Results from a Meta-analysis of Combination of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 Inhibitors in Malignant Cancer Patients: Does PD-L1 Matter?

Background: Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been widely used for clinical treatment in recent years, which has a better survival benefit. However, not all patients can derive clinical benefit from combination immunotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the biomarkers of combination immunotherapy.Methods: We retrieved articles from electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software. Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were the outcome indicators. In the unselect population, we compared combination therapy with other treatments. In addition, we also conducted subgroup analysis on PFS, OS and ORR according to PD-L1 status.Results: Seven studies were included in the analysis for a total of 3,515 cases. In the unselected population, we found that combination therapy has longer PFS, OS, and better ORR than other treatments for cancer patients. The longer PFS was showed in PD-L1 ≥ 5% cases (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.56–0.76; p < 0.001) than PD-L1 ≥ 1% cases (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.66–0.79; p < 0.001), while ORR and OS have not related to the status of PD-L1.Conclusion: This study supported the efficacy of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and also showed that PFS in patients with malignant tumors is positively correlated with PD-L1 expression. Due to the limited number of trials included, more high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials should be conducted to confirm the review findings.

Download Full-text

Immune-Related Adverse Events Predict the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.631949 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Donghui Wang ◽

Cen Chen ◽

Yanli Gu ◽

Wanjun Lu ◽

Ping Zhan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Lung Cancer Patients

BackgroundImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported to be associated with the efficacy of immunotherapy. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to demonstrate that irAEs could predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients.MethodsLiterature on the correlation between irAEs and the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients were searched to collect the data on objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients. These data were incorporated into the meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 34 records encompassing 8,115 patients were examined in this study. The irAEs occurrence was significantly associated with higher ORR {risk ratio (RR): 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.06–2.88], p < 0.00001} and improved OS {hazard ratio (HR): 0.51, 95% CI [0.43–0.61], p < 0.00001}, and PFS (HR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.44–0.57], p < 0.00001) in lung cancer patients undergoing ICIs. Subgroup analysis revealed that OS was significantly longer in patients who developed dermatological (OS: HR: 0.53, 95%CI [0.42–0.65], p < 0.00001), endocrine (OS: HR: 0.55, 95%CI [0.45–0.67], p < 0.00001), and gastrointestinal irAEs (OS: HR: 0.58, 95%CI [0.42–0.80], p = 0.0009) than in those who did not. However, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, and high-grade (≥3) irAEs were not correlated with increased OS and PFS.ConclusionThe occurrence of irAEs in lung cancer patients, particularly dermatological, endocrine, and gastrointestinal irAEs, is a predictor of enhanced ICIs efficacy.

Download Full-text

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors versus other systemic therapies in advanced head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis

Immunotherapy ◽

10.2217/imt-2020-0070 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (6) ◽

pp. 541-555

Author(s):

Lingrong Tang ◽

Tingting Liu ◽

Jun Chen ◽

Jun Dang ◽

Guang Li

Keyword(s):

Head And Neck Cancer ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Neck Cancer ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Systemic Therapies

Aim: We assessed the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors relative to other systemic therapies in previously treated recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. Materials & methods: Relative treatment effects were assessed from eligible randomized controlled trials using Bayesian network meta-analyses. Results: Among 15 trials evaluating 14 treatments, nivolumab achieved the best overall survival (OS) benefit; zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel provided the best progression-free survival benefit and objective response rate. Buparlisib + paclitaxel and zalutumumab were associated with the best OS rate at 6 and 12 months, respectively; nivolumab yielded the best OS rate at 18–24 months. Conclusion: Nivolumab was the most favorable treatment. Zalutumumab and buparlisib + paclitaxel had better efficiency, and might be a better selection for patients with programmed death-ligand 1-low/negative tumors than other treatments.

