scholarly journals Predictive and Prognostic Effects of Primary Tumor Size on Colorectal Cancer Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olatunji B. Alese ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Renjian Jiang ◽  
Katerina Zakka ◽  
Zhonglu Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumor Size

BackgroundPathologic staging is crucial in colorectal cancer (CRC). Unlike the majority of solid tumors, the current staging model does not use tumor size as a criterion. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic impact of primary tumor size on all stages of CRC.MethodsUsing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted an analysis of CRC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection of their primary cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive and prognostic factors, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models for association between tumor size and survival.ResultsAbout 61,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 63 years and majority of the tumors were colon primary (82.7%). AJCC stage distribution was: I - 20.1%; II - 32.1%; III - 34.7% and IV - 13.1%. The prognostic impact of tumor size was strongly associated with survival in stage III disease. Compared to patients with tumors <2cm; those with 2-5cm (HR 1.33; 1.19-1.49; p<0.001), 5-10cm (HR 1.51 (1.34-1.70; p<0.001) and >10cm (HR 1.95 (1.65-2.31; p<0.001) had worse survival independent of other variables. Stage II treated without adjuvant chemotherapy had comparable survival outcomes (HR 1.09; 0.97-1.523; p=0.148) with stage III patients who did, while Stage II patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy did much better than both groups (HR 0.76; 0.67-0.86; p<0.001). Stage III patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had the worst outcomes among the non-metastatic disease subgroups (HR 2.66; 2.48-2.86; p<0.001). Larger tumors were associated with advanced stage, MSI high, non-rectal primary and positive resection margins.ConclusionsFurther studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in prognostic staging models, and how to incorporate it into therapy decisions.

Impact of primary tumor size/horizontal extent on survival in colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Olatunji B. Alese ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Renjian Jiang ◽  
Katerina Mary Zakka ◽  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Primary Tumor Size ◽  
The Impact

125 Background: Pathologic staging in colorectal cancer (CRC) is crucial in patient management. Data regarding the impact of size/horizontal tumor extent is limited, contradictory and currently excluded from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging model. However, a previously published SEER analysis showed that AJCC stages I and IIIA have similar 2- and 5- year survival rates, and worse rates for stage II. Using the largest cohort to date, we report the impact of primary tumor size on CRC survival. Methods: Data were obtained from all US hospitals that contributed to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2010 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between tumor/patient characteristics and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 61,145 patients were identified with a similar gender distribution (M/F:50.9%/49.1%). The mean age was 62.7years (SD+/-14.1) and 82% were non-Hispanic Whites. Majority had colon primary (82.7%) and 82.4% had microsatellite stable (MSS) disease. Distribution across stages I-IV was 20.1%, 32.1%, 34.7% and 13.2% respectively. Among the total study population, AJCC stage correlated closely with OS on multivariate analysis (HR 1.49, 2.29, 8.38 for stages II to IV compared to stage I), while the distinguishing power for tumor size was relatively mild (HR 1.19 and 1.33 for 5-10 cm and >5cm compared to <5cm). Among patients with stage II disease, tumors >10cm were associated with worse survival compared to those <5cm (HR 1.2; 1.03-1.39; p=0.22). Stage III disease also had differential survival rates; patients with tumors 5-10cm (HR 1.21; 1.14-1.28; p<0.001) and >10cm (HR 1.57; 1.37-1.80; p<0.001) had worse survival than those <5cm. Patients with stage II who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) had worse survival outcomes (HR 1.29; 1.08-1.55; p=0.005) compared to stage III disease who did. Accounting for tumor size, there was no statistically significant survival differences between stage I patients and stages II and III patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Tumors larger than 10cm have inferior outcomes among patients in the same AJCC stages. Stage II patients without adjuvant CTX did worse than stage III with CTX. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in staging models. [Table: see text]

Prognostic significance of pathological biomarkers in patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14518-14518
Author(s):  
C. Funaioli ◽  
C. Pinto ◽  
C. Ceccarelli ◽  
F. Di Fabio ◽  
D. Cuicchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
The Impact

