Impact of primary tumor size/horizontal extent on survival in colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Olatunji B. Alese ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Renjian Jiang ◽  
Katerina Mary Zakka ◽  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Primary Tumor Size ◽  
The Impact

125 Background: Pathologic staging in colorectal cancer (CRC) is crucial in patient management. Data regarding the impact of size/horizontal tumor extent is limited, contradictory and currently excluded from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging model. However, a previously published SEER analysis showed that AJCC stages I and IIIA have similar 2- and 5- year survival rates, and worse rates for stage II. Using the largest cohort to date, we report the impact of primary tumor size on CRC survival. Methods: Data were obtained from all US hospitals that contributed to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2010 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between tumor/patient characteristics and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 61,145 patients were identified with a similar gender distribution (M/F:50.9%/49.1%). The mean age was 62.7years (SD+/-14.1) and 82% were non-Hispanic Whites. Majority had colon primary (82.7%) and 82.4% had microsatellite stable (MSS) disease. Distribution across stages I-IV was 20.1%, 32.1%, 34.7% and 13.2% respectively. Among the total study population, AJCC stage correlated closely with OS on multivariate analysis (HR 1.49, 2.29, 8.38 for stages II to IV compared to stage I), while the distinguishing power for tumor size was relatively mild (HR 1.19 and 1.33 for 5-10 cm and >5cm compared to <5cm). Among patients with stage II disease, tumors >10cm were associated with worse survival compared to those <5cm (HR 1.2; 1.03-1.39; p=0.22). Stage III disease also had differential survival rates; patients with tumors 5-10cm (HR 1.21; 1.14-1.28; p<0.001) and >10cm (HR 1.57; 1.37-1.80; p<0.001) had worse survival than those <5cm. Patients with stage II who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) had worse survival outcomes (HR 1.29; 1.08-1.55; p=0.005) compared to stage III disease who did. Accounting for tumor size, there was no statistically significant survival differences between stage I patients and stages II and III patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Tumors larger than 10cm have inferior outcomes among patients in the same AJCC stages. Stage II patients without adjuvant CTX did worse than stage III with CTX. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in staging models. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Predictive and Prognostic Effects of Primary Tumor Size on Colorectal Cancer Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olatunji B. Alese ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Renjian Jiang ◽  
Katerina Zakka ◽  
Zhonglu Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumor Size

BackgroundPathologic staging is crucial in colorectal cancer (CRC). Unlike the majority of solid tumors, the current staging model does not use tumor size as a criterion. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic impact of primary tumor size on all stages of CRC.MethodsUsing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted an analysis of CRC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection of their primary cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive and prognostic factors, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models for association between tumor size and survival.ResultsAbout 61,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 63 years and majority of the tumors were colon primary (82.7%). AJCC stage distribution was: I - 20.1%; II - 32.1%; III - 34.7% and IV - 13.1%. The prognostic impact of tumor size was strongly associated with survival in stage III disease. Compared to patients with tumors &lt;2cm; those with 2-5cm (HR 1.33; 1.19-1.49; p&lt;0.001), 5-10cm (HR 1.51 (1.34-1.70; p&lt;0.001) and &gt;10cm (HR 1.95 (1.65-2.31; p&lt;0.001) had worse survival independent of other variables. Stage II treated without adjuvant chemotherapy had comparable survival outcomes (HR 1.09; 0.97-1.523; p=0.148) with stage III patients who did, while Stage II patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy did much better than both groups (HR 0.76; 0.67-0.86; p&lt;0.001). Stage III patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had the worst outcomes among the non-metastatic disease subgroups (HR 2.66; 2.48-2.86; p&lt;0.001). Larger tumors were associated with advanced stage, MSI high, non-rectal primary and positive resection margins.ConclusionsFurther studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in prognostic staging models, and how to incorporate it into therapy decisions.

