scholarly journals Validation of the GenesWell BCT Score in Young Asian Women With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mi Jeong Kwon ◽  
Jai Min Ryu ◽  
Soo Youn Cho ◽  
Seok Jin Nam ◽  
Seok Won Kim ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe prognostic or predictive value of commonly used multigene assays in young patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) early breast cancer is unclear. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of the GenesWell BCT assay according to age group.MethodsWe identified patients with pN0-1, HR+/HER2− breast cancer in a prospective cohort of women who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017. The GenesWell BCT assay was performed on tissue samples from selected patients. Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the risk groups assigned by the BCT score.ResultsA total of 712 patients were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up time was 7.47 years. The BCT score was prognostic in patients aged ≤50 years (n = 404) and those aged >50 years (n = 308). In both age groups, the 10-year DMFS and DFS rates for patients classified as high risk by the BCT score were significantly lower than those for patients classified as low risk. A multivariate analysis revealed that the BCT score was an independent prognostic factor for DFS in patients aged ≤50 years (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.05–1.56; P = 0.015), as well as those aged >50 years.ConclusionThe BCT score could be used to identify low-risk patients who will not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy to treat HR+/HER2− early breast cancer regardless of age. A further prospective study to assess the prognostic and predictive value of the BCT score is required.

Author(s):  
Kristi Orbaugh, RN, MSN, RNP, AOCN ◽  
Val R. Adams, PharmD, FCCP, BCOP, FHOPA ◽  
Theresa W. Gillespie, PhD, MA, RN, FAAN

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are revolutionizing care for patients with advanced and metastatic hormone receptor–positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) breast cancer. These oral agents, often combined with other hormone-based therapy, have demonstrated considerable success in clinical trials and are used widely in oncology practices. CDK4/6 inhibitors are also being investigated for the treatment of early stage HR+, HER2– breast cancer. The addition of abemaciclib to adjuvant endocrine therapy improved invasive disease-free survival and distant relapse-free survival compared with endocrine therapy alone in patients with HR+, HER2–, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer, and is now FDA-approved as adjuvant treatment in this setting. Here we review recent clinical data supporting the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in both early and metastatic breast cancer. In addition, an expert faculty panel will discuss practical strategies to promote and improve adherence and side effect management in patients being treated with oral CDK4/6 inhibitors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 423-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Zambelli ◽  
Giovanni Pappagallo ◽  
Paolo Marchetti

Aim: Adding pertuzumab to standard trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the APHINITY trial. However, the magnitude of benefit was marginal in the overall population. Methods: We used GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) analysis on data from APHINITY to build summary-of-findings tables to evaluate the efficacy, safety and quality of evidence of predefined clinical outcomes for the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk HER2-positive early breast cancer. Results: Pertuzumab significantly improved 3-year, event-free, absolute benefit in disease-free survival, IDFS and distant relapse-free interval (DFRI) in patients with node-positive or hormone receptor-negative disease. The analysis provides strength of evidence supporting the addition of pertuzumab in this patient population.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1657-1663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Hackshaw ◽  
Michael Roughton ◽  
Sharon Forsyth ◽  
Kathryn Monson ◽  
Krystyna Reczko ◽  
...  

Purpose The Cancer Research UK “Over 50s” trial compared 5 and 2 years of tamoxifen in women with early breast cancer. Results are reported after median follow-up of 10 years. Patients and Methods Between 1987 and 1997, 3,449 patients age 50 to 81 years with operable breast cancer who had been taking 20 mg of tamoxifen for 2 years were randomly assigned to either stop or continue for an additional 3 years, if they were alive and recurrence free. Data on recurrences, new tumors, deaths, and cardiovascular events were obtained (April 2010). Results There were 1,103 recurrences, 755 deaths as a result of breast cancer, 621 cardiovascular (CV) events, and 236 deaths as a result of CV events. Fifteen years after starting treatment, for every 100 women who received tamoxifen for 5 years, 5.8 fewer experienced recurrence, compared with those who received tamoxifen for 2 years. The risk of contralateral breast cancer was significantly reduced (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.00). Among women age 50 to 59 years, there was a 35% reduction in CV events (P = .005) and 59% reduction in death as a result of a CV event (P = .02); in older women, the effect was much smaller and not statistically significant. Conclusion Taking tamoxifen for the recommended 5 years reduces the risk of recurrence or contralateral breast cancer 15 years after starting treatment. It also lowers the risk of CV disease and death as a result of a CV event, particularly among those age 50 to 59 years. Women should therefore be encouraged to complete the full course. Although aromatase inhibitors improve disease-free survival, tamoxifen remains a cheap and highly effective alternative, particularly in developing countries.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 553-553
Author(s):  
Mei Xue ◽  
Peter Fishman ◽  
Marc Botteman

553 Background: In the ZO-FAST trial, postmenopausal women with early breast cancer and a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≥ –2 and receiving adjuvant letrozole (2.5 mg/day) were randomized to either immediate ZOL (4 mg/6 months) treatment (upfront ZOL) or to the same therapy but only when BMD T-score decreased to < –2 or fracture occurrence (delayed ZOL). After 60 months, upfront ZOL increased both BMD and disease-free survival (P < .05) relative to delayed ZOL. The present analysis assessed, from a US payer perspective, the cost effectiveness of upfront ZOL vs delayed ZOL in this population. Methods: A Markov state-transition model was developed to estimate the lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving letrozole with upfront or delayed ZOL. Consistent with ZO-FAST, patients were 57 years of age and breast cancer recurrence-free at baseline. Patients could progress over time to Local Recurrence, Contra-lateral Tumor, Distant Recurrence, or Death. Transition probabilities were derived from ZO-FAST, supplemented with literature. Costs and utilities were literature based. All outcomes were discounted 3% per year. Results: Compared to delayed ZOL, upfront ZOL resulted in better overall survival, disease-free survival, and QALYs, but at a higher cost (Table). In the base case, the incremental cost/QALY gained with upfront vs delayed ZOL was $7,967. In > 95% of 1,000 probabilistic sensitivity analysis runs, upfront ZOL costs less than $38,376/QALY gained. Conclusions: Upfront ZOL may increase survival and QALY and, at a cost per QALY well under the $50,000/QALY threshold, is very cost-effective in this population. [Table: see text]


2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1535-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M Moyer ◽  
Vera J Suman ◽  
Richard M Weinshilboum ◽  
Rajeswari Avula ◽  
John L Black ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
D N Kravchenko ◽  
A A Parokonnaya ◽  
M I Nechushkin ◽  
D E Avtomonov

Breast cancer is the most prevalent female malignancy. When diagnosed at young age (up to 40 years), negative clinical, morphological and prognostic features are noted. A non-randomized retrospective trial (n=500) was performed to evaluate different scenarios of breast cancer hormone therapy in young patients. Ovarian suppression in young patients is shown to statistically improve prognosis. Disease-free survival rate values are observed to decrease in patients without ovarian suppression in comparison with any type of ovarian suppression, especially at a remote follow-up (after 60 months). Menstrual function resumption and no amenorrhea after chemotherapy significantly decrease disease-free survival rate values in young patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document