Prognostic significance of pathological biomarkers in patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14518-14518
Author(s):  
C. Funaioli ◽  
C. Pinto ◽  
C. Ceccarelli ◽  
F. Di Fabio ◽  
D. Cuicchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
The Impact

14518 Background: Biopathological colorectal cancer (CRC) studies have provided information on pathogenesis, but it is unclear how important biomarkers actually are in predicting prognosis. The aim of our study was to define the prognostic significance of biomarkers and a biopathological profile that could predict an increase in the disease relapse risk in stage II-III CRC patients (pts). Methods: The primary tumor of the CRC pts treated with surgery was immunohistochemically evaluated on the Ki67, p53, bcl-2, TS, EGFR, MLH1 and MSH2 expressions. All 7 markers were measured using standard immunohistochemical techniques. The biomarker evaluations were scored by just one pathologist. Results: Between March 2001 and October 2006 the primary tumor of 242 consecutive pts was investigated. Pt characteristics were: males 141(58.3%), females 101(41.7%); median age 68.5 (24–88); primary tumor site: right colon 94(38.8%), left colon 148(61.2%); stage II 102(42.1%), stage III 81(33.5%), stage IV 59(24.4%). 5-fluorouracil based adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 121 (66.1%) pts. After a median follow up of 30 months (1–80), 34 pts (10 pts stage II, 24 pts stage III) of 183 stage II-III pts (18.6%) had a disease recurrence. In a univariate analysis of stage II-III pts, a higher expression of Ki67 (= 50% positive cells) was significantly associated with an improved DFS (p= 0.014) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.010). Expression of p53, bcl-2, TS, EGFR, MLH1 and MSH2 were not significantly associated with DFS and OS. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for the impact of the disease stage and adjuvant chemotherapy, a higher expression of Ki67 was significantly associated with diminished risk of recurrence (HR: 0.395; 95% CI: 0.183–0.855, p=0.018) and death (HR: 0.179; 95% CI: 0.046–0.696, p=0.013). The evaluation of DNA mismatch repair status (MLH1, MSH2) demonstrated that the lack of MLH1 is more frequent in non-relapsed II-III stage pts than in IV stage pts (p= 0.024). Conclusions: This analysis showed a significant correlation between higher Ki67 expression and better DFS and OS in pts with stage II-III CRC. An higher frequency of MLH1 deficiency was observed in non-relapsed pts with stage II-III than in advanced disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Impact of primary tumor size/horizontal extent on survival in colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 125-125
Author(s):  
Olatunji B. Alese ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Renjian Jiang ◽  
Katerina Mary Zakka ◽  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Primary Tumor Size ◽  
The Impact

125 Background: Pathologic staging in colorectal cancer (CRC) is crucial in patient management. Data regarding the impact of size/horizontal tumor extent is limited, contradictory and currently excluded from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging model. However, a previously published SEER analysis showed that AJCC stages I and IIIA have similar 2- and 5- year survival rates, and worse rates for stage II. Using the largest cohort to date, we report the impact of primary tumor size on CRC survival. Methods: Data were obtained from all US hospitals that contributed to the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2010 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with patient outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between tumor/patient characteristics and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 61,145 patients were identified with a similar gender distribution (M/F:50.9%/49.1%). The mean age was 62.7years (SD+/-14.1) and 82% were non-Hispanic Whites. Majority had colon primary (82.7%) and 82.4% had microsatellite stable (MSS) disease. Distribution across stages I-IV was 20.1%, 32.1%, 34.7% and 13.2% respectively. Among the total study population, AJCC stage correlated closely with OS on multivariate analysis (HR 1.49, 2.29, 8.38 for stages II to IV compared to stage I), while the distinguishing power for tumor size was relatively mild (HR 1.19 and 1.33 for 5-10 cm and >5cm compared to <5cm). Among patients with stage II disease, tumors >10cm were associated with worse survival compared to those <5cm (HR 1.2; 1.03-1.39; p=0.22). Stage III disease also had differential survival rates; patients with tumors 5-10cm (HR 1.21; 1.14-1.28; p<0.001) and >10cm (HR 1.57; 1.37-1.80; p<0.001) had worse survival than those <5cm. Patients with stage II who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) had worse survival outcomes (HR 1.29; 1.08-1.55; p=0.005) compared to stage III disease who did. Accounting for tumor size, there was no statistically significant survival differences between stage I patients and stages II and III patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Tumors larger than 10cm have inferior outcomes among patients in the same AJCC stages. Stage II patients without adjuvant CTX did worse than stage III with CTX. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in staging models. [Table: see text]