Prognostic significance of pathological biomarkers in patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14518-14518
Author(s):  
C. Funaioli ◽  
C. Pinto ◽  
C. Ceccarelli ◽  
F. Di Fabio ◽  
D. Cuicchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
The Impact

14518 Background: Biopathological colorectal cancer (CRC) studies have provided information on pathogenesis, but it is unclear how important biomarkers actually are in predicting prognosis. The aim of our study was to define the prognostic significance of biomarkers and a biopathological profile that could predict an increase in the disease relapse risk in stage II-III CRC patients (pts). Methods: The primary tumor of the CRC pts treated with surgery was immunohistochemically evaluated on the Ki67, p53, bcl-2, TS, EGFR, MLH1 and MSH2 expressions. All 7 markers were measured using standard immunohistochemical techniques. The biomarker evaluations were scored by just one pathologist. Results: Between March 2001 and October 2006 the primary tumor of 242 consecutive pts was investigated. Pt characteristics were: males 141(58.3%), females 101(41.7%); median age 68.5 (24–88); primary tumor site: right colon 94(38.8%), left colon 148(61.2%); stage II 102(42.1%), stage III 81(33.5%), stage IV 59(24.4%). 5-fluorouracil based adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 121 (66.1%) pts. After a median follow up of 30 months (1–80), 34 pts (10 pts stage II, 24 pts stage III) of 183 stage II-III pts (18.6%) had a disease recurrence. In a univariate analysis of stage II-III pts, a higher expression of Ki67 (= 50% positive cells) was significantly associated with an improved DFS (p= 0.014) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.010). Expression of p53, bcl-2, TS, EGFR, MLH1 and MSH2 were not significantly associated with DFS and OS. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for the impact of the disease stage and adjuvant chemotherapy, a higher expression of Ki67 was significantly associated with diminished risk of recurrence (HR: 0.395; 95% CI: 0.183–0.855, p=0.018) and death (HR: 0.179; 95% CI: 0.046–0.696, p=0.013). The evaluation of DNA mismatch repair status (MLH1, MSH2) demonstrated that the lack of MLH1 is more frequent in non-relapsed II-III stage pts than in IV stage pts (p= 0.024). Conclusions: This analysis showed a significant correlation between higher Ki67 expression and better DFS and OS in pts with stage II-III CRC. An higher frequency of MLH1 deficiency was observed in non-relapsed pts with stage II-III than in advanced disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Which side is better? The impact of primary tumor side in early stage colorectal cancer (CRC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15106-e15106
Author(s):  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Andrew Mackinlay ◽  
Christine Semira ◽  
Antonio Jose Jimeno ◽  
Belinda Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
The Impact

e15106 Background: Multiple studies have indicated the prognostic and potential predictive significance of primary tumor side in metastatic CRC. To date, the few studies examining its impact in early stage disease have either combined data across multiple stages or restricted analysis to overall survival (OS) data. A by stage analysis of the impact of tumor side on recurrence risk is critical if it is to impact adjuvant therapy decisions. Methods: We examined data from a multi-site Australian registry of consecutive patients diagnosed from 2003-2016. Tumors at and distal to the splenic flexure, including the rectum, were considered a left primary (LP). Rectal patients treated with initial chemoradiation were excluded. Clinico-pathologic and outcome data were examined. Data analysis was provided by the healthcare group at IBM Research Australia. Results: A total of 6123 patients were identified, of which 1046 (17.1%) had initial stage I, 1892 (30.9%) had stage II, 1708 (27.9%) had stage III, and 1477 (24.1%) had stage IV disease. Most patients were male (55.2%), and had a LP (n = 3818, 62.4%). Median age at diagnosis was 68.8 years, was higher in patients with a right primary (RP) (71.6 versus 67.0 years for LP, p < 0.001), with more females in the RP group (51.1% vs 41.0% for LP, p < 0.001). The proportion of RP varied by stage, highest in stage II (44.9%), lowest in stage IV (31.5%). For all stage IV disease, including metachronous cases, OS was worse with a RP (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.14-1.53). For early stage cases, distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) was similar for RP vs LP for stage I (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32-1.23), better for stage II RP (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95) and worse for stage III RP disease (HR 1.22, 1.01-1.48). OS did not differ for RP vs LP for stage I or II disease, but was worse for stage III disease with a RP (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.13-1.70). Furthermore, post recurrence survival was poorer in stage III RP disease (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.33-1.96). Conclusions: Primary tumor side has potential as an important prognostic marker in early stage CRC. Our novel finding of a variable impact by stage indicate that an assessment of cohorts where recurrence data is available is critical to fully understanding the implications of tumor side for adjuvant therapy decision making.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer in frail patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Mima ◽  
Nobutomo Miyanari ◽  
Keisuke Kosumi ◽  
Takuya Tajiri ◽  
Kosuke Kanemitsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Frail Patients

