intake [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.27–6.04] and red meat protein (AOR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.27–5.70), specifically in the second trimester, had significantly higher GDM risk compared with the women in the middle tertile of intake (T2). Interestingly, the women in the T3 of egg protein in the second trimester were significantly at lower GDM risk (AOR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.18–0.91) compared with those in T2.Conclusion: The highest tertile of animal protein (≥42.15 g/day) intake, particularly red meat protein in the second trimester was positively associated with the GDM risk, whereas the highest tertile of egg protein was inversely associated with the GDM risk. Protein intake before or during early pregnancy was not associated with the GDM risk. These findings underscore the importance of sources and types of protein intake, particularly after the first trimester of pregnancy, in relation to GDM risk.

scholarly journals Dietary Protein Sources and Muscle Mass over the Life Course: The Lifelines Cohort Study

Nutrients ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita Alexandrov ◽  
Coby Eelderink ◽  
Cécile Singh-Povel ◽  
Gerjan Navis ◽  
Stephan Bakker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Dietary Protein ◽  
Total Protein ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
Animal Protein ◽  
Creatinine Excretion ◽  
Protein Sources ◽  
Fish Meat ◽  
Total Protein Intake ◽  
Egg Protein

The influence of dietary protein intake on muscle mass in adults remains unclear. Our objective was to investigate the association between protein intake and muscle mass in 31,278 men and 45,355 women from the Lifelines Cohort. Protein intake was estimated by food frequency questionnaire and muscle mass was estimated from 24 h urinary creatinine excretion. The age range was 18–91 years and mean total protein intake was 1.0 ± 0.3 g/kg/day. Across increasing quartiles of total protein intake, animal protein intake, and fish/meat/egg protein intake, creatinine excretion significantly increased in both men (+4% for total and +6% for fish/meat/egg protein intake, p < 0.001) and women (+3% for total and +6% for fish/meat/egg protein intake, p < 0.001). The associations were not systematically stronger or weaker with increasing age, but associations were strongest for young men (26–45 years) and older women (>75 years). The association between total protein intake and muscle mass was dependent on physical activity in women (p interaction < 0.001). This study suggests that total protein intake, animal protein intake, and in particular fish/meat/egg protein intake may be important for building and preserving muscle mass. Dietary protein sources should be further studied for their potential to build and preserve muscle mass.

95-OR: Plasma miRNAs Levels at First Trimester of Pregnancy Predict Insulin Sensitivity Estimated at the Second Trimester of Pregnancy

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 95-OR
Author(s):  
CÉCILIA LÉGARÉ ◽  
VÉRONIQUE DESGAGNÉ ◽  
FRÉDÉRIQUE WHITE ◽  
MICHELLE S. SCOTT ◽  
PATRICE PERRON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Insulin Sensitivity ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Plasma Mirnas

scholarly journals Distribution of diandric and digynic triploidy depending on gestational age

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Massalska ◽  
Katarzyna Ozdarska ◽  
Tomasz Roszkowski ◽  
Julia Bijok ◽  
Anna Kucińska-Chahwan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Parental Origin ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Spontaneous Pregnancy ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction

Abstract Purpose To establish the distribution of diandric and digynic triploidy depending on gestational age. Methods 107 triploid samples tested prospectively in a single genetic department during a four-year period were analyzed for parental origin of triploidy by Quantitative Fluorescent Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF-PCR) (n=95) with the use of matching parental samples or by MS-MLPA (n=12), when parental samples were unavailable. Tested pregnancies were divided into three subgroups with regard to the gestational age at spontaneous pregnancy loss: <11 gestational weeks, 11–14 gestational weeks, and >14 gestational weeks. Results Diandric triploidy constituted overall 44.9% (46.5% in samples miscarried <11 gestational weeks, 64.3% in samples miscarried between 11 and 14 gestational weeks, and 27.8% in pregnancies which survived >14 gestational weeks). Conclusions The distribution of diandric and digynic triploidy depends on gestational age. The majority of diandric triploid pregnancies is lost in the first trimester of pregnancy. In the second trimester, diandric cases are at least twice less frequent than digynic ones.

scholarly journals Adequacy and Sources of Protein Intake among Pregnant Women in the United States, NHANES 2003–2012

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 795
Author(s):  
Mary M. Murphy ◽  
Kelly A. Higgins ◽  
Xiaoyu Bi ◽  
Leila M. Barraj
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Protein Intake ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
The United States ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Health And Nutrition ◽  
Animal Source ◽  
Usual Intake ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Using Data

Limited information is available on protein intake and adequacy of protein intake among pregnant women. Using data from a sample of 528 pregnant women in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2003–2012, usual intake of protein (g/day and g/kg body weight (bw)/day) and prevalence of intake below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) by trimester of pregnancy were calculated using the National Cancer Institute method. Percent contributions to protein intake by source (i.e., plant and animal, including type of animal source) were also calculated. Mean usual intake of protein was 88 ± 4.3, 82 ± 3.1, and 82 ± 2.9 g/day among women in trimester 1, 2, and 3 of pregnancy, respectively, or 1.30 ± 0.10, 1.35 ± 0.06, and 1.35 ± 0.05 g/kg bw/day, respectively. An estimated 4.5% of women in the first trimester of pregnancy consumed less protein than the EAR of 0.66 g/kg bw/day; among women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, 12.1% and 12.8% of women, respectively, consumed less protein than the EAR of 0.88 g/kg bw/day. Animal sources of protein accounted for approximately 66% of total protein. Findings from this study show that one in eight women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy have inadequate intake of protein. Pregnant women should be encouraged to consume sufficient levels of protein from a variety of sources.