Is adjuvant chemotherapy beneficial for stage II-III goblet cell tumors of the appendix?

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 796-796
Author(s):  
Katerina Mary Zakka ◽  
Shayla Williamson ◽  
Renjian Jiang ◽  
Olatunji B. Alese ◽  
Walid Labib Shaib ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Goblet Cell ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Pathological Stage ◽  
Multivariable Analyses ◽  
The Impact

796 Background: Goblet cell tumors (GCT) of the appendix are very rare tumors constituting 2.5%-5% of all primary appendiceal neoplasms. Role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is not established for GCT. This study aims to evaluate the impact of AC in stage II-III appendiceal GCT. Methods: Patients with pathological stage II and III GCT who underwent surgical resection between 2006 and 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8243/3, 8245/3 and C18.1. Patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic and/or radiation therapy and adjuvant radiation were excluded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier Curves were used to compare overall survival (OS) based on treatment received with Log-rank test. Results: A total of 1,046 patients were identified. 53.7% males and 89.0% Caucasian; median age 56 (range, 20-90) years. Distribution across pathological stages II-III was 83.6% (N = 874) and 16.4% (N = 172) consecutively. 8.3% (N = 73) of stage II and 50.6% (N = 87) of stage III patients received AC. In the total cohort, AC was not associated with better OS compared to no AC in univariate analysis (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.26-2.67; p = 0.001) or multivariable analysis (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.57-1.52; p = 0.790). For stage II patients, AC was not associated with better OS in univariate (HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.60-2.57; p = 0.562) or multivariable analyses (HR 1.67; 95% CI 0.76-3.64; p = 0.199). Similarly, in stage III patients, AC was not associated with better OS in univariate (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.48-1.29; p = 0.340) or multivariable analyses (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28-1.04; p = 0.067). In the entire cohort 5-year OS for patients that received AC was 83.9% (80.3%, 86.9%) versus 70.7% (60.9%, 78.5%) (p = 0.001) with no AC. For stage II patients, 5-year OS was 77.3% with AC vs. 87.7% with no AC (p = 0.562). For stage III patients, 5-year OS was 64.8% with AC vs. 54.4% with no AC (p = 0.340). Conclusions: AC was not associated with improved 5-year OS in patients with pathological stage II and III GCT compared to no AC.

Immunohistochemical Test for MLH1 and MSH2 Expression Predicts Clinical Outcome in Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer Patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (15) ◽  
pp. 2359-2367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Lanza ◽  
Roberta Gafà ◽  
Alessandra Santini ◽  
Iva Maestri ◽  
Laura Guerzoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Purpose To evaluate the prognostic significance of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status in a large series of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients. The relationship among MMR status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical outcome was also investigated. Patients and Methods The study included 718 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (393 stage II and 325 stage III) who underwent curative surgical resection. MMR status was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 expression. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was assessed in 363 patients using mononucleotide and dinucleotide markers. Results One hundred fourteen (15.9%) carcinomas showed abnormal MMR protein (MMRP) expression (96 MLH1 negative and 18 MSH2 negative) and were classified as MMRP negative, whereas 604 tumors demonstrated normal MLH1/MSH2 immunoreactivity (MMRP positive). MLH1/MSH2 expression was closely related to MSI status (P < .001) and several clinicopathologic features. Patients with MMRP-negative carcinomas demonstrated a marked reduction in the risk of cancer-related death with respect to patients with MMRP-positive tumors (hazard ratio, 0.2579; 95% CI, 0.1289 to 0.5159). A better clinical outcome for patients with MMRP-negative tumors was observed in both stage II (P = .0006) and stage III (P = .0052) disease. In stage III disease, the survival advantage conferred by MMRP-negative tumors was more evident among patients treated with surgery alone than among patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. A nonsignificant trend for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was observed among patients with MMRP-positive carcinomas but not among those with MMRP-negative carcinomas. Conclusion Immunohistochemical testing for MLH1/MSH2 expression provides useful prognostic information for the management of stage II and III colorectal cancer patients.