scholarly journals Comparison of Primary Tumor Size in Stage I and III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 6507-6511 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDGAR PETRU ◽  
CAROLA HUBER ◽  
EVA SAMPL ◽  
JOSEF HAAS
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Primary Tumor Size

Clinical and Socioeconomic Factors that Predict Non-completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer in a Rural Cancer Center

2022 ◽  
pp. 000313482110547
Author(s):  
Chelsea Knotts ◽  
Alexandra Van Horn ◽  
Krysta Orminski ◽  
Stephanie Thompson ◽  
Jacob Minor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Socioeconomic Factors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Complete Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background Previous literature demonstrates correlations between comorbidities and failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy. Frailty and socioeconomic disparities have also been implicated in affecting cancer treatment outcomes. This study examines the effect of demographics, comorbidities, frailty, and socioeconomic status on chemotherapy completion rates in colorectal cancer patients. Methods This was an observational case-control study using retrospective data from Stage II and III colorectal cancer patients offered chemotherapy between January 01, 2013 and January 01, 2018. Data was obtained using the cancer registry, supplemented with chart review. Patients were divided based on treatment completion and compared with respect to comorbidities, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and insurance status using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results 228 patients were identified: 53 Stage II and 175 Stage III. Of these, 24.5% of Stage II and 30.3% of Stage III patients did not complete chemotherapy. Neither ECOG status nor any comorbidity predicted failure to complete treatment. Those failing to complete chemotherapy were older (64.4 vs 60.8 years, P = .043). Additionally, those with public assistance or self-pay were less likely to complete chemotherapy than those with private insurance ( P = .049). Both factors (older age/insurance status) remained significant on multivariate analysis (increasing age at diagnosis: OR 1.03, P =.034; public insurance: OR 1.84, P = .07; and self-pay status: OR 4.49, P = .03). Conclusions No comorbidity was associated with failure to complete therapy, nor was frailty, as assessed by ECOG score. Though frailty was not significant, increasing age was, possibly reflecting negative attitudes toward chemotherapy in older populations. Insurance status also predicted failure to complete treatment, suggesting disparities in access to treatment, affected by socioeconomic factors.

Identification of a subgroup of patients with breast cancer and histologically positive axillary nodes receiving adjuvant chemotherapy who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1107-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Fowble ◽  
R Gray ◽  
K Gilchrist ◽  
R L Goodman ◽  
S Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Primary Tumor Size ◽  
Axillary Nodes ◽  
Postmastectomy Radiation