14518 Background: Biopathological colorectal cancer (CRC) studies have provided information on pathogenesis, but it is unclear how important biomarkers actually are in predicting prognosis. The aim of our study was to define the prognostic significance of biomarkers and a biopathological profile that could predict an increase in the disease relapse risk in stage II-III CRC patients (pts). Methods: The primary tumor of the CRC pts treated with surgery was immunohistochemically evaluated on the Ki67, p53, bcl-2, TS, EGFR, MLH1 and MSH2 expressions. All 7 markers were measured using standard immunohistochemical techniques. The biomarker evaluations were scored by just one pathologist. Results: Between March 2001 and October 2006 the primary tumor of 242 consecutive pts was investigated. Pt characteristics were: males 141(58.3%), females 101(41.7%); median age 68.5 (24–88); primary tumor site: right colon 94(38.8%), left colon 148(61.2%); stage II 102(42.1%), stage III 81(33.5%), stage IV 59(24.4%). 5-fluorouracil based adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 121 (66.1%) pts. After a median follow up of 30 months (1–80), 34 pts (10 pts stage II, 24 pts stage III) of 183 stage II-III pts (18.6%) had a disease recurrence. In a univariate analysis of stage II-III pts, a higher expression of Ki67 (= 50% positive cells) was significantly associated with an improved DFS (p= 0.014) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.010). Expression of p53, bcl-2, TS, EGFR, MLH1 and MSH2 were not significantly associated with DFS and OS. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for the impact of the disease stage and adjuvant chemotherapy, a higher expression of Ki67 was significantly associated with diminished risk of recurrence (HR: 0.395; 95% CI: 0.183–0.855, p=0.018) and death (HR: 0.179; 95% CI: 0.046–0.696, p=0.013). The evaluation of DNA mismatch repair status (MLH1, MSH2) demonstrated that the lack of MLH1 is more frequent in non-relapsed II-III stage pts than in IV stage pts (p= 0.024). Conclusions: This analysis showed a significant correlation between higher Ki67 expression and better DFS and OS in pts with stage II-III CRC. An higher frequency of MLH1 deficiency was observed in non-relapsed pts with stage II-III than in advanced disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer in frail patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Mima ◽  
Nobutomo Miyanari ◽  
Keisuke Kosumi ◽  
Takuya Tajiri ◽  
Kosuke Kanemitsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Frail Patients

Prognostic impact of interhospital variation in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with Stage II/III colorectal cancer: a nationwide study

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. O162-O172 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Arakawa ◽  
K. Kawai ◽  
T. Tanaka ◽  
K. Hata ◽  
K. Sugihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Nationwide Study

Clinical and Socioeconomic Factors that Predict Non-completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer in a Rural Cancer Center

2022 ◽  
pp. 000313482110547
Author(s):  
Chelsea Knotts ◽  
Alexandra Van Horn ◽  
Krysta Orminski ◽  
Stephanie Thompson ◽  
Jacob Minor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Socioeconomic Factors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Complete Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background Previous literature demonstrates correlations between comorbidities and failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy. Frailty and socioeconomic disparities have also been implicated in affecting cancer treatment outcomes. This study examines the effect of demographics, comorbidities, frailty, and socioeconomic status on chemotherapy completion rates in colorectal cancer patients. Methods This was an observational case-control study using retrospective data from Stage II and III colorectal cancer patients offered chemotherapy between January 01, 2013 and January 01, 2018. Data was obtained using the cancer registry, supplemented with chart review. Patients were divided based on treatment completion and compared with respect to comorbidities, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and insurance status using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results 228 patients were identified: 53 Stage II and 175 Stage III. Of these, 24.5% of Stage II and 30.3% of Stage III patients did not complete chemotherapy. Neither ECOG status nor any comorbidity predicted failure to complete treatment. Those failing to complete chemotherapy were older (64.4 vs 60.8 years, P = .043). Additionally, those with public assistance or self-pay were less likely to complete chemotherapy than those with private insurance ( P = .049). Both factors (older age/insurance status) remained significant on multivariate analysis (increasing age at diagnosis: OR 1.03, P =.034; public insurance: OR 1.84, P = .07; and self-pay status: OR 4.49, P = .03). Conclusions No comorbidity was associated with failure to complete therapy, nor was frailty, as assessed by ECOG score. Though frailty was not significant, increasing age was, possibly reflecting negative attitudes toward chemotherapy in older populations. Insurance status also predicted failure to complete treatment, suggesting disparities in access to treatment, affected by socioeconomic factors.