scholarly journals Predictive and Prognostic Effects of Primary Tumor Size on Colorectal Cancer Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olatunji B. Alese ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Renjian Jiang ◽  
Katerina Zakka ◽  
Zhonglu Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumor Size

BackgroundPathologic staging is crucial in colorectal cancer (CRC). Unlike the majority of solid tumors, the current staging model does not use tumor size as a criterion. We evaluated the predictive and prognostic impact of primary tumor size on all stages of CRC.MethodsUsing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we conducted an analysis of CRC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 who underwent resection of their primary cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive and prognostic factors, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models for association between tumor size and survival.ResultsAbout 61,000 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 63 years and majority of the tumors were colon primary (82.7%). AJCC stage distribution was: I - 20.1%; II - 32.1%; III - 34.7% and IV - 13.1%. The prognostic impact of tumor size was strongly associated with survival in stage III disease. Compared to patients with tumors &lt;2cm; those with 2-5cm (HR 1.33; 1.19-1.49; p&lt;0.001), 5-10cm (HR 1.51 (1.34-1.70; p&lt;0.001) and &gt;10cm (HR 1.95 (1.65-2.31; p&lt;0.001) had worse survival independent of other variables. Stage II treated without adjuvant chemotherapy had comparable survival outcomes (HR 1.09; 0.97-1.523; p=0.148) with stage III patients who did, while Stage II patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy did much better than both groups (HR 0.76; 0.67-0.86; p&lt;0.001). Stage III patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy had the worst outcomes among the non-metastatic disease subgroups (HR 2.66; 2.48-2.86; p&lt;0.001). Larger tumors were associated with advanced stage, MSI high, non-rectal primary and positive resection margins.ConclusionsFurther studies are needed to clarify the role of tumor size in prognostic staging models, and how to incorporate it into therapy decisions.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected high-risk stage II and stage III colorectal cancer in frail patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Mima ◽  
Nobutomo Miyanari ◽  
Keisuke Kosumi ◽  
Takuya Tajiri ◽  
Kosuke Kanemitsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Frail Patients

Clinical and Socioeconomic Factors that Predict Non-completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer in a Rural Cancer Center

2022 ◽  
pp. 000313482110547
Author(s):  
Chelsea Knotts ◽  
Alexandra Van Horn ◽  
Krysta Orminski ◽  
Stephanie Thompson ◽  
Jacob Minor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Socioeconomic Factors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Insurance Status ◽  
Complete Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Background Previous literature demonstrates correlations between comorbidities and failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy. Frailty and socioeconomic disparities have also been implicated in affecting cancer treatment outcomes. This study examines the effect of demographics, comorbidities, frailty, and socioeconomic status on chemotherapy completion rates in colorectal cancer patients. Methods This was an observational case-control study using retrospective data from Stage II and III colorectal cancer patients offered chemotherapy between January 01, 2013 and January 01, 2018. Data was obtained using the cancer registry, supplemented with chart review. Patients were divided based on treatment completion and compared with respect to comorbidities, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and insurance status using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results 228 patients were identified: 53 Stage II and 175 Stage III. Of these, 24.5% of Stage II and 30.3% of Stage III patients did not complete chemotherapy. Neither ECOG status nor any comorbidity predicted failure to complete treatment. Those failing to complete chemotherapy were older (64.4 vs 60.8 years, P = .043). Additionally, those with public assistance or self-pay were less likely to complete chemotherapy than those with private insurance ( P = .049). Both factors (older age/insurance status) remained significant on multivariate analysis (increasing age at diagnosis: OR 1.03, P =.034; public insurance: OR 1.84, P = .07; and self-pay status: OR 4.49, P = .03). Conclusions No comorbidity was associated with failure to complete therapy, nor was frailty, as assessed by ECOG score. Though frailty was not significant, increasing age was, possibly reflecting negative attitudes toward chemotherapy in older populations. Insurance status also predicted failure to complete treatment, suggesting disparities in access to treatment, affected by socioeconomic factors.

Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer in Uruguay: A population-based study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53-53
Author(s):  
Santiago Fontes ◽  
Ana Marín-Jiménez ◽  
Megan Berry ◽  
Mauricio Cuello ◽  
Juan Carlos Sánchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Factors Associated

53 Background: Despite surgery, the 5-year risk of systemic recurrence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the absence of any further therapy is approximately 50 % for those with lymph node involvement and 20 ─ 30 % if the lymph nodes are negative. Adjuvant chemotherapy contributes to improved disease-free and overall survival for node-positive (stage III) or high-risk node negative (stage IIB) colon cancer. Similar benefits are observed for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Previous research shows varied rates of adherence to published adjuvant chemotherapy Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) for CRC, although population-based data is scarce. Purpose: The aim of this analysis was to assess adherence rates to adjuvant chemotherapy prescription within 16 weeks of surgery according to local and international CPGs for CRC patients treated with curative intent between 2008 and 2019 at the Uruguayan National Cancer Institute. Data regarding factors associated with chemotherapy receipt beyond 16 weeks from surgery and chemotherapy non receipt was also retrieved and analysed. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical and pathology reports of 833 patients diagnosed with CRC at our institution. Patients with stages IIB or III CRC who underwent curative-intent surgery were identified and included in the present analysis. A 16-week benchmark timeline for treatment initiation from date of surgery was considered. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine factors independently associated with receipt of chemotherapy and meeting the 16-week benchmark (p 0.05). Results: A total of 400 patients were identified of which 72% had peritoneal colorectal tumors and 28% had sub-peritoneal rectal tumors. Approximately 70% of the latter group received neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Considering the total cohort, 61% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Factors predicting chemotherapy receipt in the peritoneal colorectal group were age ≤ 70 and stage III disease. In the sub-peritoneal rectal group no significant effect was found. The 16-week benchmark was met in 72% (175) of those receiving chemotherapy and 70.6% (167) completed 6 months of systemic adjuvant treatment. A total of 156 patients (39%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. The factors predicting chemotherapy non receipt were age > 70 and stage IIB in the peritoneal colorectal group. Conclusions: This analysis of adherence to CPGs identified several factors associated with chemotherapy non receipt and chemotherapy receipt outside of timeline benchmarks from date of curative-intent surgery in Montevideo, Uruguay. The two main factors significantly associated with chemotherapy non receipt were advanced age and lower disease stage. To our knowledge, our data is the first to elucidate these specific factors in the Uruguayan CRC patient population.

scholarly journals Prognostic significance of MUC2, CDX2 and SOX2 in stage II colorectal cancer patients

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Ribeirinho-Soares ◽  
Diana Pádua ◽  
Ana Luísa Amaral ◽  
Elvia Valentini ◽  
Daniela Azevedo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Low Expression