Risk factors for isolated local-regional (LR) recurrence following mastectomy for breast cancer were analyzed in a review of 627 women entered into Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) adjuvant chemotherapy trials between 1978 and 1982. Premenopausal patients were randomized to cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (5-FU) (CMF), cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, and prednisone (CMFP), or cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-FU, prednisone, and tamoxifen (CMFPT). Postmenopausal patients were randomized to observation, CMFP, or CMFPT. Median follow-up time was 4.5 years. At 3 years, 225 patients relapsed and in 70 (31% of failures, 11% of all patients) the initial site was LR without distant metastases. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of an isolated LR recurrence significantly correlated with the number of positive axillary nodes, the primary tumor size, the presence of tumor necrosis, and the number of axillary nodes examined. Factors that significantly discriminated between an isolated LR recurrence and distant metastasis were the number of positive nodes and primary tumor size. Patients with four to seven positive nodes or tumor size greater than or equal to 5 cm had a chance of developing an isolated LR recurrence almost equal to the risk of distant metastases. These findings suggest a potential for improved survival in this subset of patients with the addition of postmastectomy radiation to chemotherapy, and continue to emphasize the presence of a group of patients at high risk for isolated LR recurrence despite adjuvant chemotherapy.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colectomy for Colon Cancer: Experiences with 308 Consecutive Cases

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasumitsu Hirano ◽  
Masakazu Hattori ◽  
Kenji Douden ◽  
Chikashi Hiranuma ◽  
Yasuo Hashizume ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Intention To Treat

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been developed with the aim to further reduce the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. Our experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients with SILS for colon cancer are reviewed, and its outcomes are evaluated to determine the midterm clinical and oncologic safety of SILS for colon cancer in a community hospital. A single surgeon's consecutive experience of SILS for colon cancer is presented. Three hundred and eight patients were treated with the SILS procedure for colon cancer between December 2010 and March 2015. Data were analyzed according to intention to treat. Of these 308 patients, 19 (6.2%) were converted to laparotomy. Intraoperative injury occurred in five patients. Postoperative complications occurred in 19 patients (6.2%). The 2-year relapse-free survival rates of patients with Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III were 97.8, 92.2, and 80.4 per cent, respectively, and the 2-year overall survival rates of patients with Stage I, Stage II, Stage III, and Stage IV were 100, 95.7, 93.0, and 74.4 per cent, respectively. Our initial experiences showed that SILS colectomy for cancer can be performed safely and with good short-term oncologic outcomes by a skilled surgeon.

Uptake of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer in older and younger patients in the Irish population.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 478-478
Author(s):  
Seamus Coyle ◽  
Zia Rehman ◽  
Chalen Lee ◽  
Sandra Deady ◽  
Harry Comber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
The Impact

478 Background: Colon cancer is predominantly a disease of the elderly, with recent evidence supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the older population. However, it remains unclear to what degree such patients are receiving adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. We examined uptake of adjuvantchemotherapy and it’s impact on survival in older patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer in a national cohort. Methods: Using the National cancer Registry of Ireland, we identified 3,486 patients with stage II and III colon cancer who were treated with curative resection from 2004-2009. Clinopathological features and chemotherapy use were compared between those ≥70 years and those < 70 years. Results: A total of 2,026 patients with stage II disease were identified, 56% male and 60% ≥ 70 years. T3 tumors accounted for 81%, T4 19% and 89% were grade 2/3. Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 10% and 40% of ≥ 70 and <70 years, respectively (p<0.0001). A benefit for chemotherapy over observation alone was seen in both the older [HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.36 – 0.68; p <0.0001] and younger patient groups [HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.2701 - 0.6881; p<0.0004]. Of 1,460 patients with stage III disease, 51% were ≥ 70 years, 54% male. 34% of older and 83% of younger patients received adjuvant therapy (p<0.0001). A similar magnitude of benefit from chemotherapy compared to observation was seen in patients ≥ 70 years [HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.29 - 0.45 ; p <0.0001] and <70 years [HR 0.22 95%CI 0.1 – 0.2; p<0.0001] with stage III disease. Conclusions: Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be associated with significant survival benefit in older patients (age ≥ 70 years), however, is still underutilized in clinical practice. The impact of sociodemographic and clinicopathological features as potential drivers of treatment decisions in a cohort of this population will be reported.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document