Download Full-text

191. The impact of antibiotic use on clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.235 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S101-S101

Author(s):

Maria Tsikala Vafea ◽

Neel Belani ◽

Kendra Vieira ◽

Dimitrios Farmakiotis

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Antibiotic Use ◽

Experimental Models ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background Observational studies and experimental models suggest that use of antibiotics close to the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can negatively affect tumor response and patient survival. This observation may be attributed to microbiome dysbiosis and the resultant suppression of host immune response against neoplastic cells. Methods We conducted a systematic search of PUBMED and EMBASE databases and references of articles retrieved. We included studies published between 1/1/17 and 2/1/20, which evaluated the association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICI. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and progressive disease (PD) rate. We performed a study-level random-effects meta-analysis with pooling of hazards ratios (HR) for OS, PFS, and odds ratios (OR) for RR and PD (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020166473). Results We included 41 studies with a total of 10,857 patients. The most common malignancies were lung cancer (59.7%), melanoma (23.1%), renal cell and urothelial carcinomas (8.1%). OS and PFS were shorter, RR lower, and PD higher in patients receiving antibiotics, both in univariate analyses and after adjustment for other confounders. Heterogeneity was significant for all outcomes, less so for adjusted OS and PFS (Table). To our knowledge, this is the largest meta-analysis on the association between antibiotic use and efficacy of ICI, and the only one to address RR and PD to-date. Association between antibiotics and clinical outcomes. Conclusion We demonstrated a significant association between antibiotic use and unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with cancer receiving ICI. Such patients may be an important target group for antibiotic stewardship interventions. The high heterogeneity across all outcomes underscores the need for more detailed, patient-level studies with stratification by host, antibacterial and cancer treatment factors. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Download Full-text

Impact of corticosteroids use on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e15234 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15234-e15234

Author(s):

Jiarui Li ◽

Kaili Yang ◽

Lin Zhao ◽

Chunmei Bai ◽

Zhao Sun

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Study Selection ◽

The Impact ◽

Detrimental Impact

e15234 Background: Corticosteroids are commonly used for management of cancer-related symptoms or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, given the inhibitory effects of corticosteroids on a broad range of immune responses, it is presumed that the use of these agents may affect the clinical outcomes of ICIs. This meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of corticosteroids use on the efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a search covering electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL), conference abstracts (ASCO and ESMO) and reference lists to identify relevant studies. Studies that reported clinical outcomes of patients with corticosteroids administration before and/or after the initiation of ICIs treatment were eligible for evaluation. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The random-effects model was utilized to synthesize the effect sizes of individual studies. Results: The initial literature search identified 1,900 records. After study selection, a total of 15 studies with 14,123 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Corticosteroids use significantly reduced PFS (HR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.30–2.61; P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18–1.68; P < 0.001) in cancer patients treated with ICIs. In subgroup analysis, corticosteroids use for cancer-related symptoms was associated with a shorter PFS (HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.40–2.78; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.25–2.83; P = 0.003), but their use for irAEs did not show a detrimental impact on OS (HR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.77–1.44; P = 0.740). Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that corticosteroids use might hinder the efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. The indications of corticosteroids use should be strictly controlled during the course of immunotherapy.

Download Full-text

Results from a meta-analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line renal cancer patients: does PD-L1 matter?

Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology ◽

10.1177/1758835919861905 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

pp. 175883591986190 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Giandomenico Roviello ◽

Silvia Paola Corona ◽

Gabriella Nesi ◽

Enrico Mini

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Pooled Analysis ◽

First Line

Background: The aim of this study was to perform a literature-based meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of the novel immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), focusing on the predictive role of PD-L1 expression. Methods: The primary outcome was overall survival, and secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response. We planned a subgroup analysis for overall survival according to PD-L1 status. Results: Five studies were included in the analysis for a total of 4063 cases. Overall survival was greater in PD-L1 positive tumours (HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36–0.67; p < 0.001). The pooled analysis of the unselected cases showed a statistically significative improvement in PFS with the use of ICIs (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99; p = 0.04) and we found a greater PFS benefit (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.57–0.74; p < 0.001) in patients with PD-L1 positive tumours. Conclusions: This study supports the efficacy of ICIs and, although a significant clinical benefit has been reported in PD-L1 negative patients, a greater efficacy of ICIs was observed in PD-L1 positive patients. More prospective randomized studies are needed to clarify the role of PDL-1 status in metastatic RCC treated with ICIs.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients of different ages: a meta-analysis

Future Oncology ◽

10.2217/fon-2019-0279 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 15 (31) ◽

pp. 3633-3646 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jing Li ◽

Jian Gu

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Age Groups ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Systematic Evaluation ◽

Free Survival ◽

Older Cancer Patients

Aim: We conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in different age groups. Methods: The relevant RCTs in cancer patients receiving ICIs were searched and the systematic evaluation was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies published till January 2019. Results: A total of 27 RCTs included 17,546 patients were available for this meta-analysis. ICIs significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in both of the younger (<65 years) and the older cancer patients (≥65 years). No significantly prolonged OS and PFS was observed among patients older than 75 years. Conclusion: ICIs could not significantly improve OS and PFS compared with controls in cancer patients aged over 75 years.