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a serious health concern worldwide. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, about 15 to 30% of stage II CRC patients subjected to tumor resection with curative intent, develop disease relapse. Moreover, the therapeutic strategy adopted after surgery is not consensual for these patients. This supports the imperative need to find new prognostic and predictive biomarkers for stage II CRC. Methods For this purpose, we used a one-hospital series of 227 stage II CRC patient samples to assess the biomarker potential of the immunohistochemical expression of MUC2 mucin and CDX2 and SOX2 transcription factors. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival curves that were compared using the log-rank test, in order to determine prognosis of cases with different expression of these proteins, different mismatch repair (MMR) status and administration or not of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results In this stage II CRC series, none of the studied biomarkers showed prognostic value for patient outcome. However low expression of MUC2, in cases with high expression of CDX2, absence of SOX2 or MMR-proficiency, conferred a significantly worst prognosis. Moreover, cases with low expression of MUC2 showed a significantly clear benefit from treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusion In conclusion, we observe that patients with stage II CRC with low expression of MUC2 in the tumor respond better when treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This observation supports that MUC2 is involved in resistance to fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy and might be a promising future predictive biomarker in stage II CRC patients.

Impact of M1a and M1b staging in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3590-3590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Jason Yu ◽  
Sharlene Gill ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Charles Davic Blanke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
7Th Edition ◽  
The Impact

3590 Background: In 2009, pts with M1 colorectal cancer were divided into two subsets for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition. Pts with metastases (mets) confined to one organ or site at initial diagnosis became stage M1a while multiple sites or peritoneal mets became M1b. The objectives of the study are to evaluate the impact of site of mets and M1a/b staging among pts with M1 colorectal cancer. Methods: All pts referred to the BC Cancer Agency from 1999-2007 with newly diagnosed M1 colon or rectal cancer were included. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were prospectively collected. The prognostic impact of individual sites of mets was assessed by hazard ratio estimates from univariate Cox models. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine variables associated with overall survival in the entire cohort and in those undergoing resection of their primary tumor. Results: 2,049 pts with M1 disease were included. Median age was 66 years; 71% had colonic origin; 70% had their primary tumor resected; and 69% received chemotherapy. In univariate analysis, solitary mets were associated with improved survival. In multivariable analysis, M1a/b status still had significant prognostic effect. The effect remained significant in the subgroup analysis of pts with resected primary tumors when histology, T and N stage were included. Conclusions: Pts with solitary mets, including peritoneum, have superior overall survival as compared to those with multiple sites of mets. AJCC 7th edition staging that includes M1a/b provides significant prognostic information and should be considered in clinical practice and trials of pts with M1 disease who otherwise have few prognostic factors. [Table: see text]

Uptake of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer in older and younger patients in the Irish population.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 478-478
Author(s):  
Seamus Coyle ◽  
Zia Rehman ◽  
Chalen Lee ◽  
Sandra Deady ◽  
Harry Comber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
The Impact

478 Background: Colon cancer is predominantly a disease of the elderly, with recent evidence supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the older population. However, it remains unclear to what degree such patients are receiving adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. We examined uptake of adjuvantchemotherapy and it’s impact on survival in older patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer in a national cohort. Methods: Using the National cancer Registry of Ireland, we identified 3,486 patients with stage II and III colon cancer who were treated with curative resection from 2004-2009. Clinopathological features and chemotherapy use were compared between those ≥70 years and those < 70 years. Results: A total of 2,026 patients with stage II disease were identified, 56% male and 60% ≥ 70 years. T3 tumors accounted for 81%, T4 19% and 89% were grade 2/3. Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 10% and 40% of ≥ 70 and <70 years, respectively (p<0.0001). A benefit for chemotherapy over observation alone was seen in both the older [HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.36 – 0.68; p <0.0001] and younger patient groups [HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.2701 - 0.6881; p<0.0004]. Of 1,460 patients with stage III disease, 51% were ≥ 70 years, 54% male. 34% of older and 83% of younger patients received adjuvant therapy (p<0.0001). A similar magnitude of benefit from chemotherapy compared to observation was seen in patients ≥ 70 years [HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.29 - 0.45 ; p <0.0001] and <70 years [HR 0.22 95%CI 0.1 – 0.2; p<0.0001] with stage III disease. Conclusions: Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be associated with significant survival benefit in older patients (age ≥ 70 years), however, is still underutilized in clinical practice. The impact of sociodemographic and clinicopathological features as potential drivers of treatment decisions in a cohort of this population will be reported.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document