scholarly journals Prenatal Detection of Fetal Anomalies at the 11- to 13-Week Scan—Part I: Brain, Face and Neck

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 359-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara Illescas ◽  
Waldo Sepulveda ◽  
Begona Adiego ◽  
Pilar Martinez-Ten
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Brain ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Fetal Anomalies ◽  
Prenatal Detection ◽  
Ultrasound Findings ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Structural Anomalies

ABSTRACT In the last 20 years, the role of first-trimester ultrasound screening has expanded from individual calculation of the risk of aneuploidy through measurement of the nuchal translucency to a powerful technique to evaluate important aspects of the fetal anatomy. Traditionally, the full anatomy scan for detection of structural anomalies has been performed in the second trimester of pregnancy. However, with the implementation of the first-trimester scan at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation many of the structural anomalies traditionally detected in the second trimester can now be identified earlier in pregnancy. In the first part of this review we discuss the main ultrasound findings that may facilitate the prenatal detection of fetal brain, face and neck abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy. How to cite this article Sepulveda W, Illescas T, Adiego B, Martinez-Ten P. Prenatal Detection of Fetal Anomalies at the 11- to 13-Week Scan—Part I: Brain, Face and Neck. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;7(4):359-368.

scholarly journals A rare case of hypercalcemia-induced pancreatitis in a first trimester pregnant woman

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carine Ghassan Richa ◽  
Khadija Jamal Saad ◽  
Ali Khaled Chaaban ◽  
Mohamad Souheil El Rawas
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Pregnant Woman ◽  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Rare Case ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
List Type ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Severe Hypercalcemia ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy

Summary The objective of the study is to report a case of acute pancreatitis secondary to hypercalcemia induced by primary hyperparathyroidism in a pregnant woman at the end of the first trimester. The case included a 32-year-old woman who was diagnosed with acute pancreatitis and severe hypercalcemia refractory to many regimens of medical therapy in the first trimester of pregnancy. She was successfully treated with parathyroidectomy in the early second trimester with complete resolution of hypercalcemia and pancreatitis. Neonatal course was unremarkable. To our best knowledge, this is a rare case when primary hyperparathyroidism and its complications are diagnosed in the first trimester of pregnancy. In conclusion, primary hyperparathyroidism is a rare life-threatening condition to the fetus and mother especially when associated with complications such as pancreatitis. Early therapeutic intervention is important to reduce the morbidity and mortality. Parathyroidectomy performed in the second trimester can be the only solution. Learning points: Learning how to make diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism in a woman during the first trimester of pregnancy. Understanding the complications of hypercalcemia and be aware of the high mortality and sequelae in both fetus and mother. Providing the adequate treatment in such complicated cases with coordinated care between endocrinologists and obstetricians to ensure optimal outcomes.

scholarly journals Echogenic intracardiac focus – existence in the first trimester and the role of microRNAs

Folia Medica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-147
Author(s):  
Antonios Koutras ◽  
Zacharias Fasoulakis ◽  
Arzou Halil ◽  
Emmanuel N. Kontomanolis
Keyword(s):  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Fetal Heart ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Papillary Muscles ◽  
Ultrasound Scan ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Ultrasound Study ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Low Sensitivity

Echogenic intracardiac focus (EIF) constitutes a finding in the ultrasound study that indicates an area which is echogenically bright in the fetal heart and is as bright as the bone that moves synchronically to the atrioventricular valves. Microcalcifications of the papillary muscles or chordae tendinae are being represented by this echogenicity and are mostly present in the left ventricle (90% of cases). EIF appears usually at the ultrasound that is realized in the mid-trimester in a percentage that reaches 3.5% in euploid fetuses and 15% to 30% in fetuses with trisomy 21. In the current paper, the rare and curious case of a 21-year-old primigravida woman is described, who presented for ultrasound scan at the 12th week of gestation. The scan revealed the presence of EIF, which is very rare, as it is well-known that it usually appears in the second trimester of pregnancy. Counseling and debriefing for dismissing parents&rsquo; anxiety is necessary as well as further examinations, because EIF has low sensitivity. This specific case report could constitute a beginning in the research of whether investigating EIF in the first trimester of pregnancy is possible and which are the benefits of its detection for the mother, the fetus and the whole family, in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Parathyroidectomy in First Trimester of Pregnancy

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia G Sharma ◽  
Steven N Levine ◽  
Rajini K Yatavelli ◽  
Manish A Shaha ◽  
Cherie Ann O Nathan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Hyperparathyroidism ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Extreme Degree ◽  
First Trimester Of Pregnancy ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Asymptomatic Disease

Abstract Primary hyperparathyroidism is not commonly diagnosed during pregnancy. For pregnant women with mild, asymptomatic disease, surgery can be avoided unless the degree of hypercalcemia becomes more severe or they develop complications. However, there are no evidence-based guidelines to assist clinicians regarding the management of primary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy. When surgery is deemed necessary during pregnancy, the second trimester is generally considered to be the optimal time. We report the case of a 31-year-old female G1P0 who presented at 6 weeks gestation with symptoms of nausea, vomiting, polyuria, and corrected calcium of 14.8 mg/dL. Due to the extreme degree of hypercalcemia and refractory to medical treatment, it was decided that surgery could not be delayed until the second trimester. At 7w3d gestational age the patient had resection of a 37 gram, 5 × 4 × 3 cm right inferior parathyroid adenoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document