Download Full-text

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in malignancies with mismatch repair deficiency: a review of the state of the current knowledge

Journal of Investigative Medicine ◽

10.1136/jim-2016-000342 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 65 (4) ◽

pp. 754-758 ◽

Cited By ~ 22

Author(s):

Ali Naboush ◽

Christopher A J Roman ◽

Iuliana Shapira

Keyword(s):

Microsatellite Instability ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Malignant Tumors ◽

Current Knowledge ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Manual Search

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat malignant tumors with microsatellite instability is an emerging new modality. This is based on the observations that these tumors may have a high mutation rate—thus a potential source of tumor-specific neoantigens—and harbor infiltrating cytotoxic T cells in response, suggesting that they may be particularly susceptible to immune checkpoint therapy. PUBMED and ASCO library were systematically reviewed to identify all relevant data that involved the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of cancers with microsatellite instability. The manual search retrieved a total of 3 relevant articles and 1 abstract published between 2015 and 2016. A total of 61 patients with colorectal, 3 with ampullary/cholangiocarcinoma, 2 with endometrial carcinomas, 3 with small bowel cancers, 2 with glioblastoma multiforme, and 1 with bladder cancer with reported efficacy results were reviewed. All the patients had stage IV cancer and were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors until progression of disease or intolerable side effects emerged. The range of objective response rate was 25–71%. Responses were also durable with progression-free survival at 20 weeks of around 67–78% and to 46% at 1 year. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is effective in cancers that express microsatellite instability.

Download Full-text

Abstract #582 Endocrine Consequences of Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients

Endocrine Practice ◽

10.1016/s1530-891x(20)46926-5 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 25 ◽

pp. 297-298

Author(s):

Sevil Aliyeva ◽

Pamela Schroeder ◽

Issam Cheikh

Keyword(s):

Combination Therapy ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors

Download Full-text

Treatment with therapeutic anticoagulation is not associated with immunotherapy response in advanced cancer patients

Journal of Translational Medicine ◽

10.1186/s12967-021-02712-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Paul Johannet ◽

Amelia Sawyers ◽

Nicholas Gulati ◽

Douglas Donnelly ◽

Samuel Kozloff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽

Coagulation Cascade ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients ◽

Clinical Endpoints

Abstract Background Recent preclinical data suggest that there may be therapeutic synergy between immune checkpoint blockade and inhibition of the coagulation cascade. Here, we investigate whether patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and were on concomitant anticoagulation (AC) experienced better treatment outcomes than individuals not on AC.Affiliation: Kindly confirm if corresponding authors affiliation is identified correctly.The corresponding author's affiliation is correct. Methods We studied a cohort of 728 advanced cancer patients who received 948 lines of ICI at NYU (2010–2020). Patients were classified based on whether they did (n = 120) or did not (n = 828) receive therapeutic AC at any point during their treatment with ICI. We investigated the relationship between AC status and multiple clinical endpoints including best overall response (BOR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of bleeding complications.Affiliations: Journal instruction requires a country for affiliations; however, this is missing in affiliations 1 to 5. Please verify if the provided country is correct and amend if necessary.The country is correct for all affiliations (1 - 5). Results Treatment with AC was not associated with significantly different BOR (P = 0.80), ORR (P =0.60), DCR (P =0.77), PFS (P = 0.59), or OS (P =0.64). Patients who received AC were significantly more likely to suffer a major or clinically relevant minor bleed (P = 0.05). Conclusion AC does not appear to impact the activity or efficacy of ICI in advanced cancer patients. On the basis of our findings, we caution that there is insufficient evidence to support prospectively evaluating the combination of AC and immunotherapy.

Download Full-text