Identification of a subgroup of patients with breast cancer and histologically positive axillary nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1107-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Fowble ◽  
R Gray ◽  
K Gilchrist ◽  
R L Goodman ◽  
S Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Primary Tumor Size ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Postmastectomy Radiation

Risk factors for isolated local-regional (LR) recurrence following mastectomy for breast cancer were analyzed in a review of 627 women entered into Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) adjuvant chemotherapy trials between 1978 and 1982. Premenopausal patients were randomized to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF), cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, and prednisone (CMFP), or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, prednisone, and tamoxifen (CMFPT). Postmenopausal patients were randomized to observation, CMFP, or CMFPT. Median follow-up time was 4.5 years. At 3 years, 225 patients relapsed and in 70 (31% of failures, 11% of all patients) the initial site was LR without distant metastases. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of an isolated LR recurrence significantly correlated with the number of positive axillary nodes, the primary tumor size, the presence of tumor necrosis, and the number of axillary nodes examined. Factors that significantly discriminated between an isolated LR recurrence and distant metastasis were the number of positive nodes and primary tumor size. Patients with four to seven positive nodes or tumor size greater than or equal to 5 cm had a chance of developing an isolated LR recurrence almost equal to the risk of distant metastases. These findings suggest a potential for improved survival in this subset of patients with the addition of postmastectomy radiation to chemotherapy, and continue to emphasize the presence of a group of patients at high risk for isolated LR recurrence despite adjuvant chemotherapy.

Impact of M1a and M1b staging in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3590-3590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Jason Yu ◽  
Sharlene Gill ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Charles Davic Blanke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
7Th Edition ◽  
The Impact

3590 Background: In 2009, pts with M1 colorectal cancer were divided into two subsets for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition. Pts with metastases (mets) confined to one organ or site at initial diagnosis became stage M1a while multiple sites or peritoneal mets became M1b. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the impact of site of mets and M1a/b staging among pts with M1 colorectal cancer. Methods: All pts referred to the BC Cancer Agency from 1999-2007 with newly diagnosed M1 colon or rectal cancer were included. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were prospectively collected. The prognostic impact of individual sites of mets was assessed by hazard ratio estimates from univariate Cox models. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine variables associated with overall survival in the entire cohort and in those undergoing resection of their primary tumor. Results: 2,049 pts with M1 disease were included. Median age was 66 years; 71% had colonic origin; 70% had their primary tumor resected; and 69% received chemotherapy. In univariate analysis, solitary mets were associated with improved survival. In multivariable analysis, M1a/b status still had significant prognostic effect. The effect remained significant in the subgroup analysis of pts with resected primary tumors when histology, T and N stage were included. Conclusions: Pts with solitary mets, including peritoneum, have superior overall survival as compared to those with multiple sites of mets. AJCC 7th edition staging that includes M1a/b provides significant prognostic information and should be considered in clinical practice and trials of pts with M1 disease who otherwise have few prognostic factors. [Table: see text]

Clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 867-867
Author(s):  
Shusuke Yagi ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Diverting Ileostomy ◽  
Grade 3

867 Background: CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard care option for stage III and high risk stage II colorectal cancer(CRC). And then chemotherapy induced diarrhea (CID) is known as one of the dose-limiting toxicities for CAPOX. Although diverting ileostomy is useful for preventing serious complications of high risk anastomosis, it is well recognized that high ileostomy output is hard to manage. Furthermore, the effect of diverting ileostomy on CID of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we addressed the clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC. Methods: Patients who diagnosed with stage III colon cancer and stage II or III rectal cancer after curative surgery and received CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy during 2011- 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated the relationship between diverting ileostomy and dose intensity, toxicities and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 112 patients (median age 60 years, 52% male, 69% colon cancer, 63% stage III, median follow-up 47 months) were enrolled in this study. Of 112 patients, 100 patients were received chemotherapy without ileostomy (non-ileostomy group: NIG) and 12 patients were received chemotherapy with ileostomy (ileostomy group: IG). 112 Patients received 870 chemotherapy cycles. All treatment related grade 3/4 adverse events were documented in 39% of patients in NIG and 33% of patients in IG (P = 0.77). Grade 3/4 of CID occurred in 8% of patients in NIG and 8% of patients in IG (P = 1). Grade 3/4 of neutropenia were recognized in 21% of patients in NIG and 17% of patients in IG (P = 1). Average relative dose intensity (RDI) in NIG were 75.7% and 85.8% for capecitabine and oxaliplatin, respectively. Average RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in IG were 76.1% and 82.7%, respectively. Significant difference of RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were not shown in comparison between NIG and IG (P = 0.93, P = 0.63). The 3-year DFS rate was 85.0% in NIG and 75.0% in IG. The HR for DFS for NIG compared to IG was 1.709 (95% CI, 0.49 to 5.95; P = 0.40). Conclusions: The presence of diverting ileostomy does not affect RDI of CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document